BIBLIOGRAPHY DOQUEZA, MERCY B....

BIBLIOGRAPHY

DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012, Growth and Yield Performance of
Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic Fetilizers. Benguet State University,
La Trinidad, Benguet.


Adviser: Franklin G. Bawang, MSc.


ABSTRACT

This study was conducted at the Horticulture laboratory field area of Benguet
State University, La Trinidad, Benguet from December 2011 to March 2012; to determine
the effect of various organic fertilizers on the growth and yield of different Bush snap bean
varieties, to determine the best organic fertilizers appropriate for fresh bush snap
bean pods production, and to determine the economics of using different organic fertilizers
on bush snap bean production.
Results showed significant differences between variety and organic fertilizers
with regards to the percentage of plant survival, weight of marketable pods, yield per

plot, computed yield per hectare, average length of pods, occurrence of insect pests (cut

worm), and the number of laterals per plant. As to the number of days to complete

seedling emergence, weight of non-marketable pods, days from planting to harvesting,

occurrence of insect pests (pod borer), plant height, result showed no significant

differences. However, highest return of investment of 27.79 % was obtained by

Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


growing Cv. Bokod applied with siglat fertilizer at the rate of 2 kg per 5 sq.m plot. All

the three (3) varieties such as Cv. Sablan, Cv. Contender and Cv. Bokod and applied


with BSU compost or alnus fertilizer are the best suited under La Trindad, Benguet

condition for good performance, yield and marketability of bush snap bean.






















Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Soil Analysis

Table 1 shows the soil analysis before and after the study. The soil pH
decreased

slightly from 6.44 to 6.25. On the other hand, the organic matter content decreased from
7.0 to

1.5%, phosphorous, increased from54 to 120 ppm and the potassium increased from
690

to 1,260 ppm. The soil contains high amount of potassium, medium amount of
phosphorous

and it had a sufficient amount of nitrogen.
Table 1.Soil analysis initial and final

pH
OM

P, ppm

K,ppm
INITIAL
6.44
7.0

54

690


FINAL
6.25
1.5

120

1,260








Number of Days to Complete Seedling Emergence

Effect of variety. There were no significant statistical differences observed on
the number of days to complete seedling emergence as affected by the varieties
of bush bean used. However, numerical data in Table 2 showed that seedling of Cv. Sablan
were the earliest to complete the seedling emergence with an average mean of 8.22 days
followed by the Cv. Bokod with an average mean of 8.29 days. While the Cv. Contender
took longer to attain complete seedling emergence with an average mean of 8.50 days.

Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. Results showed that there were
no significant differences on the number of days to complete seedling emergence as
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


influenced by the kinds of organic fertilizers used. But numerically, Siglat fertilizers and
alnus compostseem to have enhance earlier seedling emergence, with a mean of 8.11
days. While delayed Table 2.Number of days to complete seedling emergence was
observed on plants applied with
BSU compost having a mean of 8.67 days.
Interaction effect. There were no significant Interaction effects noted between
the different varieties of bush beans and kinds of organic fertilizers used on the number
of days to complete seedling emergence.


Table 2. Number of days to complete seedling emergence
TREATMENT MEAN
(Days)

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans






0.22a

Contender







8.50a

Bokod beans






8.28a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmers practice






8.56a

BSU compost






88.67a

NBEM







8.22a

Siglat







8.11a

Alnus compost






8.11a

Chicken dung






8.33a
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT




Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Percentage of Plant Survival
Effect of variety. There were no significant differences observed on the
effects of the bush bean varieties on the percentage of plant survival (Table 3).
Means of thevarieties grown ranged from 72.58 to 78.29 percent (%) of plant survival.
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. There were highly significant
differences observed on the percentage of plant survival as affected by different
organic fertilizers applied. Table 3 showed that plants applied with BSU compost had
the highest percentage of plant survival with an average mean of 83.56 % but are
statistically comparable to the plants applied with alnus compost, having a mean of
81.39 % and further comparable to the plant applied with siglat and NBEM fertilizers.
The plants applied with chicken manure obtained the lowest percentage of plant survival
having a mean of 60.66 %.
Interaction effect. There were no significant interaction effects observed between
the different varieties of bush bean and the kinds of organic fertilizers with regards to
percentage of plant survival.
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012



Figure 3. Complete seedling emergence

Table 3. Percentage of plant survival

TREATMENT MEAN (%)

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans






75.52a

Contender







78.29a

Bokod beans






72.58a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmers practice






68.07bc

BSU compost






83.56a

NBEM







78.88ab

Siglat







80.23ab

Alnus compost






81.39a

Chicken dung






60.66c
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT





Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Weight of marketable pods (kg)


Effect of variety. Table 4 shows that there were no significant differences on
theweight of marketable pods as affected by the varieties of bush beans grown.
However, numerical data showed that plants of Cv.Bokod produced higher weight of
marketable pods with an average mean of 2.34 kg per 1x3m plot, while lower yield
was observed on the Contender having a mean of only 2.13 kg per plot.
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizer. There were significant differences noted
on the effects of organic fertilizers on the weight of marketable pods as shown in
Table 4. Results show that , plants applied with BSU compost and alnus compost
produced the highest weight of marketable pods with an average mean of (2.50
kg). However, it was statistically comparable to the plants applied with siglat (2.48 kg)
and NBEM fertilizers (2.29 Kg), while plants applied with chicken manure h ad the
lowest weight of marketable pods with a mean of only 1.75 kg.

Interaction effect. There were no significant interaction effects noted between
the different bush bean varieties and different organic fertilizers with regards to the
weight of marketable pods per 1x3m plot.





Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Table 4.Weight of marketable pods per 1x3m
TREATMENT MEAN (Kg)

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 2.23a

Contender 2.13a

Bokod beans 2.34a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmer practice 1.87b

BSU compost 2.50a

NBEM 2.29a

Siglat 2.48a

Alnus compost 2.50a

Chicken dung 1.75b

Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT


Weight of Non-marketable Pods (kg)

Effects of variety. Table 5 reveals that there were no significant differences on
the weight of non-marketable pods as affected by different bush bean varieties used
in the study. However, results showed that Cv. Contender and Cv. Bokod attained
slightly higher weight of non-marketable pods over the sablan variety.
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizer. There were no statistical differences on
the effect of organic fertilizers on the weight of non-marketable pods. However, results
showed that plants applied with BSU compost, siglat and chicken manure had highest
weight of non-marketable pods as compared to the other fertilizers treatments.
Interaction effect. There were no significant interaction effect, noted between
the different varieties and kinds of organic fertilizers application.

Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Table 5.Weight of non- marketable pods per 1x3m plot
TREATMENT MEAN (kg)

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 0 .363a

Contender 0 .380a

Bokod beans 0 .380a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmer practice 0.361 a

BSU compost 0.383a

NBEM 0.361 a

Siglat 0.383 a

Alnus compost 0.377a

Chicken dung 0 .383a
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT

Days from Planting to Harvesting

Effect of variety. Table 6 shows that there were no significant differences
between the two factors: variety and different organic fertilizers. Means ranged from
67 to 69.67 days to harvesting of pods.
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. As presented table 6, results showed
that there were no significant differences on the number of days from planting to
harvesting. However, plants applied with the BSU compost and NBEM fertilizers
promote earlier harvesting of pods with a mean of 67.56 and 67.67 days; respectively.
Interaction effect. There were no significant interaction effect between the
varieties and different organic fertilizers with regards to the durations from planting
to harvesting stage.



Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Table 6. Days from planting to harvesting
TREATMENT MEAN (Days)

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 68.06a

Contender 68a

Bokod beans 68.22a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmer practice 68.67a

BSU compost 67.56a

NBEM 67.67a

Siglat 68a

Alnus compost 67.22a

Chicken dung 69.44a
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT


Yield Per Plot (kg)


Effect of variety. Table 7 shows that there were no significant differences, noted
on the effects of the different bush bean varieties with regards to the yield per plot.
However, Cv.Sablan had the highest harvested pods with a mean of 2.59 kg, followed by
Cv. Contender (2.51 kg).
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. Highly Significant differences were
observed on the total yield of pods per plot (kg) from March to April (Table 7). Plants
applied with BSU compost and alnus compost had the heaviest weight of pods both having
an average mean of 2.88 kg but was comparable to the plants applied with Siglat and
NBEM fertilizers.
However, plants applied with fertilizers using the farmer’s practice and chicken
manure had the lowest yield producing means of 2.22 kg and 2.13 kg; respectively.
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Interaction effect. There were no significant interaction effect between the
varieties and different kinds organic fertilizers with regards to the total yield produced
per plot.


Table 7. Yield per plot
TREATMENT MEAN (kg)

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 2.59a

Contender 2.51a

Bokod beans 2.72a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmer practice 2.22b

BSU compost 2.88a

NBEM 2.65a

Siglat 2.87a

Alnus compost 2.88a

Chicken dung 2.13b
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT


Computed Yield (tons/ha)

Effect of variety. As presented in table 8, results showed that there were no
significantdifferences observed on the computed yield per hectare as affected by the
different varieties of bush beans used in the study. However, the Cv. Bokod had the
heaviest computed yield per hectare with a mean of 5.44 tons while Cv. Contender
had the lowest computed yield per hectare with a mean of 5.01 tons. Ideally, bush bean
showed yield 5.44 tons/ ha.
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. Results showed that there were
highly significant differences on the computed yield (tons/ha) as affected by the
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


different organic fertilizers. Plants applied with BSU compost obtained the heaviest
yield per hectare with an average mean of 5.77 tons but was statistically comparable
to the plants applied with alnus compost, siglat fertilizers and NBEM fertilizers
having means of 5.76, 5.73 and 5.30, respectively. The lowest total computed yield
(tons/ha) was obtained from plants applied with chicken manure and plants fertilized
using the farmer’s practice.
Interaction effect. There were no significant interaction effect between the two
factors: bush bean variety and organic fertilizers on the computed yield (tons/ha) of bush
bean yield range from 6.13 to 3.63 tons/ha.

Table 8. Computed yield per hectare of Bush snap bean
TREATMENTS MEAN (tons/ ha)
Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 5.18a

Contender 5.01a

Bokod beans 5.44a

Kind of Organic Fertilizer

Farmer practice 4.44b

BSU compost 5.77a

NBEM 5.30a

Siglat 5 .73a

Alnus compost 5.76a

Chicken dung 4.27b
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT
Average Length of Pods (cm)


Effect of variety. Highly significant differences were observed on the
average length of pods as affected by different varieties of bush beans. Results showed
Table 9 that Cv. Contender had longer pods with an average mean of (15.58 cm) as
compared to Cv. Sablan (14.43 cm) and CV. Bokod (14.97 cm). It was further observed
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


that the pods of Cv. Sablan and Cv.Bokod produced slender and shiny pods compared to
Contender.
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. Results showed that there were no
significant statistical differences observed on the average length of pods of bush
bean as affected by different organic fertilizers. Plants applied with BSU compost
produced longer pods with an average mean of 15.31cm while the rest treatments mean
range from 14.89 to 14.96 cm but not with the other treatments.
Interaction effect. There were no significant interaction effects observed between
the different varieties of bush bean and different organic fertilizers with regards to the
average length of pods.

Table 9.Average length of pods
TREATMENT MEAN (cm)

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 14.43c

Contender 15.58a

Bokod beans 14.97b

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmer practice 14.93a

BSU compost 15.31a

NBEM 14.93a

Siglat 14.96a

Alnus compost 14.89a

Chicken dung 14.94a
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT




Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Occurrence of Insect Pests (Cutworm)

Effect of variety. There were no significant differences noted on the different
varieties with regards to the occurrence of insect pests particularly cut worm. Based
on the results, all the varieties studied exhibited mild resistance to cut worm.
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. Table 10 shows that there were
significant differences noted on the occurrence of insects as affect by different organic
fertilizers applied. Application of alnus compost, BSU compost, NBEM and siglat
fertilizers on bush bean showed less infestation where 1-25 % of the total population
were affected by the cut worm cut worm in which it is mild of resistant. While the plants
applied with chicken dung fertilizers had more cutworm infestation where 26 -50% of
the total plants are affected indicating moderate resistance.
Interaction effect. There was no significant interaction effects between the two
factors: Bush bean varieties and different kinds o f organic fertilizers applied with
regards to the occurrence
Occurrence of Insect Pests (Pod Borer).
Effect of variety. Results in table 10 b Showed that there were no significant
differences on the occurrence of insect pest (pod borer) on the different varieties of
bush beans. Based on the results, the three varieties grown exhibited mild resistance to
pod borer. of insect pests (cutworm) during the study.
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. Based on the statistical analysis, there
were no significant differences noted on the different varieties with regards to the
occurrence of insect pests particularly pod borer.
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Interaction effect. There was no significant analysis interaction effect between
the two factors: varieties and organic fertilizers with regards to the occurrence of insect
pest (pod borrer) during the study

Table 10 a. Occurrence of insect pest (cut worm)

TREATMENT MEAN (Rating Index)

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 2.44a

Contender 2.28a

Bukod beans 2.39a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmer practice 2.78ab

BSU compost 2.11c

NBEM 2.11c

Siglat 2.22bc

Alnus compost 2c

Chicken dung 3a
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT (Menes 2010).


Scale
Description



Remarks
1
No infection



Highly resistance
2
1-25 % of the total plant infected

Mild resistance
3
26-50 % of the total plant infected
Moderate resistance
4
51-75 % of the total plant infected
Susceptible
5
76-100 % of the total plant infected
Very susceptible

Table 10 b. Occurrence of insect pest (pod borer)

TREATMENT MEAN (Rating Index)
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012



Varieties of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 2.39a

Contender 2.56a

Bokod beans 2.56a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmer practice 2.44a

BSU compost 2.56a

NBEM 2.33a

Siglat 2.67a

Alnus compost 2.56a

Chicken dung 2.44a
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT (Menes 2010).

Scale
Description



Remarks

1
No infection



Highly resistance
2
1-25 % of the total plant infected

Mild resistance
3
26-50 % of the total plant infected
Moderate resistance
4
51-75 % of the total plant infected
Susceptible
5
76-100 % of the total plant infected
Very susceptible
Plant Height at First Harvesting of Pods (cm)
Effect of variety. There were no significant differences on plant height at first
harvesting of pods as affected by the different varieties, however Cv.Bokod beans
produced the tallest plants with a mean of 37.57 cm, but were not significantly different
with the other fertilized treatments.
Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. As presented in table 11, results showed that
there were no significant differences on plant height a first harvesting of pods as affected
by different organic fertilizers. However, plants applied with fertilizers using the
farmer’s practice produced the tallest plant s with an average mean of 37.53 cm, as
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


compared to the other treatments but were statistically comparable to the fertilized
treatments.
Interaction effect. Statistical analysis showed that there were no significant
effects of the two factors; bush bean variety and kinds of organic fertilizers on plant
height at first harvesting of pods.
Table11. Plant height at first harvesting of pods

TREATMENT MEAN (cm)

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 36a

Contender 36.27a

Bokod beans 37.57a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmer practice 37.53a

BSU compost 36.97a

NBEM 36.42a

Siglat 36.01a

Alnus compost 36.12a

Chicken dung 36.63a
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT
Number of Laterals Per Plant at First Harvesting of Pods
Effect of variety. The number of laterals at first harvesting of pods is
presented in table 12. Results showed that Cv.Contender produced the highest number of
laterals at first harvesting of pods with a mean of 5.30 but was not significantly
different with the other varieties grown. The results may imply that the three varieties
of bush beans have the same number of laterals produced at first harvesting of
pods.
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Effect of the kinds of organic fertilizers. Results showed that there were
highly significant differences observed on the number of laterals at first harvesting
of pods as affected by different organic fertilizers. Plants applied with BSU compost
produced the highest number of laterals per plant at first harvesting with a mean
of 5.77 but are statistically comparable to the plants applied with siglat, NBEM
and alnus compost all having a of mean 5.31, 5.27 and 5.22 respectively. While the
plants applied with chicken dung produced the lowest laterals per plants at first
harvesting of pods with a mean of 4.62.
Interaction effect. There were no significant interaction effects between the
different bush bean varieties and the different kinds of organic fertilizers on the number
of laterals counted at first harvesting of pods


Table12. Number of laterals per plant at first harvesting of pods.
TREATMENT MEAN

Variety of Bush Bean

Sablan beans 5.27a

Contender 5.30a

Bokod beans 5.12a

Kind of Organic Fertilizers

Farmer practice


BSU compost 5.76a

NBEM 5.27a

Siglat 5.31a

Alnus compost 5.22a

Chicken dung 4.62b
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT



Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Cost and Return Analysis


Table 13 shows that Cv.Bokod applied with siglat fertilizer had the highest return
ofinvestment (ROI) of 27.79 %, followed by Cv. Sablan applied with Siglat fertilizers
with 20.41%. A negative ROI was obtained in Cv. Contender applied with the different
organic fertilizers, Cv. Bokod and Cv. Sablan applied with the farmer’s practice
and chicken, manure fertilizers (Table 13).

Table 13. Cost and return analysis.



Variety
Cv. Sablan
Cv. Contender

Fertilizers
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T1
T2
T3











Marketable
5.75
7.5
6.8
8.15
7.6
5.25
6.45
7.25
7.75
yield (Kg/
1xm plot

Sales (PhP)
143.7 187.5 170
203.75
190
131.25
129
145
155
Farm inputs









Cv. Sablan
38
38
38
38
38
38
-
-
-

Cv.
-
-
-
-
-
-
35
35
35
Contender

Cv. Bokod
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Chicken
20
-
-
-
-
52
20
-
-
dung
BSU
-
59
-
-
-
-
-
59
-
compost
NBEM
-
-
48.67
-
-
-
-
-
48.67
Siglat
-
-
-
48.67
-
-
-
-
-
Alnus
-
-
-
-
44
-
-
-
-
T- 14-14-14 28.50 15.75 15.75
15.75
15.75
15.75
28.50 15.75
15.75
Urea
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
Insecticides 16.50 16.50 16.50
16.50
16.50
16.50
16.50 16.50
16.50
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


Fungicides
141
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
Others
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30










Total
153
179.5
169.22 169.22
164.55
172.55
150.3 176.22
166.22
expenses
5
Net income -9.25 7.95
.78
34.53
25.45
-41.3
-21.3
-31.55
-11.2










ROI (%)
-6.05
4.43
.46
20.41
15.47
-23.93
-14.7
-17.87
-6.75










RANK
12
8
9
2
3
18
14
15
13


Table 13. Continued...




Cv. Bokod
T4
T5
T6
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
6.5
7.9
6.85
6.6
7.75
7.55
8.65
7
6.65
130
158
137
165
193.75
188.75 216.25 175
166.25









-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35
35
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
38
38
38
38
38
38
-
-
52
20
-
-
-
-
52
-
-
-
-
59
-
-
-
-
48.57
-
-
-
-
48.57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
48.67
-
-
-
44
-
-
-
-
-
44
-
15.75
15.75
15.75
15.75
15.75
15.75
15.75
15.75
15.75
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
16.50
16.50
16.50
16.50
16.50
16.50
16.50
16.50
16.50
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
30
30
30 30
30
30
30
30
30
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


166.22
161.55
169.55 153.30
174.55
169.22 169.22 164.55
172.55









-36.22
-3.55
-32.55 -11.7
19.2
19.53
47.33
10.45
-6.3
-21.79
-2.19
-19.19 7.63
11
11.54
27.79
6.53
-3.65
17
10
16
6
5
4
1
7
11

Note. Selling price Cv. Sablan and Cv. Bokod was Php 2 5.00/ kg, Cv. Contender
Php 20.00 kg



















Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

Summary

The study was conducted to determine the effect of various organic fertilizers on
the growth and yield of different bush bean varieties, determine the best organic fertilizer
appropriate for fresh pod bean production and determine the economics of using organic
fertilizers in bush bean production under La Trinidad, Benguet condition. The study was
conducted at the Horticulture laboratory area at BSU LaTrinidad, Benguet from December
2011 to March 2012.
Results showed highly significant differences between the two factors: variety and
organic fertilizers. Cv. Contender applied with BSU compost had the highest percentage
of plant survival as compared to the other variety applied with different organic fertilizers
but are statistically comparable to plants applied with siglat fertilizers. For the days from
planting to harvesting, results showed that all varieties had similar days to attain harvesting
stage while plants applied with chicken manure took longer days to form flowers and attain
harvesting stage while bush beans applied with alnus leaves were the earliest to attain
flowering and harvesting stage but are comparable to the rest of the treatments used.
Cultivar Contender applied with BSU compost produced the longest pods at
harvesting stage but are statistically the same with the other treatments while Cv. sablan
applied with chicken manure had the shortest pods at harvesting stage. As to the average
number of lateral branches at harvesting stage, result showed significant differences
wherein Cv. Contender of bush beans applied with chicken manure had the most number
of lateral branches produced. Base on the results, Cv. Contender applied with BSU compost
had longer days to complete seedling emergence, and those applied with alnus compost
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


showed mild resistance to insect pest particularly cutworm, while Cv. Sablan applied with
chicken dung had the more number of plants affected but in all indications, all the plants
are mild resistant to cutworm while in pod borer results showed in table 10 b. no significant
differences. As noted between the two factors: varieties and kinds of organic fertilizers
used in the study showed that all plants exhibited mild resistant to pod borer. Cv. Bokod
applied with siglat fertilizers produced tallest plant at first harvesting of pods compared to
the other treatments.
With regards to the weight of marketable pods, Cv. Bokod applied with BSU and
alnus compost had a significantly higher weight of marketable pods as compared to other
varieties applied with different organic fertilizers. As to the non-marketable pods, Cv.
Bokod and Cv. Contender varieties applied with chicken manure, sigalt and BSU compost
had a higher weight of non-marketable pods as compared to the rest of the varieties
evaluated. For the total yield per plot and total computed yield per hectare, highly
significant results were observed in bokod variety applied with BSU and alnus compost
fertilizers out yielding the rest of the varieties evaluated. Based on findings of the study,
the application of siglat fertilizers to Cv. Bokod gave the highest return of investment of
33.88%.

Conclusions


Based on the results presented and discussed, all the bush bean varieties applied
with the different organic fertilizers were adapted under La Trinidad, Benguet condition.
Cultivar Contender applied with BSU compost had the highest percentage of plant survival.
Cultivar Bokod applied with BSU compost and siglat fertilizers had the highest weight of
marketable pods while cultivar Sablan applied with NBEM fertilizers had the least weight
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


of non-marketable pods. Cultivar . Contender applied with alnus compost and BSU
compost were the earliest to attain the harvesting stage. Cv. Bokod applied with BSU and
alnus compost produced the highest yield per plot and also had the highest computed yield
per hectare (tons). Cv. Contender applied with BSU compost produced the longest pods
harvested. It was also observed that Cv. Bokod applied with chicken dung was not resistant
to cut worm insects. Cv. Bokod applied with chicken manure + T-14 produced the tallest
plants. Cv. Contender applied with BSU compost had the highest number of lateral
branches. Better growth and yield of bush beans could be obtained with the application of
siglat fertilizers in the soil having a pH of 6.44 to 6.25, 7.0 to 1.5% organic matter, 54
to120 ppm phosphorus, and 690 to 1,260 ppm of potassium.
Recommendation
Based on the findings of this study, it is therefore recommended all the three (3)
variety applyied with BSU compost or alnus fertilizer are the best suited under La Trindad,
Benguet condition for good performance, yield and marketability of bush bean . It was
futher found that Cv. sablan and Cv. Bokod beans are appropriate for fresh pod bean
production while the Cv. Contender is good for seeds production.









Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


LITERATURE CITED


BRADY, N.C. 1974. The Nature and Properties of Soils. New York: McMillan Publishing

Co.,Inc. P. 652.

BRADY, N.C. and R.R.WELL.2000.The Nature and Properties of Soils. Upper
SaddleRiver, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., Prentice Hall.

CHOUNG M.G. B.R; CHOI ANY-N.Y.H CHU; Y.SCHO.2003 Anthocyanin profile of

Korean cultivated Kidney bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) j. Agric Food Chem. 19
“51 (24); 7040- 3.2006.

DELA CRUZ, L. 1953. The effects of seed size on yield of bush sitao, cowpea, bush lima
and snap bean.BS Thesis. Hort.BSU, La Trinidad, Benguet.P. 445.

DONAHUE, R. C. 1972.Our Soils and Their Management. Danville, Illinois: The
Interstate
Printer and Pub. Inc.P. 101.

ERASQUIN, N.B. 1981. Fundamental of Horticulture.3rd Edition. New York: McGraw
Hill. Inc. Pp.66-70.

FOLLET, R.H. 1981. Fertilizer and Soil Amendments. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Pp.

459-460.

GEORGE, R. 1985. Vegetable Seed Production. New York: Longman Inc. P. 194.

GONZALES, E.L. 1983. Characterization and yield evaluation of common varieties of
snap bean. BS Thesis. (Mountain State Agriculture College, La Trinidad, Benguet. P.30.

KNOTT, J.E and J.R. DEANON. 1967. Vegetable Production in Southeast Asia,
University of
the Philippines, College of Agriculture, Los Banos Laguna. Pp.70-
96.

KINOSHITA, K.L 1972. Vegetable Production in the Sub-tropics and Tropics, Tokyo,
Japan: Overseas Corporation Agency. Pp.374-375.

KUDAN, S.L. 1995. Performance of snap bean as influence by seeds from different pod
location and maturity seeds. BSU Graduate School Research Journal. 5:70-96

MARTIN, J.H. and W.H. LEONARD. 1970. Principles of Crop Production. New York:
MC
Millan Co. P. 681.

MENES, A. 2010.Response of Pole Beans to Animal Manure Application under Organic

Production at La TrinidadaBenguet.BS Thesis.Benguet State University. La

Trinidad Benguet. P. 3.
Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012


PCARRD, R.C. 1982. The Philippine Recommends for Organic Fertilizer Production and

Utilization. Pp 450.

SANCHEZ, A.D. 1980. Properties and Management of Soil in the Tropics New York: John

Wiley and Sons. Pp. 630

TINDAL, H.D. 1983. Vegetable in the Tropics. Hampshire: Macmillan Educ. Ltd. P. 281-

283.

THOMPSON, H.C. 1978. Vegetable Crops. New York: McGraw-hill Co. P. 543.

THOMPSON, J.H. and C. KELLY. 1959. Vegetable Crops. 5thed. New York: McGraw
Hill Book Co. Inc. P. 151.

WALLACE, DH. 1997. Genetic Environment and Plant Response. In R.C. Villarreal and

D.H.Wallace edition.Vegetable Training Manual.UPLB College,Laguna.

WATTS, R. L. 1992. Vegetable Gardening New York; Orange Judd. P. 351-358.

WARE,G.W. 1980. Producing Vegetable Crops, Illinosis, The Inter State Printers and

Publisher, Inc, P.41.










Growth and Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean as Affected by Different Organic
Fetilizers | DOQUEZA, MERCY B. APRIL 2012