ABSTRACT
BIBLIOGRAPHY


ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008. Status of Livestock and Poultry Production
in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya. Benguet State University, La Trinidad, Benguet.

Adviser: Samuel S. Arcellana, MSc.

ABSTRACT


The survey was conducted to determine the socio-economic profile of the
respondents; management practices in terms of housing, feeding, breeding, herd health
management, and herd care management; marketing and consumption practices; support
systems they avail of; and problems/constraints that the respondents encountered.

The majority of the respondents had no formal education; female; married;
belonged to age bracket 41-50 years old; and are farmers/animals raisers to supplement
their meager income and as major source of income for the non-salaried farmers.

The native animals raised is the most commonly produced due to their endurance
to adverse weather condition, thus, inbreeding through natural mating is practiced.

Ruminants free to range feed on napier grass while ‘palay’ is offered to chicken,
and kitchen left-over cooked rice for ducks. Middlemen buy livestock and sell them at
liveweight or dressed weight basis while poultry species are sold directly to buyer-
consumers.

The problems encountered in animal raising are absence of market outlet, lack of
cash capital, limited technical knowledge, and limited grazing area for ruminants.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i

Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i

Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ii


INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Swine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4

Cattle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4

Carabao . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5

Goat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6

Chicken . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7

Duck . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7

METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Profile of Respondents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15

Animals Raised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16

Years in Swine Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17

Number of Heads Raised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17

Purpose in Swine Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

18

Stock and Capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

18

Breeds\\Strain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19


Breeding System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

21

Length of Gestation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22

Litter size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22

Farrowing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

23

Feeds and Feeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24

Preventing and Controlling Swine
Diseases and Parasites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29

Housing Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30

Herd Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33

Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

34

Years in Cattle Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35

Number of Cattle Raised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35

Purpose in Cattle Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35

Source of Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35

Breeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37

Gestation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39

Birth Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39

Years in Carabao Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40

Number of Carabao Raised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41

Purpose in Raising Carabao . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41

Source of Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41

Breeds and Breeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43

Gestation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45

Age at First Breeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45


Birth Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45

Years in Raising Goat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46

Number of Heads Raised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46

Purpose in Goat Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46

Source of Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46

Breeds and Breeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

48

Gestation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

48

Age at First Breeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50

Birth Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51

Number of Kids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51

Indigenous Feeds and Feeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52

System of Feeding in Ruminants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52

Parasite and Disease Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54

System of Animal Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54

Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54

Chicken Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57

Source of Stock and Capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

58

Breeds and Breeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

58

Feeds and Feeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

57

Disease and Parasite Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63

Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64

Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67

Years in Duck Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67

Heads Raised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67

Purpose of Duck Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67

Breeds\\Strains and Breeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

68

Egg Laying . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71

Feeds and Feeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

72

Disease and Parasite Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


72

Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


74

Marketing System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


74

Problems\\Constrains of Animal Raising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


76

Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .


76

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


78

Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


80

Recommendation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


80

LITERATURE CITED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


81

APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


83


INTRODUCTION


Livestock and poultry raising is common among farming-household communities
in Nueva Vizcaya. This small-scale business is a gainful self-employment endeavor and
most people depend on it to sustain family income. Besides, livestock and poultry raising
is an important aspect in the socio-economic life of the people in the Cagayan Valley.
Just like other households in other regions like the Cordillera, livestock and poultry
raising is a part of their culture and a hobby. Some even treat their animals as pets. They
raise livestock and poultry not only for the purpose of selling them to the market but
sometimes use them for personal needs if they celebrate special occasions like: baptisms,
weddings, birthdays/anniversaries and other rituals called by their cultural traditions.

Currently, livestock and poultry production under small holder farming system
with no deliberate breeding program is still based on native and indigenous stocks which
are often non-descript mongrels with low performance potential. While imported
temperate breeds are generally shown to adapt poorly to our tropical environment,
improvement of the native stocks through crossbreeding and imported purebred offers a
quick and convenient way of intensifying their competitiveness in production and
marketing (Bondoc et al., 1997). However, success in livestock and poultry production is
greatly influenced by several factors and among them are: stocks, feeds and feeding,
housing, disease control and management. Each of these factors must be fully considered
in order to meet profitability.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


2
The study was aimed to answer the following questions:

1. What is the socio-economic profile of the livestock and poultry raisers of
Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya?

2. What are their management practices in terms of housing, feeding, breeding,
herd health management and herd care management?

3. What are their marketing and consumption practices?

4. What are the support systems that they avail of?

5. What are the problems/constraints the raisers usually encountered?

Objectives of the Study

The study aims to determine the:
1. Socio-economic profile of the respondents;
2. Management practices in terms of: a. housing; b. feeding; c. breeding; d. herd
health management; e. herd care management;
3. Marketing and consumption practices;
4. Support systems they avail of; and
5. Problems/constraints that the respondents encountered.


The result of the study would benefit researchers as well as backyard farm animal
raisers. Further, the information generated from the respondents increased their
knowledge and improve their skills in livestock and poultry production thereby
increasing their income and additional food sources.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


3

Furthermore, the results of the study served as reference material to students, and
a guide to concerned agencies in addressing the problems encountered by the backyard
farm raisers.


The scope of the study was limited to the top 11 barangays of Kasibu, Nueva
Vizcaya having the highest number of animal raisers.

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Swine

Swine production can be a means of providing employment. Unemployed
persons can engage in swine raising either backyard or for commercial purposes; it can
also serve as an additional source of income to those who are employed. Pork like other
kinds of meat is a very good source of protein which is needed in human nutrition
(Supnet and Gatmaitan, 1980).

According to PCARRD (1981), there are many problems encountered by swine
raisers such as inadequate supply and high cost of feeds, high losses due to occurrence of
major diseases and parasites, slow transfer of technology and its adoption by end-users,
poor feeding, improper management practices, difficulty in obtaining loans for medium
to large terms, and for medium to large swine projects. According to the Bureau of
Agricultural Statistics (1993), the low productivity of swine industry is due to disease
outbreaks and improper management practices. Statistical data shows that in 1993, the
swine production in the Philippines increased from 3.43% as compared to the previous
years due to the increased in number of consumers.

Cattle

The Philippine native cattle are predominantly descendants of those cattle brought
into the country by the Chinese and Spaniards. The most prominent type of Philippine
cattle, the Batangas, is believed to have originated from the yellow cattle of Southern
China which is presumed to have evolved from the wild cattle (India Zebu) in Java and
Brahmin archipelago (Payne, 1970).
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


5

Cattle of Chinese origin are still found in Mindoro, Central and Southern Luzon
while cattle introduced by the Spaniards are found in Northern Luzon (Parker, 1987).
Other identifiable Philippine cattle strains are: the Large Ilocos found in Northwest
Luzon, and Iloilo cattle found in Panay Island. A local analysis of blood transferrin
genes suggested that cattle form Southern Tagalog, Western Visayas and Northern and
Eastern Mindanao have genetic affinities with most Asiatic and African cattle; while
those in Ilocos, Cagayan Valley, Eastern Visayas and Central Luzon are related to most
cattle of temperate breeds (Parker et al., 1971).

The Philippine native cattle are small in size, about 280 to 380 kg adult
bodyweight, with color patterns and shade mainly of red to yellow, black or sometimes a
combination of these colors. It is not a dairy type stock and produces only enough milk
for its young. The total milk yield is about 190 liters only (4.56% butterfat) in 144 days
of lactation (Villegas, 1958). The birth weight averaged 19.1 kg only, with mean
yearling and 2-year old weights of 139 kg and 258 kg, respectively (Arboleda et al.,
1985). Philippine cattle can easily obtain a daily gain of 0.3 to 0.7 kg feed efficiency of 8
to 16 % on rations with varying levels of low-quality roughage, ipil-ipil leaves and by-
product concentrates (Perez, 1962).

Carabao

Carabaos weigh an average of 31.2 kg, 112.1 kg, 174.9 kg, and 361.0 kg at birth,
6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 of age, respectively (Shrestha and Parker, 1994). The
average lactation yield of carabaos is 535.0 only, with an average lactation length of
208.2 days (i.ei 2.57 kg per day). The first calving of a carabao is 5.36 years (Shrestha,
1992).
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


6

Most carabaos used for draft are males (about 63.0%; De Guzman and Perez,
1982). Small carabulls are castrated at a mean age of 3.3 years, with a range of 1.8 to 4.8
years. Small carabulls which are selected for draft are left to mate the female carabaos,
and hence could have resulted into declining size and weight of the carabaos over the
years. Farmers are not enthusiastic to have their animals impregnant. They believe that
once caracow is mated it is no longer fit for work; otherwise it will abort. The usual
practice is thus to wait in six to 10 months after calving before the caracow is allowed to
mate again (Shrestha, 1992).

Goat

Goats are indigenous to this country and believed to have originated from the wild
goats of Western Asia which were introduced by Arab and Chinese traders in the 7th and
9th century B.C. (Devendra and Burns, 1985).

Several exotic stocks were also introduced into the Philippines even before the
Second World War, but their number was insignificant to make any contribution to the
improvement of the local herds. Most of the foreign breeds used to improve the milk and
meat performance of native goat belong to dairy type goat breeds such as Anglo-Nubian,
French Alpine, La Mancha, Saanen, and Toggenburg. Meat type breeds such as Jumna
pari from India and Boer goats were also used in local upgrading programs. Analysis of
goat performance data showed that imported breeds of goats are generally superior to the
natives in terms of the body weight and milk production but poorer in reproductive
performance (Arboleda et al., 1985).


Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


7
Chicken

The native chickens in the Philippines are believed to have descended from the
domesticated red jungle fowl (Gallus bankiva; Arboleda, 1980).

The adult size is usually small, with the male weighing an average of 1.3 kg and
the female 1 kg. they are nervous and fighty, but the females are broody and have strong
maternal instincts. They are hardy and can reproduce and survive with care and
management. Hens lay an average of 30 to 50 eggs in 3 to 4 clutches a year. The eggs
are small and brown in color (Arboleda, 1987).

Native chickens have always been part of rural setting, often turned loose to
scavenge. They provide additional source of income for many rural farmers. They also
serve as cheap source of animal protein through their meat and eggs. They are commonly
sold in the wet market as live chickens or ‘dressed’ with the head and feet on. Although
native chickens grow at a slower rate and produce lesser number of eggs than improved
commercial breeds, meat from native chickens are preferred by many Filipinos because
the taste, leanness, pigmentation and their suitability for special dishes (Lambio, 1990).
Other unique attributes of native chicken include adaptability to harsh environment,
ability to utilize farm by-products and resistance to diseases and parasites (Bondoc et al.,
1997).


Duck

The feet are orange, and the bill of male is bright green, while that of the female is
less brightly colored. The head feathers of the drake are iridescent green color, and
glitter in the sun. the drake has raspy low voice similar to that of the wild duck, and is
very attentive to the females (Palad, 1994).
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


8

The male Pateros has a coarser head than the female. The average weight of an
adult drake is 1.75 kg, while the adult female is 1.50 kg. one male Pateros can serve 15
to 20 females, normally registering a high fertility of 80 to 85%. Under the traditional
management practices, a duck can lay 200 eggs in 365 days of laying, with eggs
relatively large in size. However, these ducks are non-sitters. As experienced by local
raisers, their adaptability to local environment conditions and management practices is far
better than other stocks. Moreover, their products have unique attributes that consumers
generally prefer (PCARRD, 1981).

The plumage color and pattern of the Philippine Mallards are dominantly of the
mallard (wild) pattern (54%), followed by the dusky pattern (20%), runner pattern (12%),
magpie pattern (9%), and the restricted pattern (5%). The average breast depth, breast
width, keel length, and shank length in the Philippine Mallard is 6.8 cm, 7.3 cm, 10.3,
and 4.4 cm, respectively. Drakes are generally found to be heavier and have longer
anatomical body than the female ducks (Afable, 1997).

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


METHODOLOGY


The study was conducted in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya from January to February
2007 (Figure 1).

Purposive sampling was done to gather information from the respondents. The
top barangays raising animals were chosen as source of respondents.

Table 1. Livestock and poultry population in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya


BARANGAYS
A N I M A L S R A I S E D
CARABAO
SWINE
CHICKEN TOTAL
CATTLE
GOAT
DUCK
________________________________________________________________________

Antutot

55
10
100 30 2850 600
3645
Cordon

10
2
89 2 344 23
470
Macalong

50
1
250 40 4200 980
5521
Kongkong

60
10
200 40 326 600
1236
Watwat

8
10
120 40 1910 336
2424
Poblacion

70
15
900 20 4046 520
5571
Pudi

65
10
200 20 3400 40
3735
Lupa

45
5
80 5 2210 162
2507
Bua

9
7
77 3 449 35
580
Siguem

75
20
8 10 1755 150
2018
Muta

16
30
160 10 3400 8
3624
Paquet

90
45
150 15 3694 100
4094
Dine

9
8
68 3 470 190
748
Pao

19
4
78 7 336 26
470
Biyoy

10
6
66 5 230 30
347
Alloy

70
5
100 40 2385 210
2810
Nantawakan
23
2
77 6 600 33
741
Katawaran

12
7
65 3 400 34
521
Papay

13
6
56 5 367 19
466
Malabing

23
4
88 4 222 16
357
Tadji

20
9
65 3 349 11
457
Binogawan
16
5
89 5 320 15
450
Wangal

21
4
190 6 250 34
505
Capisan

24
9
169 4 219 22
447
Tokod

21
5
55 3 398 66
548
Didipyo

33
6
44 2 249 12
346
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


10


Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


11





















Figure 1. Map of Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


12
Table 1. continued…

BARANGAYS
A N I M A L S R A I S E D
CARABAO
SWINE
CHICKEN TOTAL
CATTLE
GOAT
DUCK
________________________________________________________________________
Belet

33
3
33 5 450 21
545
Camamasi

20 11
23 5 267 20
346
Alimit

23 16
76 3 342 23
483
TOTAL
946 275 3676 344 36438 4336 46012
Source: Office of the Municipal Agriculture, Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya (2006)




Table 2. The sample barangays and number of respondents from Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya

BARANGAY

NUMBER OF

NUMBER OF




HOUSEHOLDS


RESPONDENTS
Antutot



85



13
Macalong



95



19
Kongkong



127



20
Watwat



71



20
Alloy



79



11
Poblacion



143



23
Pudi



59



24
Lupa



57



14
Siguem



60



20
Muta



138



29
Paquet



66



20
TOTAL



980


213
Source: Office of the Municipal Agriculture, Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya (2006)





The study considered information from an average of 21.73% of the households
from the Municipality of Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya who were found to be raising animals.

Personal interview with the use of prepared questionnaire on the pre-scheduled
time as well as photo documentation were done.

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


13
Data Gathered
1. General information. This covered the respondent’s personal profile.
2. Number of years in raising animals. The number of years the respondents had
been raising animals.
3. Classification and number of animals being raised. This includes the class, age
or weight of the animals, breeds or strain, purpose and number.

4. Source of stock. This includes the source of initial and replacement stocks and
breeding animals.

5. Source of capital. States how the operation is financed.

6. Kind of housing or rearing management. This is a comprehensive description
of the type of housing materials, roof structure and stocking density.

7. Facilities. This includes all the equipment being used in the farm.

8. Types and sources of feeds. Describes the source and the types of
conventional and non-conventional feedstuff fed to the different species of animals.

9. Feed preparation method. Describes the method of processing or preparation
of feeds (both conventional and non-conventional).

10. Use of additives/supplements. It includes kind, purpose and frequency of
feeding.

11. System of feeding. It covers pertinent data on system and frequency of
feeding.

12. Breeding system. It includes the breeding and mating system.

13. Terms of payment for breeding services. This shows how the respondents
pay for their breeding services.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


14

14. Age at breeding, birth rate, length of lactation and frequency of breeding to
conception.

15. Reproductive performance. This includes litter size at birth and at weaning or
number of eggs/clutch and number of eggs hatched.

16. Sanitation practices. This reflects the batching/cleaning schedules of the
disinfectant used, frequency/amount spent.

17. Vaccination practices. Shows if the respondents vaccinate their animals
against common diseases, frequency, source, and amount spent.

18. Care of sick animals. This describes how the respondents care for morbid
animals such as veterinarian services, cost, and medication.

19. Management of parasites. This describes the routine prevention, cure or
remedies both conventional and non-conventional.

20. Non-conventional remedies. These are the indigenous remedies being
adopted by the farmers.

21. Herd management. This reflects the management scheme of the respondents
which includes care for all classes of animals.

22. Products and market outlet. This description of products and marketing
strategies as well as pricing schemes of the respondents.

23. Support system. This shows if technical services have ever been extended to
farmers as those from the LGU, private entities, and non-government organizations.

24. Problems/constraints. The problems the respondents encounter on animal
raising.


Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


15
Data Analyses

The data and information gathered from the respondents were tabulated,
consolidated, and interpreted by ranking and percentage.

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Profile of Respondents

Based on the survey conducted among the top 11 barangays raising animals in
Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya, the parameters: age, sex civil status, educational attainment as
well as occupation of the respondents did not limit them to engage in animal raising.

Age. It was found that most of the respondents belonged to age bracket 31-40
years old with 24.41%. Further, there were 3.76% who were septuagenarians.

Sex. There were more female (131) than male (82) animal raisers. The figure
show that animal raising in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya is not constrained by sex.

Civil status. Of the 213 respondents, there were 96 who were married, 70 single
and 82 widow/er. The reason behind why there were more married respondents engaged
in animal raising was because they have to augment their family income.

Educational attainment. Attending formal education was found not to hinder
animal raising. There were 87 respondents who were not able to attend school. The
other respondents (126) attended formal education from elementary (80), high school
(19), and college level (27).

Occupation. Farming as well as animal raising were the major occupation of the
respondents (92). Those employed (26), those engaged in vending (33), and housewives
(62) raise animals to supplement their income.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


16
Table 3. Personal profile of the respondents

PARTICULARS

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Age Bracket

21 – 30



49



22.00

31 – 40



52



24.41

41 – 50



43



20.19

51 – 60



39



18.31

61 – 70



22



10.33

70 – 80



8



3.76
TOTAL



213


100.00
Sex

Female


131



61.50

Male


82



38.50
TOTAL



213
Civil Status

Married



96



45.07

Single



70



32.86

Widow/er



47



22.07
TOTAL



213


100.00
Educational Attainment

No formal education

87



40.85

Elementary


80



40.85

High school


19



8.92

College level


27



12.67
TOTAL



213


100.00
Occupation

Government employee

26



12.21

Farming/Animal raising

92



43.19

Housekeeping


62



29.11

Vending



33



15.49
TOTAL



213



100.00

Animals Raised


The respondents raise chicken (126), swine (112), duck (97), carabao (81), goat
(33), and cattle (21) (Table 4). Chicken and swine topped the list of animals raised
because these are easier to manage and produce.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


17
Table 4. Animals raised and number of respondents raising each kind
KIND OF ANIMAL

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
Swine





112

52.58
Cattle





21

9.86
Carabao





81

38.03
Goat





33

15.49
Chicken




126

59.15
Duck





97

45.54
TOTAL





470* (n = 213)
* - multiple responses

Swine
Years in Swine Raising

The length of time (years) the respondents had been raising swine is shown in
Table 5. Out of the 213 respondents, there were 12 who raise swine. Most of the
respondents (36) claimed to raise swine as short as 1-5 years while 23 raised swine for 21
years or more.

Number of Heads

The number of swine heads the respondents raise in a single time ranged from one
to more than 10. Those involved in raising 1-3 and 4-6 heads at a given time were those
who find ways to augment their income and have them for special occasions but for those
raising 7 and more were having farming alongside with swine raising hence, their main
source of income.




Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


18
Table 5. Number of years in swine raising
NUMBER OF YEARS
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
1 – 5




36



31.42
6 – 10




21



18.75
11 – 15




18



16.07
16 – 20




14



12.50
21 – above




23



20.54
TOTAL



112


100.00


Table 6. Number of swine raised by the respondents in a single time
NUMBER OF HEADS
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
1 – 3




57



50.89
4 – 6




24



21.43
7 – 9




21



18.75
10 – above




10



8.93
TOTAL



112


100.00



Purpose in Swine Raising

Since the survey was conducted in the farming communities, animal production is
done to implement their meager income especially to those who are employed. Few of
the respondents found tending 1-3 and 4-6 heads were caring swine for special planned
purpose while other than this, the respondents will not raise swine (Table 7).

Stock and Capital

Stock. The neighbors within their respective barangays were the main source of
stocks. Others procure their animals from other barangays within the municipality and
from nearby municipalities for upgrading purposes (Table 8).

Cash capital. Majority of the respondents (59.82%) use their own money to
provide the necessary needs is raising swine. others avail loans from cooperatives.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


19
Table 7. Purpose of raising swine

PURPOSE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Main source of income


28


25.00
Supplementary source of income

66


58.93
For special occasion


18


16.07
TOTAL




112


100.00


Table 8. Source of stock and cash capital
SOURCE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Stock

Neighbor (same barangay) 73



65.18

Near municipality

28



25.00

Other barangays within
the municipality

11



9.82
TOTAL



112



100.00
Capital Own money


67



59.82
Loan from cooperative

45



40.18
TOTAL



112



100.00

Breeds\\Strain

The breeds\\strains of swine raised in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya is shown in Table 9.
The ‘native’ pig, as claimed by the respondents is the most raised breed followed by
‘upgrade’ breeds like, landrace, hypor, large white, and duroc in descending order.

Though the ‘native’ breed is much smaller than the other breeds but still preferred
by the respondents due to their endurance to harsh weather condition, more resistant
against diseases and parasites, and better meat quality among others.



Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


20



Figure 2. The native swine being raised in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya




Figure 3. Landrace breed of swine raised in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


21
Table 9. Breed/strain of swine raised by the respondents
BREED/STRAIN

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Native




32



28.57
Grade




22



19.64

Large White



14



12.50
Landrace




17



15.19
Hypor




15



13.39
Duroc




12



10.71
TOTAL


112
100.00

Breeding System

Age at first breeding. Most of the respondents claim they breed their swine at 8-9
months old, recommended to them by hearsays. But for others, they breed their swine at
6-7, 10-11, and 12-13 months old (15.18%, 19.64%, 25.55%, respectively).
Type of breeding. There were 43.75% of the respondents that followed
crossbreed to any available boar of good traits. Those who wanted to perpetuate their
present stocks, inbreeding (37.50%) is being done while upgrading their stock is done by
18.75% of the respondents.

Nature of breeding. Natural mating is the only way followed by swine raisers to
perpetuate the species’ character traits found in the areas where the survey was
conducted.

Source of boar. Breeding boars in rural communities are neither owned (15.18%),
borrowed (84.82%) or rented.

Number of services before conception. Fifty percent of the respondents reiterated
their sow is served twice before conception; 45.54% had their sow serviced only once
and 4.46% even have them served three times when finally going to conception.

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


22
Table 10. System of breeding

PARTICULARS

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Age at First Breeding (months)

6 – 7



17



15.18

8 – 9



45



40.18

10 -11



22



19.64

12 – 13



28



25.00
Type of Breeding

Grading



21



18.75

Inbreeding



42



37.50

Crossbreeding


49



43.75
Nature of Breeding

Natural mating

112



100.00
Source of Boar

Owned



17



15.18

Borrowed



95



84.82
Number of Service\\s Before Conception

Once



51



45.54

Twice



56



50.00

Thrice



5



4.46
Terms of Payment for Mating Service\\s

Cash



21



18.75

Piglets



83



74.11

None (Owned)


8



7.14

Length of Gestation

The gestation period of swine in the areas of concern ranges from 110 to 114 days
but there were those (16.96%) claiming to have observed gestation for about 115 days or
more (Table 11).

Litter Size

Litter size at birth. The number of piglets at birth ranges from a low 7 to more
than 15 regardless of swine breed. Forty four out of 112 respondents mentioned the
average litter size was 11-12. Only four were lucky enough to have produced 15 or more
litters per farrowing period (Table 12).
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


23
Table 11. Length of gestation in swine

LENGTH OF GESTATION NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(DAYS)
110



3


2.68
112




16


14.29
113




40


35.71
114




34


30.36
115 – above



19


16.96
TOTAL




112


100.00


Table 12. Litter size at birth and at weaning





NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
LITTER SIZE
AT BIRTH

AT WEANING




F

%

F

%
7 – 8


22
19.64

25

22.32
9 – 10


31
27.68

38

33.93
11 – 12


44
39.29

36

32.14
13 – 14


11
9.82

9

8.04
15 and above

4

3.57

4

3.57
TOTAL


112 100.00
112
100.00





Litter size at weaning. Mortality rate was highest at 11-12 litter size and lowest at
13-14 piglets. All the respondents who had litter size of 15 or more at birth had 100%
survival at weaning (Table 12). Considering the production system of swine in the
surveyed areas which is more conventional, the mortality in piglet production is quite
low.

Farrowing

Shown in Table 13 is the number of farrowing per year as observed by the
respondents. The different swine breeds\\strains being raised farrow twice a year.

Native breed. Thirteen of 20 respondents observed the native breed to farrow
only once a year while 7 commented also to farrow at most two times a year.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


24

Upgrade breed. This breed commonly farrow once a year as claimed by 78.57%
of the respondents.

Large white. There were 17 of the 25 respondents who mentioned that this breed
farrow twice a year, very rare farrow once a year.

Landrace. Of the 23 respondents raising this breed, majority (56.52%) observed
to farrow twice a year.

Hypor. There were 17 out of the 112 respondents who raise this breed of swine,
64.71% observed this to farrow at most twice a year but could also farrow five times in
two years.

Duroc. This breed commonly farrow once a year as claimed by 54.55% of the
respondents. Three or 27.27% observed farrowing twice a year when given proper
nutrition.

Feeds and Feeding

Kinds of feed. Indigenous feeds or non-conventional feeds was the most common
feedstuff given to swine (68.75%). Some of the respondents (17.86%) combine
commercial feed preparation with indigenous feeds for their produce. Few (15 or
13.39%) give 100% pure commercial feeds (Table 14).

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


25

Table 13. Number of farrowing per year


BIRTH RATE
NATIVE
UPGRADE LARGE WHITE LANDRACE
HYPOR
DUROC



F
% F % F %
F % F
% F %


Once a year 13 65.00 2 14.29 1 4.00 4 17.39 1 5.88 2 18.18
1-2 times/year
7 35.00 11 78.57 17 68.00 13 56.52 11 64.71 6 54.55
2 times/year 0 0.00 1 7.14 7 28.00 6 26.09 5 29.41 3 27.27


TOTAL
20 100.00 14 100.00 25 100.00 23 100.00 17 100.00 11 100.00



Table 14. Preparation of indigenous feeds for swine


METHOD OF PREPARATION


KITCHEN REFUSE

SQUASH


GABI






F
%

F
%
F %
Mixed with rice bran


19 28.36
0 0

0 0
Pure kitchen refuse

48 71.64
0 0
0 0
Chopped-cooked

0 0.00 2 16.67 33 100.00
Chopped-raw



0 0.00 10 83.33 33 100.00
TOTAL
67 100.00 12 100.00 66 100.00

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


26
Preparation of indigenous feeds. The indigenous feeds given to swine varied and
prepared in a number of ways as mentioned by the respondents. However, majority
(71.64%) offered pure kitchen refuse as feeds. Gabi and squash are either chopped and
cooked or chopped only before given to swine. Rice bran is being mixed with kitchen
refuse as feedstuff (Table 15.)
Frequency of feeding. The frequency of feeding swine is done once to three times
a day depending on the growth stage of the animal. All respondents provide feeds to
their sucklings twice a day. At weanling stage, 102 (91.07%) of the respondents continue
to provide feedstuff twice a day while 10 reduced feeding to once a day, only one client
give feedstuff thrice a day. During the growing stage, there were 105 of the respondents
that give feedstuff twice a day while five or 4.46% feed their growers once a day, and
only two of them at three times a day. Towards the finishing stage, once a day feeding
was claimed by 32 respondents while 77 still feed their hogs twice a day, and three or
2.68% provide feedstuffs thrice a day.
System of feeding. There were two feeding systems employed by swine raisers of
Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya, namely: the wet-group and the dry-group feeding. Based on the
result of the survey, there were more raisers who prefer wet-group feeding in any
growing stage over the dry-group feeding (Table 17). The main reason for this kind is
the nature of feedstuffs given to their swine.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


27
Table 15. Frequency of feeding for swine


FREQUENCY

SUCKLING
WEANLING
GROWER

FINISHER
SOW/BOAR




F
%
F
%
F
% F
%
F
%


Once a day



10
8.93
5
4.46 32
28.57
24
21.43
Twice a day

112 100.00 101
90.18 105
93.75 77
68.75 88
78.57
Thrice a day




1
0.89 2
1.79 3
2.68


TOTAL


112 100.00 112
100.00 112
100.00 112 100.00 112 100.00



Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


28
Table 16. Kinds of feed provided to swine
PARTICULARS

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

Commercial feeds



15



13.39
Indigenous feeds (Non-conventional)
77



68.75
Combination



20



17.86
TOTAL



112



100.00

Table 17. System of feeding for swine






NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS

FEEDING SYSTEM

WET-GROUP DRY-GROUP





F

%
F

%
Weanling



65
58.04
47
41.96
Grower



59
52.68
53
47.32
Finisher



72
64.29
40
35.71
Boar/Sow



81

72.32
31
27.68




Figure 4. Feeding system of swine in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


29
Preventing and Controlling Swine
Diseases and Parasites

Isolation. Majority of the respondents in the surveyed area are not isolating
diseased or infested swine, thereby, prevention as well as the spread of any infection or
infestation to their animals is not being checked.

Culling of sick animals. Of the 112 respondents, 99 practice the disposal of their
sick or infested swine from the healthy group. However, culling is done at the late stage
of disease infection or parasite infestation.

Deworming. This practice of health care is not being followed by all respondents
in their swine production.

Vaccination. Vaccinating and immunization so as to prevent disease infection or
parasite infestation is practiced by only 8 respondents while majority of the raisers do not
as well follow herd health vaccination.

Cleaning of pens. Pens are cleaned when necessary by 99 of the 112 respondents
who were found to confine their animals.


Table 18. Methods of preventing and controlling swine diseases and parasites





NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PARTICULARS


Yes

No .





F
%
F %
Isolation



29
25.89
83 74.11
Culling of sick animals

99
88.39
13 11.61
Deworming


55
49.11
57 50.89
Vaccination


8
7.14 104 92.86
Cleaning of pens


99
88.39
13 11.61


Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


30
Housing Management


Management practices. Complete confinement of swine is practiced by 58.04%
of the respondents, 37.50% tether them and 4.46% make use of the so called semi-
confine pigsty (Table 18).

Housing material. Nipa/cogon were the most common roofing material used, but
others made use of galvanized iron (GI sheet). Walls of pig pens were usually bamboo,
and wood. Only one of the respondents was found to have used old steel walls. Concrete
or cemented flooring was also noted on most of the pig pens. There were 39 of the
respondents who do not provide floorings on their pig pens.

Table 19. Housing management practices

KIND OF HOUSING

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
Complete confinement



65


58.04
Semi-confinement




5


4.46
Tethering





42


37.50
TOTAL




112


100.00


Table 20. Type of housing materials in swine raising

TYPE OF MATERIAL

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
USED
Nipa\\cogon + bamboo walls +
cemented floor


20


17.86
Nipa/cogon + wood walls +
cemented floor




19


16.96
GI roofing + bamboo walls +
concrete floor




17


15.18
GI roofing + wood walls +
concrete floor




16


14.29
Nipa/cogon + bamboo walls


20


17.86
Nipa/cogon + wood walls



19


16.96
GI roofing + steel walls +
cemented floor



1


0.89
TOTAL




112


100.00
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


31

Roof structure. The type of roofing is either the shed-type (72.32%) which is the
most common and the A-type (27.68%). The former is much preferred considering the
area of study being located in a mid-elevation with predominantly warm climate.

Pens or corrals. The number of pens\\corrals ranged from single to four-in-one
housing. Most (83) of the respondents had 1 – 2 pens in a single house and 29 had 3 – 4
pens.

Heads per pen. The number of heads in one pen ranged from 1 to 4 hogs. During
the weanling and grower\\finisher stages, two animals occupy one pen at most (Table 22).

Table 21. Housing

STRUCTURE

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

Type of Roof

A-type



31



27.68

Shed-type



81



72.32

Number of Pen\\s in One House

1 – 2



83



74.11

3 – 4



29



25.89

Number of Heads in One Pen

Weanling

1 – 2



94



83.93

3 – 4



8



16.07
Grower\\Finisher

1 – 2



91

3 – 4



21



18.75





Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


32







Figure 5. The A-type rural swine housing in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya







Figure 6. The shed-type urban swine housing in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


33
Herd Management

The removal of transplacental membrane upon expulsion of piglets, cutting of the
navel cord, weaning of piglets, and the gradual change of feeds are the management
practices which are not followed by majority of the respondents.
Providing brooder to piglets, feeding the piglets on the fifth day, and providing
rail guards to protect piglets from crushing are the management practices being employed
by the swine raisers (Table 23).
These management practices which are measures to improve and enhance swine
production by the raisers but they are not yet aware of its importance.

Table 22. Herd management practices




NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS



Yes No .




F
% F %
Removal of transplacental
membrane upon expulsion
45

40.18
67 59.82

Cutting of the navel cord

37

33.04
75 66.96

Provide brooder


93

83.04
19 16.96

Allow piglets to suck
collustrum

107

95.54
5 4.46

Feeding the piglets
on their fifth day 106

94.64
6 5.36

Weaning of piglets

32 28.57
80 71.43

Gradual change of feeds

3
2.68 109
97.32

Provide guard rails to
protect piglets


87

77.68
25 22.32


Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


34
Marketing

Disposal. Swine produced by the respondents are either sold directly to
consumers (83.93%) and to middlemen or ‘partidor’ (16.07%) (Table 24). These are
disposed on basis of either liveweight or dressweight (retail) (Table 25) basis.

Table 23. System of swine disposal


MARKETING SYSTEM

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE


Direct to consumers



94


83.93
Producer to middlemen to consumer

18


16.07

TOTAL




112


100.00



Table 24. Method of marketing


MARKETING METHOD
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Per kilogram (liveweight)



23


20.54
Per kilogram (dressed)



89


79.46

TOTAL




112


100.00




Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


35
Cattle

Years in Cattle Raising

Cattle raising in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya is not as old as swine raising. Based on
the result of the survey two (2) of the respondents were found to have tended cattle for
almost 13 years or more while ten had been raising cattle for 9 – 12 years, six for 5 – 8
years, and 1 – 4 years (Table 26).

Number of Cattle Raised

Shown in Table 27 is the number of heads each of the respondents had been
tending. Majority of the respondents (52.38%) had 1 – 2 cattle/s, 8 had 3 – 5 heads, and
2 had 5 and above.

Purpose in Raising Cattle

Cattle are being raised as supplementary source of income by 76.19% of the
respondents, 19.05% claimed that raising cattle is their main source of income while a
lone farmer raise cattle for special occasion only for his family (Table 28).

Source of Stock

Cattle raisers in the area procured their initial stock from their neighbors and
nearby barangays within the municipality. One claimed his stock was purchased from
adjacent municipality for the purpose of upgrading his existing livestock. There were
eight who acquired their stock from their parents as an heir (Table 29).


Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


36
Table 25. Number of years in raising cattle

NUMBER OF YEARS
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 – 4





3


14.29
5 – 8





6


28.57
9 – 12




10


47.62
13 – above





2


9.52
TOTAL




21
100.00


Table 26. Number of cattle raised by the respondents

NUMBER OF CATTLE
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
1 – 2




11



52.38
3 – 5




8



38.10
5 – above




2



9.52
TOTAL




21


100.00


Table 27. Purpose of raising cattle

PURPOSE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Main source of income


4



19.05
Supplementary source of income

16



76.19
For special occasion


1



4.76

TOTAL




21



100.00


Table 28. Source of stock

SOURCE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Neighbor (within barangay)

10



47.62
Barangay within municipality

2



9.52
As an heir




8



38.10
Adjacent municipality


1



4.76
TOTAL



21



100.00



Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


37
Breeding

Breeds of cattle raised. The native breed is the major cattle being raised with
71.43% while the upgraded breed are grown by six of the 21 respondents (Table 30). The
preference for the native breed over those other animals are given more attention because
they are better tolerant to adverse weather condition. Much more to this, docile ones
usually grow faster and fatten easily.

Breeding system. To perpetuate selected and raised cattle specie, inbreeding and
upgrading are the means of breeding employed (Table 30).

Mating. Due to lack of technical knowledge on the system of breeding cattle, the
respondents do not resort to artificial insemination. Thus, natural mating is the only
method being practiced.

Source of breeding bull and payment,. The breeding bull used in mating are
either hired (85.71%) or owned (14.29%). The hired bulls are paid in cash.

Table 29. Breeding

PARTICULARS



NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS







F

%
Breed

Native





15


71.43

Grade





6


28.57
System of Breeding

Inbreeding





15


71.43

Grading





6


28.57
Method of Mating

Natural





21

100.00
Source of Bull

Hired





18


85.71

Owned





3


14.29
Terms of Payment

Cash





18


85.71

Free (Owned)



3


14.29
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


38


Figure 7. Breeds of cattle (Front – upgrade; background – native)
and free range system of feeding in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya



Figure 8. Upgrade cattle and tether system of feeding in
Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya


Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


39
Age at first breeding. The earliest age of breeding cattle observed by the
respondents is at 2-3 years old and the latest at 3-4 years of age (Table 31).

Gestation

The gestation period of cattle ranged from 260-296 days. Seven of the 21
respondents observed gestation period to be from 279-287 days, six for 270-278 days,
five for 277-280 days, and three observed it to be 288-296 days (Table 32). The
difference lies in the different feed intake of their animals.

Birth Rate

Based on the survey, all the respondents observed that cattle calved only once a
year.

Table 30. Age at first breeding of cattle


AGE (Years)

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

2 – 3




20



95.24
3 – 4




1



4.96

TOTAL




21



100.00



Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


40
Table 31. Length of gestation period in cattle


LENGTH OF GESTATION
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(Days)

260 – 269





5


23.81
270 – 278





6


28.57
279 – 287





7


33.33
288 – 296





3


14.29

TOTAL




21


100.00



Carabao



There were only 81 of the 212 respondents who have carabaos under their care.
The reason why only few care carabaos is that Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya is a mountainous
place and few farm fields wide enough to be plowed with the use of said animals.

Years in Raising Carabao

The number of years in raising carabao ranged from one year up to 21 years and
above (Table 34). More respondents had been caring carabaos for almost 11-15 years,
but only two have cared carabaos for 21 years or more.

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


41
Number of Carabao Raised

The number of heads of carabao cared by the respondents ranged from one head
to more than 5 animals. Majority (77.78%) of which had 1-2 heads while six claimed to
have 5 or more draft animals (Table 34).

Purpose of Raising Carabao

The main reason why respondents raise carabao is for supplementary source of
income (83.95%), 12.35% claimed as their main livelihood while three raise carabao
intended for special occasions only (Table 35).


Source of Stock

The main source of carabao stock is from neighboring barangays in their
municipality (54), within their barangay (15), as an heir (7), and from adjacent
municipalities (5) (Table 36).

Table 32. Number of years in raising carabao


NUMBER OF YEARS

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

1 – 5





13


16.05
6 – 10





24


29.63
11– 15





33


40.74
16 – 20





9


11.11
21 – above





2


2.47

TOTAL





81


100.00
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


42
Table 33. Number of carabao raised by the respondents


NUMBER OF CARABAO
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 – 2





63


77.78
3 – 4





12


14.81
5 – above





6


7.41
TOTAL





81


100.00



Table 34. Purpose of raising carabao


PURPOSE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

Main source of income


10



12.35
Supplementary source of income

68



83.95
For special occasion


3



3.70

TOTAL




81



100.00


Table 35. Source of stock


SOURCE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

Neighbor (within barangay)

15



18.52
Barangay within municipality

54



66.67
As an heir




7



8.64
Adjacent municipality


5



6.17

TOTAL




81



100.00
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


43
Breeds and Breeding

Breeds of carabao. There were two breeds of carabao raised by the respondents,
namely; the native and the upgrade. The native breed was preferred more by the
respondents because of its endurance to any adverse weather conditions. The upgraded
carabao are usually the product of the native breed crossed with an introduced breed
usually from the neighboring barangays or municipalities.

Breeding system. Inbreeding and grading were the only breeding system
practiced by the respondents in the improvement of their existing breed.

Mating. Natural mating is the means and ways respondents have their carabaos
impregnated.




Figure 9. Upgrade tethered carabao raised in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


44

Source of breeding bull. The breeding bulls used to impregnate their carabaos are
either hired (90.12%) while the rest have their own breeding bull.

Terms of payment. Those who hire breeding bulls pay services in terms of cash
(Table 36 ).

Table 36. Breeds and breeding of carabao
PARTICULARS

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

Breeds

Native



75



92.59

Grade



6



7.41
System of breeding

Inbreeding



70



86.42

Grading



11



13.58
Method of mating

Natural



81



100.00
Source of bull

Hired



73



90.12

Owned



8



9.88
Terms of payment

Cash



73



90.12

Owned



8



9.88

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


45
Gestation


The gestation of carabao is shown in Table 38. The number of days from
impregnation to delivery of young carabao varies from 295 to 339 days. There were
more respondents who observed that gestation period of their carabao fall under range
295 – 303 days which was the shortest period. Only nine of the respondents claimed that
their carabao gestate from 331 – 339 days which was the longest period observed.

Age at First Breeding

It was noted from the respondents that two to three years old was the majority age
of carabao at first breeding. There were only two who mentioned that the first breeding
of their carabo was about 3 to 4 years old.

Birth Rate


The birth rate of carabao is only once a year as claimed by the respondents.

Table 37. Length of gestation in carabao
LENGTH OF GESTATION NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
(Days)
295 – 303





32


39.51
304 – 312





16


19.75
313 – 321





11


13.58
312 – 330





13


16.05
331– 339





9


11.11
TOTAL





81


100.00

Table 38. Age at first breeding of carabao
AGE (YEARS)
NUMBER OF RESPONDNETS
PERCENTAGE
2 – 3




79



97.53
3 – 4




2



2.47
TOTAL




81



100.00
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


46
Goat


There were 33 out of the 212 respondents who were found raising goat.

Years in Goat Raising

The number of years in goat raising ranged one up to more than nine years.
Majority of the respondents were new in this venture as proven by the number of years
they had tended raising goat. There were three out of the 33 respondents who claimed
goat raising for nine years and above.

Number of Heads Raised

The number of goats raised ranged from one to five or more. There were 25 with
one to two heads, five with 3 – 4 heads, and three with five and above (Table 41).

Purpose in Goat Raising

The main reason the respondents raise goat was to supplement their income as
claimed by 19 raisers, 12 have them in preparation for special occasions, and only two
are engaged in goat raising as their major source of income (Table 42).

Goat raising seemed as a pass time to farmer-respondents as evidenced by the
number of years they had been raising, the number of heads they maintain, and the
purpose for which they raise.

Source of Stock

The major source of their initial stock come from their neighbors (57.58%),
27.27% have their initial stock from neighboring barangays, and five had their initial
stock as an heir.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


47
Cash capital. The respondents claimed that their invested cash capital are their
personal money.

Table 39. Number of years in raising goat

NUMBER OF YEARS
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 – 4





23


69.70
5 – 8





7


21.21
9 – above





3


9.09
TOTAL





33


100.00


Table 40. Number of goats raised by the respondents

NUMBER OF GOAT
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 – 2




25



75.76
3 – 4




5



15.15
5 – above




3



9.09
TOTAL




33



100.00


Table 41. Purpose of raising goat

PURPOSE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Main source of income


2



6.06
Supplementary source of income

19



57.58
For special occasion


12



36.36

TOTAL




33



100.00


Table 42. Source of initial stock and capital

SOURCE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Stock Neighbor (within barangay)
19



57.58
Barangay within municipality
9



27.27

As an heir



5



15.15
Capital

Own money


33



100.00
TOTAL




33



100.00
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


48
Breeds and Breeding

Breed/s. There were only two (2) breeds of goat being raised, the Native and the
Upgraded breed. These upgraded breed came from a cross between their existing goat
with that of the other strains they selected. The selection of buck depends on the
preference of raisers.

Breeding system. To improve their existing strain of goat, crossbreeding is
employed with those available buck, however, inbreeding is also practiced due to
unavailability of hybrid goat strain.

Mating. Artificial insemination on goat is never heard in the locality, thus, they
are compelled on natural mating as the only means of improving their stock as well as to
impregnate their animals.

Source of buck. When goat raisers do not own bucks to mate their does, they
have to hire bucks for that purpose.

Payment. The hired buck for breeding purposes are paid in cash basis for an
amount of Php200-250.

Gestation

The gestation period of goat ranged from 145 to 149 days. The shortest time for
native breed to gestate occur 145 days while the longest period claimed by the
respondents go beyond 149 days. The upgraded breed had a day shorter than the native
breed.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


49



Figure 10. Upgrade goat and system of feeding in goat of Kasibu, Nueva
Vizcaya


Figure 10. Upgrade goat and system of feeding in goat of Kasibu, Nueva
Vizcaya
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


50
Age at First Breeding

The youngest doe mated about 8-9 months old while others claimed their doe
were bred at 12-13 months. However, most of the respondents mentioned the earliest
time their doe mated from 10-11 months of age.

Table 43. Source of initial stock and capital

PARTICULARS
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS

PERCENTAGE
Breed Native


28




84.85
Grade


5




15.15
Breeding System
Inbreeding


25




75.76

Grading


8



24.24
Mating

Natural


33




100.00
Source of breeding buck
Hired


22



66.67
Owned


11




33.33
Terms of payment for breeding
services Cash


22



66.66
Owned

11



33.33


Table 44. Length of gestation in goat

LENGTH OF GESTATION

NATIVE

UPGRADE
(Days)


F
%
F
%
145



13
92.86
146



7
36.84
1
7.14
147



6
31.58
148



4
21.05
149 – above


2
10.53
TOTAL



19 100.00



Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


51
Table 45. Age at first breeding of goat


AGE (Months)

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

8 - 9




12



36.36
10 – 11




19



57.58
12 – 13




2



6.06


TOTAL




19


100.00


Table 46. Number of kids per birth


NUMBER OF KIDS


NATIVE

UPGRADE






F
%
F %

1





17
51.51
14
42.42

2





2
6.06


TOTAL




19
57.67
14 42.42



Birth Rate


All the respondents mentioned that their does kid once a year.


Number of Kids


Of the 19 respondents who had the native breed, 17 claimed that their does kid to
only one per gestation while two noted their does to have delivered two. However, the 14
respondents who had the upgraded breed noted the does to produce only one kid per
gestation.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


52
Indigenous Feeds and
Feeding of Ruminants


Grasses. Listed in Table 49 are the indigenous weeds provided to their ruminants.
These different grasses are readily available in the locality though at times these are
scarce during dry season.

The napier grass is the most common among the grasses fed to cattle, carabao,
and goat followed by carabao grass, rice straw, and para grass. Some grasses which were
not identified though fed to ruminants account for a very low percentage which are least
liked by these animals.

Source. The grasses fed are abundantly found along river banks while rice straw
are gathered from rice fields after the harvest season which are usually stored and given
during dry season or during typhoons.

Season of abundance. During the wet season, grasses for ruminants can be found
abundantly in the locality but during the dry season these grasses can still be found but
not as abundant as during the rainy days.

System of Feeding in
Ruminants

There are only two systems of feeding ruminants, the “cut-and-carry” and
grazing. The former is locally termed as ‘sakate’. Grazing is done as free range or
animals are tethered in some areas where abundant grasses are to be found and after
sometime animals are moved to another pasture area.

Based on the result of the survey, grazing animals is much preferred over the
“cut-and-carry” system (Table 51).
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


53
Table 47. Indigenous feeds provided to ruminants

INDIGENOUS

CATTLE

CARABAO
GOAT
FEEDS

F
%
F
%
F
%

Carabao grass
6
28.57
29
35.80
9
27.27
Napier grass
9
42.86
35
43.21
11
33.33
Para grass

2
9.52
8
9.88
4
12.12
Rice straw

3
14.29
9
11.11
2
6.09
Others

1
4.76
0
0
7
21.21
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL

21
100.00 81 100.00 33 100.00
* multiple response


Table 48. Source of greater abundance of indigenous feeds for ruminants

SOURCE OF

CATTLE

CARABAO
GOAT
ABUNDANCE
F
%
F
% F %

River bank

11
52.38
41
50.62
9
27.27
Rice fields

8
38.10
27
33.33
19
57.58
Others

2
9.52
13
16.05
5
15.15
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL

21
100.00 81 100.00 33 100.00
* multiple response


Table 49. Season of abundance of indigenous weeds for ruminants

SEASON OF
CATTLE
CARABAO GOAT
ABUNDANCE

F
% F
% F
%

Wet season

15
76.19
70
86.42
28
84.85
Dry season

5
23.81
11
13.58
5
15.15

* multiple response
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


54
Table 50. System of feeding in ruminants






SYSTEM OF FEEDING
ANIMAL


“Cut and carry”

Grazing




F
%

F %

Cattle


4
19.05

17 80.95
Carabao


32
39.51

49 60.49
Goat


2
6.06

31 93.94

* multiple response

Parasite and Disease Management

The method of parasite and disease management of ruminants is shown in Table
52. Ruminants are rarely vaccinated. The main reason why raisers seldom do this is
either they do not notice any disorder or they are not aware of any signs and symptoms
caused by parasites and disease causing organisms.

System of Animal Raising

Tethering. This system of raising animals was noted on ruminants. This system
is most commonly employed because it eases the burden of cutting grasses and bringing
them to where the animals are located.

Range. This system is least being employed on ruminants because of limited
pasture areas available thus, very few let loose animals to openly roam and graze.

Semi-confinement. Goat is the only ruminant where this system of raising is
being followed. One probable season could be the size of the animals.

Marketing

Marketing system. All the respondents who raise cattle sell directly to buyers
acted as middlemen. Majority of the carabao (54.32%) and goat raisers (63.64%) dispose
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


55
directly to middlemen while direct selling to consumers is done by 37% and 36.36% of
their carabao and goat, respectively.
Marketing method. Cattle and carabao are sold on per head basis (‘bultuhan’),
per kilogram (liveweight), and per kilogram (dressedweight). Goats are also sold per
kilogram either liveweight or butchered.

Table 51. Methods of preventing and controlling disease and parasites





METHOD
ANIMAL

VACCINATION

D.A. ASSISTANCE


Yes No

Yes No .


F % F % F % F
%
Cattle
1 4.76 20 95.24 10 47.62 11
52.38
Carabao
4 4.94 77 95.06 17 20.99 79.01
Goat
1 3.03 32 96.97 5 15.15 84.85


Table 52. System of animal raising


SYSTEM

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Cattle
Tethering


17




80.95
Range


4




19.05
TOTAL



21




100.00
Carabao

Tethering


79




97.53

Range


2




2.47
TOTAL



81




100.00
Goat

Tethering


26




78.79

Semi-confinement

7




21.21
TOTAL



33




100.00
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


56
Table 53. Marketing system


MARKETING METHOD
CATTLE
CARABAO
GOAT




F
%
F
% F
%


Direct to buyers (middlemen) 21 100.00 44
54.32
21
63.64
Direct to consumers
0 0
37
45.68
12
36.36


TOTAL


21 100.00 81
100.00
33 100.00




Table 54. Method of marketing


MARKETING METHOD CATTLE

CARABAO
GOAT




F
%
F
% F
%


Per head (“bultuhan”)
3
14.29
7
8.64
0
0

Per kilogram (liveweight)
12
57.14
35
43.21
19
57.58

Per kilogram (butchered)
6
28.57
39
48.15
14
42.42


TOTAL


21
100.00
81
100.00 33
100.00




Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


57
Chicken
Chicken Raising

Number of respondents in chicken raising. Of the 126 respondents, there were
33.33% who claimed chicken raising 4-6 years; 29.37% 1-3 years; 20.63% and 16.67%
10 years and above, and 7-9 years, respectively (Table 59).

Number of heads raised. The number of heads raised is shown in Table 78.
There were 59.79% of the respondents who have 1-3 roosters and 40.21% with four or
more. One half of the respondents maintain an average of 4-6 hens/pullets while 40.48%
with 1-3 only, and 9.52% tend to have 7 or more. Majority of the respondents have 1-5
chicks; 30.16% had 6-10; and only 13.49% had 11 and above chicks.

Purpose. The main reason of the respondents in raising chicken was for home
consumption (50.00%); 26.98% claimed they raise chicken as supplementary source of
cash income; and 23.02% raise chicken specifically for any special occasions.



Table 55. Number of years in raising chicken


NUMBER OF YEARS
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE


1 – 3




37



29.37

4 – 6




42



33.33

7 – 9




21



16.67

10 – above




26



20.63


TOTAL



126



100.00

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


58
Source of Stock and Capital


Stock. The birds raised by the respondents were mainly acquired from their
neighbors (45.24%); 21.43% of the chicken raisers bought their initial stock from
neighboring barangays; and there were those who bought outside their municipality.

Cash capital. Nearly all 126 respondents utilized their own money as initial
source of cash capital while 22 raisers are funded by contract growers.

Breeds and Breeding

Breed/strain. The only breed or strain of chicken being raised in the area of study
is the native breed.

System of breeding. Inbreeding is the only method done in the locality thus, the
breed of chicken they raise in terms of productivity does not improve as evidenced by the
number of day-old chicks being cared.

Source of breeding rooster. There were 76.98% of the respondents who make use
of their own rooster to mate hens; 23.02% borrow them from their neighbors/friends.

Terms of payment. The services rendered by the roosters to their pullets/hens are
free which are owned by their neighbors/friends.

Age at first breeding. As observed by the respondents, pullets are usually
copulated 5 to 9 months old and the age of pullets copulated most was at seven and eight
months old.

Number of eggs laid per clutch. Based from the result of the survey, their
chickens were low producers. Majority (52.38%) of the respondents noted that their hens
lay 5-7 eggs per clutch; 30.95% had 8-10; and only 16.67% observed their chickens lay
11 or more eggs.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


59
Feeds and Feeding

Types of feeds. The feeds given to their chicken are ‘palay’ which is the main
feed given (36.51%), followed by cooked rice, rice bran, and rice bran mixed with
cooked rice, in descending order (32.54%, 17.46%, 13.49%, respectively) (Table 67).

Feeding system. The dry and the wet feeding systems are being employed in
chicken raising. These systems are done either individually or group feeding. The most
common system was the dry group feeding with 42.06% of the respondents, wet group
feeding is being done by 36.51%. Individual feeding wet or dry feeding is not a common
practice (15.87% and 5.56%, respectively) by the respondents.

Frequency of feeding. Majority (58.73%) of the respondents feed their chicken
twice a day, usually early morning and late afternoon. Feeding the chickens once a day is
being observed by 34.92% while there were only 6.35% who feed their chicken three
times a day. The chickens fed thrice a day are those that are confined.

Table 56. Number of chickens raised by the respondents


NUMBER

ROOSTER
HEN/PULLETS CHICKS




F %
F
% F
%

1 – 3
58 59.79
51 40.48
4 – above
39 40.21
4 – 6


63 50.00
7 – above


12 9.52
1 – 5






71
56.35
6 – 10





38
30.16
11 – above





17
13.49


Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


60
Table 57. Purpose of raising chicken


PURPOSE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

Home consumption


63



50.00
Supplementary source of income

34



26.98
For special occasion


29



23.02
TOTAL



126



100.00


Table 58. Source of stock and capital

SOURCE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Stock

Neighbor (same barangay)
57

45.24

Raisers within locality

27

21.43

Outside the municipality

42

33.33
Capital

Own money


104

82.54

Contract grower


22

17.46


Table 59. Source of breeding rooster

SOURCE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

Owned



97



76.98
Borrowed



29



23.02

TOTAL



126



100.00



Table 60. Terms of payment for breeding services

TERMS

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

Owned



97



76.98
Free



29



23.02

TOTAL



126



100.00

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


61



Figure 12. The native chicken being raised in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya






Figure 13. Dry-group feeding employed to chicken and Muscovy duck in
Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


62
Table 61. Age of chicken at first breeding

AGE (Month)
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

6





28



22.22
7





38



30.16
8





47



37.30
9





13



10.32
TOTAL



126



100.00


Table 62. Number of eggs laid per clutch

NUMBER OF EGGS
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
LAID PER CLUTCH

5 – 7




66



52.38
8 – 10




39



30.95
11 – above




21



16.67

TOTAL



126



100.00


Table 63. Types of feeds provided to chicken

TYPES OF FEED

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Rice bran




22



17.46
Rice bran mixed with cooked rice
17



13.49
Cooked rice



41



32.54
‘Palay’




46



36.51
TOTAL



126



100.00



Table 64. System of feeding chicken

FEEDING SYSTEM
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Dry feeding



53



42.06
Dry individual feeding


20



15.87
Wet group feeding


46



36.51
Wet individual feeding


7



5.56
TOTAL



126



100.00
Table 65. Frequency of feeding
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


63

FREQUENCY

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Once a day



44



34.92
Twice a day



74



58.73
Thrice a day



8



6.35
TOTAL



126



100.00

Disease and Parasite Management


Cleaning of pens. Majority (51.35%) of the respondents clean their pens once a
week while the rest clean their chicken pens as the need arises.

Deworming. There were only five out of the 126 respondents who were surveyed
are deworming their chicken.

Isolation. When the respondents observe any signs and symptoms of morbidity
on their chicken, these are being isolated so as not to infect and or infest other birds in the
brood.

Medication. Morbid chicken are seldom given medication and it was found that
only 23 of the respondents medicate their stricken chickens.

D.A. assistance. The respondents rarely avail of the services of the Department of
Agriculture in their area. Out of the 126 respondents, there were only 19 who sought the
assistance of the D.A. Technical Group.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


64
Table 66. Preventive and control measures against disease and parasites
PARTICULARS


NUMBER OF

PERCENTAGE



RESPONDENTS
Cleaning of pens

Once a week


19



51.35

As needed



18



48.65
Deworming

No


121



34.92

Yes



5



3.97
Isolation

No




44



34.92

Yes



82



65.08
Medication

No


103



81.75

Yes



23



18.25
D.A. Assistance

No


107



84.92

Yes



19



15.08

Housing

Kind of housing. The chickens are free to roam in the locality as claimed by 89 of
the respondents, 35 claimed their chicken are ranged during good weather but confined
them during bad weather condition and at night time. There were only two of the
respondents who completely confine their birds.

Housing materials. The roofing materials used are either G.I. sheet or cogon. The
flooring materials are either bamboo slats or wood and at times the soil. The
wallings/fence are either made of bamboo, wood or wire screen.

Roof structure. The A-type of roofing was the most common (61.11%) and the
shed-type was employed by 38.89% of the respondents.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


65
Table 67. Kind of housing in chicken
KIND OF HOUSING
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Free range




89



70.63
Semi-confinement



35



27.78
Complete confinement


2



1.59
TOTAL



126



100.00



Table 68. Housing materials in chicken

TYPE OF MATERIALS


NUMBER OF
PERCENTAGE
USED


RESPONDENTS

Roofing

G.I. sheet




15


40.54

Cogon




22


59.46

Flooring

Soil




17


45.95

Bamboo




11


29.73

Wood




9


24.32

Walling/fencing

Bamboo




12


32.43

Wood




17


49.95

Screen




8


21.62



Table 69. Roof structure of chicken house

STRUCTURE

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE


Shed-type




49


38.89
A-type




77


61.11

TOTAL




126


100.00
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


66


Figure 14. The A-type of chicken house in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya


Figure 15. The shed-type o f housing in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


67
Marketing

The only method of selling chicken is through direct buyer-consumers. Chickens
are priced according to live-weight on a per kilogram basis.

Duck

Years in Duck Raising

Most of the respondents ventured into duck raising from 1-3 years (45.36%), 4-6
years (32.99%), and 7 or more years (21.65%).

Heads Raised

Drake. Based on the survey, there were 44 respondents who had 1-3 drakes and
10 had 3 or more. The reason why very few had drakes was that the service of a male
duck during the mating period is rendered free by the drake of their neighbors.

Hen. Of the 97 duck raisers, there were 37 who had 1-3 hens, 41 with 3-6, and 19
with 7 or more hens.

Chicks. The ducks in the locality are likewise poor producers as proven by the
number of chicks found, 32 with only 1-3 chicks and 65 with 6-9 chicks.

Purpose of Raising Duck

The major purpose in raising duck was for home consumption. Others raise duck
as additional source of income, but few for special occasions.

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


68
Breeds/Strains and Breeding

Breeds/strains. There were only two breeds/strains of duck being raised, namely;
Muscovy (58.76%), and Mallard or native duck (41.24%).

System of breeding. Crossbreeding of ducks was practiced by 59.79% of the
respondents. This was so to improve the present breeds being raised. Inbreeding was
also employed by 40.21%. This cannot be avoided because at times ducks are free to
roam and even during the mating season

Source of breeding drake. Majority (60.82%) of the respondents had their own
drake and 39.18% with no available drake only borrowing, from their neighbors. The
services of the breeding drake are for free.

Source of stock and capital. The major source of stocks are from their neighbors
within their barangays (47.42%), other duck raisers within the locality (29.90%), and
from outside of their municipality (22.68%).

Table 70. Number of years in raising duck


YEARS


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE


1 – 3




44



45.36
4 – 6




32



32.99
7 – above




21



21.65

TOTAL




97



100.00


Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


69
Table 71. Number of ducks raised by the respondents

NUMBER


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Drake

1 – 2



49



83.05

3 – above



10



16.95
Hen

1 – 3



37



38.14

3 – 6



41



42.27

7 – above



19



19.59
Chicks

1 – 3



32



32.99

6 – above



65



67.01


Table 72. Purpose of raising ducks

PURPOSE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Home consumption


40



41.24
Supplementary source of income

21



21.65
For special occasion


36



37.11
TOTAL




97



100.00


Table 73. Breed/strain of duck raised by the respondents

BREED/STRAIN

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Muscovy




57



58.76
Mallard




40



41.24
TOTAL




97



100.00



Table 74. Source of stock and capital

SOURCE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Neighbors (within barangay)

46



47.42
Raisers (within locality)


29



29.90
Outside the municipality


22



22.68
TOTAL




97



100.00

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


70

Figure 15. Muscovy ducks being raised in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya


Figure 16. Muscovy ducks and type of housing in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


71
Table 75. System of breeding in ducks

SYSTEM


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Inbreeding




39



40.21
Crossbreeding



58



59.79
TOTAL




97



100.00



Table 76. Source of breeding drake

SOURCE


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Owned




59



60.82
Borrowed




38



39.18
TOTAL




97



100.00



Table 77. Terms of payment for breeding drake

TERMS


NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Owned




59



60.82
Free




38



39.18
TOTAL




97



100.00

Egg laying

Age at first egg laying. The respondents claimed that ducks lay their first eggs as
early as 6 months old and as late as 9 months old. However, most of the respondents
noted that most ducks lay their first eggs at 8-9 months old (Table 82).

Eggs per clutch. The ducks raised were low egg producers (Table 83). The
reason for this could be attributed to many factors such as the breeding system employed,
the feeds and feeding system, and the care and management practices.













Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


72
Feeds and Feeding








Type of feeds. There were variety of feeds given to ducks, individually or mixed.
Cooked rice was the most common feed given to ducks and commercial feeds mixed with
cooked rice the least feed given them.

Feeding system. There were only two feeding system given to ducks, the dry
group and the wet group feeding. The former is being employed by majority over the
latter system.

Frequency of feeding. Ducks are fed twice a day though others claimed that they
feed their ducks once and even thrice a day.

Disease and Parasite Management

The preventive measures done against diseases and parasites were cleaning of
pens as needed, deworming, isolation of sick ducks, medication of morbid animals, and
seldom assistance from the Department of Agriculture Technical Group.

Table 78. Age of duck at first egg laying


AGE (Months)

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
6





19



19.59
7





39



40.21
8





37



38.14
9





2



2.06

TOTAL




97



100.00

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


73
Table 79. Number of eggs laid per clutch

NUMBER OF EGGS
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
LAID PER CLUTCH
1 – 5




58



59.79
6 – 10




21



21.65
11 – above




18



18.56
TOTAL




97



100.00


Table 80. Types of feeds provided to duck

TYPE OF FEEDS

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Commercial feeds mixed with
cooked rice


10



10.31
Rice bran mixed with

cooked rice


20



20.62
Cooked rice



41



42.27
‘Palay’




26



26.80
TOTAL




97



100.00


Table 81. System of feeding duck

FEEDING SYSTEM
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Dry group feeding



55



56.70
Wet group feeding


42



43.30
TOTAL




97



100.00



Table 82. Frequency of feeding

FEEDING SYSTEM
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Once a day



25



25.77
Twice a day



66


68.04
Thrice a day



6


6.19
TOTAL




97



100.00





Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


74
Table 83. Preventive and control measures against disease and parasites

PARTICULARS

NUMBER OF

PERCENTAGE



RESPONDENTS
Cleaning of pens

Once a week


7



7.22

As needed



90



92.78
Deworming

No




53



54.64

Yes



44



45.36
Isolation

No




36



31.11

Yes



61



62.89
Medication

No




78



80.41

Yes



19



19.59
D.A. Assistance

No




39



40.21

Yes



58



59.79


Housing

Kind of housing. Based on the result of the survey, majority of the respondents
completely confine their ducks, and semi-confinement as well as free range are also done
but on a smaller scale.

Housing materials. The roofing materials commonly used is the cogon grass and
flooring are either made of bamboo slats or wood but often times no flooring provided.
The walling\\fencing are either made of bamboo slats, wood, or screen\\net.

Roof structure. The shed-type was much preferred over that of the A-type.

Marketing system

Ducks are sold directly to buyer-consumers on per head basis or per kilogram
basis. Though some of these buyers collect from different households and bring it to the
local market.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


75
Table 84. Kind of housing in duck raising in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya


STRUCTURE

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE

Shed-type




45



59.21
A-type




31



40.79


TOTAL




76



100.00

===============================================================

Table 85. Housing materials in duck raising in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya

TYPE OF MATERIALS
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
USED
Roofing

Cogon



74



97.37

G.I. Sheet



2



2.63
Flooring

Soil



37



48.68

Bamboo



24



31.58

Wood



15



19.74
Walling\\fencing

Bamboo



39



51.32

Wood



21



27.63

Screen\\Net


16



21.05


Table 86. Roof structure of duck house


STRUCTURE

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE


Shed-type




45



59.21

A-type




31



40.79


TOTAL




76



100.00



Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


76
Table 87. Methods of marketing


MARKETING

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE


Per head




19



33.33

Per kilogram (live weight)

38



66.67


TOTAL




57



100.00



Problems/Constraints of
Animal Raising

Based on the survey, animal raisers in the 11 identified barangays of Kasibu,
Nueva Vizcaya enumerated the problems they encountered is shown in Table 88.
The major problem presented were the absence of market outlet followed by lack
of capital, least technical knowledge on animal raising, and limited grazing area for
ruminants.

Solutions

The suggested possible solutions from the respondents were: alongside with a
market outlet there should be government support in terms of cash capital as well as
initial stock of good breeds/strains which are adaptable to the conditions of the locality;
also, the responsible government agency/ies on the dissemination of technical know-how
on animal raising assessing the area so that assistance could be rendered based on their
needs.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


77
Table 88. Problems encountered in animal raising


PROBLEMS

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE


Swine

Lack of capital


48



42.86

Lack of market outlet

51



45.54

Lack of technical knowledge
13



11.61

Cattle\\Carabao\\Goat

Lack of capital


41



30.37

Lack of technical knowledge
32



23.70

Lack of market outlet

60



44.44

Limited grazing area

2



1.48

Poultry

Lack of market outlet
159



71.30

Lack of technical knowledge
64



28.70
* multiple responses

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Summary
The result showed that the respondents were distributed almost evenly to age 21 –
60 years old to 70 – 80 years of age.

Females outnumber male respondents; mostly married; had no formal education,
and engaged in farming/animal raising as their major livelihood activity.

Respondents had been raising swine with the purpose of augmenting their meager
income. Their neighbors are the sources of their initial stock but majority utilize their
own money to finance swine production.

The ‘native’ pig is the most breed/strain raised in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
Breeding of swine was from 8 to 9 months old but then most respondents borrow boar to
impregnate their sows. Piglets are the means of paying the services of boars. Litter size
at birth was 11-12 piglets and the litter size at weaning was 9-10 piglets.

Indigenous feeds or non-conventional feeds are the most common feedstuff given
and prepared in varied ways. Pure kitchen refuse was the over-all feeds offered to swine.
Complete confinement of swine in a nipa/cogon shed-type with 1-2 pens in a
single house is the most practiced by the farmers.

The management practices employed were providing brooder to piglets, feeding
piglets on the fifth day, and providing guard rails to protect the piglets while marketing
swine are directly disposed to consumers.

Cattle raisers were found to have been raising cattle for 9-12 years. The main
purpose of raising cattle is to supplement their income. Procurement came from their
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


79
neighbors. The native breed of cattle is the most common in the surveyed area. The
bulls used for breeding are mostly hired and paid in cash aged 2-3 years old.

There were more respondents found raising carabao for 11-15 years with 1-2
heads with native carabao for supplementing their income. Inbreeding is the method
employed to perpetuate the specie through natural mating; bulls used for mating are hired
which are paid in cash.

Goat raising in the surveyed area with respondents venturing 1-4 years with 1-5
heads; increasing their income. The native breed is the most common and crossbreeding
to improve their existing strain. Bucks for mating are usually owned while hired bucks
are paid PhP200-250.

Napier and carabao grasses are the most common feeds given to ruminants which
are abundantly found in riverbanks during the wet season.

The systems of animals raising in the surveyed area are: tethering, range, and
semi-confinement.

Disposal of live animals is direct selling to middlemen while ruminants are sold
on per head basis or ‘bulto’.

At Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya, respondents were found raising chicken 4-6 years
with varied number of hens, roosters, and chicks; for home consumption so that cash
investment are their personal money; pullets are bred mostly at 8 months old; majority
had 5-7 eggs per clutch. ‘Palay’ is the major feed given to chicken. Chickens are free to
range; the A-type housing made of cogon roofing with walls made of wood and no
flooring. Chicken are sold to buyer-consumers on a live-weight per kilogram basis for
pricing.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


80

Duck raising ranged 1-3 years with varied number of drakes, hens, and chicks;
home consumption is the main purpose of raising ducks; Muscovy is the most common
breed; drake for breeding are owned; initial stock came from neighbors; cooked rice is
the main feed offered through the dry-group feeding method; preventive and control
measures such as cleaning pens, deworming, isolation, and medication are not commonly
observed. Ducks are sold directly to buyer-consumers.


Conclusion

Based on the findings of the survey conducted the following were derived:

1. The majority of the respondents had no formal education; female; married;
belonged to age bracket 41-50 years old; and were farmers/animal raisers.

2. The respondents raise animals to supplement their meager income for those
who are employed and as major source of income for the non-salaried farmers.

3. The problems encountered in animal raising are absence of market outlet; lack
of cash capital, limited technical knowledge, and limited grazing area for ruminants.

Recommendations
The solutions suggested which arose from the respondents were: alongside with a
market outlet there should be government intervention in terms of providing loans for
cash capital, and technical assistance from concerned agencies.





Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


LITERATURE CITED


AFABLE, T.A. 1997. Morphometric varieties, blood protein and isozyme
polymorphisms in the Philippine mallard (Anas paltrrynchos L.) and in muscovy
ducks (Cairina moschata L.) of the Philippines and Thailand. PhD Thesis.
UPLB, College, Laguna. 141 Pp.

ARBOLEDA, C.R. 1987. Animal genetics resources conservation and development in
the Philippines. Anim. Prod. Techn. J. 3(2):2-7.

ARBOLEDA, C.R. 1980. Current development, trends, and strategies for improving
poultry production in the tropics. Phil. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. Pp. 59-64.

ARBOLEDA, C.R., V.G. ARGANOSA, B.B. PARKER, A.L. LAMBIO, O.A. PALAD,
E.F. PENALBA, O.L. BOMDOC and N.A. CARIGMA. 1985. Improvement of
Philippine livestock productivity through breeding. Some policy issues. J. Agric.
Econ. Dev. 15(1-2):141-158.

BONDOC, O.L., E.F. PENALBA, A.L. LAMBIO, M.D. PALAD, P.S. FAYLON, E.C.
VILLAR, and J.P. SUSBILLA. 1997. Report on the Animal Genetic Resource
Survey. Colloquium on the Philippine Genetic Resources Improvement Program
(Phil-GRIP) for Farm Animals. 13 pp.

BUREAU OF AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS. 1993. 130 pp.

DEVERDRA and BURNS. 1985. Goat Production in the Tropics. Commonwealth
Agricultural Bureaux. Farmham House, U.K. Pp. 135-137.

LAMBIO, A.L. 1990. Studies on poultry breeding in the Philippines. Anim. Prod.
Techn. J. 5:18-23.

PALAD, M.D. 1994 Cytogenetics of Pekin (Anas platyrhynchos L.), Philippine Mallard
(Anas platyrhynchos L.), Muscovy (Carina muschata) ducks and their crosses.
MSc. Thesis. UPLB, Los Banos, Laguna. 108 pp.

PARKER, B.A. 1987. Philippine Cattle: a breed to conserve and develop. Anim. Prod.
Techn. J. 3(2):8-14.

PARKER, B.A. and V.G. MOMONGAN. 1971. Bolld transferin genotypes in
Philippine cattle. Phil. J. Anim. Sci. 8(1):17-22

PAYNE, W.J.A. 1970. Cattle production in the tropics. Longman Corp. Ltd., London.
336 pp.

Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008


82
PEREZ, E.F. 1962. The growth fattening performance of Philippine cattle and goats: a
review. Phil. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 8(3 and 4):83-99.

PHILIPPINE
COUNCIL
FOR
AGRICULTURAL
RESEARCH
AND
DEVELOPMENT. 1981. Philippine Recommends for Pork Production. Los
Banos, Laguna. Pp. 220-221.

SHRESTHA, N.P. and B.A. PARKER. 1994. Heterosis of growth and milk production
in Philippine Murrah F1 hybrids. Phil. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 20(1 and 2):26-32.

SHRESTHA, N.P. 1992. Genetic evaluation of Philippine carabao (PC), Murrah
carabao (MB) and the F1 hybrids (MB x PC Nili-Ravi). PhD. Thesis. UPLB,
Laguna. 327 pp.

SUPNET, M. and GATMAITAN. 1980. Swine Farming Manual. Phil. Squibb and
Sons, Corp. Pp. 29-59.

VILLEGAS, V.E. and E.C. CRUZ. 1958. Dairy qualities of Philippine cows. Phil.
Agric. 41(9):495-498.
Status of Livestock and Poultry Production in Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.
ALUPIAS, RENE C. MARCH 2008

APPENDIX
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE


I. GENERAL INFORMATION

Name: __________________________________
Gender: ___________
Address: ________________________________
Age: ______________
Civil Status: _____________

Occupation: _______________________
Highest Educational Attainment: ____________________________________________

Years in raising animals




Farm Animal
Number of years
Swine

Cattle

Carabao

Goat

Chicken

Duck

Others (specify)


Classification and number of animals being raised
Animal
Class/Age/Weight
Breed/Strain
Purpose
No. of Animals
Swine
Suckling




Weanling




Grower




Finisher




Sow




Boar



Cattle
Cow




Bull




Calf



Carabao
Calf




Buffalo




Caraballa



Goat
Bucks




Doe




Kid



Chicken
Chicks




Pullets




Hen




Rooster



Duck
Ducklings




Hen




Drake



Others






84

Stock Animal
Class/Age/Weight
Source of
Source of replacement
initial stock
Swine
Suckling



Weanling



Grower



Finisher



Sow



Boar


Cattle
Cow



Bull



Calf


Carabao
Calf



Buffalo



Caraballa


Goat
Bucks



Doe



Kid


Chicken
Chicks



Pullets



Hen



Rooster


Duck
Ducklings



Hen



Drake


Others





Source of capital

How is the project financed?
_____ own money


_____ contract grower
_____ loan from cooperative

_____ other sources (specify)
_____ loan from private individuals

______________________________

II. Housing

A. Kind of housing or rearing
_____ free range

_____ tethering
_____ complete confinement _____ ranching
_____ semi-confinement
_____ other types of rearing (specify) _________________

B. Type of housing materials used
Please describe in detail the materials used


_____ nipa/cogon + bamboo walls


_____ nipa/cogon + walls made of stick


_____ galvanized roof + cemented walls and floor


_____ galvanized roofing + wood walls + cemented floor


85



_____ other types of housing (describe completely)

Roof structure


_____ Gable type

_____ Semi-monitor type


_____ A-type

_____ Broken type


_____ Monitor type

Classification and number of animals being raised
Animal
Class/Age/Weight
Breed/Strain
Purpose
No. of Animals
Swine
Suckling




Weanling




Grower




Finisher




Sow




Boar



Cattle
Cow




Bull




Calf



Carabao
Calf




Buffalo




Caraballa



Goat
Bucks




Doe




Kid



Chicken
Chicks




Pullets




Hen




Rooster



Duck
Ducklings




Hen




Drake



Others


















86

Number of animals per house/pen
Animal
Number of
Area of one
Number of animals per pen
pens/house
pen
Swine























Cattle











Carabao











Goat











Chicken



























Others




Facilities. Identify all fixtures and equipment (include improvised equipment) being used






















87

III. Feeding

Type and source of feeds and frequency of feeding
Animal
Class/Age/Weight
Type of
Source of
Type of
Conventional
Conventional Feeds
Conventional
Feeds
Feeds
Swine
Suckling




Weanling




Grower




Finisher




Sow




Boar



Cattle
Cow




Bull




Calf



Carabao
Calf




Buffalo




Caraballa



Goat
Bucks




Doe




Kid



Chicken
Chicks




Pullets




Hen




Rooster



Duck
Ducklings




Hen




Drake



Others







Identification and processing of indigenous/non-conventional feeds
Type of non-
Source of greater
Season of
Source of information on the
conventional feeds
abundance
abundance
use of non-conventional feeds























































88

Preparation of non-conventional feeds
Type of non-conventional
Method of preparation/processing
Amount in ration
feed

















Use of supplements/additives

Are they using feed supplements or additives of any kind?
Animal Class/Age/ Feed Supplement
Feed Additive
Source of
Weight
Recommendation


Amt
Freq
Amt
Freq

Swine
Suckling






Weanling






Grower






Finisher






Sow






Boar





Cattle
Cow






Bull






Calf





Carabao Calf






Buffalo






Caraballa





Goat
Bucks






Doe






Kid





Chicken Chicks






Pullets






Hen






Rooster





Duck
Ducklings






Hen






Drake





Others








System of feeding

(1) wet group feeding

(4) dry individual feeding

(2) wet individual feeding

(5) free range/choice feeding

(3) dry group feeding

(6) others (specify)





89

Type and source of feeds and frequency of feeding
Animal
Class/Age/Weight
System of Feeding
Frequency of Feeding
Swine
Suckling



Weanling



Grower



Finisher



Sow



Boar


Cattle
Cow



Bull



Calf


Carabao
Calf



Buffalo



Caraballa


Goat
Bucks



Doe



Kid


Chicken
Chicks



Pullets



Hen



Rooster


Duck
Ducklings



Hen



Drake


Others





IV. Breeding

Breeding system
Animal
Breeding System
Mating System
Age at First Breeding
Swine



Native



Grade



Crossbreed



Cattle



Carabao



Goat



Chicken



Duck



Others (Specify)










90

Source of male breeding animals


(1) owned

(3) hired


(3) borrowed
(4) other arrangements (specify) _______________

Animal
Source of Breeding
Terms of payment for Breeding Service
Animal
Swine


Native


Grade


Crossbreed


Cattle


Carabao


Goat


Chicken


Duck


Others (Specify)




Farrowing rate, length of lactation and frequency of breeding to conception
Animal
Farrowing rate
Length of lactation Interval of breeding to
or age at weaning
conception
Swine



Native



Grade



Crossbreed



Cattle



Carabao



Goat



Chicken



Duck



Others (Specify)




















91

Other reproductive data
Animal
Litter Size
Litter Size
No. of
No. of Eggs
No. of
at Birth
at
Eggs/
Hatched
Unhatched
Weaning
Clutch
Eggs
Swine
Alive Dead


Alive
Dead

Native






Grade







Crossbreed






Cattle







Carabao







Goat







Chicken







Duck







Others







(Specify)


V. Herd health management

Sanitation practices: Frequency of bathing/cleaning


(1) everyday
(4) once a month


(2) twice a day
(5) no definite schedule


(3) once a week
(6) do not clean or bath animals
Animal
Bathing
Cleaning Pens
Deworming*
Disinfection*
Waste
Disposal

Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No

Swine









Native









Grade









Crossbreed








Cattle









Carabao









Goat









Chicken









Duck









Others









(Specify)
* - if YES, please specify dewormer and disinfectant used










92

Vaccination practices
Animal
Class/Age/
Vaccination
Source of Vaccine
Weight


Yes
No

Swine
Suckling




Weanling




Grower




Finisher




Sow




Boar



Cattle
Cow




Bull




Calf



Carabao
Calf




Buffalo




Caraballa



Goat
Bucks




Doe




Kid



Chicken
Chicks




Pullets




Hen




Rooster



Duck
Ducklings




Hen




Drake



Others








93

Care of sick animals
Animal Class/Age/ Isolation Medication Culling of Sick
Source of
Weight
or Remedies
Animals
Information
Swine
Suckling





Weanling





Grower





Finisher





Sow





Boar




Cattle
Cow





Bull





Calf




Carabao
Calf





Buffalo





Caraballa




Goat
Bucks





Doe





Kid




Chicken
Chicks





Pullets





Hen





Rooster




Duck
Ducklings





Hen





Drake




Others







VI. Herd management

Care for young pigs
Standard Practice
Yes
No
Removal of transplacental membrane upon expulsion of

piglet
Cutting of the navel cord


Cutting of the needle teeth


Ear notching or tail docking


Provide warm brooder box


Allow pigs to suckle collostrum as soon as possible


Fostering for orphaned pigs


Iron injection*


Feeding piglets starting on the fifth day


Castration of young male pigs**


Weaning***


Gradual change of feed


Provide guard rails to protect piglets




94

* - when and what they inject
** - what they put in the wound after castration
*** - how many days after

VII. Market outlet and consumption

Products and market outlet
Product Frequency
No. of
Marketing Manner of
Price
Market
of Selling
Products
Age
Selling
Outlet
Sold



























































VIII. Support System

Are there technical services or financial support being extended to the farmers
from any agency be it private or government? How often do they avail of these services?


IX. Problems/constraints

- What are the most common problems encountered in raising animals?

- What possible solutions could they suggest to solve these constraints?






Document Outline

  • Status of Livestock and Poultry Productionin Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya
    • BIBLIOGRAPHY
    • TABLE OF CONTENTS
    • INTRODUCTION
    • REVIEW OF LITERATURE
    • METHODOLOGY
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • SUMMARY
    • LITERATURE CITED
    • APPENDIX