BIBLIOGRAPHY MENZI, MARCIANNE...

BIBLIOGRAPHY

MENZI, MARCIANNE M. April 2009. Adaptability and Acceptability of
Soybean Accession Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet. Benguet State University, La
Trinidad, Benguet.
Adviser: Janet P. Pablo, MSc.
ABSTRACT

The experiment on adaptability and acceptability of soybean was conducted at
Pacso, Kabayan, benguet.

Among the soybean accessions from AVRDC, AGS 439 and AGS 433 are the
best in terms of earliness to flower and to first green pod formation. The accession also
produced the tallest plants, widest, longest, heaviest and most acceptable pods.

Though the local variety was the earliest to emerge, produced the heaviest
marketable pods and tallest plants, it was disliked moderately.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………...
i
Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………..
i
Table of Contents ………………………………………….........................................
ii

INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………
1
REVIEW OF LITERATURE…………………………………………………………
3

Botanical Description of Soybean……………………………………………..
3

Climatic and Soil Requirements………………………………………………
4
Cultural
Management………………………………………………………….
5

Varietal Evaluation and Adaptability………………………………………….
8

Genetic Resources of Soybean………………………………………………...
8
MATERIALS AND METHODS……………………………………………………...
9
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ……………………………………………………...
17
Meteorological
Data…………………………………………………………...
17

Number of Days from Sowing to Harvesting…………………………………
18
Initial and Final Plant Height………………………………………………………….
19

Plant Vigor at 30 to 60 Days after Planting…………………………………………...
21
Growth habit, Pod Color and Reaction to Lodging…………………………………...
21
Number of Seeds per Pods…………………………………………………………….
21
Width of Pods (cm)……………………………………………………………………
22
ii

Length of Pods (cm)…………………………………………………………………...
22
Weight of pods (kg)…………………………………………………………………...
23
Weight of Marketable, Non –marketable

and Total Yield per Plot………………………………………………………………
25

Computed Yield (t)..………………………………………………………….
25

Reaction to Soybean rust

and Leaf miner ………………………….…………………………………….
26

Sensory Evaluation of Boiled

Green Pods ……………………………………………………………………
29

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION………………………..
31
Summary………………………………………………………………………
31
Conclusion
……………………………………………………………………
31
Recommendation……………………………………………………………...
32
LITERATURE CITED………………………………………………………………..
33
APPENDICES……………………………………………………………..………….
36

iii

1

INTRODUCTION

Soybean, scientifically known as Glycine max, is an erect, bushy annual that varies in
height from 12 inches to 8 feet depending upon the cultivar, daylength, temperature, moisture
and nutrition requirement. The first true leaves are simple and opposite, while all later
occurring leaves are trifoliate and alternate (Smith,1995).

Soybean is an important global crop, providing oil and protein. The bulk of the crop
is solvent-extracted for vegetable oil and then defatted soy meal is used for animal feed. A
small proportion of the crop is consumed directly by humans. Soybean products appear in
large varieties of processed food (Wilson and Clifford, 1975).

Soybean can be grown in the tropics and subtropics throughout the year, but a number
of factors limit production, i.e. the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil and water
environment and the overlapping effects of climate (Sulzberger and Mclean, 1986)
Vegetable soybean is a rich and a cheap source of vitamins, minerals, protein, energy
and fiber. It is a very versatile crop that fits well into cropping systems, has oil-enriching
properties and high income value for small farmers. However, in spite of these advantages
the crop is still relatively unknown to most farmers in the country (AVRDC, 1994).
Aside from the benefit it can give to man and animals, it is also important for the soil.
As a leguminous crop, the plant takes nitrogen from the air and add it to the soil through the
action of the bacteria in its roots.

At present, farmers at Kabayan are planting cruciferous crops like cabbage, broccoli,
cauliflower, root crops ( sweet potato and carrots) and snap bean only for legumes. Also most
of the farmers are practicing monocropping. Because of this practices, it is advisable to
introduce and encourage other crops such as green soybeans. The selection of the best
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

2

varieties that could perform well and accepted by farmers should be considered in
introducing a crop in the locality. Furthermore, because of the effect of the climate change on
agriculture particularly on crop adaptation, there is need to evaluate potential crops in the
locality as alternate crops.

In this case, the study was evaluating accessions of soybean. Soybean just like
snapbean is an excellent source of proteins and vitamins, partly contributing to the solution
of the malnutrition problem.

Objectives of the Study

The study was conducted to:
1. determine the adaptability of the different soybean accessions in Pacso, Kabayan,
Benguet condition
2. determine the best soybean accession/s based on the yield and resistance to pests
and diseases and;
3. determine the acceptability of the accession.

Time and Place of the Study

The study was conducted at Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet from October 2008 to February
2009.

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

3

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Botanical Description of Soybean

Soybean belongs to the Fabaceae or Leguminosae family. The soybean is known as
Soya in French, SoJa in Spanish and Italian and sojabohne in German (Benton, 2003).
However, it is considered a pulse crop with low to high oil content and greater response to
applied nitrogen levels, it has now been place in oil seeds category (Singh, 1991).
Soybean plants which have typical, small legume flowers are predominately self-
pollinated. However, cross pollination by insects does occur and may be a problem in
maintaining cultivar purity in the seed fields. Flower is purple or white; eight to sixteen
flowers are borne in terminal or auxiliary racemes. Typical of the legume family, the pistil is
simple and the ovary matures into legumes pod. At maturity pod usually contains of two to
three seeds but can produce as many as five seeds per pods. Seeds vary in shape from nearly
spherical to somewhat flattened discs and the color from pale green yellow to dark brown
(Chapman, 1976).

Soybean is looked upon not merely as a means to supply food for humans and
animals, but also at the same time to serve as a means for improving the soil through their
ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen. As a legume, it is an ideal component of a sound
agricultural system. It is in the perspective of all these advantages of adaptability and
productivity across tropical, subtropical and temperature environments that significant strides
have been made in its innovation. In fact, the expansion of soybean across the world has been
characterized as one of the striking development of recent decades.

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

4

Climate and Soil Requirements

Soybean thrives well in area where there is less rainfall during the wet season, and
only a short dry season. The temperature requirement is 10-400C. The crop is grown from
latitudes of 0 to 55 degrees however; management practices, cultivar selection and the
concentration of commercial production vary considerably across those latitudes (Persley,
1983).

Smith (1995) reported that air and temperature affect soybean growth and
development physiology processes, nitrogen fixation, seed quality, protein and oil content,
and pest damage. The optimum air temperature for seed germination and hypocotyl
elongation is about 300C. Optimum temperature for photosynthesis is between 25 and 300C.
For nodule formation and the development of nitrogen fixation, 270C appears to be optimum.
Nutrient uptake is also favored by temperature between 25 to 300c. The minimum for
germination is 50C while the maximum temperature is 400C. Growth activity increases with
temperatures from about 100C to the optimum and then tend to decline as temperature’s
exceeds the optimum. Furthermore, all stages of soybean development are photoperiod
responsive to some degree. Seasonal variation and day length become more important for the
adaptation and eventual production of soybean cultivars at increasingly higher latitudes.
Therefore, in temperate zone the planting date becomes critical in the selection of cultivars
for high grain yields. Day length variation during the growing season is close to three hours,
enough to alter the growth and development of soybean cultivar.

Soybean can be grown in deep, well-drained, fertile clay loam or sandy loam soil with
high calcium content. Soil pH of 5.8-6.5 is suitable with high calcium content. Soil pH of
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

5

5.8-6.5 is suitable for the growth of both soybean and the nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Norman
1978).

In general, the crop is sensitive to saline soils but there are cultivar differences.
Cultivar selection may be extremely important for successful production in salty soils. The
water holding capacity and the nutrient content of various soils will usually determine the
degree of success. The optimum soil pH for soybean is near or slightly below neutral.
Extremely acid or alkaline soils may reduce the availability of certain nutrient and cause
stress (Smith, 1995).

Cultural Management

Van der Maesen et al (1990) reported that basal and side dressing of fertilizer maybe
used based on the result of soil analysis. However, in the absence of such analysis and during
the dry season cropping, basal application of three bags of ammonium phosphate and one bag
of muriate of potash (24 kg N, 30 kg P2O5 and 30 kg of K2O) per hectare is recommended for
soybean planted after corn and upland rice. If these fertilizers are not available, four bags of
complete fertilizer per hectare may be used.

Smith (1995) reported that nitrogen fertilization is less important with the crop than
with non-legume crops than can be grown in similar environments because the crops co-
symbiotically fix nitrogen when in association with Rhizobium japonicum. Producing a
soybean crop may be needed depending on the soil analysis. Micronutrient toxicity has also
reduced the productivity of soybeans in certain soils.

Soybean is responsive to irrigation especially at its reproductive phase. Water
consumption is relatively low after germination and greatest at the beginning of blooming.
Unless exposed to continuous long drought, soybean is not much affected. The soybean
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

6

water requirement ranges from 0.5-0.8 cm/day during seed filling. During the entire growing
period, it needs 550-700 mm. For dry areas, the recommended application rate is 40-60 cm
per cropping season in three applications: The first application is done soon after planting
while he other two irrigations are applied during the periods of blooming and pod setting
(Benton, 2003).

In addition, proper soil moisture is for good and uniform germination. Heavy rain and
flooding soon after planting before germination will result in seed rot and poor plant stand.
Irrigation is essential especially (if there insufficient moisture) at flowering and pod-filling
stages. Soil cracking and plant wilting should be as much as possible avoided. Irrigation is
necessary after fertilizing (Shanmugasundaram, 1991)

Furthermore, Shanmugasundaram (1991) reported that inoculated seeds should be
coated thoroughly with fresh Rhizobium japonicum and from a reputable source or apply
granular inoculums in plant rows at the time of sowing. This inoculation will promote nodule
formulation and fixation by the plant roots. It is not required to apply inoculation in field
where legumes are regularly cultivated.

On the other hand, soybean seeds are physiologically mature when maximum dry
weight and seed viability are attained. Soon after maturity, the seed crop is ready for harvest
when pods turned browned and leaves have yellowed and fallen-off. At harvest time, seed
moisture is very high (20-26%). This factor exerts the greater influence on seed quality. It is
important that the post-harvest seed moisture is reduced as quickly as possible and
maintenance to preserve high seed quality (Whigham, 1983).

For vegetable soybeans Shanmugasundaram (1991) reported that, it is ready for
harvest when the pods are still green and 80% of all pods are completely filled with seed.
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

7

Varietal Evaluation and Adaptability

Varietal evaluation is important to observe the performance characters such as yield,
earliness, vigor, maturity and quality because varieties has a wide range difference of a plant
in size and yield performance (Work and Carew, 1995).

Varietal evaluation gathers data on plants characteristics, yield performance and pod
quality. Hence, we can obtain high yield and improve varieties that are known to plants
important role in boosting production (Regmi, 1990). Moreover, Bautista and Mabesa (1977)
stated that the variety to be selected should be high yielding, pests and disease resistant and
early maturing so that production would entail less expense, and ensure more profit.
Selecting the right variety will minimize problems associated with water and fertilizer
managements.

Furthermore, varietal evaluation is a process in plant breeding, which provides
comparison of promising lines by breeders. It is through varietal evaluation that a variety
among developed lines in terms of yield, quality adaptability stress, tolerance and resistance
to pest and disease is selected (Sunil, 1990).

Thus, varietal improvement is a major activity which is expected to increase cropping
intensity and yield. Since soybean is grown mostly as an upland, non-irrigated crop, it has to
withstand drought as well as water-logging to fit to the prevailing rainfall patterns in different
regions. The development of early-maturing and photoperiod-insensitive cultivars which are
resistant to pest and disease and disease is desirable (Shanmugasundaram, 1991).

Reilly and Shry (1991) reported that variety must be adapted to the area in which it
is grown. Different varieties which are grown under the same method of culture have a great
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

8

variation in the yielding ability. A variety that yields in one region is not a guarantee that it
will perform well in another region.

Genetic Resources of Soybean

Germplasm is a collection of genetic resources for an organism. For plants, the
germplasm may be stored as a seed collection or genetic diversity (Peregine, 2003). Genetic
diversity is the basic raw material upon which genetic improvement of soybean varieties is
dependent. The soybean germplasm collection is the primary source of soybean genetic
diversity available to US researchers to address these problems and identifying new and
useful diversity is critical to the economic health of the soybean industry (USDA, 2006).

Germplasm of soybean are collected in order to save the traditional material
cultivated in several localities. Germplasm collection is done to conserve, multiply and make
the seed of soybean and utilization purposes Shanmugasundaram (1991). Brush (1995)
conducted that gene bank is the storage center of genetic resources because it ensures
conservation of genetic diversity that will provide germplasm for small breeders and farmers.

Shanmugasundaram (1987) Stated that AVDRC has screened the majority of the
germplasm and has identified resistant or tolerant accessions to soybean rust, beanfly and
insensitivite to photoperiod. Furthermore, vertical resistant gene available in the soybean
germplasm is being incorporated into improved breeding lines.

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

9

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An area of 165 m2 was properly cleaned and prepared into raise beds. The area was
divided into three blocks consisting of 11 plots measuring 1m x 5 m. The seeds was sown in
two rows with a distance of 40 cm between rows and 30 cm between hills at a depth of 4-5
cm at 1 seed per hill. The experiment was laid out using the randomized complete block
design (RCBD) with three replications. The accessions were acquired from Asian vegetable
research development center (AVRDC), Taiwan. A local check from Ifugao was included in
the trial
ACCESSION

DESCRIPTIONS
A1
AGS
432

A2

AGS 433

A3

AGS 434

A4

AGS 435

A5

AGS 436

A6

AGS 437

A7
AGS
438

A8

AGS 439

A9

AGS 440

A10

AGS 292

A11

Local Variety
Cultural management practices such as irrigation, weeding, fertilizer application, side
dressing and hilling- up, and disease control were properly employed.

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

10

Data Gathered
1. Agro-climatic data. Temperature, relative humidity, light intensity and rainfall
were taken during the conduct of experiment.
2. Maturity
a. Days of sowing to emergence. This was recorded by noting the date of sowing
minus the date of emergence.
b. Days from emergence to flowering. This was recorded by noting the date of sowing
minus the date of flowering.
c. Days from flowering to pod setting. This was recorded by counting the number of
days starting from flowering to the days when pod set are formed at the same time recording
the date of pod setting.
d. Days from emergence to first harvest. This was recorded by counting the number
of days from emergence to first harvest at the same time recording the date of first harvest.
e. Days from emergence to last harvest. This was recorded by counting the number of
days from emergence to last harvest at the same time recording the date of last harvest.
3. Plant Height
a. Initial plant height (cm). This was measured from the base of the plant at ground
level to the tip of the youngest shoots, using a meter stick from five samples per plot at 30
days after planting.

b. Final height (cm). This was measured from the base of the plant at the ground level
to the youngest shoots before the first harvest, using a meter stick from five samples per pot.

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

11

4. Plant Characters

a. Growth Habit. This was recorded by observing the growth of the plants either as
determinate or indeterminate.

b. Plant Vigor: This was gathered at 30 and 60 DAP using the CIP rating scale
(as cited by NPRCRTC, 1983).
Scale Description Remarks
1 Plants are weak with few poor vigor
stems and leaves; very pale.

2 Plants are weak with few thin less vigorous
Stems and leaves; pale

3 Better than less vigorous Vigorous

4 Plants are moderately strong
with robust stem and leaves; moderately vigorous
leaves are light green in color.

5 Plants are strong with robust stems
and leaves; leaves are light to dark highly vigorous
green in color.

c. Reaction to Lodging. This was taken by rating the plants before harvest.

Scale Description

Remarks

1 All plants erect

Resistant

2 All plants leaning slightly or
moderately

10% of the plants lodging

resistant
3 10 to 50% of the plants lodging
Intermediate

4 50 to 80% of the plants lodging
moderately

lodging

5 almost all the plants lodging Susceptible

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

12

5. Pod Characters

a. Number of one-seeded , two-seeded and three-seeded pods. This was recorded by
stripping the pods from these five plants and separate the one-seeded, two seeded and three-
seeded pods into three groups then counted separately.

b. Weight of one-seeded, two-seeded and three-seeded pods. This was recorded after
counting the pods separately then weighed.

c. Length of one-seeded pods, two-seeded pods and three-seeded pods. This was
recorded by measuring the selected five one-seeded pods, two-seeded and three-seeded
randomly and the length measured.

d. Width of one-seeded pods, two-seeded pods and three-seeded pods. This was
recorded after measuring the length of five full one-seeded, two-seeded and three-seeded
pods then the width measured.

e. Pods Color. Rate pod color was described using the following scale:
Scale Description

1 Dark green

2 Green

3 Yellow-Green

4 Yellow

6. Yield and Yield Components
a. Weight of marketable fresh pod per plot (kg). This was recorded by weighing the
marketable fresh pods per plot. Marketable pods are smooth, well-formed and free from
damages.
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

13

b. Weight of non-marketable fresh pods per plot (kg). This was obtained by weighing
the non-marketable pods per plot. These are pods that over matured, malformed and damaged
by pest and diseases.
c. Total yield per plot (kg). This was recorded by summing the total weight of
marketable pods and non-marketable pods per plot.

d. Computed fresh pod yield per hectare (t). This was computed based on the total
yield per plot using the formula:
Yield (t/ha) = Total yield per plot X 2
5m2

Where 2 is the factor used to convert yield in kg/5m2 to ton/ha. Assuming one hectare
effective area.
7. Reaction to Pest and disease. This was assessed by rating the degree of disease and
insect damage on the crop. Reaction were rated using the following scale:
a. Soybean Rust

Scale Description Remark
1 No infection High resistant
2 1-20% of the total plant Mild resistant
per plot is affected

3 25-50% of the total plant Moderate resistant
per plot is affected

4 51-75% of total plant Susceptible
per plot is affected

5 76-100% of the total plant Very susceptible
per plot is affected

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

14

b. Rating scale for leaf miner damage
Scale Description Remark
1 No infection High resistant
2 1-20% of the total plant Mild resistant
per plot is affected

3 25-50% of the total plant Moderate resistant
per plot is affected

4 51-75% of total plant Susceptible
per plot is affected

5 76-100% of the total plant Very susceptible
per plot is affected

8. Sensory Evaluation for Green Shelled. Newly harvested pods were blanched
separately and were evaluated by 15 panelists for general acceptability and aroma using the
following scale.
a. Acceptability

Scale Description
1 dislike very much
2
dislike moderately
3 like
4 like moderately
5 like very much
b. Aroma
Scale Description
1 Not aromatic
2 Slightly aromatic
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

15

3 Moderately aromatic
4 Very aromatic
5 Extremely aromatic

Analysis of Data

All quantitative data were analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for
randomized complete block design (RCBD). The significance of difference among treatment
means was tested using the Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 5% level of
probability.

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

16

Figure 2. Overview of the experimental area before planting and after hill-up
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

17

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Meteorological Data During the Conduct of the Study

Table 1 shows the temperature, relative humidity, amount of rainfall and light
intensity during the conduct of the study. The temperature ranges from 16.30 to 23.89 0C.
Highest temperature of 23.890C was experienced in of October while the lowest temperature
was observed in January (16.30 0C). The relative humidity was highest in the February
(80%), while lowest was in October of 51%. Rainfall occurred only in the November of
75.57 ml. Light intensity was gathered during pod setting of the plants.

Temperature during the conduct of the study was favorable for soybean production
since soybeans grow best at temperatures between 10 to 400C.

Table 1. Meteorology data during the conduct of the study

Month TEMPERATURE RELATIVE RAINFALL

(0C)
HUMIDITY
(ml)

October

23.89 51
-

November

23.43

57
75.57

December

17.22

69
-

January

16.30

71
-
February

19.13

80
-

___________________________________________________________________________
MEAN

20.13

65.6
75.57

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

18

Number of Days from Sowing to Harvesting,

Significant differences were observed among the accessions on the number of days
from sowing to flowering. The local soybean accession was the earliest to emerge at seven
days after sowing but the latest to be harvested (73 days). The other accessions emerged
eight days after sowing and were the first to be harvested at 72 days after emergence.
Apparently, all the eleven accessions of soybeans have similar maturity period under Pacso,
Kabayan, Benguet (Table 2).

Table 2. Number of days from sowing to harvesting of the 11 soybean accessions

NUMBER OF DAYS FROM

SOWING TO EMERGENCE TO FLOWERING TO EMERGENCE TO
ACCESSIONS EMERGENCE FLOWERING POD SETTING FIRST HARVEST LAST HARVEST
AGS 432
8b 39fg
6 72a
85
AGS 433
8b 40g
6 72a
85
AGS 434
8b 38fg
5 72a
85
AGS 435
8b 40g
6 72a
85
AGS 436
8b 34a
7 72a
85
AGS 437
8b 36ed
5 72a
85
AGS 438
8b
34a
6 72a
85
AGS 439
8b 34a
6 72a
85
AGS 440
8b 37de
6 72a
85
AGS 292
8b 35bc
5 72a
85
Local variety 7a 47g
6 73b
85
CV
(%) 5.11
2.16
9.56
0.64
0.56
*Means followed by a common letters are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

19

No significant differences were observed among the eleven soybean accessions on the
number of days from flowering to pod setting and last harvest. Differences on the days to
harvesting could be attributed to the varietal characteristics of the different accessions in
terms of maturity.

Initial and Final Plant Heights

Plant height at 30 days after planting and before the first harvest was observed to be
significantly different among the accessions. AGS 292 produced the tallest plants (14.79cm)
while the local variety the shortest of 11.51 cm but had the tallest final height of 23.21 cm.

Table 3. Initial and final height of the 11 soybean accessions

ACCESSIONS

PLANT HEIGHT (cm)

INITIAL

FINAL
AGS
432
12.41f
15.75de

AGS
433
14.30ab
22.79a
AGS
434
12.58ef
18.03c
AGS
435
14.09b 21.60ab
AGS
436
13.09de
20.45b
AGS
437
13.45ed
18.43c
AGS
438
13.71bc
18.58c
AGS
439
12.10f 14.39e
AGS
440
13.49cd
17.47cd
AGS
292
14.79a
18.47c
Local
Variety
11.51g 23.21a

CV
(%) 5.40
5.85
*Means followed by a common letters are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

20

AGS 433 had a comparable initial height with AGS 292 and final height with the local
variety. Differences in the height of the plants could be due to the inherent characteristics of
the accessions like narrow adaptability to climatic condition of the introduced accessions
while the local variety is already adapted (Table 3).

Table 4. Plant vigor at 30 and 60 days after planting of the 11 soybean accessions

ACCESSIONS PLANT VIGOR (DAP)

30

60

AGS
432
1b

2

AGS
433
2a

3
AGS
434
2a

3
AGS
435
2a

3
AGS
436
2a

3
AGS
437
2a

3
AGS
438
2a

3
AGS
439
2a

3
AGS
440
2a

3
AGS
292
2a

3
Local
variety
2a

4

CV
(%) 11.56
*Means followed by a common letters are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT

Legend: 1- Poor vigor; 2- Less vigorous; 3- vigorous; 4-moderately vigorous; 5- Highly Vigorous

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

21

Plant Vigor at 30 and 60 Days after Planting

AGS 432 significantly exhibited poor vigor while the AVRDC accessions were all
less vigorous at 30 days after planting. At 60 days after planting, most of the accessions
were observed to be vigorous. The local variety was moderately vigorous while AGS 432
was less vigorous (Table 4).

The poor plant vigor could be due to the lack of water during the vegetative stage of
the plant and the prevailing climatic condition during the growing period of the plant.

Growth Habit, Pod Color and Reaction to Lodging

The growth habits of the eleven soybean accessions are determinate. Determinate
soybeans have fewer nodes per plant and are shorter at maturity than indeterminate type
(Baligar and Jones, 1997).
For the pod color, nine soybean accessions have green fresh pods, AGS 440 has dark
green while the local variety has yellow green. On the reaction to lodging, all the 11 soybean
accessions were observed to be resistant.

Number, Width, Length and Weight of
One- , Two- and Three-seeded Pods

Significant differences were observed in all the parameters gathered as shown in
Table 5.

Number of Seeds per Pod

Significant differences among the accessions were recorded in one-seeded pods. The
local variety produced significantly the highest number of one-seeded, two-seeded and three-
seeded pods. Lowest number of one-seeded pod was observed in AGS 432 (31), AGS 436
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

22

(45) and AGS 440 (46). AGS 432 had the least number of two-seeded pods of 31 and AGS
434 recorded the least (2) of three-seeded pods.
Basically, the number of seeds per pod is controlled by its genetic components and
therefore not easily influenced by the environmental factor (Buena, 2004). Furthermore,
there are also other factors that affect the development of the seed per pods such as; pest,
disease, nutrient and water availability.

Width of Pods

For the width of one-seeded pods, AGS 439 had the widest pods with of 1.85 cm
comparable with accession AGS 433 (1.75cm); AGS 434 (1.78cm); AGS 435 (1.74cm) and
AGS 440 (1.75cm). The narrowest pods were obtained from the local variety (1.39 cm).

For the two-seeded pods, AGS 440 had the widest pods of 1.84 cm while the local
variety had the narrowest pods of 1.37 cm. On the width of the three-seeded pods, AGS 440
had the widest pod width with a mean of 1.77 cm. However, it was observed that all the
varieties tested had acceptable pod width based on the desirable width of legumes as cited by
Tandang (1990).

Length of Pods

Significant differences were observed among the accessions in terms of pod length.
The longest one-seeded pods were obtained from AGS 439 (4.17cm) followed by AGS 438
(4.13cm) and AGS 433 (4.05 cm) while AGS 432 has the shortest pods length of 3.39cm.

As to two-seeded pods, AGS 439 produced the longest pods of 5.61 cm comparable
with AGS 440 and AGS 438. The shortest pods were obtained from AGS 432. For the three-
seeded pods, AGS 438 has the longest pods of 6.37 cm.
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

23

Pod length is one of the criteria used to determine the marketability of the legume
pods. Consumers and buyers of the beans pods usually prefer longer pods than the shorter
ones (Viernes, 2000). In this study, pod length was measured from the pedicel to the blossom
end of the pods.

Weight of Pods

The local variety registered the heaviest pods of 0.79 kg one-seeded pods. AGS 433
had a comparable weight (0.75kg) while the lightest was obtained from AGS 432 (0.22kg).

Significant differences were observed among the accessions in terms of the weight of
two-seeded pods. The local soybean variety produced heaviest pods of 1.78 kg followed by
AGS 439 (1.35kg) while the lightest was obtained from AGS 432 with 0.35 kg.

On the weight of the three-seeded pods, AGS 438 produced the heaviest pods of 0.29
kg comparable with AGS 433 (0.21kg), AGS (0.20kg) and AGS 439 (0.22kg).

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

24
Table 5. Number, width, length and weight of one-seeded, two-seeded and three-seeded pods of the 11 soybean accessions

ACCESSION ONE-SEEDED POD TWO-SEEDED POD THREE-SEEDED POD
NUMBER WIDTH LENGTH WEIGHT NUMBER WIDTH LENGTH WEIGHT NUMBER WIDTH LENGTH WEIGTH
(cm) (cm) (kg) (cm) (cm) (kg) (cm) (cm) (kg)
AGS 432 31c 1.56c 3.39c 0.22c 31d 1.48f 4.43e 0.35e 4cde 0.54bc 1.57b 0.09def
AGS 433 94b 1.78ab 4.05a 0.75c 61c 1.65bcd 4.93bc 0.88c 12bc 1.54a 5.59a 0.21bc
AGS 434 50bc 1.78ab 3.84ab 0.42bc 40cd 1.72bc 5.12b 0.50de 2e 1.52a 4.79a 0.04f
AGS 435 64bc 1.74ab 3.77abc 0.44bc 48cd 1.59def 4.82cd 0.56de 3de 1.55a 4.67a 0.07ef
AGS 436 45c 1.71abc 3.91ab 0.42bc 41cd 1.73b 5.19b 0.64cd 11cd 1.66a 5.90a 0.20bc
AGS 437 52b 1.62bc 3.57bc 0.48bc 33d 1.52ef 4.51e 0.52de 4cde 0.57bc 1.78a 0.05f
AGS 438 52bc 1.65bc 4.13a 0.40bc 60c 1.61cde 5.48a 0.92c 19b 1.61a 6.37a 0.29b
AGS 439 70bc 1.85a 4.17a 0.57ab 83b 1.71bc 5.61a 1.35b 10cde 1.70a 6.29a 0.22bc
AGS 440 46c 1.75ab 3.81abc 0.45bc 43cd 1.84a 5.50a 0.73cd 10cde 1.77a 6.50a 0.17cd
AGS 292 73bc 1.65bc 3.58bc 0.65ab 48cd 1.62bcde 5.01bc 0.67cd 5cde 1.08ab 1.83b 0.15cde
Local Variety 165a 1.39d 3.56bc 0.79a 210a 1.37g 4.59dc 1.78a 35a 1.52a 4.97a 0.39a
CV (%) 26.02 27.29 5.12 5.99 17.97 18.98 4.10 3.27 17.32 29.25 17.80 15.63
*Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT.
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

25
Weight of Marketable and Non- marketable Pods per 5m2 Plot

Table 6 shows significant differences on the weight of marketable fresh pods of the
11 soybean accessions. The local variety produced the highest marketable fresh pod yield of
2.56 kg and a total fresh pod yield of 2.26 kg. Among the AVRDC accession AGS 439
produced the heaviest marketable pods of 1.95 kg comparable with AGS 433 that produced
3.69 kg. AGS 434 had the lowest marketable and total fresh pod yield of 0.45 kg and 0.66
kg, respectively.
The fresh pods of vegetable legumes are considered marketable when they are
smooth, tender and free from pest and insect damage (Gonzales, 1983).

Computed Fresh Pods Yield per Hectare

Among the accessions the local variety had significantly the highest computed fresh
pod yield of 5.92 ton. The lowest computed fresh pod yield per hectare was obtained from
AGS 432 with 1.34 tons. This finding may be attributed to the genetic characteristic of the
different accessions.

Regmi (1990) stated that there are always variations a yield and yield components
among the varieties. This could be due to the varying potential and with the interaction with
the environmental condition. Generally, soybeans are temperate and photoperiod sensitive
with temperature between 10 to 400C and are short-day plants (Baligar and Jones, 1997).

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

26
Table 6. Marketable, non-marketable and total fresh pod yield of the 11 soybean accessions

YIELD (kg/5m2)
ACCESSION MARKETABLE NON-MARKETABLE TOTAL COMPUTED FRESH POD
YIELD PER HECTARE (t/ha)

AGS 432
0.45f

0.21
0.66g

1.34g
AGS 433
1.56bc

0.29
1.85bc

3.69bc
AGS 434
0.82ef

0.13
0.95fg

1.58fg
AGS 435
0.89e

0.18
1.08efg

2.16efg
AGS 436
1.05de

0.22
1.26def

2.50def
AGS 437
0.96e

0.08
1.05efg

2.09efg
AGS 438
1.48cd

0.14
1.62cd

3.30cd
AGS 439
1.95b

0.19
2.14b

4.28b
AGS 440
1.07de

0.28
1.35def

2.69cde
AGS 292
1.21cde

0.26
1.47cde

2.95cde
Local variety 2.56a

0.40
2.96a

5.92a
CV (%)
18.87

0.40
18.49

18.66
*Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT.

Reaction to Soybean Rust and Leaf Miner

The AVRDC soybean accessions and the local variety showed mild to moderate
resistance to soybean rust and leaf miner incidence as shown in Table 7.

The resistance of the accessions could be due to the inherent characteristic and the
prevailing climatic condition during the study which was unfavorable for the occurrence of
bean rust and leaf miner.

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

27

Figure 2a. Marketable pods yield of the six soybean accessions
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

28

Figure 2b. Marketable pods yield of the five soybean accessions

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

29
Table 7. Reaction to soybean rust and leaf miner of the 11 soybean accessions

REACTION TO:
ACCESSIONS
SOYBEAN RUST
LEAF MINER

AGS
432
2b

2
AGS
433
3a

2
AGS
434
2b
2

AGS
435
2b

3
AGS
436
3a

3
AGS
437
2b 2
AGS
438
3a 3
AGS
439
3a 2
AGS
440
2b 2
AGS
292
2b 2
Local
Variety
2b

2
CV
(%) 16.42

17.07
*Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT.

Legend: 1- High resistant; 2- mild resistant; 3- moderately resistant; 4- susceptible; 5- Very susceptible

Sensory Evaluation of Boiled Green Pods

Harvested pods were blanched and evaluated by 15 panelists who served as
evaluators. The pods were assessed based on the aroma and general acceptability.

AGS 434 and AGS 435 were rated moderately aromatic while the other accessions
were judged as slightly aromatic. On the general acceptability there were significant
differences among accessions (Table 8). Most of the accessions were liked except for
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

30
AGS 440 which was rated liked moderately while the local soybean accession was rated
dislike moderately.

In terms of the sensory evaluation of fresh pods, consumers were considered the color
of the fresh pods. The green to dark green fresh pods were more acceptable than yellow
pods.

Table 8. Aroma and general acceptability of 11 soybean accessions

RATING:
ACCESSIONS
AROMA
GENERAL ACCEPTABILITY

AGS 432

2

3b
AGS 433

2

3b
AGS 434

3

3b
AGS 435

3

3b
AGS 436

2

3b

AGS 437

2

3b
AGS 438

2

3b
AGS 439

2

3b
AGS 440

2

4a
AGS 292

2

3b
Local
variety
2 2c
CV (%)

13.41

29.89
*Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT.
Aroma: 1- Not aromatic; 2- slightly aromatic; 3- moderately aromatic; 4- Very aromatic5- Extremely aromatic

Acceptability: 1- dislike very much; 2- dislike moderately; 3- like; 4- like moderately; 5- like very much

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

31
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Summary

This study aimed to determine the growth and yield performance of soybean
accession in Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet condition; determine the best soybean accession/s
based on the yield and resistance to pest and disease and determine the farmer acceptability.
This was conducted at Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet condition from.

Significant differences among the soybean accessions were observed on the number
of days from sowing to emergence, emergence to flowering, emergence to first harvest, plant
vigor at 30 and 60 days after planting, number of seeds per pods, width of pods, length of
pods, weight of pods, weight of marketable yield, total yield per plot, computed fresh pod
yield per hectare, soybean rust and acceptability.

Among the AVRDC soybean accessions, AGS 433 was the earliest to flower,
produced tallest plants. It also produced the longest and heaviest one-seeded pods. AGS 439
produced widest, longest one-, two- and three-seeded pods. AGS 435 was earliest to flower.
On general acceptability, AGS 440 was liked moderately.

As to the performance of the local variety compared of the AVRDC accessions, it
was observed that the local variety emerged earlier, produced taller plants and had heaviest
marketable pods.

Conclusion

Among the soybean accessions from AVRDC, AGS 439 and AGS 433 are the best in
terms of earliness to flower and first to pod formation. The accession also produced tallest
plant, widest, longest, heaviest and most acceptable pods.
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

32

Though the local variety was the earliest to emerged, produced the heaviest
marketable pods and tallest plants. It was disliked moderately.

Recommendation

The different soybean accessions are adapted under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet
condition. However, the yield was low which could be due to unfavorable climatic
conditions during the conduct of the study. It is therefore recommended that the accessions
will be planted as lately as August so flowering will coincide with short days (November to
December) soybean being a short day plant.
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

33
LITERATURE CITED

ASEAN VEGETABLE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CENTER. 1994. Progress
Report. AVRDC. Shannhua, Tainan Roc. P.369 and 429.

BAUTISTA, O. K. and R. G. MABESA.1997. Vegetable Production Los Banos
University of the Philippines Los Banos P. 28

BALIGAR, V. C. and ALLAN JONES C. 1997. Growth and minerals nutrition of field
crops. Accessed at http://books.google.comph/books?/ sbn=0824700899

BENTON, J.Jr. 2003. Agronomic Handbook Management of Crops, soil and Fertility,
CRC Press LLC.Pp 136,139

BRUSH, S. B. 1995. In site conservation of landrace in centers of crop diversity, Crop
Science, San Francisco, W.P. Freeman and Company. Pp 346-340.

BUENA, C. G. 2004. Seed Production of Garden Pea applied with dolomite and coco
coir dust. BS Thesis. BSU, La Trinidad Benguet Pp. 14-15.

CHAPMAN, S. R, 1976. Crop Protection 2nd edition Freeman and company San
Franscisco, freeman Book Company Inc. P 27-30.

GONZALEZ, E. L. 1983. Characterization and Yield Evalution of Local Varieties of
snap Bean. BS. Thesis ( Unpub.). MSAC, La Trinidad, Benguet. P. 3.

NPRCRTC, 1983. The Nothern Philippines Root Crops Research and Training Center
Annual Report. Benguet state University, La Trinidad, Philippines. P. 18.

PEREGRINE, E. 2003. USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection. Access at. http://
agronomyday. cropsci.uiuc.edu/2003/exhibits/soybean_germplasm.html

PERSLEY, G. J (Editor). 1983. Tropical Legume Improvement. Proceeding of Thailand/
ACIAR Planning and Coordination Workshop, Bangkok P.28

REGMI, S. K. 1990. Varietal of Promising Lines and Path Coefficient Analysis in Pole
Snap bean. Ms Thesis BSU, La Trinidad, Benguet P 39-40.

REILY, H. E. and L .C. SHRY 1991. Introductory Horticulture. New York, Delmar
Publisher. Inc P. 562.

SHANMUGANDARAM, S. 1991. Vegetable Soybean, Research needs for Production
and Quality Improvement. Kenting, Taiwan/AVRDC. Publishing No. 911-346.
P.151.

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

34
SINGH, S. S 1991. Handbook of Agriculture Sciences, First Edition, KALYANI
Publishing Inc. New York. P.132.

SMITH, C. W. 1995. Crop Production Evolution, History and Technology, John Wiley
and Sons,Inc. United State of America. P 350-407.

SULZBERGEN, E. W. and B. T. McLean. 1986. Soybean in Tropical and Subtropical
Cropping System, Revised Edition. AVRDC Publication No. 86-253 Pp 1,202-
203,333-345.

SUNIL, K. R. 1990. Varietal Evaluation of Promising Lines and Path Coefficient
Analysis of Pole Bean. Ms Thesis. Benguet State University, La Trinidad,
Benguet Pp 3-4..

TANDANG, L.L. 1990. Promising Varieties of Snap Bean in the Highlands. A paper
Presented During the Highlights at the Regional Science Development Center.
Benguet state University. La Trinidad, Benguet. P 17.

USDA. 2006. Soybean genetic resources management and utilization. Accessed at.
http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/projects/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=407333&fy
=2006

VAN DER MAESEN, L. J. G and SADIKIN SAMAATMADJA. 1990. Plant Resources
of South-East Asia 1@ Pudoc/Prosea Wageningen, The Netherlands P.43-47.

WHIGHAM, D. K. 1983. Symptom on Potential Productivity of field Crops Under
Different Environment, IRRI Los Banos, Laguna, Philippine P. 205-225.

WILSON, J. W. and P. H. CLIFFORD. 1975. Vegetable Gardening. Lan Publishing Co.
Menlo Park, California P. 39

WORK, D. and J. CAREW. 1995. Producing Vegetable Crops. The Interstate Printers
and Publishers, Inc. Printed in the United State of America p. 238.

VIERNES, E. E. 2000. Increasing Productivity of Pole Snap Beans Through the use of
Effective Microorganisms (FM) B-S. Thesis. (Unpub). Benguet State University.
La Trinidad, Benguet Pp. 12-20.
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

35
APPENDICES

Appendix 1. Number of days from sowing to emergence

REPLICATION
ACCESSION
1

11

11
TOTAL MEAN

AGS
432
8 9 8 25
8
AGS
433
8 8 7 23
8
AGS
434
8 8 8 24
8
AGS
435
8 8 7 23
8
AGS
436
8 9 8 25
8
AGS
437
8 8 8 24
8
AGS
438
8 8 8 24
8
AGS
439
8 8 8 25
8
AGS
440
8 8 8 24
8
AGS
292
8 8 8 23
8
Local
Check
7 7 7 21
7
_______________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 87

89

85

261
===============================================================

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2 0.727
0.364

Variety 10
4.727
0.473
2.89*
2.35
3.37
Error
20
3.273
0.164
TOTAL 32

8.727
*- Significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 5.11%
Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

36
Appendix 2. Number of days from emergence to flowering
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
39
38
39
116
39

AGS
433
4 39
41
12
40
AGS
434
39
38
38
115
38
AGS
435
4 4 41
121
40
AGS
436

34
33
34
101
34
AGS
437
36
35
36
107
36
AGS
438
34
34
35
103
34
AGS
439
33
35
34
102
34
AGS
440
38
38
36
112
37
AGS
292
36
34
34
14
35
Local
Check
47
48
47
142
47
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 416
412
415
1240

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.788
0.394

Variety
10
483.333
48.333
73.16**
2.35 3.37
Error
20
13.212
0.661

TOTAL 32
497.333
**-Significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 2.16%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

37
Appendix 3. Number of days from flowering to pod setting.
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
6 6 6 18
6
AGS
433
6 6 5 17
6
AGS
434
5 5 6 16
5
AGS
435
6 6 5 17
6
AGS
436

7 7 6 20
7
AGS
437
5 6 5 16
5
AGS
438
7 6 5 18
6
AGS
439
6 5 6 17
6
AGS
440
7 6 6 19
6
AGS
292
5 6 5 16
5
Local
Check
6 6 5 17
6
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 66
65
60
191

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
1.879
0.939

Variety
10
5.515 0.552
1.80ns
2.35 3.37
Error
20 6.121 0.306

TOTAL
32 13.515
ns - Not significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 9.56%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

38
Appendix 4. Number of days from emergence to first harvest
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
72
71
71
215
72

AGS
433
72
72
73
217
72

AGS
434
72
72
72
216
72
AGS
435
72
72
73
217
72
AGS
436

72
71
72
215
72
AGS
437
72
72
72
216
72
AGS
438
71
72
72
216
72
AGS
439
71
72
72
215
72
AGS
440
72
72
72
216
72
AGS
292
73
72
72
217
72
Local
Check
73
74
73
220
73
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 793
792
795
2380

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2

0.424
0.212

Variety
10
6.848
0.685
3.23*
2.35 3.37
Error
20
4.242
0.212

TOTAL 32
11.515
*- Significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 0.64%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

39
Appendix 5. Number of days from emergence to last harvest
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
85
84
85
254
85
AGS
433
84
85
86
255
85
AGS
434
85
85
85
255
85
AGS
435
85
85
86
256
85
AGS
436

85
84
85
254
85
AGS
437
85
85
85
255
85
AGS
438
85
85
85
255
85
AGS
439
84
85
85
254
85
AGS
440
85
85
85
255
85
AGS
292
86
85
85
256
85
Local
Check
86
86
86
258
86
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 935
934
938
2607

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.788
0.394

Variety
10
4.545
0.455
2.0ns
2.35
3.37
Error
20
4.545
0.227

TOTAL 32
9.879
ns- Not significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 0.56%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

40
Appendix 6. Initial plant height (cm)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
11.86
11.04
14.34
37.24
12.41

AGS
433
14.68
13.38
14.84
42.90
14.30

AGS
434
12.86
12.78
12.10
37.72
12.58
AGS
435
14.20
13.10
14.98
42.28
14.09
AGS
436

12.54
13.16
13.56
39.26
13.09
AGS
437
12.64
13.80
13.92
40.36
13.45

AGS
438
12.84
14.50
13.80
41.14
13.71
AGS
439
11.70
12.44
12.16
36.30
12.10

AGS
440
13.26
13.16
14.04
40.46
13.49

AGS
292
14.26
14.3
15.80
44.36
14.79

Local
Check
11.56
11.36
11.62
34.54
11.51

________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 142.40
143.02
151.16
436.58

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
4.345
2.172

Variety
10
29.990
2.999
5.87**
2.35 3.37
Error 20
10.213
0.511

TOTAL 32
44.546
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 5.40%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

41
Appendix 7. Final plant height (cm)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
15.34
14.72.
17.18
47.24
15.75
AGS
433
23.70
22.04
22.62
68.37
22.79
AGS
434
18.56
17.46
18.08
54.10
18.03
AGS
435
21.02
20.42
23.36
64.80
21.60
AGS
436

20.34
20.16
20.86
61.36
20.45
AGS
437
17.78
19.06
18.44
55.28
18.43
AGS
438
16.86
20.66
18.06
55.58
18.58
AGS
439
14.58
14.28
14.32
43.18
14.39
AGS
440
17.64
18.54
16.24
52.42
17.47
AGS
292
17.50
18.60
19.30
55.40
18.47
Local
check

21.72
23.14
24.76
69.62
23.21
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 205.04
209.08
213.22
627.34

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
3.042
1.521

Variety 10
230.441
23.044
18.64**
2.35 3.37
Error 20
24.731
1.237

TOTAL 32
258.214
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 5.85%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

42
Appendix 8. Plant Vigor at 30 days after planting
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
1 1 2 4 1
AGS
433
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
434
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
435
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
436

2 2 2 6 2
AGS
437
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
438
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
439
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
440
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
292
2 2 2 6 2
Local
Check
2 2 3 7 2
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 21
21
23
65

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block 2
0.242
0.121

Variety 10
1.636
0.164
3.0*
2.35 3.37
Error 20 1.091
0.055

TOTAL 32
2.970
*-signmificant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 11.86%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

43
Appendix 12. Number of one-seeded pods
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
30
27
35
92
31
AGS
433
61
107
115
283
94
AGS
434
57
43
50
150
50
AGS
435
53
73
65
191
64

AGS
436

37
48
51
136
45
AGS
437
47
56
54
157
52
AGS
438
59
54
44
157
52
AGS
439
48
78
83
209
70
AGS
440
48
41
49
138
46
AGS
292
58
66
94
218
73
Local
Check
74
198
224
496
165
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 572
791
864
2227

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
4198.606
2099.303

Variety
10
40242.242
4024.224
6.48**
2.35 3.37
Error
20
12423.394
621.170

TOTAL 32
56864.242
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 26.02%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

44
Appendix 13. Number of two-seeded pods
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
41
26
26
96
31

AGS
433
43
78
62
183
61
AGS
434
41
39
39
119
40
AGS
435
46
45
54
145
48
AGS
436

31
46
47
124
41
AGS
437
42
37
21
100
33
AGS
438
70
53
58
181
60
AGS
439
81
87
81
249
83
AGS
440
44
50
36
130
43
AGS
292
54
45
46
145
48
Local
Check
184
235
212
631
210
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 677
741
682
2100

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
230.364
115.182

Variety 10
77546.303
7754.630 59.31**
2.35 3.37
Error 20
2614.970
130.748

TOTAL 32
80391.636
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 17.97%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

45
Appendix 14. Number of three-seeded pods
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
24
4 7 13
4
AGS
433
6 18
13
37
12
AGS
434
10
2 3 7 2
AGS
435
10
4 3 10
3
AGS
436

19
7 13
32
11
AGS
437
6 3 3 12
4
AGS
438
12
19
19
57
19
AGS
439
3 9 10
29
10
AGS
440
2 12
7 29
10
AGS
292
6 3 6 15
5
Local
Check
2 49
33
106
35
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 100
130
177
407

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
41.152
20.576

Variety 10
2766.909 276.691 13.43**
2.35 3.37
Error 20
412.182 20.609

TOTAL 32
3220.242
**- highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 17.32%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

46
Appendix 15. Width of one-seeded pods (cm)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
1.58
1.48
1.62
4.68
1.56
AGS
433
1.66
1.82
1.86
5.34
1.78
AGS
434
1.74
1.72
1.88
5.34
1.78
AGS
435
1.74
1.58
1.90
5.22
1.74
AGS
436

1.62
1.74
1.78
5.14
1.71
AGS
437
1.56
1.64
1.66
4.86
1.62
AGS
438
1.62
1.60
1.72
4.94
1.65
AGS
439
1.90
1.72
1.92
5.54
1.85
AGS
440
1.60
1.74
1.92
5.26
1.75
AGS
292
1.64
1.54
1.76
4.94
1.65
Local
Check
1.36
1.42
1.40
4.18
1.39
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 18.02
18
19.42
55.44

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.106
0.053

Variety
10
0.517
0.052
6.93**
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.149
0.007

TOTAL 32
0.772
**- highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 5.12%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

47
Appendix 16. Width of two-seeded pods (cm)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
1.54
1.50
1.40
4.44
1.48
AGS
433
1.68
1.58
1.70
4.96
1.65
AGS
434
1.68
1.68
1.80
5.16
1.72
AGS
435
1.54
1.64
1.60
4.78
1.59
AGS
436

1.78
1.66
1.76
5.20
1.73
AGS
437
1.48
1.44
1.64
4.56
1.52
AGS
438
1.66
1.54
1.64
4.84
1.61
AGS
439
1.78
1.70
1.66
5.14
1.71
AGS
440
1.82
1.80
1.90
5.52
1.84
AGS
292
1.56
1.70
1.60
4.86
1.62
Local
Check
1.42
1.32
1.36
4.10
1.37
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 17.94
17.56
18.06
53.56

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.012
0.006

Variety
10
0.526
0.053
11.91**
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.088
0.004

TOTAL 32
0.627
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 4.10%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

48
Appendix 17. Width of three-seeded pods (cm)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
0 0 1.62
1.62
0.54
AGS
433
1.44
1.54
1.58
4.56
1.52
AGS
434
1.10
1.50
.40
3.00
1.51
AGS
435
1.50
1.55
1.60
4.65
1.55
AGS
436

1.64
1.64
1.70
4.98
1.66
AGS
437
1.70
0 0 1.70
0.57
AGS
438
1.66
1.56
1.62
4.84
1.61
AGS
439
1.66
1.74
1.70
5.10
1.70
AGS
440
1.76
1.68
1.88
5.32
1.77
AGS
292
1.62
0 1.62
3.24
1.08
Local
Check
1.42
1.6
1.54
4.56
1.52
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 15.50
12.81
15.26
43.57

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.674
0.337

Variety 10
14.281
1.428
5.94**
2.35 3.37
Error 20
4.810
0.241

TOTAL 32
19.765
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 17.80%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

49
Appendix 18. Length of one-seeded pods (cm)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
3.38
3.
40
3.40
10.18
3.39

AGS
433
4.04

4.02
4.08
12.14
4.05
AGS
434
3.94
3.78
3.80
11.52
3.84
AGS
435
3.68

3.74

3.88
11.30
3.77
AGS 436

3.80
4 .06
3.86
11.72
3.91
AGS 437

3.64
3.42 3.66
10.72
3.57
AGS
438
4.68
3.92
3.78
12.38
4.13
AGS
439
4.32
3.94
4.26
12.52
4.7
AGS
440
3.68
4.12
3.62
11.42
3.81
AGS
292
3.34
3.44
3.96
10.74
3.58
Local
Check
3.68
3.40
3.60
10.68
3.56
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 42.18
41.24
41.90
125.32

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.042
0.021

Variety
10
1.931
0.193
3.74**
2.35 3.37
Error
20
1.033
0.052

TOTAL 32 3.007
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 5.99%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

50
Appendix 19. Length of two-seeded pods (cm)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
4.52
4.30
4.46
13.28
4.43
AGS
433
4.82
5.00
4.98
14.80
1.93
AGS
434
5.14
5.54
5.22
15.36
5.12
AGS
435
4.80
5.36
4.84
14.46
4.82
AGS
436

5.48
5.18
5.18
15.56
5.19
AGS
437
4.36
4.60
4.58
13.54
4.51
AGS
438
5.78
4.90
5.48
16.44
5.48
AGS
439
5.74
4.82
5.72
16.82
5.61
AGS
440
5.30
5.00
5.66
16.50
5.50
AGS
292
4.94
5.00
5.08
15.02
5.01
Local
Check
4.50
4.30
4.58
13.76
4.59
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 55.38
54.33
55.78
165.49

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.109
0.054

Variety 10
5.120
0.512
19.0**
2.35 3.37
Error 20
0.539
0.027

TOTAL 32
5.768
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 3.27%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

51
Appendix 20. Length of three-seeded pods (cm)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
0 0 4.72
4.72
1.57

AGS
433
5.88
5.46
5.44
16.78
5.59
AGS
434
4.58
4.40
5.40
14.38
4.79
AGS
435
5.50
3.64
4.88
14.02
4.67
AGS
436

5.90
6.02
5.78
17.7
5.90
AGS
437
5.34
0 0 5.34
1.78
AGS
438
6.36
6.30
6.46
19.12
6.37
AGS
439
6.44
6.30
6.06
18.8
6.27
AGS
440
6.54
6.44
6.52
19.5
6.50
AGS
292
5.48
0 0 5.48
1.83
Local
Check
5.02
4.98
4.92
14.92
4.97
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 57.04
43.54
50.18
150.76

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
6.077
3.038

Variety
10
212.155
21.216
8.83**
2.35 3.37
Error 20
48.056
2.403

TOTAL 32
266.288
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 15.63%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

52
Appendix 21. Weight of one-seeded pods (kg)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
0.17
0.20
0.28
0.65
0.22
AGS
433
0.49
0.85
0.92
2.26
0.75
AGS
434
0.49
0.32
0.44
1.25
0.42
AGS
435
0.34
0.48
0.51
1.33
0.44
AGS
436

0.34
0.40
0.52
1.26
0.42
AGS
437
0.53
0.45
0.46
1.44
0.48
AGS
438
0.36
0.46
0.39
1.21
0.40
AGS
439
0.34
0.66
0.72
1.72
0.57
AGS
440
0.51
0.41
0.42
1.34
0.45
AGS
292
0.49
0.70
0.77
1.96
0.65
Local
Check
0.35
0.98
1.03
2.36
0.79
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 4.41
5.91
6.46
16.78

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.205
0.102

Variety
10
0.852
0.085
4.42**
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.385
0.019

TOTAL 32
1.441
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 27.29 %

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

53
Appendix 22. Weight of two-seeded pods (kg)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
0.36
0.34
0.36
1.06
0.35

AGS
433
0.67
1.08
0.90
2.65
0.88
AGS
434
0.49
0.48
0.53
1.50
0.50
AGS
435
0.65
0.58
0.46
1.69
0.56
AGS
436

0.54
0.72
0.67
1.93
0.64
AGS
437
0.65
0.59
0.31
1.55
0.52
AGS
438
1.11
0.82
0.83
2.76
0.92
AGS
439
1.30
1.41
1.33
4.04
1.35
AGS
440
0.93
0.70
0.55
2.18
0.73
AGS
292
0.83
0.46
0.71
2.00
0.67
Local
Check
1.57
1.93
1.84
5.34
1.78
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 9.10
9.11
8.49
26.69

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.027
0.014

Variety 10
5.234
0.523
22.02**
2.35 3.37
Error 20
0.475
0.024

TOTAL 32
5.737
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 18.98%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

54
Appendix 23. Weight of three-seeded pods (kg)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
0.04
0.08
0.16
0.28
0.09
AGS
433
0.08
0.31
0.24
0.63
0.21
AGS
434
0.05
0.02
0.04
0.11
0.04
AGS
435
0.01
0.07
0.14
0.22
0.07
AGS
436

0.17
0.20
0.23
0.60
0.20
AGS
437
0.06
0.02
0.07
0.15
0.05
AGS
438
0.26
0.28
0.34
0.88
0.29
AGS
439
0.26
0.21
0.19
0.66
0.22
AGS
440
0.18
0.20
0.14
0.52
0.17
AGS
292
0.14
0.19
0.13
0.46
0.15
Local
Check
0.37
0.43
0.37
1.17
0.39
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 1.62
2.01
2.05
5.68

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.010
0.005

Variety
10
0.349
0.035
13.75**
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.051
0.003

TOTAL 32
0.411
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 29.25%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

55
Appendix 24. Weight of marketable pods (kg)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
0.39
0.53
0.44
1.36
0.45
AGS
433
1.04
2.15
1.48
4.67
1.56
AGS
434
0.91
0.81
0.75
2.47
0.82
AGS
435
0.96
1.04
0.68
2.68
0.89
AGS
436

0.89
1.19
1.06
3.14
1.05
AGS
437
1.13
1.00
0.76
2.89
0.96
AGS
438
1.63
1.45
1.35
4.43
1.48
AGS
439
1.85
2.23
1.78
5.86
1.95
AGS
440
1.33
1.19
0.69
3.21
1.07
AGS
292
1.18
1.30
1.15
3.63
1.21
Local
Check
2.10
3.06
2.52
7.68
2.56
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 13.41
15.95
12.66
42.02

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.541
0.270

Variety 10 10.355 1.035
17.94**
2.35 3.37
Error 20 1.154 0.058

TOTAL 32 12.050
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 18.87%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

56
Appendix 25. Weight of non-marketable pods (kg)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
0.18
0.09
0.36
0.63
0.21
AGS
433
0.20
0.09
0.58
0.87
0.29
AGS
434
0.12
0.01
0.26
0.39
0.13
AGS
435
0.04
0.09
0.42
0.55
0.18
AGS
436

0.16
0.13
0.36
0.65
0.22
AGS
437
0.11
0.06
0.08
0.25
0.08
AGS
438
0.10
0.11
0.21
0.42
0.14
AGS
439
0.05
0.05
0.46
0.56
0.19
AGS
440
0.29
0.12
0.42
0.83
0.28
AGS
292
0.28
0.05
0.46
0.79
0.26
Local
Check
0.19
0.28
0.72
1.19
0.40
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 1.62
1.08
4.33
7.03

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.539
0.269

Variety 10
0.230
0.023
2.24ns
2.35 3.37
Error 20
0.190
0.010

TOTAL 32
0.960
ns- Not significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 15.15%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

57
Appendix 26 . Total yield per plot (kg)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
0.57
0.62
0.80
1.99
0.66
AGS
433
1.24
2.24
2.06
5.54
1.85
AGS
434
1.03
0.82
1.01
2.86
0.95
AGS
435
1.00
1.13
1.10
3.23
1.08
AGS
436

1.05
1.32
1.42
3.79
1.26
AGS
437
1.24
1.06
0.84
3.14
1.05
AGS
438
1.73
1.56
1.56
4.85
1.62
AGS
439
1.90
2.28
2.24
6.42
2.14
AGS
440
1.62
1.31
1.11
4.04
1.35
AGS
292
1.46
1.35
1.61
4.42
1.47
Local
Check
2.29
3.34
3.24
8.87
2.96
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 15.13
17.03
16.99
49.15

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.214
0.107

Variety
10
12.384
1.238
16.32**
2.35 3.37
Error 20
1.517
0.076

TOTAL 32
14.115
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 18.49%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

58
Appendix 27 . Computed fresh pod yield per hectare (t/ha)
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
1.14
1.24
1.60
3.98
1.33

AGS
433
2.48
4.48
4.12
11.08
3.69
AGS
434
2.06
1.64
2.02
5.72
1.91
AGS
435
2.00
2.26
2.20
6.46
2.15
AGS
436

2.10
2.64
2.84
7.58
2.53
AGS
437
2.48
2.12
1.68
6.28
2.09
AGS
438
3.46
3.12
3.12
9.70
3.23
AGS
439
3.80
4.56
4.48
12.84
4.28
AGS
440
3.24
2.62
2.22
8.08
2.69
AGS
292
2.92
2.70
3.22
8.84
2.95
Local
Check
4.58
6.68
6.48
17.74
5.91
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 30.26
34.06
33.98
98.30

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.742
0.371

Variety
10
49.737
4.974
16.01**
2.35 3.37
Error
20
6.213
0.311

TOTAL 32
56.213
**-highly significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 18.66%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

59
Appendix 28 . Reaction to soybean Rust
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
2 3 2 7 2
AGS
433
3 3 3 9 3
AGS
434
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
435
2 2 3 7 2
AGS
436

3 3 3 9 3
AGS
437
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
438
3 2 3 8 3
AGS
439
3 2 3 8 3
AGS
440
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
292
3 2 2 7 2
Local
Check
2 2 2 6 2
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 27
25
27
79

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block 2
0.242
0.121

Variety 10 4.545 0.455
2.94*
2.35 3.37
Error 20 3.091 0.155

TOTAL 32 7.879
*-significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 16.42%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

60
Appendix 29 . Reaction to leaf miner
===============================================================
VARIETY REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN
1 11 111
AGS
432
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
433
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
434
2 2 3 7 2
AGS
435
3 3 3 9 3
AGS
436

3 3 2 8 3
AGS
437
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
438
3 2 3 8 3
AGS
439
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
440
2 2 2 6 2
AGS
292
3 2 2 7 2
Local
Check
2 2 3 6 2
________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 26
24
26
76

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
2
0.242
0.121

Variety 10
3.636 0.364
2.34ns
2.35 3.37
Error 20 3.091 0.155

TOTAL 32 6.970
ns- Not significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 17.07%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

61
Appendix 30 . Aroma of the 11 soybean accession
===============================================================
VARIETY PANELIST TOTAL MEAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
AGS 432 4 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 2
36 2

AGS 433 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 3 2 2 1 1 3 2 1
35
2
AGS 434 3 4 3 2 3 4 4 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 1
37
3
AGS 435 4 1 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 3
40
3
AGS 436 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 1
30
2
AGS 437 3 2 2 1 3 2 4 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2
31
2
AGS 438 3 2 3 2 3 2 5 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 3
35
2
AGS 439 4 2 2 2 2 2 5 1 3 3 1 1 1 2 1
32
2
AGS 440 4 3 2 1 2 2 4 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 4
34
2
AGS 292 3 2 1 2 2 2 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
33
2
Local Check3 3 2 1 1 2 4 2 2 1 1 4 1 2 3
32
2
________________________________________________________________________
TPTAL 37 26 24 20 25 31 42 25 25 21 15 20 22 20 23

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
14
62.364
4.455

Variety 10
5.661 0.566
0.98ns
1.88 2.46
Error 140
80.703 0.576

TOTAL 160 148.727
ns- Not significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 13.41%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

62
Appendix 31 . Acceptability of the 11 soybean accession
===============================================================
VARIETY PANELIST TOTAL MEAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
AGS 432 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 3
42 3

AGS 433 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 4 2 2
47
3
AGS 434 2 4 4 4 5 4 3 3 5 2 5 2 2 1 3
49
3
AGS 435 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 4 4 3 3 2 3 1 1
40
3
AGS 436 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 4 2 3
45
3
AGS 437 4 2 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 2 2 5 1 2
47
3
AGS 438 3 2 3 4 5 4 3 3 3 5 2 2 2 3 3
47
3
AGS 439 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 2 3 5 2 3
48
3
AGS 440 1 3 4 2 2 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 5 2 2
64
4
AGS 292 1 3 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 3
39
3
Local Chec 3 1 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 1
33
2
________________________________________________________________________
TPTAL 37 26 24 20 25 31 42 25 25 21 15 20 22 20 23

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULATED
OF OF SQUARE SQUARE F ____F_______
VARIANCE FREEDOM 0.05 0.01
Block
14
40.036
2.860

Variety
10
15.927
1.593
2.08*
1.88 2.46
Error
140
107.164
0.765

TOTAL 160
163.127
*-significant Coefficient of Variation (CV) 29.89%

Adaptability And Acceptability Of Soybean Accession
Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet / Marcianne M. Menzi. 2009

Document Outline

Adaptability and Acceptability of Soybean Accession Under Pacso, Kabayan, Benguet
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- ABSTRACT
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- INTRODUCTION
- REVIEW OF LITERATURE
- MATERIALS AND METHODS
- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
- SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
- LITERATURE CITED
- APPENDICES