BIBLIOGRAPHY BENIASAN, EFREN T....
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BENIASAN, EFREN T. OCTOBER 2010. Pilot Testing of Garden Pea (Pisum
sativum L.) Lines Under Topdac, Atok, Benguet Condition. Benguet State University, La
Trinidad, Benguet.
Adviser: Percilval B. Alipit, PhD
ABSTRACT
Several garden pea lines were evaluated under Topdac, Atok, Benguet condition
as to their growth and yield performance in October to December (early dry and cool
season).
Observation shows that growth did not differ among the lines tested. Although not
significant, yield was higher in CGP 110 at 16.31 t/ha although having smaller pods and
in CGP 18A at 15.24 t/ha having bigger pods. These lines have moderate resistance to
leaf miner and powdery mildew, are preferred by farmers in terms of better pod shape,
size, and color, and from which high return on investment was obtained.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Bibliography........................................................................................................ i
Abstract.................................................................................................................. i
Table of Contents.................................................................................................. ii
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 1
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Description of Garden Pea........................................................................ 2
Importance of Garden Pea......................................................................... 3
Soil and Climatic Requirements
of Garden Pea............................................................................................ 3
Varietal Selection...................................................................................... 4
MATERIALS AND METHODS.......................................................................... 6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Days to Emergence, Flowering
and Harvest………………………………………………………………. 16
Leaf Characteristics……………………………………………………… 17
Plant Height……………………………………………………………… 17
Number of Nodes Bearing First Flower
Cluster and Last Pod Cluster, Number of
Nodes per Plant and Number of
Flowers per Cluster………………........................................................... 18
Flower Color…………………………………………………………….. 18
Pod Length and Width…....…………………………………………….. 19
Pod Color………………………………………………………………. 19
Number of Pod Pickings…….………………………………………….. 20
Marketable, Non-marketable,
and Total Yield.…..…………………………………………………… 20
Computed Yield……………..……………………………………........ 20
Insect Pest and Disease Rating………………………………………... 21
Farmers’ Acceptability………………………………………………… 21
Economic Analysis…………………………………………………...... 23
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Summary.................................................................................................. 24
Conclusion............................................................................................... 24
Recommendation..................................................................................... 24
LITERATURE CITED....................................................................................... 25
APPENDICES………........................................................................................ 26
1111111111
INTRODUCTION
Atok is one of the 13 municipalities of Benguet producing tons of temperate
vegetable due to its favorable climate. There are vegetables being grown in this place but
legumes are rarely grown by farmers for the reason of unavailability of seeds and good
varieties. Garden pea is cool climate requiring crop and Atok is a suitable growing area.
Pilot testing is an innovative work, drawing on existing knowledge gained from
research and/or practical experience that is directed to producing new materials, products
or devices, installing new processes, system and services and improving substantially
those already produced or installed (IPB-BSU).
The selection of the best garden pea lines for farmers to grow will enable them to
produce high yield and quality as well as improve farm income.
The objectives of the study were to:
1. Evaluate the growth and yield performance of garden pea lines produced by the
Institute of Plant Breeding-Benguet State University (IPB-BSU) Highland Crops
Research Station (HCRS) in a farmer’s field and
2. Identify the lines best adapted in the locality.
The study was conducted in Nalseb, Topdac, Atok, Benguet from October to
December 2009.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Description of the Garden Pea
Garden peas differ from beans in that the stems are hollow and the leaves are
pinnately compound with one, two, or three pairs of leaflets and a branched terminal
tendril and large stipules; the flowers are born singly or in pairs on long stalks; the pods
are non constricted, and the seed is round and either smooth or wrinkled when dry.
Edmund (1964). Similarly, Hughes (1930) reported that the pods of garden peas are about
three inches long, each containing five to nine round seed. The seed are generally brown.
Seed of field peas are generally smooth and those of garden peas wrinkled at maturity.
Chapman (1976) stated that the pea plant is an herbaceous annual. Stems range
from 2 to 4 feet (50.8-101.6 cm) in length and are quite succulent. Leaves are typically
pinnately compound, but the apical leaflet is modified into a split or double tendril.
Flowers are commonly borne in single leaf axils. In addition, Delorit (1974) stated that
the field peas have been classified as a species different from garden and canning peas,
but they resemble each other rather closely. Some garden and canning varieties are
sweeter and more wrinkled. Peas are annual, leguminous plants with long weak,
herbaceous stems. The stems maybe 24 to 48 inches long, but the plants usually do not
stand that tall because of lodging. The pale green leaves consist of one to three pairs of
leaflet with a terminal tendril. The blossoms are reddish-purple or white. The pods
(ovaries) usually contain four to nine seeds (ovules).
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
3
Importance of Garden Pea
Garden Peas are harvested for seed or edible peas when most of the pods are ripe
and the seed is hard. Many of the dry edible peas are marketed as split peas for use in
soups. Dry pea seeds and the by-products from pea seed processing also are used in
mixed livestock feeds and in pigeon feeds (Delorit, 1974). Similarly, Chapman (1976)
reported that field peas are grown primarily as a green manure crop. When the crop is
harvested for seed, it is most commonly used as split peas in various types of soups. Field
peas are high in protein (as much as 24 percent) and may become increasingly important
as both a food and a feed crop in the future. In addition, Tindall (1983) reported that the
protein content of immature seeds varies from 3.1-7.2%, that of young pods 2.6-3.1% and
mature peas about 22%.
Soil and Climatic Requirements of Garden Pea
Pea is a cool season crop and thrives best when the weather is cool and when
ample moisture is available. The young plants will tolerate considerable colds and lights
frosts but the flower and green pods are often injured by heavy frosts. If the crop is
planted late, maturity takes place when the temperatures are too high for optimum growth
and yield (Ware, 1937).
Tindall (1983) stated that most cultivars require a relatively cool humid climate
with temperature in the range 13-18 degrees Celsius and are, therefore, only suitable for
cultivation at altitudes above 1200-1400m since high temperature affect pollination.
Seeds have a minimum soil temperature requirement of about 10 degrees
Celsius. In addition, Delorit (1974) reported that garden peas grow best on fertile, well
lined soils that have good drainages.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
4
Heriteau (1975) reported that peas leave a supply of nitrogen in the soil so they do
not need a heavy supply of nutrient, therefore fertilize with a low nitrogen fertilizer.
Garden pea is a crop that is difficult to grow in warm places since this crop thrives
best in relatively cool places. The growth is generally affected by temperature, humidity,
and soil conditions. Different varieties may respond differently to the climate, which
involve temperature, moisture, and light (Ware and Swaider, 2002).
This crop grows best in soil that is friable, fertile, well-drained, and free from
nematodes and fungus diseases. Garden pea requires a pH of 5.5-6.0 (Purseglove, 1972).
Varietal Selection
In the highlands, leguminous crops are planted at the end of the rainy season,
starting from October and extended to December. Garden peas are harvested when the
pods are fully green and well developed but still tender. The seeds should be near full
size and should not have begun to harden. Pea pods intended for dry pea or seed should
be harvested when they start to yellow or begin to dry up (Ware and Swaider, 2002).
Varieties to be selected should be high-yielding, resistant to pest and diseases,
early maturing and these traits would make the possible growing of the crop less
expensive and more productive. More over choosing the right variety will minimize
problems associated with water and fertilizer management so that high yield will be
obtained. Growing the variety may mean crop failure due to low yield and pest
infestation. Yield performance of any variety is affected by environmental conditions like
soil condition, climate and incidence of pest and diseases (PCARRD, 1989).
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
5
Bautista and Mabesa (1997) mentioned that choosing the right variety will
minimize the problem associated with water and fertilizer management so that high yield
will be obtained.
Ware (1975) stated that in selecting garden pea varieties, one must consider the
resistance to pest and diseases to obtain high yield. In addition, Heritaeu (1975) stated
that one thing to consider in selecting seeds includes growth habit.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
6
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The materials used in the study were seeds different lines of garden pea, garden
tools, insecticide, fungicide, fertilizers, sprinkler, record book, ruler, meter stick, and a
calculator.
An area of 90 sq. m. was prepared for the study. The area was divided into three
blocks representing the replications and each block was subdivided into six plots
measuring 1m x 5m each representing the garden pea lines as treatments. The treatments
were laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and represented as
follows.
Code
Garden Pea lines
L1 CGP 13
L2 CGP 110
L3 CGP 18A (Check)
L4 CGP 34
L5 CGP 59
L6 CLG (Local Check)
Two furrows spaced 15 cm apart were made in each plot afterwhich two seeds
were sown in the furrow 12 cm apart. All other practices like fertilizer application,
irrigation, pest control, cultivation and training were employed to every treatment plot.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
7
Data Gathered
The data gathered were as follows:
A. Growth and Development Stages
1. Number of days from sowing to emergence. This was obtained by counting the
number of days from sowing to emergence.
2. Number of days from emergence to flowering. This was recorded by counting
the number of days from emergence to the time when at least 50% of the plants in a plot
had at least two fully opened flowers.
3. Number of days from emergence to last flowering. This was recorded by
counting the number of days from emergence to last flowering when 50% of the plants in
a plot had stopped flowering.
4. Number of days from flowering to pod setting. This was obtained by counting
the number of days from flowering until the pods begun to develop.
5. Number of days from flowering to first and last harvesting. This was recorded
by counting the number of days from flowering to first and to last harvesting.
B. Leaf Characteristics
1. Leaflet length (cm). This was measured using a ruler from the base of the
petiole to the leaf tip of the ten sample leaves per treatment at 35 days after planting.
2. Leaflet width (cm). The sample leaves used in measuring the leaflet length
were used to measure the leaflet width. This was obtained by measuring from left to the
right margin of the leaf.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
8
C. Stem Characteristics
1. Plant height at 35 DAP and last harvest (cm). This was measured from the base
of the plant at ground level to the tip of the youngest shoot using a meter stick from ten
sample plants per treatment at 35 DAP and during the last harvest.
2. Number of nodes per plant. This was counted from the base of the plant to the
tip of the main stem of ten sample plants per treatment during the last harvest.
3. Number of nodes bearing first flower cluster. This was recorded by counting
the nodes from the base of the plant to the node bearing first flower cluster in five sample
plants per treatment.
4. Number of nodes bearing first pod cluster. This was recorded by counting the
nodes from the base of the plant to the node bearing the first pod cluster in five sample
plants per treatment.
D. Flower Characteristics
1. Flower color. This was recorded when 50% of the plants per plot have fully
opened flowers using color chart.
2. Number of flowers per cluster. The flowers per cluster were counted from ten
samples per plot.
E. Pod Characteristics
1. Pod length (cm). This was obtained by measuring the length of ten sample pods
per treatment from the base to the tip of the pod.
2. Pod width (cm). This was obtained by measuring the broadest part of the
sample pods used in gathering pod length using foot rule.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
9
3. Pod color. This was recorded as green, light green, yellow, dark green when the
pods were fully developed.
F. Yield Characteristics
1. Weight of marketable pods (kg/1 x 5 m plot). This was recorded by weighing
the marketable pods per plot from first to last harvest. Marketable pods were smooth,
well formed pods, and free from damages.
2. Weight of non-marketable pods (kg/1 x 5 m plot). This was obtained by
weighing non-marketable pods per plot. Non-marketable pods were over-matured,
malformed and damaged by insect pests and diseases.
3. Total yield (kg/1 x 5 m plot). This was recorded by getting the total weight of
marketable and non-marketable pods per plot.
4. Number of pod pickings. This was the total number of harvest from the first to
the last picking.
5. Computed yield per hectare (t/ha). This was obtained by multiplying the yield
per plot by 2000 which is the number of 1m x 5m plot per hectare.
G. Insect Pest and Disease Assessment
1. Rating on insect pest and disease damage. The insect pest damage and disease
infection were recorded. The following subjective rating (Del-amen, 2009) was used:
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
10
Scale
Description Remarks
1.0 No insect pest damage/infection
High resistance
2.0 1-25% of the total no. of plants Mild resistance
per plot is damaged/infected,
mild damage/infection
3.0
26-50% of the total no. of plants Moderate resistance
per plot is damaged/infected,
moderate damage/infection
4.0 51-75% of the total no. of plants Susceptible
per plot is damaged/infected ,
severe damage/infection
5.0
76-100% of the total no. of plants Very susceptible
per plot is damaged/infected,
severe damage/infection
H. Farmers’ Acceptability
Sensory evaluation of six lines of garden pea was done by the farmers in terms of
growth, pod shape and size, pod color, and pod crunchiness as to whether they are liked,
liked very much or disliked.
I. Return on Investment
This was computed by subtracting the total expenses per 5 m sq plot from the
gross sale divided by total expenses times one hundred.
J. Documentation
The study was documented from the sowing of seeds to harvest evaluation as
shown in figures1 to 7.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
11
Figure 1. Sowing of seeds
Figure 2. Field after sowing of seeds
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
12
Figure 3. Seedling emergence six days after planting
Figure 4.Training of plants with trellis
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
13
Figure 5 a. Garden pea lines CGP 13
Figure 5 b. CGP 110
Figure 5 c. CGP 18A
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
14
Figure 5 d. CGP 34
Figure 5 e. CGP 59
Figure 5 f. CLG
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
15
Figure 6. Garden pea lines at harvest stage
Figure 7 a. Evaluation of garden pea lines by farmers after harvest
Figure 7 b. Evaluation of garden pea lines by farmers after harvest
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
16
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Days to Emergence, Flowering, and Harvest
The number of days from sowing to emergence, emergence to flowering,
flowering to pod set, and to harvest were not significantly different among the garden pea
lines evaluated (Table 1).
Table 1. Days to emergence, flowering, pod set, and harvest
DAYS DAYS FROM DAYS FROM FLOWERING TO
FROM EMERGENCE TO POD FIRST LAST
LINES SOWING FIRST LAST SET HARVEST HARVEST
TO SEEDLING FLO- FLO-
EMERGENCE WERING WERING
CGP 13 6a 36.33a 66.67a 2.33a 6.67a 38.00a
CGP 110 6a 36.00a 67.33a 2.33a 6.33a 38.67a
CGP18A 6a 36.67a 66.33a 2.00a 6.0a 37.00a
CGP 34 6a 37.3a 67.00a 2.33a 6.67a 37.67a
CGP 59 6a 37.33a 66.33a 2.33a 6.67a 37.67a
CLG 6a 36.67a 67.33a 2.33a 6.00a 37.67a
CV (%) 0 1.96 5.64 22.41 6.82 3.05
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
17
Leaf Characteristics
Leaflet length. CGP 18A significantly had the longest leaf as shown in Table 2.
Leaflet width. In terms of leaflet width, there were no significant differences
observed among the lines (Table 2).
Plant Height
There were no significant differences in the plant height at 35 days after planting
and last harvest (Table 3). However, CGP 18A was the tallest.
Table 2. Leaflet length and width
LINES LEAFLET SIZE (cm)____ __
LENGTH WIDTH
CGP 13 3.57b 2.62a
CGP 110 3.59b 2.65a
CGP 18A 3.97a 2.71a
CGP 34 3.49b 2.53a
CGP 59 3.62b 2.67a
CLG 3.72ab 2.79a
CV (%) 3.86 3.15
Means with the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
18
Table 3. Plant height
LINES _____PLANT HEIGHT (cm)______
35 DAP LAST HARVEST
CGP 13 39.43a 151.47a
CGP 110 35.23a 135.27a
CGP 18A 38.40a 153.27a
CGP 34 34.33a 147.20a
CGP 59 36.80a 142.43a
CLG 34.80a 129.67a
CV (%) 14.06 8.08
Means with the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT
Number of Nodes Bearing First Flower
Cluster and Last Pod Cluster, Number of
Nodes per Plant and Number of Flowers per
Cluster
Table 4 shows that CLG significantly flowered earlier at fewer number of nodes.
The number of nodes to last pod cluster, number of nodes per plant, and number of
flowers per cluster did not significantly differ among the lines.
Flower Color
In terms of color, all the lines had violet flowers except CLG having white
flowers.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
19
Table 4. Number of nodes bearing the first flower cluster and last pod cluster, number of
nodes per plant, and number of flowers per cluster
NUMBER OF NODES BEARING
LINES FIRST LAST NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
FLOWER POD NODES PER FLOWERS PER
CLUSTER CLUSTER PLANT CLUSTER
CGP 13 11.67ab 29.67a 34.00a 2.00a
CGP 110 12.67a 28.33a 34.33a 1.33a
CGP 18A 9.33ab 30.33a 34.67a 1.67a
CGP 34 13.00a 30.33a 34.33a 2.00a
CGP 59 10.00ab 29.33a 33.33a 1.67a
CLG 8.67b 28.33a 33.00a 2.00a
CV (%) 12.04 4.46 3.86 24.52
Means with the same letters are not significantly difference at 5% level by DMRT
Pod Length and Width
Table 5 shows that CGP 18A and CGP 13 significantly had the longest pod at
around eight centimeters, while CGP 18A significantly had the widest pod at 1.77 cm.
Pod Color
In terms of pod color, all the lines had green pods except for CGP 110 and CLG
having dark green and light green pods, respectively.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
20
Table 5. Pod length and width
_____________POD SIZE (cm)______ ___
LINES POD LENGTH POD WIDTH
CGP 13 8.23a 1.50b
CGP 110 7.10bc 1.33b
CGP18A 8.27a 1.77a
CGP 34 7.63b 1.43b
CGP 59 7.00c 1.47b
CLG 7.33bc 1.43b
CV (%) 2.95 6.00
Means with the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT
Number of Pod Pickings
All the lines except CGP 18A and CGP 34 significantly had more number of
pickings at seven times (Table 6).
Marketable, Non-marketable, and Total Yield
As shown in Table 6, no significant differences were observed in yield among the
lines. However, higher marketable yield was obtained from CGP 110, CLG, CGP 34, and
CGP 18A.
Computed Yield
In terms of computed yield per hectare, there were no significant differences
among the lines. However, CGP 110, CGP 18A, and CLG had higher yield at around 15
to 16 t/ha (Table 7).
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
21
Table 6. Number of pod pickings, marketable, non-marketable, and total yield
LINES
YIELD (kg/1 x 5 m plot) .
NUMBER OF MARKETABLE NON- TOTAL
POD MARKETABLE
PICKINGS
CGP 13 7.00a 6.21a 0.39a 6.60a
CGP 110 7.00a 7.78a 0.48a 8.16a
CGP18A 6.00b 7.11a 0.51a 7.62a
CGP 34 6.00b 7.15a 0.38a 7.41a
CGP 59 6.67a 5.86a 0.38a 6.16a
CLG 7.00a 7.19a 0.42a 7.60a
CV (%) 3.77 15.04 12.74 14.18
Means with the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT
Insect Pest and Disease Rating
There were no significant differences among the lines on insect infestation
particularly leaf miner and disease infection of powdery mildew (Table 7). Nevertheless,
all the lines except CGP 59 and CLG had moderate resistance to said pests.
Farmers’ Acceptability
CGP 110 as well as CGP 18A were most liked by the farmers in terms of pod
shape, size, and color (Table 8).
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
22
Table 7. Computed yield per hectare and insect pest and disease incidence rating
RATING
LINES COMPUTED INSECT PEST DISEASE (POWDERY
YIELD
(LEAF MINER
MILDEW INFECTION)
(kg/ha) INFESTATION)
CGP 13 13195.00a 3.33a 3.33a
CGP 110 16310.67a 3.00a 3.00a
CGP18A 15238.00a 3.33a 3.33a
CGP 34 14813.33a 3.33a 3.33a
CGP 59 12322.67a 4.00a 4.00a
CLG 15199.33a 3.67a 3.67a
CV (%) 14.27 15.27 15.27
Means with the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT
Table 8. Farmers’ acceptability
LINES __________ POD________________
GROWTH SHAPE AND SIZE COLOR CRUNCHINESS
CGP 13 Like
Like
Like Like
CGP110
Like
Like Very Like Very
Like
Much
Much
CGP 18A
Like
Like Very Like
Like
Much
CGP 34
Like
Like
Like Like
CGP 59
Like
Like
Like Like
CLG
Like
Dislike
Like Dislike
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
23
Economic Analysis
Table 9 shows that the highest return on investment was obtained from CGP 110,
CLG, CGP 34, and CGP 18A.
Table 9. Cost and return analysis (90 sq. m. area)
ITEM
LINES
CGP 13 CGP 110 CGP 18A CGP 34 CGP 59 CLG
Yield(kg) 18.62 23.33 21.33 21.46 17.56 21.56
Sales(PhP) 1117.2 1399.8 1279.8 1287.6 1053.6 1293.6
Expenses
Inputs:
1. Seeds 41 41 41 41 41 41
2. Fertilizer 20 20 20 20 20 20
Labor Costs (PhP)
3.Land
Preparation 25 25 25 25 25 25
4. Planting 15 15 15 15 15 15
5. Irrigation 20 20 20 20 20 20
6. Weeding 15 15 15 15 15 15
7. Harvesting 15 15 15 15 15 15
8. Marketing 10 10 10 10 10 10
Total Expenses
(PhP) 161 161 161 161 161 161
Net Income
(PhP) 956.2 1238.8 1118.8 1126.6 892.6 1132.6
ROI(%) 593.91 769.44 694.90 699.75 544.40 703.47
Fresh pods were sold at PhP 60.00/ kg.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
24
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
Six garden pea lines developed by the Institute of Plant Breeding –Benguet State
University (IPB-BSU) Highland Crops Research Station (HCRS) were tested in a
farmer’s field in Topdac, Atok, Benguet to determine adaptable line(s) in the locality.
There were no significant differences observed among the six garden pea lines on
the duration to emergence, flowering, pod set, and harvest as well as on plant height.
CGP 18A significantly had the longest and widest pods. Yield did not
significantly differ but higher marketable yield was obtained from CGP 110, CLG, CGP
34 and CGP 18A, and also from which higher return on investment was derived.
All the lines have moderate resistance to leaf miner and powdery mildew except
CGP 59 and CLG which were susceptible.
Farmers' preferred CGP 110 and CGP 18A for having better pod shape, size and
color.
Conclusion
Based on the results, CGP 110 and CGP 18A were observed to have better yield
performance and acceptability in the site of the study. Potential lines for adaptation are
CLG and CGP 34.
Recommendation
It is therefore recommended that the garden pea lines CGP 110 and CGP 18A be
grown in Nalseb, Topdac, Atok and nearby localities. Other lines such as CLG and CGP
34 could be further evaluated for verification of their performance.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
25
LITERATURE CITED
BAUTISTA, O. K. and R.C. MABESA. 1997. Vegetable Production. College of
Agriculture, UP at Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. P. 320.
CHAPMAN, H. 1976. Crop Production Principles and Practices. W.H. Freeman and
Company. San Francisco. P. 371.
DEL-AMEN, M. B. 2009. Growth, yield and farmers’ acceptability of promising lines of
garden pea in Madaymen, Kibungan, Benguet. BS Thesis. BSU, La Trinidad,
Benguet. P. 4.
DELORIT, J. R. 1974. Crop Production 4th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. P. 432.
EDMUND,J. B. 1964. Fundamentals of Horticulture. Tata McGraw hill Pub. Co. Ltd.
P. 476.
HERITEAU, J. 1975. Small Fruit and Vegetables Gardens. New York. P. 461.
HUGHES, H. and HENSON. 1930. Crop Production Principles and Practices. New York.
P. 365.
PCARRD. 1989. Snap Bean Technoguide for the Highlands. First Edition. BSU, La
Trinidad, Benguet. P. 5.
PURSEGLOVE, J .W. 1972. Tropical Crops Dicotyledons, Copyright Longman Group
Limited, United Kingdom. P. 312.
TINDALL, H. D. 1983. Vegetables in the Tropics. Mc Millan Publishing Company.
P. 284.
WARE, G. W. 1975. Producing Vegetable Crops. Second Edition. The Interstate
Printers and Publications, Inc. P. 379.
WARE, G. W. 1937. Southern Vegetable Crops. New York: American Company. P. 306.
WARE, G. W. and SWAIDER, J.M. 2002. Producing Vegetable Crops. The Interstate
Printers and Publishers, Inc. USA. Pp. 427-439.
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
26
APPENDICES
Appendix Table 1. Number of days from sowing to emergence
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 6 6 6 18 6
CGP 110 6 6 6 18 6
CGP 18A 6 6 6 18 6
CGP 34 6 6 6 18 6
CGP 59 6 6 6 18 6
CLG 6 6 6 18 6
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0 0
Treatment 5 0 0 0ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 0 0
TOTAL 17 0
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=0%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
27
Appendix Table 2. Number of days from emergence to flowering
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 36 37 36 109 36.33
CGP110 36 36 36 108 36.00
CGP 18A 36 38 36 110 36.67
CGP 34 37 38 37 112 37.33
CGP 59 38 38 36 112 37.33
CLG 37 36 37 110 36.67
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 2.11 1.06
Treatment 5 4.28 0.86 1.65ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 5.22 0.52
TOTAL 17 11.61
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=1.96%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
28
Appendix Table 3. Number of days from emergence to last flowering
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 67 66 67 200 66.67
CGP110 67 68 67 202 67.33
CGP 18A 66 67 66 199 66.33
CGP 34 67 67 67 201 67.00
CGP 59 66 66 67 199 66.33
CLG 67 68 67 202 67.33
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.33 0.17
Treatment 5 3.17 0.63 2.1ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 3 0.3
TOTAL 17 6.5
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=0.82%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
29
Appendix Table 4. Number of days from flowering to pod setting
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 2 3 2 7 2.33
CGP110 2 2 3 7 2.33
CGP 18A 2 2 2 6 2.00
CGP 34 2 2 3 7 2.33
CGP 59 2 3 2 7 2.33
CLG 2 2 3 7 2.33
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.78 0.39
Treatment 5 0.28 0.06 0.23ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 2.55 0.26
TOTAL 17 6.5
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=22.41%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
30
Appendix Table 5. Number of days from flowering to first harvest
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 7 6 7 20 6.67
CGP110 6 6 7 19 6.33
CGP 18A 6 6 6 18 6.00
CGP 34 7 6 7 20 6.67
CGP 59 6 7 7 20 6.67
CLG 6 6 6 18 6.00
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.78 0.39
Treatment 5 1.61 0.32 1.68ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 1.89 0.19
TOTAL 17 4.28
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=6.82%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
31
Appendix Table 6. Number of days from flowering to last harvest
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 38 39 37 114 38.00
CGP 110 38 39 39 116 38.67
CGP 18A 37 38 36 111 37.00
CGP 34 39 37 37 113 37.67
CGP 59 38 39 36 113 37.67
CLG 39 36 38 113 37.67
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 3.4 1.7
Treatment 5 4.4 0.88 0.66ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 13.31 1.33
TOTAL 17 21.11
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=3.05%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
32
Appendix Table 7. Leaflet length (cm)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 3.56 3.58 3.56 10.7 3.57
CGP 110 3.68 3.69 3.39 10.76 3.59
CGP 18A 3.77 3.95 4.2 11.92 3.97
CGP 34 3.46 3.51 3.49 10.46 3.49
CGP 59 3.63 3.67 3.57 19.87 3.62
CLG 3.76 3.66 3.74 11.16 3.72
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0 0
Treatment 5 0.44 0.09 4.5* 3.33 5.64
Error 10 0.16 0.02
TOTAL 17 0.60
*- Significant
Coefficient of variation=3.86%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
33
Appendix Table 8. Leaflet width (cm)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 2.79 2.57 2.5 7.86 2.62
CGP 110 2.8 2.53 2.61 7.94 2.65
CGP 18A 2.9 2.72 2.71 8.12 2.71
CGP 34 2.59 2.4 2.59 7.58 2.53
CGP 59 2.74 2.64 2.62 8.00 2.67
CLG 2.95 2.71 2.7 8.36 2.79
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.09 0.05
Treatment 5 0.12 0.02 2.86ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 0.07 0.007
TOTAL 17 0.28
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=3.15%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
34
Appendix Table 9.Plant height at 35 DAP (cm)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 36 34.8 47.5 118.30 39.43
CGP 110 31 43.3 31.4 105.70 35.43
CGP 18A 36.1 37.9 41.2 115.30 38.40
CGP 34 30.6 43.2 29.2 103.00 34.33
CGP 59 35.7 40.7 34 110.40 36.80
CLG 30.1 38.9 35.4 104.40 34.80
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 128.73 64.37
Treatment 5 64.18 12.84 0.49ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 263.39 26.34
TOTAL 17 0.60
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=14.06%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
35
Appendix Table 10. Plant height at last harvest (cm)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 170.3 172.3 111.8 454.40 151.47
CGP 110 152 139 114.8 405.80 135.27
CGP 18A 172.3 170.7 116.8 459.80 153.27
CGP 34 170.2 169.9 101.5 441.60 147.20
CGP 59 152 162.2 113.1 427.30 142.43
CLG 154.5 142.5 110 389.00 129.67
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 9238.03 4619.02
Treatment 5 1297.05 259.41 1.94ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 1338.60 133.86
TOTAL 17 11837.68
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=8.08%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
36
Appendix Table 11. Number of nodes per plant
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 35 33 34 102.00 34.00
CGP 110 34 35 34 103.00 34.33
CGP 18A 33 36 35 104.00 34.67
CGP 34 34 36 33 103.00 34.33
CGP 59 35 33 32 100.00 33.33
CLG 32 35 32 99.00 33.00
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 5.44 2.72
Treatment 5 6.27 1.25 0.73ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 17.23 1.72
TOTAL 17 28.94
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=3.86%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
37
Appendix Table 12. Number of nodes bearing the first flower cluster
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 13 9 13 35.00 11.67
CGP 110 12 13 13 38.00 12.67
CGP 18A 11 8 9 28.00 9.33
CGP 34 13 14 12 29.00 13.00
CGP 59 11 9 10 30.00 10.00
CLG 9 7 10 26.00 8.67
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 7.45 3.73
Treatment 5 49.11 9.82 5.71** 3.33 5.64
Error 10 17.22 1.72
TOTAL 17 73.78
**- Highly significant
Coefficient of variation=12.04%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
38
Appendix Table 13. Number of nodes bearing the last pod cluster
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 31 28 30 29.00 29.67
CGP 110 29 28 28 85.00 28.33
CGP 18A 30 31 30 91.00 30.33
CGP 34 32 30 29 91.00 30.33
CGP 59 29 29 30 88.00 29.33
CLG 27 29 29 85.00 28.33
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.78 0.39
Treatment 5 12.28 2.46 1.86ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 13.22 1.32
TOTAL 17 26.28
ns - Not significant
Coefficient of variation=4.46%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
39
Appendix Table 14. Number of flowers per cluster
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 2 2 2 6 2.00
CGP 110 1 1 2 4 1.33
CGP 18A 2 1 2 5 1.69
CGP 34 2 2 2 6 2.00
CGP 59 1 2 2 5 1.66
CLG 2 2 2 6 2.00
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.53 0.53
Treatment 5 0.93 0.23 1.28ns 3.48 5.99
Error 10 1.47 0.15
TOTAL 17 2.93
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=24.52%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
40
Appendix Table 15. Pod length (cm)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 8 8.2 8.5 24.70 8.23
CGP 110 7.2 7 7.1 21.30 7.10
CGP 18A 8.4 8.1 8.3 24.80 8.27
CGP 34 7.3 8 7.6 22.90 7.63
CGP 59 7.2 7 6.8 21.00 7.00
CLG 7.2 7.4 7.4 22.00 7.33
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.018 0.009
Treatment 5 4.58 0.92 18.4** 3.33 5.64
Error 10 0.53 0.05
TOTAL 17 5.13
**- Highly significant
Coefficient of variation=2.95%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
41
Appendix Table 16. Pod width (cm)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 1.5 1.5 1.5 4.50 1.50
CGP 110 1.4 1.3 1.3 4.00 1.33
CGP 18A 1.9 1.8 1.6 5.30 1.77
CGP 34 1.3 1.5 1.5 4.30 1.43
CGP 59 1.5 1.5 1.4 4.40 1.47
CLG 1.4 1.4 1.5 4.30 1.43
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.018 0.009
Treatment 5 4.58 0.92 18.4** 3.33 5.64
Error 10 0.53 0.05
TOTAL 17 5.13
**- Highly significant
Coefficient of variation=6.00%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
42
Appendix Table 17. Marketable yield (kg/ 1 x 5 m plot)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 7.07 5.79 5.76 18.62 6.21
CGP 110 8.5 7.68 7.15 23.33 7.78
CGP 18A 6.83 7.91 6.59 21.33 7.11
CGP 34 5.5 9 6.96 21.46 7.15
CGP 59 5.71 6.09 5.79 17.59 5.86
CLG 7.5 6.09 7.97 21.56 7.19
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.46 0.23
Treatment 5 7.54 1.51 1.41ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 10.74 1.07
TOTAL 17 18.74
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=15.04%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
43
Appendix Table 18. Non-marketable yield (kg/ 1 x 5 m plot)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 0.298 0.42 0.455 1.17 0.39
CGP 110 0.236 0.79 0.32 1.44 0.48
CGP 18A 0.479 0.268 0.78 1.53 0.51
CGP 34 0.378 0.423 0.329 1.13 0.38
CGP 59 0.38 0.244 0.51 1.13 0.38
CLG 0.428 0.378 0.443 1.25 0.42
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.03 0.02
Treatment 5 0.04 0.008 2.67ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 0.3 0.003
TOTAL 17 0.38
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=12.74%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
44
Appendix Table 20.Total yield (kg/ 1 x 5 m plot)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 7.368 6.21 6.215 19.79 6.60
CGP 110 8.826 8.17 7.47 24.47 8.16
CGP 18A 7.309 8.178 7.37 22.86 7.62
CGP 34 5.878 9.423 6.919 22.22 7.41
CGP 59 5.88 6.034 6.3 18.48 6.16
CLG 7.298 6.458 8.413 22.80 7.60
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.38 0.19
Treatment 5 8.16 1.63 1.54ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 10.63 1.06
TOTAL 17 19.17
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=14.18 %
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
45
Appendix Table 19. Number of pod pickings
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 7 7 7 21..00 7.00
CGP 110 7 7 7 21.00 7.00
CGP 18A 6 6 6 18.00 6.00
CGP 34 6 6 6 18.00 6.00
CGP 59 7 6 7 20.00 6.67
CLG 7 7 7 21.00 7.00
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.11 0.06
Treatment 5 3.61 0.72 12** 3.33 5.64
Error 10 0.56 0.06
TOTAL 17 4.28
**- Highly significant
Coefficient of variation=3.77%
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
46
Appendix Table 21. Computed yield per hectare (kg)
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 14736 12420 12430 39586.00 13195.33
CGP 110 17652 16340 14940 48932.00 16310.67
CGP 18A 14618 16356 14740 45714.00 15238.00
CGP 34 11756 18846 13838 44440.00 14813.33
CGP 59 11760 12608 12600 36968.00 12322.67
CLG 15856 12916 16826 45598.00 15199.33
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 1532012.33 766006.17
Treatment 5 32556867.67 6511373.53 1.54ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 42196361 4291636.1
TOTAL 17 77005241
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=14.27 %
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
47
Appendix Table 22. Rating on insect pest (leaf miner) incidence
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 3 4 3 10.00 3.33
CGP 110 3 3 3 9.00 3.00
CGP 18A 3 3 4 10.00 3.33
CGP 34 4 3 3 10.00 3.33
CGP 59 4 4 4 12.00 4.00
CLG 4 3 4 11.00 3.67
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.11 0.06
Treatment 5 1.77 0.35 1.35ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 2.56 0.26
TOTAL 17 4.44
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=15.27 %
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
48
Appendix Table 23. Rating on disease (powdery mildew) incidence
LINES REPLICATIONS TOTAL MEAN
I II III
CGP 13 3 4 3 10.00 3.33
CGP 110 3 3 3 9.00 3.00
CGP 18A 3 3 4 10.00 3.33
CGP 34 4 3 3 10.00 3.33
CGP 59 4 4 4 12.00 4.00
CLG 4 3 4 11.00 3.67
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF DEGREE OF SUM OF MEAN OF COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIANCE FREEDOM SQUARES SQUARES F 0.05 0.01
Replication 2 0.11 0.06
Treatment 5 1.77 0.35 1.35ns 3.33 5.64
Error 10 2.56 0.26
TOTAL 17 4.44
ns- Not significant
Coefficient of variation=15.27 %
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
49
CA-UR Form 4
Benguet State University
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE
La Trinidad, Benguet
April 5, 2010
Date
APLLICATION FOR MANUSCRIPT ORAL DEFENCE
Name: EFREN T. BENIASAN
Degree(Major Field): BS in AGRICULTURE (HORTICULTURE)
Title of Research: PILOT TESTING OF GARDEN PEA (Pisum sativum L.) LINES
UNDER TOPDAC, ATOK, BENGUET CONDITION
Endorsed: Percival B. Alipit
Adviser and Chairperson, Advisory Committee
Date and Time of Defense: April 5, 2010 - 8 to 10AM
Place of Defense:
AC 201
Approved:
Percival B. Alipit
Araceli G. Ladilad
Member,
Member, Advisory Committee
Member, Advisory Committee
and Department Chairperson
RESULT OF ORAL DEFENCE
Name and Signature
Remarks (Passed/Failed)
Percival B. Alipit
Adviser and Chairperson, Advisory Committee
Fernando R. Gonzales
Member Advisory Committee
Araceli G. Ladilad
Member, Advisory Committee and Department
Chairperson
Rooting of Pineapple Crown (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) as Affected by Different ANAA
Concentrations. BAYENG, JUNE O. APRIL 2011
Document Outline
- Pilot Testing of Garden Pea (Pisumsativum L.) Lines Under Topdac, Atok, Benguet Condition
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- INTRODUCTION
- REVIEW OF LITERATURE
- MATERIALS AND METHODS
- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
- SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- LITERATURE CITED