BIBLIOGRAPHY
WAYAN, ALONES S. AUGUST 2009. Evaluation of Sorghum Entries
Intercropped with Bush Bean Under La Trinidad Condition. Benguet State University, La
Trinidad, Benguet.
Adviser: Esther Josephine D. Sagalla, MSc.
ABSTRACT
This study was conducted to identify the most suitable cropping system for
sorghum; to determine the best sorghum entry based on the yield and resistance to
disease; and to determine the interaction between cropping system and sorghum only
under La Trinidad, Benguet condition.
Monocropping of sorghum resulted in higher plant survival, wider stems and high
grain and stalk yield. Intercropping of sorghum with bush bean on the other hand,
resulted in greater resistance to corn borer.
Entries ICSU 700 and ICSU 93046 had the highest stalk yield and tolerance to
kernel smut and corn borer. In addition, SPV 422 had wide stems and had the highest
grain yield per plot.

---

TABLES OF CONTENTS




Page
Bibliography…………………………………………………………..
i

Abstract ……………………………………………………………….
i

Table of contents ……………………………………………………..
ii



INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………
1

REIEW OF LITERATURE …………………………………………..
3

Description of intercropping ……………………………...........
3

Crop combinations in intercropping …………………………...
3

Effect of intercropping …………………………………………
5

Legumes as intercrop …………………………………………..
6

Uses of sorghum ……………………………………………….
6

MATERIALS AND METHODS …………………………………….
8

Land preparation and
8
experimental design ……………………………………………

Sowing and management ………………………………………
8

Data gathered …………………………………………………..
9

Data analysis …………………………………………………...
12

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ……………………………………
13

Rainfall, relative humidity,

and temperature …………………………………………………
13
Plant survival ……………………………………………............
14
Plant vigor ………………………………………………………
15
ii

---

Number of days from sowing to emergence,

tillering, heading, ripening, and harvesting……………………...
18
Number of tiller ………………………………………………..
18
Final plant height ……………………………………………….
20

Stem diameter …………………………………………………..
20

Corn borer infestation …………………………………………..
23

Kernel smut infection …………………………………………..
24

Length of the panicle ……………………………………………
27

Stalk yield ………………………………………………………
28

Weight of 100 grains ……………………………………………
28

Grain yield per plot ……………………………………………..
29

Sugar content ……………………………………………………
30

Grain moisture content …………………………………………
33

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION

AND RECOMMENDATION …………………………………..........
35


Summary ………………………………………………………..
35

Conclusion ………………………………………………...........
36

Recommendation ……………………………………………….
36

LITERATURE CITED ……………………………………………….
37



APPENDICES …………………………………………………..........
39

iii

---

INTRODUCTION


Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is an important substitute for staple food in
developing countries or in areas with limited supply of rice. Additionally sorghum is a
good substitute for corn as feed for animal production purposes (Aday, 2008 ).

However sorghum when planted needs high amount of nitrogen fertilizers to
produce high yield (Ahmad et al, 2007) thus, if planted as monocrop and if planted
continuously, it may become a major cause of declining soil fertility. One good strategy
to produce and benefit the sorghum while conserving the productivity of the soil is
intercropping.
Intercropping is a wise management system for increasing income in sorghum
production and increasing soil productivity. Economic analysis of intercropping sorghum
with different legumes reveal higher net income compared to sole cropping of sorghum
(Ahmad et al, 2007)

In addition, legumes such as bush bean which fix atmospheric nitrogen, serve as
good intercrops to meet the nitrogen requirements of sorghum. Higher yield of sorghum
intercropped with legumes resulted in studies done at Pakistan over time due to efficient
utilization of soil nutrients (Ahmad et al, 2007).

Limited research work, however, has been done to explore the potential benefit of
intercropping sorghum and bush bean in La Trinidad thus; it is the aim of this study to
specifically look into the feasibility of sorghum intercropping.
The study was conducted to:
1. identify the most suitable cropping system for sorghum;
2. determine the best sorghum entry based on yield and resistance to disease; and
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

2
3. determine the interaction between cropping system and sorghum entries.


The study was conducted at Balili, La Trinidad, Benguet condition from October
2008 to April 2009.



















Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Description of Intercropping
Intercropping is growing of two or more crops together on the same piece of land
(Bautista, et al 1983). Gupta (1986) define it as a planting of two or more species
simultaneously in alternate rows or in separate rows on the same field. Crops need not be
sown at the same time and their harvest time may differ, but they usually are
simultaneous for most of their growing period.
Intercropping utilize the garden area even more intensively. It is essentially a
system whereby a smaller quick growing vegetable is planted in the same area and time
as one larger and more slowly developing. Intercropping is the most manageable kind of
double copping under ordinary condition of soil and moisture (Bautista, et al 1983).
Intercropping offers two important advantages to subsistence oriented farm
household. First, it enhances the diversity of farm products, a very desirable feature for a
farm. Secondly, intercropping increases the stability of farm productivity so that the yield
even during dad times is still enough to satisfy the minimum requirement (Gomez and
Gomez 1983). Gupta (1986) added that another advantage of intercropping is increased
productivity of complimentary component crop. Well designed intercropping combines
component crops that use growth resources more fully than would single crop.

Crop Combinations in Intercropping
Bautista et.al (1983) stated that the crops used as intercrops to coconut are fruit
crops such as Lansones, Banana, Pineapple; Plantation crops such as black pepper,
coffee, cacao; Vegetable crops such as Bush sitao, cowpea, ginger, gabi, sitao, eggplant,
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

4

patola and agronomic crops such as cassava and peanut. This intercropping resulted to
increased yield of coconut due to more careful attention given to weeding, cultivation and
fertilization of the intercrop. ICRISAT (1981) added that the best intercrops to use are
beans, tomatoes, cabbage and corn. Moreover, for sorghum the recommended intercrops
are grain legumes such as cowpea, mungbean, black bean, or groundnut, which do not
generally affect the yield but help to obtain additional return.
Wood (2008) stated that the most common combinations for intercropping are
maize-beans, maize-soybean, maize-rice, maize-sorghum, sorghum-millet, sweet potato-
sugarcane and cotton-peanut. The net result of such combinations can vary widely from
productive to unproductive compared to sole planting of some crops. Fertilization of
plants as well as many other factors influences the result.
PCARRD (1986) stated that intercropping with corn-ipil-ipil has increased corn
yield in Cebu from 300- 1500 kg/ ha because soil fertility was improved and soil erosion
was reduced. Wood (2008) added that greater crop density and protection against wind
and water erosion are achieved.
Bautista, et al (1983) mention that intercropping of leguminous and non-
leguminous vegetables is an example of a good cropping system that will conserve and
improve the nutritional status of the soil, add organic matter to improve soil structure,
protect the land from erosion for maximum crop growth and development, and,
ultimately, give high yield.
Ahmad, et al (2007) stated that the highest gross benefits of RS 5920 ha -1 was
obtained from Sorghum + Cowpeas intercropping system followed by Sorghum +
Sespania (RS 42057 ha -1). However, the sorghum + chisterbean intercropping system
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

5

gave the minimum gross benefits of RS 38100 ha -1. The total variable cost of
intercropping of sorghum + cowpeas, sorghum + sesbania and sorghum + mungbean was
cost of RS.6820, 5920 and 5859 ha -1, respectively.

Effect of Intercropping
Gomez and Gomez (1983) reported that competition effect is most pronounced in
intercropping or relay cropping, when two or more species compete not only for sunshine
and carbon dioxide in the air but also for water and nutrients. Wood (2008) added that
crops of different maturities have varying peak requirements for water, fertilizer, light
and space. Thus, there may be less competition between different crops than there is in
planting of identical plants. Moreover, disease and insect infestation of intercropped
plants tend to be less.
PCARRD (1983) reported that intercropping significantly affected the net income
derived per unit area. Gupta (1986) mentioned that the beneficial effect of mixed or
intercropping system maybe increased because one crop might survive and give a good
harvest and income. Intercropping legumes such as cowpea, peanut, mungbean, and
string bean to corn resulted to high profit.
PCARRD (1983) observed that intensive cropping of soybean, mungbean, peanut
and sorghum for five consecutive planting resulted in reduction of grain yield, plant
height and crop stand. The yield reduction was attributed mainly to increased incidence
of stem and root rotting coupled with early and severe incidence of foliar diseases. The
injuries of intensive cropping could be partially alleviated by sequential cropping. The
yield of sorghum and stylo were higher in monocropping than in growing them as
intercrops. Stylo plants intercropped with sorghum were taller because of limited light
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

6

intensity; the herbage yield of stylo was increased by extending a plant growth period by
three weeks after harvesting the sorghum intercrop.
PCARRRD (1986) found that multiple cropping promoted great diversity of
insect pest types which tend to resulted in biological stability. Some insect served as
predator of other insect pest therefore controlling pest outbreak. Wood (2008) added that
multiple cropping ensures greater use of available solar energy in the dry season,
improved pest control, greater insurance against crop failure, better nutrional balance for
families because of the wider variety of food produced, and a more stable farm income.

Legumes as Intercrop
Legumes are good for intercropping despite the low nutrient consumption. In
addition, legumes supply nitrogen to the soil because it is associated with nitrogen fixing
bacteria. Legumes as intercrop can capture light that filters down through the canopy to
shade the ground. The shading discourages weeds from growing (Bautista, et al., 1983).

Uses of Sorghum
Sweet sorghum is used as base material for fermentation and brewing, as edible
syrups and crystalline dextrose, as cheap source of ethanol in the production of biofuel
(Aday, 2008).
Grain sorghum is used to replace corn grits in the brewing and distilling
industries, and in the manufacture of alcohol. The grain of waxy varieties was used for
extraction of starch to manufacture a satisfactory substitute for minuto tapioca. Other
important uses are manufacture of starch, glucose, oil, gluten feeds and other products
similar to those produced in the wet milling of corn (Martin, et al., 1996). Aday (2008)
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

7

added that the grain sorghum is used for human food. Elsewhere it is generally feed to
livestock or poultry.


Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Land Preparation and Experimental Design
An area of 360m² was thoroughly prepared and was divided into three blocks.
Each block was further subdivided into 12 plots each measuring 1m x 10m. The
treatments were laid-out following split-plot design with three replications.
The treatments were:
Main Plot (Cropping system)

Code

Description

CS
1

Sorghum
only

CS
2

Sorghum + bush bean
Sub Plot (Sorghum Entries)

Code

Entry


E1 SPV 422


E2 M552


E3 ICSU 700


E4 ICSU 93046


E5 ICBR 93034


E6 Bakakew

Sowing and Management
Two to three seeds per hill were planted at a distance of 30 cm x 45 cm between
two rows and hills. Bush bean seed were planted between rows of sorghum.

Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

9

Illustration:
Legend:
x-bush
bean
o-sorghum








45 cm


X
X

X X


O O

O 30 cm

X

X
X X

All recommended cultural management was uniformly followed in all treatments
such as irrigation, hilling up, weeding, and others.

Data Gathered
A. Sorghum
1. Plant survival. The data was computed using the formula:
% Plant Survival= Number of plant survival x 100
Total number of plant
2. Plant vigor. The plants were rated at 45, 60, 75 and 90 DAP using the
following scale (CIP, 1984):
Scale Description Remarks
1 Plants are weak with few stems Poor vigor
and leaves; very pale
2 Plants are weak with few thin Less vigorous
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

10

stems and leaves
3 Better than less vigorous Vigorous
4 Plants are moderately strong with Moderately vigorous
robust stems and leaves
5 Plants are strong with robust stem Highly vigorous
and leaves; leaves are light to dark
Green in color
3. Number of days from sowing to emergence. This was recorded by counting the
number of days from sowing to emergence when at least 50% of the seed sown has
emerged.
4. Number of days from sowing to tilling. This was taken by counting the number
of days from sowing to tilling when at least 50% or more produce tillers.
5. Number of tillers. This was taken when the flag leaf of the sorghum came out
using ten sample hills.
6. Number of days from sowing to heading. This was recorded by counting the
number of days from sowing to heading when at least 50% or more of the plant produced
head.
7. Number of days from sowing to ripening. This was done when 50% of the
grains in the panicle matured.
8. Number of days from sowing to harvesting. This was recorded by counting the
number of days from sowing to harvesting.
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

11

9. Stem diameter (cm). The stem diameter was measured at the internodes of the
fifth leaf down from the flag leaf taken from ten randomly picked plants per plot using
Vernier caliper.
10. Final plant height (cm). This was measured from the base to the tip of ten
sample plants randomly picked per plot at harvest

11. Insect infestation (corn borer). Insect infestation was rated at 45, 60, 75and 90
DAP using the following scale (Tugui-in, 1997):

Scale Description Remarks

1 Sound Healthy, no insect change

3 Slight 1 to 3 leaves dam

5 Moderate 4 to 6 leaves damage

7 Severe More damaged

9 Skeletonized Plants is fully damaged
12. Disease infection (kernel smuts). This was recorded by observing the disease
affecting the sorghum plant. Disease infestation was recorded by using the following
scale (Catalino, 1996):
Scale Description Remarks
1 Resistant No infection
2 Moderate Severe infection
3 Weak Highly infected
13. Length of panicle (cm). This was measured from the base to the tip of the
panicles of ten samples per plot at harvest.
14. Stalk yield (kg). The weight of stalks per plot was taken.
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

12

15. Weight of 100 grains (gm). This was obtained by average weighing in grams
100 grains (14% moisture content) per plot.
16. Total yield of sorghum per plot (kg). This was taken by weighing and
recording the yield per plot.
17. Stalk sugar content. The sugar content of the stems of ten sample plants was
taken using digital refractometer.
18. Grain moisture content. This was taken after subjecting the grains to 100 o C
in 24 hours. The moisture content was computed using the formula:
MC= Fresh weight- Oven dry weight x 100
Oven dry weight


B. Bush Bean
1. Total weight of marketable green pods (kg). The marketable green pods were
harvested at maturity and their weight was recorded for yield computation. Pods were
considered marketable if they are straight, tender and free from insect damage and
diseases.
2. Total weight of non- marketable pods (kg). Non-marketable pods include those
that were abnormal in shape, over matured and affected by pest and diseases.

Data Analysis

All the quantitative data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for
split plot design with three replications. The significant differences among the treatment
means were tested using the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 5% level of
significance.
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

RESULT AND DISCUSSION


Rainfall, Relative Humidity, and Temperature


Temperature ranged from 13oC to 24oC, relatively humidity is from 75% to 89%
while rainfall amount was recorded at average of 4.13mm. Total sunshine duration
ranged from 267 to 393 kj from October to April.

Sorghum grows best in areas with a mean temperature of about 37oC (Martin, et
al., 1976). The average temperature of 15oC during the conduct of the study may affect
stalk and grain yield of the entries.

Table 1. Rainfall, relative humidity, and temperature from October 2008 to April 2009
at La Trinidad, Benguet. Pag-asa (2008-2009)
RAINFALL RELATIVE
TEMPERATURE SUNSHINE
MONTHS
AMOUNT
HUMIDITY
DURATION

(MM) (%)
MAX
MIN (KJ)
October 7.7
85 24.4 21.4 319.6
November 3.10
75.2
25.2 16.2
304.6
December 0.1
82
24.4 13.6 369.8
January 0.03
85 24.6 13.1 349.0
February 3.5
85 24.8 13.6 393.0
March 1.6
86 25.1 14.8 266.9
April 12.9
89 24.4 16.0 278.6
MEAN 4.13 83.88 24.74 15.53 325.93



Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

14

Plant Survival

Cropping system. No significant differences were noted on the percentage
survival of sorghum plants (Table 2). Monocropping of sorghum had higher plant
survival.
Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were noted on the percentage
survival of the sorghum entries. Entries ICSU 700 and ICSU 93046 had the highest plant

Table 2. Plant survival of different sorghum entries intercropped with bush beans (%)


TREATMENTS
SURVIVAL (%)


Cropping System (CS)
Sorghum only
97.46
Sorghum + bush bean
96.01
Sorghum Entries (SE)

SPV 422
98.50b
M552
98.55b
ICSU 700
100.00ª
ICSU 93046
100.00ª
ICBR 93034
90.22d
Bakakew
93.12c
CS x SE
ns
(CS)
2.83
(SE)
4.06
Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% level of
significance by DMRT
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

15

survival while ICBR 93034 had the lowest plant survival of 90.22%. These results signify
that the differences on percentage of survival may be attributed to the different genetic
characteristics of the entries. Moreover, temperature and light intensity during the
conduct of the study may have been favorable for plant survival of some entries.
Interaction effect. No significant effect was noted on the interaction of cropping
system and sorghum entries on plant survival.

Plants Vigor


Cropping system. An increasing vigor is observed on both cropping systems at 45
to 90 days after planting. Significant differences were also noted on the plant vigor of
sorghum at 45 days after planting (Table 3). Monocropping of sorghum was moderately
vigorous with robust stem and leaves while sorghum plants intercropped with bush beans
were vigorous. This may be due to the shading afforded by the bush bean plants on the
sorghum seedlings at 45 DAP.
Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were noted on the plant vigor of
the different entries of sorghum at 45 and 60 days. Majority of the sorghum entries were
moderately vigorous except for Bakakew which was vigorous at 45 days. Similarly
majority of the sorghum entries were highly vigorous except for M552 and Bakakew
which were moderately vigorous at 60 days. These differences may be due to the slight to
moderate resistance of the entries to pest.
Interaction effect. Significant interaction was noted between cropping system and
sorghum entries on plant vigor taken at 45 days after sowing (Fig. 1). Intercropping of
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

16

Bakakew with bush beans resulted in vigorous plants. At 45 DAP, the sorghum plants
were shaded by the bush beans.
No significant interaction was noted on the plant vigor at 60 to 90 days after
planting.


5.2
5
4.8
Legend:
4.6
Cropping System
4.4
4.2
Monocroping
4
3.8
Intercroping
3.6
3.4
3.2
3
2.8
SPV 422
M552
ICSU 700 ICSU9304
6 ICBR93034 Bakakew

Sorghum Entry

Figure 1. Interaction of sorghum entry and cropping system on plant vigor at 45 DAP.










Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

17

Table 3. Plant vigor of different sorghum entries intercropped with bush bean


TREATMENTS
_________PLANT VIGOR________
45 DAP 60 DAP 75 DAP 90 DAP





Cropping System (CS)
Sorghum only 4a 4 5 5
Sorghum + bush bean 3b 4 5 5
Sorghum Entries (SE)




SPV 422
4a
5a
5a
5a
M552
4a
4b
5a
5a
ICSU 700 4a
5a
5a
5a
ICSU 93046
4a
5a
5a
5a
ICBR 93034 4a
5a
5a
5a
Bakakew 3b
4b
4b
4b
CS x SE
**
ns
ns
ns
(CS)
4.38
3.55
0.00
0.00


(SE) 4.38
3.55
0.00
0.00


Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% level of
significance by DMRT


(Rating scale: 1= Poor vigor, 2 = Less vigorous, 3 = Vigorous, 4 = moderately vigorous
5 = highly vigorous.)






Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

18

Number of Days from Sowing to Emergence,
Tillering, Heading, Ripening and Harvesting


Cropping system. As shown in Table 4, no significant differences were noted on
the number of days from sowing to emergence, tillering, heading, ripening and harvesting
of monocropped and intercropped sorghum. Monocropped sorghum produced tillers
earlier than sorghum intercropped with bush bean.
Sorghum entries. As shown in Table 3, no significant differences were noted on
the number of days from sowing to emergence, tillering, ripening and harvesting of the
different entries. The number of days from sowing to emergence of the different entries
ranged from 8-10 days, with Bakakew as the latest to emerge. The entries produced tillers
up to 76 days except ICSU 930346 which did not produce any tillers. The heads of the
different sorghum entries ripened and were harvested after 155 and 162 days.
Highly significant differences were observed in the number of days from sowing
to heading of the different entries of sorghum. Entry M552 was the earliest to produce
heads which may be due to the early production of tillers.
Interaction effect. No significant interaction between cropping system and
sorghum entries was observed in the number of days from sowing to emergence, tillering,
heading, ripening and harvesting.

Number of Tillers


Cropping system. No significant differences were noted on the number of tillers
produced by monocropped and intercropped sorghum (Table 4).


Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

19

Table 4. Number of days from sowing to emergence, tillering, heading, ripening, harvesting, and number of tillers of different
sorghum entries intercropped with bush bean


TREATMENTS
NUMBER OF DAYS FROM SOWING TO NUMBER
EMER- OF
GENCE TILLERING HEADING RIPENING HARVESTING TILLERS







Cropping System (CS)


9 52 104 140
159
3
Sorghum
only
Sorghum + bush
9 69 104 140
159
3
Bean
Sorghum Entries (SE)






SPV 422
9
74
102c 141 155 3c
M552
8
68
94a
129
155
5a
ICSU 700
8
76
107d 144 162 3c
ICSU93046
8
0
113e 148 162 1d
ICBR93034
9
76
108d 141 155 3c
Bakakew
10
68
99b 136 162 4b
CS x SE
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
(CS)
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
15.99
(SE)
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
11.88
Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% level of significance by DMRT

Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were noted on the number of tillers produced by the different entries
of sorghum. Entry M552 produced the most tillers which may indicate production of more heads resulting to higher grain
yield,
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

20

stalk yield, and sugar yield. Entry ICSU 930346 did not produce tillers but produced a
secondary panicle
Interaction effect. There was no significant interaction between cropping system
and sorghum entry on the number of tillers

Final Plant Height


Cropping system. Table 5 shows highly significant differences on the final height
of monocropped and intercropped sorghum. Monocropped sorghum plants were taller
than sorghum intercropped with bush bean. This result may be due to the competition of
sorghum and bush bean plants for light and space. Furthermore, the result contradicts the
findings made by PCARRD that sorghum intercropped with legumes was taller than
monocropped sorghum.
Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were noted on the final plant
height of the different entries of sorghum. ICSU 700 was the tallest entry which may
indicate high stalk yield and stem sugar content.
Interaction effect. There was a significant interaction between the different entries
and cropping system (Fig. 2). Monocropping of entry ICSU 700 produced the tallest
plants. This result indicates that both sorghum entry and cropping system are important
considerations in selecting for tall plants.

Stem Diameter


Cropping system. Significant differences were noted on the stem diameter of sorghum
affected by different cropping systems. Monocropped sorghum plants had wider stems,
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

21

whereas sorghum intercropped with bush beans had narrower stems. Eswara Prasada Rao
et al. (2009) stated that sweet sorghum intercropped with short-stalked plant had long
stalk and narrow stems. This was due to the shading of the intercrop during the growing
stage of sorghum plants.




300
290
280

270
260
250

240
230
220

Legend:
210
Cropping System
200
190

Monocroping
180
170
160
Intercroping

150
140
130

120
110
100

90
80
SPV 422
M552
ICSU 700
ICSU 93046
ICBR 93034
Bakakew

Sorghum Entry
Figure 2. Interaction of sorghum entry and cropping system on final plant Height.


Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were noted in the stem diameter
of the different entries of sorghum. Entry SPV 422 had the widest stem while Bakakew
had the narrowest stem (1.02cm and 0.71cm respectively). The wide stems of some
entries maybe due to good germination of seeds (PCARRD, 2001.) leading to strong stalk
and high biomass yield (Li Guiying et al, 2006).
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

22

Interaction effect. There was no significant interaction between cropping system
and entries of sorghum on stem diameter.

Table 5. Final plant height and stem diameter of different sorghum entries intercropped
with bush bean



TREATMENT
FINAL HEIGHT (CM) STEM DIAMETER (CM)




Cropping System (CS)

Sorghum only
166.38a 0.94a

Sorghum + bush bean 155.11b 0.83b

Sorghum Entries (SE)


SPV 422
151.20c 1.02a
M552
155.98c
0.88c
ICSU 700
202.35a 0.82c
ICSU93046
196.48b
0.92b
ICBR93034
152.83c
0.97b
Bakakew
105.62d 0.71d
CS x SE
*
ns
(CS)
1.04
6.91
(SE) 3.09
10.33
Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% level of
significance by DMRT




Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

23

Corn Borer Infestation


Cropping system. High significance was noted on the insect infestation of
monocropped and intercropped sorghum at 45 to 90 days after planting. Monocropped
sorghum was moderately infested with corn borer. In contrast, sorghum intercropped with

Table 6. Corn borer infestation of different sorghum entries intercropped with bush bean


TREATMENTS
CORN BORER INFESTATION AT
45 DAP 60 DAP 75 DAP 90 DAP





Cropping System (CS)
Sorghum only 5a
5a
5a
5a
Sorghum + bush bean 3b
3b
3b
3b
Sorghum Entries (SE)




SPV 422
5
3b
3b
5a
M552
5
3b
3b
5a
ICSU 700 5
5a
5a
3b
ICSU 93046
5
5a
3b
3b
ICBR 93034 5
5a
5a
5a
Bakakew 5
5a
3b
5a
CS x SE
ns
ns
ns
ns
(CS)
7.32
43.49
51.39
53.53
(SE) 18.51
18.74
26.43
22.35
Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% level of
significance by DMRT
.

(Rating scale: 1 = sound, 3 = slight, 5 = moderate, 7 = severe and 9 = skeletonized)
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

24

bush bean was slightly damaged by corn borer. The lesser damage in intercropped
sorghum may be due to the bush bean plants serving as alternative host to corn borer
(ICRISAT, 1981).
Sorghum entries. Most of the entries had moderate infestation at 45 DAP, slight
infestation at 65 to 75 DAP, and moderate infestation at 90 DAP. This irregular trend in
corn borer infestation may indicate the rejuvenation of the vigor of the plants. Entries
ICSU 93046 and ICSU 700 remained slightly infested with corn borer until 90 DAP.


Interaction effect. No significant interaction was noted between cropping system
and the different entries on corn borer infestation.
Kernel Smut Infection

Cropping system. No significant differences were noted on the kernel smut
infection of sorghum as affected by the cropping systems. Monocropped sorghum and
sorghum intercropped with bush bean were moderately resistant to kernel smut. This may
imply that intercropping sorghum with bush bean does not prohibit disease infection.
Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were noted on the resistance of
the different sorghum entries to kernel smut. Entries ICSU 700 and ICSU 93046 were
resistant to kernel smut which may result in good quality grains, higher yield, and high
profit.
Interaction effect. Significant interaction was noted between cropping system and
sorghum entries on kernel smut infection (Fig.3). Selecting entries ICSU 700 and ICSU
93046 as either monocrop or intercrop is important in lessening disease infection.

Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

25



3.5

 
3

2.5
Legend:

Cropping System
2
Monocroping

Intercroping

1.5


1




0.5

SPV 422
M552
ICSU 700
ICUSU 93046 ICBR 93034
Bakakew


Sorghum Entry

Figure 3. Interaction of sorghum entry and cropping system on kernel smut infection.












Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

26

Table 7. Kernel smut infection of different sorghum entries intercropped with bush bean


TREATMENTS
KERNEL SMUT INFECTION
(160 DAP)


Cropping System (CS)
Sorghum only 2
Sorghum + bush bean 2
Sorghum Entries (SE)

SPV 422
2b
M552
2b
ICSU 700 1c
ICSU 93046
1c
ICBR 93034 2b
Bakakew
3a
CS x SE
*
(CS)
17.61
(SE) 18.19
Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% levelof
significance by DMRT


(Rating scale: 1 = resistant, 2 = moderately resistant, 3 = weak.)






Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

27

Length of the Panicle


Cropping system. Table 8 shows that sorghum entries intercropped with bush bean
had longer panicle. This result corroborates with the claim by PCARRD (1983) that using
legumes as intercrops can increase plant height, panicle length and yield.

Table 8. Length of the panicle of different sorghum entries intercropped with bush bean


TREATMENTS
PANICLE LENGTH (cm)


Cropping System (CS)
Sorghum only
27.67
Sorghum + bush bean
29.08
Sorghum Entries (SE)

SPV 422
29.60c
M552
33.53b
ICSU 700
21.33d
ICSU 93046
20.42d
ICBR 93034
28.92c
Bakakew
36.45a
CS x SE
ns
(CS)
3.56
(SE)
5.06
Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% level of
significance by DMRT

Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

28

Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were noted on the length of
panicle of the sorghum entries. Bakakew had the longest panicle of 36.45 cm while
entries ICSU 700 and ICSU 93046 had the shortest panicle. It was observed that entries
with longer panicles had the highest kernel smut infection.
Interaction effect. There was no significant interaction between cropping system
and the different entries on panicle length.

Stalk Yield


Cropping system. Monocropped sorghum had higher stalk yield than intercropped
sorghum which may be due to the long and wide stems of the plants. (Table 9).
Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences on the stalk yield of the different
entries of sorghum are observed. Entry ICSU 93046 had the highest stalk yield of 14.75
kgs which may be due to the relatively wide stems of the plants. Reddy et al, (2009)
stated that high stalk yield of sweet sorghum indicates high sucrose and biomass yield.
Interaction effect. There was no significant interaction between cropping system
and the different entries on stalk yield.

Weight of 100 grains


Cropping system. Table 9 shows that the weight of 100 grains for monocropped
and intercropped sorghum was not significantly different.
Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were noted on the weight of 100
grains of the different entries. Entry M552 had the highest weight of 100 grains which
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

29

could be attributed to the relatively long panicles of the entry and moderate resistance to
kernel smut.
Interaction effect. No significant interaction was observed between cropping
system and the different entries on the weight of 100 grains.

Table 9. Stalk yield, weight of 100 grains, and yield per plot of the different sorghum
entries intercropped with bush bean

STALKYIELD WEIGHT OF
GRAIN YIELD
TREATMENTS
PER PLOT
100
PERPLOT
(kg)
GRAIN(g)
(kg/10m2)




Cropping System (CS)
Sorghum only 8.73a 3.43 1.77
Sorghum + bush bean 7.17b 3.40 1.79
Sorghum Entries (SE)



SPV 422
6.42c 3.62b 2.10a
M552
4.48d 3.88a 1.84c

ICSU 700 12.13b 3.13d 1.97b
ICSU 93046
14.75a 3.45c 1.92b

ICBR 93034 5.78c 3.07d 1.83c
Bakakew 3.96e 3.33c 1.03d
CS x SE
ns
ns
ns
(CS)
4.74
9.73
14.87
(SE) 10.34
10.75
12.19
Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% level of
significance by DMRT


Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

30

Grain Yield per Plot


Cropping ystem. There was no significant difference on the total yield per plot of
monocropped sorghum and sorghum intercropped with bush beans (Table 9).
Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were noted on the total yield per
plot of the different sorghum entries (Table 8). Entry SPV 422 had the highest total yield
per plot of 2.10 kg while Bakakew only had a yield of 1.03 kg. The high yield of entry
SPV 422 may be attributed to its high plant survival, high vigor, and slight damage by
birds.
Interaction effect. There were no significant interaction between the cropping
system and the different entries on total yield/ plot.

Sugar Content


Cropping system. No significant differences were noted on the sugar content of
stalk from base to tip of monocropped and intercropped sorghum. (Table 10). These
findings signify that there is no significant effect of cropping system on the sugar content
of sorghum stalk.
It was also observed that the middle part of the stalk contained the highest sugar
content. The higher sugar on the middle part of the stalk may be due to wider diameter
and maturity of the plant (PCARRD, 200I).
Sorghum entries. Highly significant differences were observed on the sugar
content of the stalk of the different sorghum entries. ICSU 700 had the highest sugar
content on the base, middle and tip part of the stalk. Also, it was observed that ICSU
93046 had the highest sugar content on the tip part of the stalk. PCARRD (2001) stated
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

31

that high sugar content of sweet sorghum indicates that the plant had reached
physiological maturity and is ready for harvest. Thus, entry ICSU 700 may be early
maturing as indicated by its high sugar content.
Date of harvesting may therefore be considered for production of higher sugar
content. Delaying harvest to a later date was found to produce higher sugar content in

Table 10. Sugar content on the base, middle and tip of stalk of different sorghum entries
intercropped with bush bean

STEM SUGAR CONTENT (oBrix)
TREATMENTS
BASE MIDDLE TIP




Cropping System (CS)
Sorghum only 11.51
11.99
9.56
Sorghum + bush bean 10.98
11.64
9.70
Sorghum Entries (SE)



SPV 422
10.15c 10.47c 6.17b
M552
8.67d 5.98d 5.88b
ICSU 700 15.75a 17.42a 15.85a
ICSU 93046
14.18b 16.82b 16.03a

ICBR 93034 11.90c 12.20c 7.17b
Bakakew 6.80e 7.00d 6.67b
CS x SE
ns
*
ns
(CS)
13.17
10.73
13.48
(SE) 21.49
13.02
15.68
Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% level of
significance by DMRT
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

32

sorghum stems (Rao et al, 2009). In addition, entries with 16-23% Brix sugar had great
potential for jiggery syrup and most importantly fuel alcohol production (Reddy et al,
2009).
Interaction effect. No significant interaction between cropping system and
sorghum entry was noted on the sugar content of base and tip parts of the stalk. However,
a significant interaction was observed on the sugar content of the middle part of sorghum
stalk (Fig. 4). Monocropping of ICSU 700 produce the highest sugar content. This result
may be due to the higher stalk yield of monocopped sorghum.


 
20
18

16

Legend:
14
Cropping System
12
Monocroping

Intercroping
10

8
6
4
SPV 422
M552
ICSU 700
ICUSU 93046
ICBR 93034
Bakakew

Sorghum Entry

Figure 4. Interaction of sorghum entry and cropping system on stalk sugar content.



Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

33

Grain Moisture Content

Cropping system. The moisture content of sorghum as affected by cropping
system was not significantly different from each other. This result signifies that there is
no significant effect of cropping system on the grain moisture content of sorghum.

Table 11. Grain moisture content of different sorghum entries intercropped with bush
bean (%)


TREATMENTS
GRAIN MOISTURE CONTENT (%)


Cropping System (CS)
Sorghum only 8.88
Sorghum + bush bean 8.89
Sorghum Entries (SE)

SPV 422
8.90
M552
8.97
ICSU 700 8.92
ICSU 93046
8.90
ICBR 93034 8.72
Bakakew 8.90
CS x SE
ns
(CS)
2.65
(SE) 2.39
Means of different letters are significantly different from each other using 5% level of
significance of DMRT


Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

34

Sorghum entries. The moisture content of the different entries of sorghum was not
significantly different from each other. The moisture content of the entries ranged from
8.72 to 8.97%.
Interaction effect. No significant interaction was noted on the moisture content
of sorghum entries affected by the different cropping systems.



































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

35 
 

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION


Summary
The studies was conducted to identify the most suitable cropping system for
sorghum; determine the best sorghum entry based on yield and resistance to disease; and
determine the interaction between cropping system and sorghum entries.
Results show that cropping system did not significantly affect plant survival,
plant vigor at 60 to 90 DAP, days from sowing to emergence, tillering, heading, ripening
and harvesting , number of tillers, insect infestation at 60 to 90 DAP, kernel smut
infection, length of the panicle, weight of 100 grains, total yield per plot, sugar content,
and grain moisture content.
Significant differences among monocropped and intercropped sorghum was
observed on the plant vigor at 45 DAP, stem diameter, final plant height, insect
infestation at 45 DAP, and stalk yield per plot.
In terms of sorghum entries, highly significant differences were observed on plant
survival, insect infestation at 45 to 60 DAP, number of tillers, number of days from
sowing to heading, stem diameter, final plant height, resistance to kernel smut, length of
the panicle, stalk yield, weight of 100 grain, yield per plot, and sugar content. Entries
ICSU 700 and ICSU 93046 were observed to be the most resistant to kernel smut, had the
highest plant vigor, sugar content, and stalk yield. Entry SPV 422 had the highest yield
per plot and stem diameter.
Significant interaction between cropping system and sorghum entries were noted
on final plant height, resistance to kernel smut, and sugar content of the middle stalk.
Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

36 
 
Conclusion
Based on the results, monocropping of sorghum is best for wider stems and high
stalk yield. Intercropping of sorghum numerically produced the highest yield and
resistance to corn borer. Bush bean might therefore be a good intercrop of sorghum.
Among the sorghum entries, SPV422 produced the highest grain yield while
ICSU 93046 produced the highest stalk yield. Both ICSU 700 and ICSU 93046 were the
most resistant to kernel smut and corn borer. Entry ICSU 700 produced the highest sugar
on all stems parts.
In terms of treatment combinations, intercropping of either ICSU 700 or ICSU
93046 with bush beans is best in decreasing corn borer infestation. In addition,
monocopping of SPV 422 AND ICSU 93046 is best for high grain yield and stalk yield,
respectively.

Recommendation
Intercropping of sorghum with bush beans is recommended for resistance to
corn borer. Monocropping of sorghum is recommended for high grain and stalk yield.
Among the entries, SPV 422 is recommended for high grain yield while ICSU
93046 is recommended for high stalk yield. Both ICSU 700 and ICSU 93046 are
recommended for resistance to corn borer.

Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

37
LITERATURE CITED


ADAY, B.A. (2008). Allied Botanicals: Sorghum: features and benefits.
Accessed at www.alliedbotanizal. com
AZRAP-UL-HAQ AHMAD, RIAZ AHMAD, NAEEM MAHMOOD. (2007). Production
potential and quality of mixed sorghum forage under different intercropping
systems and planting patterns. Pp. 203-204.
BAUTISTA, O.K, R.C. VALMAYOR, H.T. TABOR, R.E. ESPINO. 1983. Introduction
to Tropical Horticulture. College of Agriculture, UPLB, Laguna. Pp. 195-199.
BAUTISTA, O.K, R.C. VALMAYOR, H.T. TABORA,and R.E. ESPINO. 1983.
Introduction to Tropical Farming system UPLB, Laguna. Pp. 195-198.

CATALINO, Z.M.1996. Progeny Evaluation of Open-Polinated Sweetpotato Varieties.
Unpublished BS Thesis. BSU. La Trinidad, Benguet. P.8.

INTERNATIONAL POTATO CENTER. 1984. Potatoes for the Developing World.
International Potato Research (CIP), Lima, Peru. P. 91

ESWARA PRASADA RAO, YAIDYNATHAN SUBRAMANIAN, MELAK
H.MENGESHA, and RAMAMURTHI JAMBUNATHAN. 2009. Sweet Sorghum
Production by Multiple Cropping with Early Maturing Crops. Pratancheru
P.O.,Andhra Pradesh India. Pp. 11-16.

GOMEZ, A.A and GOMEZ, K.A. 1983. Multiple cropping in the humid tropics of Asia.
Ottawa Onotario Canada. Pp. 45-50.

GUPTA, P.C. 1986. Upland rice: a Global perspective. IRRI, UPLB, Laguna.
Pp. 63-75.

INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI-ARID
TROPICS. 1981. Proceeding of the international work shop intercropping. P.O.
Adhara Pradesh India. Pp. 18-37.

LI GUIYING, LIU LUVIANG, WANG JING, and SOERANTO HUMAN. 2006.
Drought Tolerance of Sorghum and Soybean. Hitoshi Nakagawa Japan.p.1.

MARTIN, J.J, W.H. LEONARD, and D.C. STAMP, 1976. Principles of Field Crop
production, 2nd edition. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. New York. p.405.

PHILIPPINE COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, AND NATURAL
RESOURCES RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT. 1986. High from Philippines
agriculture and research and development network. Los Banos Laguna. Pp. 9-10.

Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

38
PHILIPPINE COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, AND NATURAL
RESOURCES RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT. 1983. State and Art abstract of
Bibliography. Sorghum Research in the Philippines. Pp. 39-40.

PHILIPPINE COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, AND NATURAL
RESOURCES RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT. 2001. Philippines Sugar Research
Institute Foundaion Inc. Los Banos Laguna. P.26.

PHILIPPINE COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, AND NATURAL
RESOURCES RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT. 2001. The Philippines
Recommended for Sugarcane. Los Banos Laguna. P.198.

REDDY,SANJANA P., RAJASHEKAR KACHAPUR, and BELUM S. REDDY. 2009.
Sweet sorghum- A Potential Alternate Raw Material for Bio-ethanol and
Bioenergy. Pp.1-6.

TUGUI-IN, R.A. 1997.Varietal Evaluation of High Yielding Varieties of Rice in Der-
an,San Mateo, Isabella. Unpublished BS Thesis. Benguet State University. La
Trinidad, Benguet. P. 13

WOOD, G.M. 2008. Sweet -Sorghum-Pilot sites in the Philippines. Accessed at
/http://www.Mixph. com.




Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

39

APPENDICES


Appendix 1. Plant survival


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CSI





SPV 422
97.83
97.83
97.83
293.49
97.83
M552
100
100
100
300
100
ICSU 700
100
100
100
300
100
ICSU 93046
100
100
100
300
100
ICBR93034
93.48
97.83
89.13
280.43
93.48
Bakakew
100
91.30
89.13
280.43
93.48






SUB TOTAL
591.31
586.96
576.09
1,754.35
584.79
CS2





SPV 422
100
100
97.83
297.83
99.28
M552
97.83
97.83
95.65
291.31
97.10
ICSU 700
100
100
100
300
100
ICSU 93046
100
100
100
300
100
ICBR93034
80.43
95.65
84.78
280.86
86.95
Bakakew
100
95.65
82.61
278.26
92.75






SUB TOTAL
578.26
589.13
560.87
1748.26
576.08






TOTAL
1,169.57
1,176.09
1,136.96
3,502.61
1,160.87


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 97.83
99.28
197.11
98.55
E2 100.00 97.10 197.10 98.55
E3 100.00 100.00 200.00 100.00
E4 100.00 100.00 200.00 100.00
E5 93.48
86.95
180.43
90.22
E6 93.48
92.75
186.23
93.12





Total
584.79
576.09
1160.87






Mean
97.46
96.01
96.74




Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

40


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 73.252
36.626
4.89ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot
1 18.922
18.922
2.53ns 18.51 98.50
(A)
Error (a)
2 14.966
7.483



Sub-plot (B)
5 501.120
100.224
6.49** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 61.484
12.297
0.80ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 308.821
15.441



Total
35 978.565


**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
2.83
ns
–not
significant
CV
(b)
=
4






























Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

41


Appendix 2. Plant vigor at 45 days


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
4
4
4
12
4
M552
4
4
4
12
4
ICSU 700
4
4
4
12
4
ICSU 93046
4
4
4
12
4
ICBR93034
4
4
4
12
4
Bakakew
4
4
3
11
3.67






SUB TOTAL
24
24
24
71
23.67
CS2





SPV 422
4
4
4
12
4
M552
3
3
3
9
3
ICSU 700
4
4
4
12
4
ICSU 93046
4
4
4
12
4
ICBR93034
4
4
4
12
4
Bakakew
3
3
3
9
3






SUB TOTAL
22
22
22
66
22

46 46 46 137 45.67
TOTAL


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 4.00 4.00 8.00 4
E2 4.00 3.00 7.00 4
E3 4.00 4.00 8.00 4
E4 4.00 4.00 8.00 4
E5 4.00 4.00 8.00 4
E6 3.67 3.00 6.67 3





Total
23.67
22.00
45.67






Mean
4
3
4





Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

42

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05
0.01
Replication
2 0.056
0.028
1.00ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.694
0.694
25.00* 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.056
0.028



Sub-plot (B)
5 2.806
0.561
20.20** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 1.472
0.294
10.60** 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.556
0.028



Total
35 5.639


**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
4.38
*-significant
CV
(b)
=
4.38
ns-not significant






























Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

43

Appendix 3. Plant vigor at 60 days


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
5
5
5
15
5
M552
5
4
4
13
4.33
ICSU 700
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 93046
5
5
5
15
5
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
5
Bakakew
4
4
4
12
4






SUB TOTAL
29
28
28
85
28.33
CS2





SPV 422
5
5
5
15
5
M552
4
4
4
12
4
ICSU 700
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 93046
5
5
5
15
5
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
5
Bakakew
4
4
4
12
4






SUB TOTAL
28
28
28
84
28






TOTAL
57
56
56
169
56.33


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E2 4.33 4.00 8.33 4
E3 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E4 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E5 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E6 4.00 4.00 8.00 4





Total
28.33
28.00
56.33






Mean
5
5
5






Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

44

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.056
0.028
1.00ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.028
0.028
1.00ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.056
0.028



Sub-plot (B)
5 6.806
1.361
49.00** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.139
0.028
1.00ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.556
0.028



Total
35 7.639


**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
3.55
ns-not
significant
CV
(b)
=
3.55































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

45

Appendix 4. Plant vigor at 75 days


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
5
5
5
15
5
M552
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 700
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 93046
5
5
5
15
5
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
5
Bakakew
4
4
4
12
4






SUB TOTAL
29
29
29
87
29
CS2





SPV 422
5
5
5
15
5
M552
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 700
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 93046
5
5
5
15
5
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
5
Bakakew
4
4
4
12
4






SUB TOTAL
29
29
29
87
29






TOTAL
58
58
58
176
58


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E2 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E3 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E4 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E5 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E6 4.00 4.00 8.00 4





Total
29.00
29.00
58.00






Mean
5
5
5







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

46

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.000
0.000



Sub-plot (B)
5 5.000
1.000
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.000
0.000



Total
35 5.000


ns-not significant



CV (a) = 0.00
CV (b) = 0.00

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

47

Appendix 5. Plant vigor at 90 days


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
5
5
5
15
5
M552
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 700
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 93046
5
5
5
15
5
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
5
Bakakew
4
4
4
12
4






SUB TOTAL
29
29
29
87
29
CS2





SPV 422
5
5
5
15
5
M552
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 700
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 93046
5
5
5
15
5
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
5
Bakakew
4
4
4
12
4






SUB TOTAL
29
29
29
87
29






TOTAL
58
58
58
174
58


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E2 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E3 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E4 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E5 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E6 4.00 4.00 8.00 4





Total
29.00
29.00
58.00






Mean
5
5
5







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

48

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.000
0.000



Sub-plot (B)
5 5.000
1.000
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.000
0.000



Total
35 5.000


ns-not
significant
CV
(a)
=
0.00
CV
(b)
=
0.00































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

49

Appendix 6. Number of days from sowing to emergence


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
9
9
9
27
9
M552
8
8
8
24
8
ICSU 700
8
8
8
24
8
ICSU 93046
8
8
8
24
8
ICBR93034
9
9
9
27
9
Bakakew
10
10
10
30
10






SUB TOTAL
52
52
52
156
52
CS2





SPV 422
9
9
9
27
9
M552
8
8
8
24
8
ICSU 700
8
8
8
24
8
ICSU 93046
8
8
8
24
8
ICBR93034
9
9
9
27
9
Bakakew
10
10
10
30
10






SUB TOTAL
52
52
52
156
52






TOTAL
104
104
104
312
104


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 9.00 9.00
18.00
9.00
E2 8.00 8.00
16.00
8.00
E3 8.00 8.00
16.00
8.00
E4 8.00 8.00
16.00
8.00
E5 9.00 9.00
18.00
9.00
E6 10.00 10.00 20.00 10.00





Total
52.00
52.00
10.4






Mean
8.67
8.67
8.67







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

50

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.000
0.000



Sub-plot (B)
5 20.000
4.000
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.000
0.000



Total
35 20.000


ns-not
significant
CV
(a)
=
0.00
CV
(b)
=
0.00































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

51

Appendix 7. Number of days from sowing to tillering


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
60
60
60
180
60
M552
60
60
60
180
60
ICSU 700
67
67
67
201
67
ICSU 93046





ICBR93034
67
67
67
201
67
Bakakew
60
60
60
180
60






SUB TOTAL
314
314
314
942
314
CS2





SPV 422
88
88
88
264
88
M552
76
76
76
228
76
ICSU 700
88
88
88
264
88
ICSU 93046





ICBR93034
88
88
88
264
88
Bakakew
76
76
76
228
76






SUB TOTAL
416
416
416
1,148
416






TOTAL
730
730
730
2,090
730



TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 60.00
88.00
148.00 74
E2 60.00
76.00
136.00 68
E3 67.00
88.00
155.00 78
E4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
E5 67.00
88.00
155.00 78
E6 60.00
76.00
136.00 68





Total
314.00
416.00
730.00






Mean
52
69
61






Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

52

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 2601.000
2601.000
0.00ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.000
0.000



Sub-plot (B)
5 27194.000
5438.800
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 666.000
133.200
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.000
0.000



Total
35 30461.000


ns-not
significant
CV
(a)
=
0.00
CV
(b)
=
0.00































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

53

Appendix 8. Number of tillers


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CSI





SPV 422
3.6
3.2
2.4
9.2
3.07
M552
5.7
4.7
3.7
14.1
4.7
ICSU 700
3.8
3.1
2.6
9.5
3.17
ICSU 93046
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
ICBR93034
2.8
3.2
2.7
8.7
2.9
Bakakew
4
4.3
4.3
12.6
4.2






SUB TOTAL
20.9
19.5
16.7
57.1
19.04
CS2





SPV 422
3.4
3.2
3.3
9.9
3.3
M552
5
5.1
4.7
14.8
4.93
ICSU 700
3
2.4
2.6
8
2.67
ICSU 93046
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
ICBR93034
3.8
3
3.1
9.9
3.3
Bakakew
4.1
4
4.2
12.3
4.1






SUB TOTAL
20.3
18.7
18.9
57.9
19.3






TOTAL
41.2
38.2
35.6
115
38.34


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 3.07 3.30 6.37 3
E2 4.70 4.93 9.63 5
E3 3.17 2.67 5.83 5
E4 1.00 1.00 3.00 1
E5 2.90 6.20 6.20 3
E6 4.20 8.30 8.30 4





Total
19.03
19.30
38.33






Mean
3
3
4






Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

54

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 1.309
0.654
2.79ns
19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.018
0.018
0.08ns
18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.469
0.234



Sub-plot (B)
5 82.012
16.402
126.71** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.776
0.155
1.20ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 2.589
0.129



Total
35 87.172


**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
15.99
ns-not
significant
CV
(b)
=
11.88































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

55

Appendix 9. Number of days from sowing to heading


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CSI





SPV 422
102
102
102
306
102
M552
94
94
94
282
94
ICSU 700
106
106
110
322
107.33
ICSU 93046
113
113
113
339
113
ICBR93034
108
108
110
326
108.67
Bakakew
99
99
99
297
99






SUB TOTAL
622
622
628
1872
624
CS2





SPV 422
102
102
99
303
101
M552
94
94
94
282
94
ICSU 700
106
106
110
322
107.33
ICSU 93046
113
113
113
339
113
ICBR93034
108
108
108
324
108
Bakakew
99
99
99
297
99






SUB TOTAL
622
622
623
1,867
622.33






TOTAL
1,244
1,244
1,251
3,739
1,246.33


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 102.00 101.00 203.00 101.50
E2 94.00 94 188.00
94.00
E3 107.33 107.33 214.67 107.33
E4 113.00 113.00 226.00 113.00
E5 108.67 108.00 216.67 108.33
E6 99.00
99.00
198.00
99.00





Total
624.00
622.33
1246.33






Mean
104.00
103.72
103.86







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

56

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 2.722
1.361
1.96ns
19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.694
0.694
1.00ns
18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 1.389
0.694



Sub-plot (B)
5 1452.139
290.428
224.36** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 1.472
0.294
0.23ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 25.889
1.294


Total
35 1484.306


**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
0.080
ns-not
significant
CV
(b)
=
1.10































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

57

Appendix 10. Number of days from sowing to ripening


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CSI





SPV 422
141
141
141
423
141
M552
129
129
129
387
129
ICSU 700
144
144
144
432
144
ICSU 93046
148
148
148
444
148
ICBR93034
141
141
141
423
141
Bakakew
136
136
136
408
136






SUB TOTAL
839
839
839
2,517
839
CS2





SPV 422
141
141
141
423
141
M552
129
129
129
387
129
ICSU 700
144
144
144
432
144
ICSU 93046
148
148
148
444
148
ICBR93034
141
141
141
423
141
Bakakew
136
136
136
408
136






SUB TOTAL
839
839
839
2,517
839






TOTAL
1,678
1,678
1,678
5,034
1,678


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 141.00
141.00
282.00 141
E2 129.00
129.00
258.00 129
E3 144.00
144.00
288.00 144
E4 148.00
148.00
296.00 148
E5 141.00
141.00
282.00 141
E6 136.00
136.00
272.00 136





Total
839.00
839.00
1678.00






Mean
140
140
140







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

58

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.000
0.000



Sub-plot (B)
5 1313.000
262.600
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.000
0.000



Total
35 1313.000


ns-not significant



CV (a) = 0.00
CV (b) = 0.00

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

59

Appendix 11. Number of days from sowing to harvesting


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
155
155
155
465
155
M552
155
155
155
465
155
ICSU 700
162
162
162
486
162
ICSU 93046
162
162
162
486
162
ICBR93034
155
155
155
465
155
Bakakew
162
162
162
486
162






SUB TOTAL
951
951
951
2,853
951
CS2





SPV 422
155
155
155
465
155
M552
155
155
155
465
155
ICSU 700
162
162
162
486
162
ICSU 93046
162
162
162
486
162
ICBR93034
162
162
162
465
162
Bakakew
162
162
162
486
162






SUB TOTAL
951
951
951
2,853
951






TOTAL
1,902
1,902
1,902
5,706
1,902


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 155.00
155.00
310.00 155
E2 155.00
155.00
310.00 155
E3 162.00
162.00
324.00 162
E4 162.00
162.00
324.00 162
E5 155.00
155.00
310.00 155
E6 162.00
162.00
324.00 162





Total
951.00
951.00
1902






Mean
159
159
159







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

60

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.000
0.000



Sub-plot (B)
5 441.000
88.200
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.000
0.000
0.00ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.000
0.000



Total
35 441.000


ns-not
significant
CV
(a)
=
0.00
CV
(b)
=
0.00































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

61

Appendix 12. Stem diameter


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
1.06
1.07
1.09
3.22
1.07
M552
0.97
0.99
0.95
2.91
0.97
ICSU 700
1
0.69
0.81
2.5
0.83
ICSU 93046
0.95
0.93
0.98
2.86
0.95
ICBR93034
0.99
1.09
1.03
3.11
1.04
Bakakew
0.93
0.76
0.67
2.36
0.79






SUB TOTAL
5.9
5.53
5.53
16.96
5.65
CS2





SPV 422
0.92
0.96
0.99
2.87
0.96
M552
0.83
0.84
0.71
2.38
0.79
ICSU 700
0.81
0.87
0.72
2.4
0.8
ICSU 93046
0.95
0.77
0.96
2.68
0.89
ICBR93034
1.02
0.94
0.75
2.71
0.90
Bakakew
0.8
0.63
0.49
1.92
0.64






SUB TOTAL
5.33
5.01
4.62
14.96
4.98






TOTAL
11.23
10.54
10.15
31.92
10.63


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 1.07 0.96 2.03 1.02
E2 0.97 0.79 1.76 0.88
E3 0.83 0.80 1.63 0.82
E4 0.95 0.89 1.85 0.82
E5 1.04 0.90 1.94 0.97
E6 0.79 0.64 1.43 0.71





Total
5.65
4.99
10.64






Mean
0.94
0.83
0.89







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

62

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication 2
0.050
0.025
6.64ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1
0.111
0.111
29.61* 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2
0.008
0.004



Sub-plot (B)
5
0.358
0.072
8.54** 2.71 4.10
AxB 5
0.022
0.004
0.53ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20
0.168
0.008



Total 35
0.717




**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
6.91
*-significant
CV
(b)
=
10.33
ns-not significant






























Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

63

Appendix 13. Final plant height


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
159.4
150.7
157.9
468
156
M552
166.9
164.6
16.7
492.2
164.07
ICSU 700
202.1
216.4
207.5
626
208.67
ICSU 93046
200.5
210.8
191.0
602.3
200.77
ICBR93034
163.8
163.1
162.8
489.7
263.23
Bakakew
107.5
101.1
107.1
316.7
105.57






SUB TOTAL
1000.2
1006.7
988
2,994.9
998.31
CS2





SPV 422
146.9
148.1
144.2
439.2
146.4
M552
151.8
151.2
140.7
443.7
147.9
ICSU 700
197.3
197.3
193.5
588.1
196.03
ICSU 93046
191.1
195.1
190.4
576.6
192.2
ICBR93034
147.1
144
136.2
427.3
142.43
Bakakew
104.1
103.4
109.5
317
105.67






SUB TOTAL
938.3
939.1
914.5
2,719.9
930.63






TOTAL
1,938.5
1,945.1
1,902.5
5,786.8
1,928.94


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 156.00 146.40 302.40 151.20
E2 164.07 147.90 311.97 155.98
E3 208.67 196.03 404.70 202.35
E4 200.77 192.20 392.97 202.35
E5 163.23 142.43 305.67 196.48
E6 105.57 105.67 211.23 152.83





Total
998.30
930.63
1928.93






Mean
166.38
155.11
160.74







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

64

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 89.561
44.780
15.97*
19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 1144.694
1144.694
408.29** 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 5.607
2.804



Sub-plot (B)
5 37342.276
7468.455
303.25** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 384.046
76.809
3.12*
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 492.566
24.628

Total
35 39458.749


** - highly significant
*-significant

CV (a) = 1.04 CV (b) = 3.09

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

65

Appendix 14. Corn borer infestation at 45 days


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
5
5
5
15
5
M552
7
5
5
17
5.67
ICSU 700
5
5
7
17
5.67
ICSU 93046
5
5
7
17
5.67
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
5
Bakakew
5
5
5
15
5






SUB TOTAL
32
30
34
96
32.01
CS2





SPV 422
5
5
5
15
5
M552
3
3
3
9
3
ICSU 700
3
3
3
9
3.67
ICSU 93046
3
3
3
9
3.67
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
4.33
Bakakew
3
3
3
9
3






SUB TOTAL
22
22
24
68
22.67






TOTAL
52
52
58
164
54.68


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 5.00 5.00
10.00 5
E2 5.67 3.00 8.67 5
E3 5.67 3.67 9.33 5
E4 5.67 3.67 9.33 5
E5 5.00 4.33 9.33 5
E6 5.00 3.00 8.00 5





Total
32.00
22.67
54.67






Mean
5
3
4.56







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

66

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 1.556
0.778
7.00ns
19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 21.778
21.778
196.00** 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.222
0.111



Sub-plot (B)
5 3.556
0.711
1.00ns
2.71 4.10
AxB
5 7.556
1.511
2.12ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 14.222
0.711


Total
35 48.889


** - highly significant
ns-not significant
CV (a) = 7.32 CV (b) = 18.51

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

67

Appendix 15. Corn borer infestation at 60 days


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
3
5
5
13
4.33
M552
5
5
5
15
5
ICSU 700
3
5
7
15
5
ICSU 93046
5
5
7
17
5.67
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
5
Bakakew
5
5
5
15
5






SUB TOTAL
26
30
34
90
30
CS2





SPV 422
3
3
3
9
3
M552
3
3
1
7
2.33
ICSU 700
3
3
3
9
3
ICSU 93046
3
3
3
9
3
ICBR93034
5
3
3
13
4.33
Bakakew
3
3
3
9
3






SUB TOTAL
20
20
16
56
18.66






TOTAL
46
50
50
146
48.66


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 4.33 3.00 7.33 3
E2 5.00 2.33 7.33 3
E3 5.00 3.00 8.00 5
E4 5.67 3.00 8.67 5
E5 5.00 4.33 9.33 5
E6 5.00 3.00 8.00 5





Total
30.00
18.67
48.67






Mean
5
3
4







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

68

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.889
0.444
0.14ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 32.111
32.111
10.32ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 6.222
3.111



Sub-plot (B)
5 4.556
0.911
1.58ns
2.71 4.10
AxB
5 4.556
0.911
1.58ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 11.556
0.578



Total
35 59.889


ns - not significant



CV (a) = 43.49
CV (b) = 18.74

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

69

Appendix 16. Corn borer infestation at 75 days


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
3
3
3
9
3
M552
3
3
3
9
3
ICSU 700
5
5
7
17
5.67
ICSU 93046
3
3
5
11
3.67
ICBR93034
5
5
3
13
4.33
Bakakew
3
5
5
13
4.33






SUB TOTAL
22
24
26
72
24
CS2





SPV 422
5
5
3
13
4.33
M552
3
3
3
9
3
ICSU 700
3
3
3
9
3
ICSU 93046
3
3
3
9
3
ICBR93034
5
5
1
11
3.67
Bakakew
3
3
1
7
2.33






SUB TOTAL
22
22
14
58
19.3






TOTAL
44
46
40
130
43.3


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 3.00 4.33 7.33 3
E2 3.00 3.00 6.00 3
E3 5.67 3.00 8.67 5
E4 3.67 3.00 6.67 3
E5 4.33 3.67 8.00 5
E6 4.33 2.33 6.67 3





Total
24.00
19.33
43.33






Mean
5
3
3







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

70

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 1.556
0.778
0.23ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 5.444
5.444
1.58ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 6.889
3.444



Sub-plot (B)
5 7.222
1.444
1.59ns 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 15.222
3.044
2.34ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 18.222
0.911



Total
35 54.556


ns-not significant




CV (a) =51.39
CV (b) =26.43

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

71

Appendix 17. Corn borer infestation at 90 days


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
3
3
5
11
3.67
M552
5
3
5
13
4.33
ICSU 700
3
3
5
11
3.67
ICSU 93046
3
3
5
11
3.67
ICBR93034
5
5
5
15
5
Bakakew
5
5
5
15
5






SUB TOTAL
24
22
30
76
25.34
CS2





SPV 422
5
5
3
13
4.33
M552
5
5
3
13
4.33
ICSU 700
3
3
3
9
3
ICSU 93046
1
3
3
7
2.33
ICBR93034
3
5
3
11
3.67
Bakakew
5
3
3
11
3.67






SUB TOTAL
22
24
18
64
21.33






TOTAL
46
46
48
140
46.67


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 3.67 4.33 8.00 5
E2 4.33 4.33 8.67 5
E3 3.67 3.00 6.67 3
E4 3.67 2.33 6.00 3
E5 5.00 3.67 8.67 5
E6 5.00 3.67 8.67 5





Total
25.33
21.33
46.67






Mean
5
3
3







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

72

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.222
0.111
0.03ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 4.000
4.000
0.92ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 8.667
4.333



Sub-plot (B)
5 10.222
2.044
2.71*
2.71 4.10
AxB
5 5.333
1.067
1.41ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 15.111
0.756



Total
35 43.556


* - significant
ns-not significant

CV (a) =53.53
CV (b) =22.35

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

73

Appendix 18. Kernel smut infection


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
2
1
2
5
1.67
M552
1
1
1
3
1
ICSU 700
1
1
1
3
1
ICSU 93046
1
1
1
3
1
ICBR93034
1
2
2
5
1.67
Bakakew
3
3
3
9
3






SUB TOTAL
9
9
10
28
9.34
CS2





SPV 422
1
2
1
4
1.33
M552
2
2
2
6
2
ICSU 700
1
1
1
3
1
ICSU 93046
1
1
1
3
1
ICBR93034
2
2
2
6
2
Bakakew
3
3
3
9
3






SUB TOTAL
10
11
10
31
10.33






TOTAL
19
20
20
59
19.67


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 2 1 3.00 2
E2 1 2 3.00 2
E3 1 1 2.00 1
E4 1 1 2.00 1
E5 2 2 3.67 2
E6 3 3 6.00 3





Total
9.33
10.33
19.67






Mean
2
2
2






Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

74

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.056
0.028
0.33ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1
0.250
0.250
3.00ns 18.51 98.50
Error
(a)
2
0.167 0.083

Sub-plot (B)
5
16.472
3.294
37.06** 2.71 4.10
AxB 5
1.583
0.317
3.56*
2.71 4.10
Error
(b)
20 1.778 0.089

Total 35
20.306




**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
17.61
*-significant
ns-not
significant
CV
(b)
=
18.19































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

75

Appendix 19. Length of panicle (cm)


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
28.7
28.7
29.6
85
28.37
M552
30.3
33.7
33.5
97.5
32.5
ICSU 700
22.1
19.7
22.5
64.3
21.43
ICSU 93046
20.9
20.5
20
61.4
20.47
ICBR93034
27.3
26.2
29.1
82.6
27.54
Bakakew
33.6
32.6
39.1
105.3
35.1






SUB TOTAL
162.9
161.4
173.8
496.1
165.36
CS2





SPV 422
30.6
29.2
30.8
90.6
30.2
M552
34.4
35.5
33.8
103.7
34.57
ICSU 700
21
21.8
20.9
63.7
21.23
ICSU 93046
20.7
19.9
20.5
61.1
20.37
ICBR93034
29.1
29.5
32.3
90.9
30.3
Bakakew
37.8
35.7
39.9
113.4
37.8






SUB TOTAL
173.6
171.6
178.2
523.4
174.47






TOTAL
336.5
333
352
1,019.5
339.83


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 29.00 30.20 59.20 29.60
E2 32.50 34.57 67.07 33.53
E3 21.43 21.23 42.67 21.33
E4 20.47 20.37 40.83 20.42
E5 27.53 30.30 57.83 28.92
E6 35.10 37.80 72.90 36.45





Total
166.03
174.47
340.50






Mean
27.67
29.08
28.38







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

76

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 17.042
8.521
8.34ns
19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 17.780
17.780
17.40ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 2.044
1.022



Sub-plot (B)
5 1239.169
247.834
120.15** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 13.278
2.656
1.29ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 41.254
2.063


Total
35 1330.568


** - highly significant
ns-not significant
CV (a) = 3.56
CV (b) = 5.06

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

77

Appendix 20. Stalk yield


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
7.6
6.9
7
21.5
7.17
M552
5.8
6.6
3.4
15.8
5.27
ICSU 700
13.5
11.75
12.75
38
12.67
ICSU 93046
17.75
16.25
15.25
49.25
16.42
ICBR93034
6.8
7.5
5.6
19.9
6.63
Bakakew
4.75
3.75
4.25
12.75
4.25






SUB TOTAL
56.2
52.75
48.25
157.2
52.41
CS2





SPV 422
6
6.6
4.4
17
5.67
M552
4.9
4
3.4
12.3
4.1
ICSU 700
12.25
11.25
11.25
34.75
11.58
ICSU 93046
14.5
11.75
13
39.25
13.08
ICBR93034
5.8
5.4
3.6
14.8
4.93
Bakakew
4.75
4.25
2
11
3.67






SUB TOTAL
48.2
43.25
37.65
129.1
43.03






TOTAL
104.4
96
85.9
286.3
95.44


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 7.17 5.67
12.83
6.42
E2 5.27 4.10 9.37 4.68
E3 12.67 11.58 24.25 12.13
E4 16.42 13.08 29.50 14.75
E5 6.63 4.93
11.57
5.78
E6 4.25 3.67 7.92 3.96





Total
52.40
43.03
95.43






Mean
8.73
7.17
7.95







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

78

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 14.301
7.150
50.37*
19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 21.934
21.934
154.52** 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.284
0.142



Sub-plot (B)
5 583.924
116.785
172.67** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 6.756
1.351
2.00ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 13.527
0.676


Total
35 640.725

**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
4.74
*-significant
ns-not
significant
CV
(b)
=
10.34































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

79


Appendix 21. Weight of 100 grains (g)


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
3.7
4
3.3
11
3.67
M552
4.4
3.9
3.6
11.9
3.97
ICSU 700
3.2
3
3.2
9.4
3.13
ICSU 93046
3.6
3.4
3.5
10.5
3.5
ICBR93034
2.2
3
3.8
9
3
Bakakew
3.5
3.1
3.3
9.9
3.3






SUB TOTAL
20.6
20.4
20.7
61.7
20.57
CS2





SPV 422
3.9
3.2
3.6
10.7
3.57
M552
4
3.1
4.3
11.4
3.8
ICSU 700
3.2
3.2
3
9.4
3.13
ICSU 93046
3.6
3.3
3.3
10.2
3.4
ICBR93034
3.4
3
3
9.4
3.13
Bakakew
3.5
3.3
3.3
10.1
3.37






SUB TOTAL
21.6
19.1
20.5
61.2
20.14






TOTAL
42.2
39.5
41.2
122.9
40.71


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 3.67 3.57 7.23 3.62
E2 3.97 3.80 7.77 3.88
E3 3.13 3.13 6.27
3.013
E4 3.50 3.40 6.90 3.45
E5 3.00 3.13 6.13 3.07
E6 3.30 3.37 6.67 3.33





Total
20.57
20.40
40.97






Mean
3.43
3.40
3.41






Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

80

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.311
0.155
1.41ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.007
0.007
0.06ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.221
0.110



Sub-plot (B)
5 2.811
0.562
4.17** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.098
0.020
0.15ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 2.696
0.135



Total
35 6.143


**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
9.73
ns-not
significant
CV
(b)
=
10.75































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

81

Appendix 22. Total yield of sorghum per plot


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
2.2
1.9
2.1
6.2
2.06
M552
1.8
2.1
1.25
5.15
1.71
ICSU 700
2.2
1.7
2
5.9
1.96
ICSU 93046
2
1.9
2
5.9
1.96
ICBR93034
2.1
1.7
1.5
5.3
1.76
Bakakew
1.5
0.9
1
3.4
1.13






SUB TOTAL
11.8
10.2
9.85
31.85
10.58
CS2





SPV 422
2.2
2.2
2
6.4
2.13
M552
1.9
2
2
5.9
1.96
ICSU 700
1.9
2
2
5.9
1.96
ICSU 93046
1.9
1.9
1.9
5.6
1.86
ICBR93034
1.8
1.9
1
5.7
1.9
Bakakew
1.3
1
2
2.8
0.93






SUB TOTAL
10.9
11
10.4
32.3
10.74






TOTAL
22.7
21.2
20.25
64.15
21.32


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 2.07 2.13 4.20 2.10
E2 1.72 1.97 3.68 1.84
E3 1.97 1.97 3.93 1.97
E4 1.97 1.87 3.83 1.92
E5 1.77 1.90 3.67 1.83
E6 1.13 0.93 2.07 1.03





Total
10.62
10.77
21.38






Mean
1.77
1.79
1.78







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

82

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.254
0.127
1.81ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.006
0.006
0.08ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.140
0.070



Sub-plot (B)
5 4.320
0.864
18.31** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.196
0.039
0.83ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.944
0.047



Total
35 5.861


** - highly significant ns-not significant
CV (a) = 14.87 CV (b) = 12.19

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

83

Appendix 23. Stalk sugar content (Base)


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
11.5
9.6
10.1
31.2
10.4
M552
13.8
10
4.5
28.3
9.43
ICSU 700
15.6
15.6
16
47.2
15.73
ICSU 93046
15.5
14.8
15.5
44.8
14.93
ICBR93034
13.8
12.2
9.9
35.9
11.97
Bakakew
4.9
5.6
9.2
19.7
6.57






SUB TOTAL
75.1
67.8
64.2
207.1
69.03
CS2





SPV 422
9.9
9.6
10.2
29.7
9.9
M552
5.7
13
5
23.7
7.9
ICSU 700
16.5
16.13
14.5
47.3
15.77
ICSU 93046
15.7
9.9
14.7
40.3
13.43
ICBR93034
12.1
12.5
10.9
35.5
11.83
Bakakew





7.5
8.9
4.7
21.1
7.03






SUB TOTAL
67.4
70.2
60
197.6
65.86






TOTAL
142.5
138
124.2
404.7
134.89


TWO-WAY
TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 10.40 9.90 20.30
10.15
E2 9.43 7.90
17.33
8.67
E3 15.73 15.77 31.50 15.75
E4 14.93 13.43 28.37 14.18
E5 11.97 11.83 23.80 11.90
E6 6.57 7.03
13.60
6.80





Total
69.03
65.87
134.90






Mean
11.51
10.98
11.24






Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

84

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 15.155
7.578
3.46ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 2.507
2.507
1.14ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 4.384
2.192



Sub-plot (B)
5 341.776
68.355
11.71** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 5.125
1.025
0.18ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 116.721
5.836


Total
35 485.668


** - highly significant ns-not significant
CV (a) = 13.17 CV (b) = 21.49

































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

85

Appendix 24. Stalk sugar content (Middle)


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
13.7
10.2
10.6
34.5
11.5
M552
8.5
5.2
4.8
18.5
6.17
ICSU 700
17
17.8
17
51.8
17.27
ICSU 93046
16.9
16.5
17.9
51.3
17.1
ICBR93034
13.7
16.4
12.4
42.5
14.17
Bakakew
5.2
5.2
6.8
17.2
5.73






SUB TOTAL
75
71.3
69.5
215.8
71.93
CS2





SPV 422
9.9
9
9.4
28.3
9.43
M552
8.2
10.2
5
23.4
7.8
ICSU 700
17.7
19.1
15.9
52.7
17.57
ICSU 93046
17.2
15.5
16.9
49.6
16.53
ICBR93034
10.7
9.7
10.3
30.7
10.23
Bakakew
9.9
9.7
5.2
24.8
8.27






SUB TOTAL
73.6
73.2
62.7
209.5
69.83






TOTAL
148.6
144.5
132.2
425.3
141.76


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 11.50 9.43 20.93
10.47
E2 6.17 7.80
13.97
6.98
E3 17.27 17.57 34.83 17.42
E4 17.10 16.53 33.63 16.82
E5 14.17 10.23 24.40 12.20
E6 5.73 8.27
14.00
7.00





Total
71.93
69.83
141.77






Mean
11.99
11.64
11.81







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

86

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

DEGREES
F
SOURCE OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
TAB
OF
F
0.05 0.01
VARIATION
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
FREEDOM
Replication 2 12.141
6.070
3.78ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1
1.103
1.103
0.69ns 18.51 98.50
Error
(a)
2
3.215 1.607

Sub-plot (B)
5
629.345
125.869
53.19** 2.71 4.10
AxB 5
42.756
8.551
3.61*
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20
47.324
2.366



Total 35
735.883




**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
10.73
*-significant
ns-not
significant
CV
(b)
=
13.02






























Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

87

Appendix 25. Stalk sugar content (Tip)


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
7.7
7.1
4.4
19.2
6.4
M552
4.1
5.3
4.4
13.8
4.6
ICSU 700
16.5
13.6
15.3
48.4
16.13
ICSU 93046
15.5
17.5
16.8
49.8
16.6
ICBR93034
11.1
6.9
5.7
23.7
7.9
Bakakew
4.8
5
7.3
17.1
5.7






SUB TOTAL
59.7
58.4
53.9
172
57.33
CS2





SPV 422
5.2
7.2
5.4
17.8
5.93
M552
8.6
7.6
5.3
21.5
7.17
ICSU 700
16
16.8
13.9
46.7
15.57
ICSU 93046
15.7
15.7
15
46.4
15.47
ICBR93034
9.3
4.8
5.2
19.3
6.43
Bakakew
8.8
9.3
4.8
22.9
7.63






SUB TOTAL
63.6
61.4
49.6
174.6
58.2






TOTAL
123.3
119.8
103.5
346.6
115.53


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 6.40 5.93
12.33
6.17
E2 4.60 7.17
11.77
5.88
E3 16.13 15.57 31.70 15.85
E4 16.60 15.47 32.07 16.03
E5 7.90 6.43
14.33
7.17
E6 5.70 7.63
13.33
6.67





Total
57.33
58.20
115.53






Mean
9.56
9.70
9.63







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

88

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 18.611
9.305
5.52ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.188
0.188
0.11ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 3.371
1.685



Sub-plot (B)
5 723.436
144.687
63.51** 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 21.262
4.252
1.87ns
2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 45.566
2.278



Total
35 812.432


**
-
highly
significant
CV
(a)
=
13.48
ns-not
significant
CV
(b)
=
15.68
































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

89

Appendix 26. Grain moisture content


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422
8.8
8.8
8.7
26.3
8.77
M552
9.0
9.1
9.2
27.3
9.1
ICSU 700
9.0
8.9
9
26.9
8.97
ICSU 93046
9.0
8.9
9
26.9
8.97
ICBR93034
7.9
9
8.8
25.7
8.57
Bakakew
8.8
8.9
9
26.7
8.9






SUB TOTAL
52.5
53.6
53.7
149.8
49.93
CS2





SPV 422
9.1
8.9
9.1
27.1
9.03
M552
8.8
9
8.7
26.5
8.83
ICSU 700
8.9
8.7
9
26.6
8.87
ICSU 93046
9
8.6
8.9
26.5
8.83
ICBR93034
8.7
9.1
8.8
26.6
8.87
Bakakew
9
8.8
8.9
26.7
8.9






SUB TOTAL
53.5
53.1
53.4
160
53.33






TOTAL
106
106.7
107.1
309.8
103.26


TWO-WAY TABLE

Treatment
CS1
CS2
Total
Mean
E1 8.77 9.03
17.80
8.90
E2 9.10 8.83
17.93
8.97
E3 8.97 8.87
17.83
8.92
E4 8.97 8.83
17.80
8.90
E5 8.57 8.87
17.43
8.72
E6 8.90 8.90
17.80
8.90





Total
53.27
53.33
106.60






Mean
8.88
8.88
8.88







Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

90

ANALYSIS OF VARIENCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREES OF
SUM OF
MEAN OF
F
F
TAB
VARIATION
FREEDOM
SQUARES
SQUARES
COMP
0.05 0.01
Replication
2 0.052
0.026
0.47ns 19.00 99.00
Main plot (A)
1 0.001
0.001
0.02ns 18.51 98.50
Error (a)
2 0.111
0.055



Sub-plot (B)
5 0.220
0.044
0.98ns 2.71 4.10
AxB
5 0.389
0.078
1.73ns 2.71 4.10
Error (b)
20 0.898
0.045



Total
35 1.670


ns
–
not
significant
CV
(a)
=
2.65
CV
(b)
=
2.39































Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

91


Appendix 27. Total weight of marketable pods (kg) of bush bean


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422





M552





ICSU 700





ICSU 93046





ICBR93034





Bakakew











SUB TOTAL

CS2





SPV 422
3.5
2.1
2.75
8.35
2.78
M552
3
2.6
2.7
8.3
2.77
ICSU 700
3.45
2
2.6
8.05
2.68
ICSU 93046
2.9
3
1.95
7.85
2.62
ICBR93034
3.35
1.9
2.85
8.1
2.7
Bakakew
3.5
2.45
4.5
10.45
3.48






SUB TOTAL
19.7
12.05
17.35
51.1
17.03



Source of
Sum of
Mean
F
df
F
tab
Variation
Squares
Square
comp
0.05 0.01
Treatment 1.549
5
.310
.621ns
3.11 5.06
Error 5.988 12 .499



Total
7.538
17
Ns- not significant














Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

92

Appendix 28. Total weight of non-marketable pods (kg) bush bean


REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN
CS1





SPV 422





M552





ICSU 700





ICSU 93046





ICBR93034





Bakakew











SUB TOTAL

CS2





SPV 422
1.3
1.04
1.28
3.62
1.21
M552
1.3
0.78
1.53
3.61
1.2
ICSU 700
0.55
0.55
1.27
2.37
0.79
ICSU 93046
1.29
0.78
1.52
3.59
1.2
ICBR93034
1.27
0.53
1.8
3.6
1.2
Bakakew
1.53
0.78
1.52
3.83
1.28






SUB TOTAL
7.24
4.46
8.92
20.62
7.88


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

Source of
Sum of
Mean
F
df
F
tab
Variation
Squares
Square
comp
0.05 0.01
Treatment
.469 5 .094
.522ns
3.11 5.06
Error 2.153 12 .179



Total
2.622
17
ns – not significant



Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean
Under La Trinidad Condition / Alones S. Wayan. 2009

---

Document Outline

• Evaluation of Sorghum Entries Intercropped with Bush Bean Under La Trinidad Condition
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • ABSTRACT
  • TABLES OF CONTENTS
  • INTRODUCTION
  • REVIEW OF LITERATURE
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • RESULT AND DISCUSSION
  • SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
  • LITERATURE CITED
  • APPENDICES

---