BIBLIOGRAPHY BOLON, GLORY ANN A. APRIL 2010....

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOLON, GLORY ANN A. APRIL 2010. Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean
Accessions Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet. Benguet State University, La
Trinidad, Benguet.
Adviser: Belinda A. Tad-awan, Ph.D.
ABSTRACT

Adaptability trial of ten AVRDC soybean accessions was conducted at
Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet to identify the best accession/s based on yield and
resistance to insects and diseases.

The AVRDC accessions had early emergence, flowering, pod setting and maturity
as compared with the local check, ‘Ifugao’. AGS 435 produced the tallest plants at 30
days after planting.
The local check, ‘Ifugao’, produced the highest number and heaviest weight of
marketable pods, and one- two- and three-seeded pods, however, it produced the
narrowest and shortest pods.

Among the AVRDC accessions, AGS 436 produced the highest marketable, total
and computed fresh pod yield.

High resistance to soybean pod borer and soybean rust was noted in all the
accessions.

As to sensory evaluation of green pods, all the accessions were slightly aromatic
except for AGS 440 which was moderately aromatic. All accessions are acceptable by the
farmers except for ‘Ifugao’ which was disliked moderately.

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
Bibliography………………………………………………………………...
i
Abstract…………………………………………………………………….
i
Table of Contents……………………………………………...…………...
iii
INTRODUCTION……………………………………………….………...
1
REVIEW OF LITERATURE……………….…………………………….
2
Adaptation of Soybean…………………………………………….
2
Germplasm Collection and
Varietal Evaluation………………………………………………...
3
MATERIALS AND METHODS………………………………………….
4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION…………………………………………..
11
Meteorological Data During
11
the Conduct of the Study…………………………………………..
Days from Sowing to Emergence………………………….………
11
Days from Emergence to Flowering……………………...………..
11
Days from Flowering to Pod Setting………………………………
12
Days from Emergence to First Harvest…………………………....
12

Days from Emergence to Last Harvest…………………...………..
12

Plant Height at 30 and 60 DAP……………………………………
13
Number of Nodes per Plant…………………………………..……
14
Pod Color…………………………………………………………..
14
Number of One-Two-and
15
Three-Seeded pods…………………………………………………

iii

Length of One-Two-and
16
Three-Seeded pods…………………………………………………

Width of One-Two-and
16
Three-Seeded pods…………………………………………………

Weight of One-Two-and
17
Three-Seeded pods…………………………………………………

Weight of Marketable Fresh Pods
18
per Plot……………………………………………………………..

Weight of Non-Marketable Fresh Pods
19
per Plot……………………………………………………………..

Total Yield per Plot…………………………………………….….
19
Computed Fresh Pod Yield…………………………………….….
20
Reaction to Pod Borer………………………………………….….
21
Reaction to Soybean Rust…………………………………………
22
Reaction to Lodging……………………………………………….
22
Sensory Evaluation……………………………………………..….
22
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS……….
24

Summary.………………………………………………………….. 24

Conclusions………………………………………………………... 25
Recommendations…………………………………………………. 25
LITERATURE CITED…………………………………………………….
26
APPENDICES…………………………………………………………….. 28

iv

INTRODUCTION

Soybean (Glycine max) is an annual warm season crop and short-day plant. It can
withstand brief periods of drought and flooding. Soybean can be grown as an upland crop
where most production occurs in areas where normal rainfall provides the entire moisture
supply for the crop. Soybeans introduced from geographical zones of high latitudes have
been observed to produce a good plant type during wet season (Lantican and Garaza,
1977).
Soybean is grown in the Philippines even it is not a native crop. Excellent
soybeans in experiment plots and in farmers’ field were observed and yield reported by
farmers are in line with yield obtained in soybean production on areas over the world
(Smith, 1971).
Soybean is highly nutritious food for both children and adults. It is cholesterol
free, has high protein content and has been found to contain substances such as
isoflavones and gnistein that helps prevent cancer (PCCARD, 2002).
With the importance of soybean, it is therefore necessary to expand its cultivation
in other areas like the Philippine highlands. However, to expand production, adaptation
trials of different accessions should be conducted.
The study aimed to evaluate the adaptability of different soybean accessions
acquired from AVRDC and to identify the best soybean accession/s based on yield and
resistance to insect and diseases under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet condition.
The study was conducted at Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet from November
2008 to March 2009.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

2

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Adaptation of Soybean

The environmental adaptation of soybean is similar to that of corn. The crop is
grown from latitudes of 0 to 55oC. However, management practices and cultivar selection
and the concentration of commercial production vary considerably across those latitudes.
In tropical latitudes, soybean is grown from below sea level to 2,000 m altitudes. The
variation in environmental conditions for this latitude and altitude range illustrates the
adaptability of soybean to different environmental conditions. The major commercial
production of soybean is between 25o to 45o latitude at altitudes of less than 1,000 m
(Bishop, 1983).
Soybean can be grown as an upland crop in 7 to 8 months of natural rainfall in
the Philippines. In the potential areas of soybean production, the first crop maybe planted
at the onset of the southwest monsoon starting in June. During this season, rainfall is
usually high, day length goes beyond 12 hours and light quality is much affected by
persistent cloud cover. This period is commonly referred to as the “wet” season. The
second crop maybe planted on October. Precipitation is less intense, temperature is lower
and day length is less than 12 hours: the dry season (Lantican and Garaza, 1977).
During the dry season, the trend of adaptation between the tropical and introduced
groups of soybeans is usually reversed. The tropical types tend to be more adaptive and
high yielding whereas the counterparts from high latitudes do not attain sufficient
vegetative development to ensure high yield (Lantican and Garaza, 1977).

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

3

Germplasm Collection and Varietal Evaluation
Soybean improvement programs in the USA, Canada, Brazil, Japan, Taiwan, and
Africa now have resources of hybridization and selection larger than has been possible
hitherto. These programs emphasize the importance of collecting, exchanging,
introducing and maintaining germplasm to provide a wide range of genetic diversity for
plant breeders to exploit (Shunmugasudaram, 1979).
Several authors have discussed the merits of using photoperiod and sensitive
cultivars, particularly in areas of the tropic and subtropic were more than one soybean
can be grown per year (Hinson, 1974, Shunmugasudaram, 1981). Such genotypes are
now available and could presumably incorporated in varietal improvement programs
(Summerfields, 1981).
Morphological characterization and evaluation done by Doco (2009) at La
Trinidad, Benguet revealed that AGS 437 and AGS 439 produced the highest fresh pod
yield among the AVRDC accessions. Moderate to mild resistance to pod borer, cutworm,
and leaf miner and high resistance to leaf blight were also noted in the same study.
The study of Menzi (2009) on adaptability and acceptability conducted at Pacso,
Kabayan showed that AVRDC soybean accessions specifically AGS 439 and AGS 433
produced the widest, longest and heaviest pods among the AVRDC accessions. Mild to
moderate resistance to soybean rust and leaf miner were observed.
Adaptability and acceptability trial conducted at Gambang, Bakun (Wa-ilen,
2009) showed AGS 438 was the best performer among the AVRDC soybean accessions
producing the highest number, widest, longest and heaviest of one-two and three- seeded
pods. Green pods of all the accessions were found to be acceptable by the farmers.
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

4

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An area of 160 m2 was thoroughly cleaned and prepared. The area was divided
into three equal blocks each with 11 plots measuring 1 m x 5 m. The experiment was
laid-out using the randomized complete block design (RCBD).
The 11 accessions tested were as follows:
TREATMENT ACCESSION
A1 AGS
432
A2 AGS
433
A3 AGS
434
A4 AGS
435
A5 AGS
436
A6 AGS
437
A7 AGS
438
A8 AGS
439
A9 AGS
440
A10 AGS
292
A11 Local
check

Planting and Planting Distance
Seeds were sown at a distance of 40 cm x 30 cm between rows and hills at a depth
of 4-5 cm with one seed per hill.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

5

Cultural Management Practices

Mushroom compost was applied at the rate of 5 kg per 5 m2 two weeks before
planting. Vermicompost was applied at the rate of 15 kg per 160 m2 during the vegetative
stage.
Cultural management practices like weeding and irrigation were uniformly
employed.

Data Gathered:
1. Agro Climatic data. Air temperature (oC), relative humidity (percentage), and
rainfall (mm) were recorded during the conduct of study.
2. Maturity
2.1. Number of days from sowing to emergence. This was recorded by
subtracting the date of sowing from the date of emergence when at least 50% of the
plants have fully emerged.
2.2. Number of days from emergence to flowering. This was recorded by
counting the number of days from emergence to the day when 50% of the plants have
flowered.
2.3. Number of days from emergence to pod setting. This was recorded by
counting the number of days from emergence until the days when the pods are developed.
2.4. Number of days from emergence to first harvest. This was recorded by
counting the number of days from emergence until the days when pods are ready to
harvest.
2.5. Number of days from emergence to last harvest. This was recorded by
counting the number of days from emergence until the day last harvest was done.
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

6

3. Stem characters
3.1. Initial plant height (cm). This was measured from the base of the plant at
ground level to the tip of the youngest shoot, using a meter stick from five sample plants
per plot at 30 days after planting.
3.2. Final plant height (cm). This was measured from the base of the plant at
ground level to the tip of the youngest shoot, using a meter stick from five sample plants
per plot.
3.3. Number of nodes per plant. This was recorded by counting the number of
nodes of five sample plants on the main stem.
4. Pod Characters
4.1. Pod color. This was observed during harvesting using the following pod
color rate:
Scale Description
1 Dark
green
2 Green
3 Yellow
green
4 Yellow

4.2. Number of one-seeded and two-seeded pods per five plants. This was
taken by counting the one-seeded pods using the same five plants where the pods were
stripped.
4.3. Weight of one-seeded and two-seeded pods per five plants (kg). This was
taken by weighing the one- seeded and two-seeded pods after counting.
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

7

4.4. Length of one-seeded and two-seeded pods (cm). This was taken by
randomly selecting filled pods from the stripped pods of the sample plants and measured
from end to end using a foot rule.
4.5. Width of one-seeded and two-seeded pods (cm). This was measured by
measuring the width of the same pods which was measured for pod length using a foot
rule.
5. Yield and Yield Components
5.1. Weight of marketable fresh pod per plot (kg). This was recorded by
weighing the marketable fresh pods per plot of each treatment. Marketable pods are free
from disease and insect damage and not deformed.
5.2. Weight of non-marketable fresh pod per plot (kg). This was obtained by
weighing the non-marketable pods per plot of each treatment. Non-marketable pods were
observed as diseased, damaged and deformed.
5.3. Total pod yield per harvest plot (kg). This was recorded by getting the total
weight of marketable and non-marketable fresh pods per plot of each treatment
throughout the harvesting period.
5.4. Computed fresh pod yield (t/ha). Total yield per hectare in tons was
computed using the following formula
Yield (t/ha) = total yield per plot x 2

Where 2 is the factor to be used to convert yield in kg/5m2 ton per hectare
assuming it is one hectare effective area.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

8

6. Reaction to Pest and Diseases
6.1. Reaction to pod borer. The reaction of infestation of pod borer was
obtained using the rating scale:
Scale Description Remarks
1
No infestation
High resistance
2
1-25% of total plant was infested Mild
resistance
3
25-50% of total plant was infested Moderate
resistance
4
51-75% of total plant was infested
Susceptible
5
76-100% of total plant was infested Very
susceptible

6.2. Reaction to soybean rust. The reaction of infestation to soybean rust was
obtained using the rating scale:
Scale Description Remarks
1
No infection
High resistance
2
1-25% of total plant was infected Mild
resistance
3
25-50% of total plant was infected Moderate
resistance
4
51-75% of total plant was infected
Susceptible
5
76-100% of total plant was infected Very
susceptible

7. Lodging. This was recorded by using the following rating scale:
Scale Definition
Remarks
1
All plants erect
Resistant
2
All plants leaning slightly or 10%
Moderately resistant
of the plants are lodging
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

9

3
Ten to 50% of the plant lodging
Intermediate
4
Fifty to 50% of the plant lodging Moderately
susceptible
5
Almost all of the plants lodging
Susceptible

8. Sensory Evaluation. Samples of newly harvested pods were blanched and
evaluated by panels consisting of 10 students, 10 faculty members from the College of
Agriculture and 10 farmers. The pods were evaluated in terms of aroma and acceptability
using the following scale:
8.1. Aroma
Scale Description
1 Not
aromatic
2 Slightly
aromatic
3 Moderately
aromatic
4 Very
aromatic
5 Extremely
aromatic
8.2. Acceptability
Scale Description
1 Dislike
very
much
2 Dislike
moderately
3 like
4 Like
moderately
5
Like very much

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

10

Data Analysis
All qualitative data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for
randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The significance of
differences among the treatment means was tested using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test
(DMRT) at 5% level of significance.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

11

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Meteorological Data During
the Conduct of the Study

Table 1 shows the temperature, relative humidity and amount of rainfall during
the conduct of the study. Temperature ranged from 14oC to 26oC. Mean relative humidity
was 73.5 %. Rainfall amount recorded was 80.25ml, which occurred only in November.
Soybean grows best in areas with 10oC to 40oC although it can be grown in most
agro-climatic regions but preferred areas are dry zone (Bishop, 1983).

Table 1. Meteorological data during the conduct of study

MONTHS
TEMPERATURE
RELATIVE
RAINFALL

(oC)
HUMIDITY (%)
AMOUNT (ml)
November
22
76
80.25
December 14 70 --
January
24
77
--
February
26
71
--
Mean
21.5
38

Maturity

Days from sowing to emergence. Significant differences were observed among
the AVRDC accessions on the number of days from sowing to emergence. AGS 437 and
AGS 434 were the earliest to emerge at eight days while the rest of the accessions
emerged at nine days after sowing (Table 2).
Days from emergence to flowering. Highly significant differences were observed
among the accessions as shown in Table 2. Among the ten accessions tested, AGS 438
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

12

was the earliest to flower at 35 days after emergence. ‘Ifugao’ was the last to flower at 47
days after emergence.
The same result was found by Doco and Menzi (2009) that days from emergence
to flowering ranged from 34 to 47 days in La Trinidad and Kabayan, respectively.
Days from flowering to pod setting. Significant differences were noted among the
AVRDC accessions (Table 2) on the number of days from emergence to pod setting.
‘Ifugao’ was the latest to produce pods at ten days after flowering while the accessions
from AVRDC produced pods at eight and nine days after flowering.
Wa-ilen (2009) also observed that pod setting of the same accessions were seven
to eight days after flowering under Bakun, Benguet condition.
Days from emergence to first harvest. No significant differences were observed
among the AVRDC soybean accessions on the number of days from emergence to first
harvest. First harvesting was done on AVRDC accessions at 71 to 72 days after
emergence. This result confirms with the study of Menzi and Wa-ilen (2009) in Kabayan
and Bakun, respectively.
‘Ifugao’ reached the R6 stage (full seed or when pod containing a green seed that
fills the pod cavity at one of the four uppermost nodes on the main stem with a fully
developed leaf) at 79 days after emergence.
Days from emergence to last harvest. As shown on Table 2, highly significant
differences were noted among the AVRDC soybean accessions. AGS 432 and AGS 292
were the earliest to be harvested at 90 days after emergence. Wa-ilen (2009) also noted
that the same accessions were harvested at 91 and 92 days after emergence in Bakun.
Last harvesting was on ‘Ifugao’ at 102 days after emergence.
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

13

Table 2. Days from sowing to emergence, emergence to flowering, flowering to pod
setting, emergence to first harvest and last harvest of the AVRDC soybean
accessions

DAYS
SOWING TO EMERGENCE FLOWERING EMERGENCE EMERGENCE
ACCESSION EMERGENCE
TO
TO POD
TO FIRST
TO LAST
FLOWERING
SETTING
HARVEST
HARVEST
AGS 432

8
38
8b
71

90e
AGS 433

9
39
9b
72
91cde
AGS 434

8
39bc

8b
71
90de
AGS 435

8
40b

8b
72
91cde
AGS 436

8
38bcd

8b
71
91cde
AGS 437

8
36de

8b
71
92bc
AGS 438

8
35e

8b
72
93b
AGS 439

8
37cd

9b
71
91bcd
AGS 440

8
38cd

9b
71
91cde
AGS 292

8
38cd

8b
72
90e
Ifugao

9
47a
10a
79

102a
CV (%)
5.33
2.35
5.44
2.36
0.84
*Means with the same letter are not significantly different by DMRT (P> 0.05)

Plant Height and Growth Pattern

Plant height at 30 and 60 DAP. Table 3 shows the height of the plants at 30 and
60 DAP. AGS 435 was measured to be the tallest (14.61cm) at 30 DAP but comparable
with AGS 433 and AGS 438 at 13.95 cm and 13.54 cm, respectively. Significant
differences on final plant height varying from 15.30 cm to 23 cm were recorded with
AGS 439 as the shortest and ‘Ifugao’ the tallest.
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

14

The study of Menzi and Wa-ilen (2009) also showed that ‘Ifugao’ produced the
tallest plants.

The results confirm the findings of Lantican (1987) that introduced varieties
generally lack the necessary height, produce limited amounts of vegetative parts and
flower very early, consequently producing poor yields. Temperate varieties generally
have limited use during dry season especially if seed for planting were imported from
their place of origin.

All the accessions have determinate habit of growth.

Number of Nodes per Plant

Highly significant differences were observed on the number of nodes per plant.
‘Ifugao’, AGS 433, AGS 435 and AGS 436 were recorded to have the highest number of
nodes but comparable with AGS 438, AGS 432, AGS 439 which have the least number
of nodes among the eleven soybean accessions evaluated.

Doco (2009) also observed that ‘Ifugao’ had the highest number of nodes and
AGS 439 had the least number of nodes under La Trinidad, Benguet condition.

Pod Characters
Pod color. All the AVRDC accessions exhibited green pods. ‘Ifugao’ has yellow-
green pods.

Menzi and Wa-ilen (2009) noted the same pod color. However, Doco (2009)
observed dark green pods of ‘Ifugao’.

The result of the various studies on soybean accessions confirm the statement of
Shanmugasundaram (1990) that pod color is highly influenced by the environment.
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

15

Table 3. Plant height at 30 and 60 DAP and number of nodes of the AVRDC soybean
accessions

HEIGHT (cm)
ACCESSION
NUMBER OF NODE
30 DAP
60 DAP
AGS 432

12.43bc
15.68fg
5.00
AGS 433

13.95ab
20.94bc
8.00
AGS 434

12.78bc 17.69e
6.00
AGS 435

14.61a
21.39ab
8.00
AGS 436

13.04bc 20.51bc
8.00
AGS 437

12.00c
18.33de
7.00
AGS 438

13.54ab 19.47cd
7.00
AGS 439

11.55c
15.30g
5.00
AGS 440

12.88bc 17.16ef
6.00
AGS 292

11.89c
18.50de
6.00
Ifugao

12.67bc 23.00a
8.00
CV (%)
6.29
5.15
7.66

*Means with the same letter are not significantly different by DMRT (P> 0.05)

Number of One-,Two-,and Three-Seeded Pods

Highly significant differences were observed among the number of one-two-and
three-seeded pods (Table 4).
‘Ifugao’ exhibited the highest number of one-two-and three-seeded pods at 553,
775 and 117, respectively. All the AVRDC accessions were not significantly different
from each other.
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

16

Numerically, the highest number of one-seeded pod was obtained from AGS 437
and two-seeded pod was obtained from AGS 436.

Doco and Menzi (2009) also reported that ‘Ifugao’ produced the highest number
of pods in La Trinidad and Kabayan, respectively. However, Wa-ilen (2009) found that
AGS 438 produced the highest number of one-, two- and three-seeded pods among the
AVRDC soybean accessions in Bakun.

Length of One-, Two-, and Three- Seeded Pods

‘Ifugao’ had the shortest one-two-and three seeded pods (Table 5). AGS 433 was
noted to have the longest one-seeded pods at 4.24 cm while AGS 438 was recorded to
have the longest two-seeded pods but did not significantly differ from AGS 434, 439 and
440. Accessions AGS 433, AGS 434, AGS 438, AGS 439 and AGS 440 were recorded to
have the longest three-seeded pods.

Width of One-, Two-, and Three- Seeded Pods
‘Ifugao” had the narrowest one-two-and three-seeded pods at 1.38, 1.39, and 1.38
cm, respectively. The widest one-seeded pod was recorded from AGS 435 and AGS 438
both measuring 1.67 cm. The other accessions have comparable pods (Table 6).

AGS 435 was measured to have the widest two-seeded pods but comparable with
the other accessions. AGS 292 has the widest three-seeded pods measuring 1.66 cm but
comparable with the other accessions.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

17

Table 4. Number of one- two- and three-seeded pods of the AVRDC soybean accessions

NUMBER
ACCESSION ONE-SEEDED POD TWO-SEEDED POD THREE-SEEDED POD
AGS 432

19.00b
12.00 b 4.00 b
AGS 433

28.00 b
16.00 b 4.00 b
AGS 434

17.00 b
16.00 b 5.00 b
AGS 435

29.00 b
19.00b 5.00 b
AGS 436

20.00 b
38.00 b 5.00 b
AGS 437

31.00 b
13.00 b 2.00 b
AGS 438

19.00 b
20.00 b 3.00 b
AGS 439

24.00 b
34.00 b 6.00 b
AGS 440

24.00 b
27.00 b 6.00 b
AGS 292

25.00 b
16.00 b 2.00 b
Ifugao

553.00 a
775.00a
117.00a
CV (%)

8.54
10.29
35.26
*Means with the same letter are not significantly different by DMRT (P> 0.05)

Weight of One-, Two-, and Three-Seeded Pods

Results showed that ‘Ifugao’ had the highest weight of one, two and three-seeded
pods at 664 g, 1470 g and 262 g, respectively (Table 7).

Menzi and Wa-ilen (2009) also reported that ‘Ifugao’ had the highest weight of
one- two- and three-seeded pods.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

18

Table 5. Length of one-two- and three-seeded pods of the AVRDC soybean accessions

LENGTH (cm)
ACCESSION ONE-SEEDED POD TWO-SEEDED POD THREE-SEEDED POD
AGS 432

3.67c
4.98bc
5.77b
AGS 433

4.24a
5.23ab
6.23a
AGS 434

3.60c
5.43a
6.47a
AGS 435

4.12ab
4.78c
5.63b
AGS 436

3.93abc
5.23ab
6.37a
AGS 437

3.73bc
4.82c
5.80b
AGS 438

3.75bc
5.56a
6.37a
AGS 439

4.12ab
5.50a
6.50a
AGS 440

4.09ab
5.35a
6.17a
AGS 292

3.96abc
4.77c
5.70b
Ifugao

3.17d
4.14d
4.83c
CV (%)
5.62
3.74
3.25
*Means with the same letter are not significantly different by DMRT (P> 0.05)

Pod Yield
Weight of marketable fresh pod per plot. Highly significant differences were
observed among the accessions on the weight of marketable fresh pods (Table8). ‘Ifugao’
produced the highest marketable fresh pods with a mean of 3.15 kg and the lowest was
obtained from AGS 432 with 0.23 kg. However, there were no noted significant
differences among the AVRDC accessions.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

19

Table 6. Width of one- two- and three seeded pods of the AVRDC soybean accessions

WIDTH
ACCESSION
(cm)
ONE-SEEDED POD TWO-SEEDED POD THREE-SEEDED POD
AGS 432

1.56b
1.61bc
1.58b
AGS 433

1.61ab
1.64ab
1.63ab
AGS 434

1.54b
1.58c
1.63ab
AGS 435

1.67a
1.68a
1.64ab
AGS 436

1.57ab
1.60bc
1.63ab
AGS 437

1.63ab
1.63abc
1.61ab
AGS 438

1.67a
1.66ab
1.64ab
AGS 439

1.62ab 1.64ab
1.63ab
AGS 440

1.64ab 1.65ab
1.66a
AGS 292

1.62ab 1.64ab
1.64ab
Ifugao

1.38c
1.39a
1.38c
CV (%)

3.66
1.84
1.5
*Means with the same letter are not significantly different by DMRT (P> 0.05)

Weight of non-marketable fresh pod per plot. No significant differences were
observed among the accessions on the weight of non-marketable fresh pods per plot.
‘Ifugao’ had the highest weight of non-marketable fresh pods with a mean of 0.09 kg.
Total pod yield per plot. The total pod yield per plot among the AVRDC
accessions was recorded to be highly significant (Table 8). The local check produced the
heaviest weight with a mean of 3.52 kg. AVRDC accessions did not show any significant
differences.
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

20

Table 7. Weight of one- two- and three-seeded pods of the AVRDC soybean accessions

WEIGHT
ACCESSION ONE-SEEDED POD TWO-SEEDED POD THREE-SEEDED POD
AGS 432

24.00

24.00

9.00
AGS 433

33.00

36.00

9.00
AGS 434

18.00

38.00

11.00
AGS 435

33.00

36.00

11.00
AGS 436

22.00

73.00

12.00
AGS 437

35.00

24.00

4.00
AGS 438

21.00

38.00

9.00
AGS 439

26.00

65.00

15.00
AGS 440

26.00

57.00

14.00
AGS 292

28.00

31.00

5.00
Ifugao

664.00

1470.00
262.00
CV (%)

13.99

6.34

2.29
*Means with the same letter are not significantly different by DMRT (P> 0.05)

Computed fresh pod yield. Among the accessions evaluated, ‘Ifugao’ produced
the highest computed fresh pod yield with 6.80 t/ha followed by AGS 436 with 1.16 t/ha.
The lowest computed fresh pod yield was produced by AGS 432 with 0.55 t/ha (Table 8).

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

21

Table 8. Pod yield of the AVRDC soybean accessions

POD YIELD (kg/5m2)
ACCESSION
COMPUTED
MARKETABLE NON
TOTAL
YIELD (t/ha)
MARKETABLE

AGS 432

0.23 b 0.05 b 0.28b
0.56d
AGS 433

0.32 b 0.05 b 0.37 b 0.74cd
AGS 434

0.28 b 0.04 b 0.32 b 0.64d
AGS 435

0.36 b 0.02 b 0.38 b 0.76cd
AGS 436

0.61 b 0.04 b 0.65b 1.30 b
AGS 437

0.28 b 0.02 b 0.30 b 0.60 d
AGS 438

0.47 b 0.07 b 0.54 b 1.08bc
AGS 439

0.47 b 0.04 b 0.51 b 1.02bc
AGS 440

0.46 b 0.08 b 0.54 b 1.08bc
AGS 292

0.33 b 0.03 b 0.36b 0.72cd
Ifugao

3.15 a 0.09 b 3.24 a 6.48 a
CV (%)
27.58
2.50
27.03
14.86
*Means with the same letter are not significantly different by DMRT (P> 0.05).

Reaction to Pests and Diseases
Reaction to pod borer. No infestation of pod borer was observed among the
accessions. However, Doco (2009) reported mild to moderate resistance to pod borer of
the AVRDC accessions under La Trinidad, Benguet condition.
In Japan, the genotypes with glabrous or curly pubescent types were reported to
be resistant to soybean pod borer, but were susceptible to potato leaf hopper (Bernard and
Weiss, 1973).
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

22

Reaction to soybean rust. No infestation of soybean rust was noted in all of the
accessions. The same case was noted by Wa-ilen (2009) in Bakun, however, Menzi
(2009) noted mild to moderate resistance to soybean rust in Kabayan, Benguet.
As reported by PCCARD (1986) soybean rust favors cool temperature and high
humidity.

Reaction to Lodging

All the accessions were resistant to lodging. This could be accounted to the short
stature of the plants.
Factors such as high plant population, high soil moisture, and high soil fertility
can stimulate vegetative growth and increase plant height, leading to lodging. As plant
populations increase, soybean stems become longer and more slender and plant
standability decreases (Klein and Elmore, 2000).

Sensory Evaluation

Samples of newly harvested pods were blanched and were evaluated by 10
farmers, 10 students and 10 faculty members.

AGS 440 was rated moderately aromatic while the rest of the accessions were
rated slightly aromatic. Based on the acceptability test, all the accessions from AVRDC
were moderately liked while ‘Ifugao’ was disliked moderately. This could be due to the
fact that ‘Ifugao’ is being cultivated for grain and not as vegetable soybean (Table 9).

For sensory evaluation of fresh pod yield, consumers are considering the color
and width of the fresh pods. Apparently, green to dark green and wide fresh pods area
acceptable in addition to their aroma (Pog-ok, 2001).
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

23

Table 9. Sensory evaluation of the AVRDC soybean accessions
ACCESSION AROMA
ACCEPTABILITY
AGS 432
Slightly aromatic
Liked
AGS 433
Slightly aromatic
Liked
AGS 434
Slightly aromatic
Liked
AGS 435
Slightly aromatic
Liked
AGS 436
Slightly aromatic
Liked
AGS 437
Slightly aromatic
Liked
AGS 438
Slightly aromatic
Liked
AGS 439
Slightly aromatic
Liked
AGS 440
Moderately aromatic
Liked
AGS 292
Slightly aromatic
Liked
‘Ifugao’ (check)
Slightly aromatic
Disliked moderately

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

24

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary

This study was conducted at Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet to evaluate the
adaptability of different soybean accessions and identify the best soybean accession/s
based on yield and resistance to insect pest and diseases under Guinaoang, Mankayan,
Benguet.

The study showed significant differences among the AVRDC soybean accessions
and ‘Ifugao’ on the number of days from sowing to emergence, emergence to flowering,
flowering to pod setting, emergence to last harvest, plant height, number of nodes,
number, length and width of one-two and three-seeded pods, and pod yield.
Results showed that the accessions from AVRDC exhibited early emergence,
flowering, pod setting and maturity. AGS 435 was noted to have the tallest plants at 30
days after planting while ‘Ifugao’ recorded the tallest plants at 60 days after planting. It
also produced the highest number and heaviest weight of one-, two and three-seeded
pods, marketable, total and computed fresh pod yield.

Among the AVRDC accessions, AGS 436 produced the highest marketable, total
and computed fresh pod yield. As for the sensory evaluation of boiled green pods, all the
accessions from AVRDC were acceptable while ‘Ifugao’ was disliked moderately. All
the accessions were slightly aromatic except for AGS 440 which was moderately
aromatic.
All the accessions showed high resistance to soybean rust, pod borer and lodging.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

25

Conclusions

The best among the AVRDC soybean accessions based on marketable, total and
computed fresh pod yield is AGS 436. All the accessions are resistant to pod borer and
soybean rust.

Although ‘Ifugao’ produced the highest pod yield, it is not intended for vegetable
soybean production but for grain production.

Recommendations

AGS 436 can be recommended as vegetable soybean in Guinaoang, Mankayan,
Benguet.

Due to low yield obtained during the conduct of the study it is recommended that
further studies should be conducted under different planting dates.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

26

LITERATURE CITED

ASIAN VEGETABLE RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT CENTER, 1997. Soybean in
Tropical and Subtropical Cropping. AVRDC Publication, Tsukuba, Japan. Pp
203-204.

BISHOP, D. L. 1983. Crop Science and Food Production. McGraw-Hill Book Company,
USA. Pp 85-89.

DOCO, J. D. 2009. Morphological characterization and evaluation of AVRDC soybean
accessions under La Trinidad, Benguet condition. BS Thesis. BSU, La Trinidad,
Benguet. Pp 18-33.

DEPARTMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 2003. Soybean Genetic
Resources Management and Utilization. Retrieved on March 2, 2010.
http://www.ars.dfid.gov/research/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=403373&fy.

FOOD and AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION. 2009. Research for Vegetable
Production and Quality Improvement. Genebank and the World Food. Publishing
No. 911-346. P 151. Retrieved on December 29, 2009. http://www.fao.gov/attra-
pub/htm.

ELMORE, J. S., and W. L. KLEIN. 2000. Heat Stress Tolerance of Transgenic Soybeans.
University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA. P 51.

HINSON, D. R. 1974. Soybean Development in India. The UN/ESCAP CGPRT Center.
Pp 3-4.

INTERNATIONAL RICE RESEARCH INSTITUTE , 1983. Potential Productivity of
Crops Under Different Environments. IRRI, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines. Pp
205-223.

KELLY, T. J., 1972. Vegetable Crops. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company L.T.D.
New Delhi. P 432.

LANTICAN, R. M. and GARAZA, C. D., 1977. Varietal Responses of Soybeans to
Cropping Seasons in the Philippines. CSSP, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines. Pp
72-77.

MENZI, M. M. 2009. Adaptability and acceptability of soybean accessions under Pacso,
Kabayan, Benguet condition. BSU, La Trinidad, Benguet. Pp 17-30.

PHILIPPINE COUNCIL for AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY and NATURAL
RESOURCE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT, 2002. R & D Milestone Crops.
Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines. Vol.3. P 97.
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

27

PHILIPPINE INFORMATION AGENCY. 2008. PIA Daily News Reader. Retrieved on
November 28, 2009. http//www.pia.gov.ph/?=12&fi=p080707.htm.

POG-OK, S. K. 2001. Varietal evaluation of promising lines and path coefficient analysis
in pole snap beans. BS Thesis. BSU, La Trinidad Benguet. Pp 16.

SHUNMUGASUDARAM, S. 1979. Varietal Improvement of Varieties of Soybean,
AVRDC Taiwan. Pp 30-42.

SMITH, J. T. 1971. Review of Soybean Potential in the Philippines. USAID Philippines.
Manila, Philippines. Pp 1-4.

SUMMERFIELDS, D. J. 1981. Soybean in Tropical and Subtropical Cropping System,
Revised Edition. AVRDC Publication No. 86-253. Pp 202-203.

WA-ILEN, D. B. 2009. Adaptability and acceptability of soybean accessions in
Gambang, Bakun, Benguet. BSU, La Trinidad, Benguet. Pp 18-27.

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

28

APPENDICES

Appendix Table 1. Days from sowing to emergence of AVRDC soybean accessions

BLOCK
ACCESSION
TOTAL MEAN
I II III
AGS 432
8
9
9
26
8.67
AGS 433
9
9
9
27
9.00
AGS 434
8
8
8
24
8.00
AGS 435
9
9
8
26
8.67
AGS 436
9
9
8
26
8.67
AGS 437
8
8
8
24
8.00
AGS 438
8
9
8
25
8.33
AGS 439
8
9
9
26
8.67
AGS 440
8
9
8
25
8.33
AGS 292
9
8
8
25
8.33
Ifugao 10 10 9 29
9.67

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
1.15
0.58
Treatment 10 6.73
3.21*
0.67
2.35 3.37
Error
20
4.18
0.21
TOTAL
32
12.06

*-Significant

CV%
=
5.33%
Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

29

Appendix Table 2. Days from emergence to flowering of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS 432
38
39
39
116
38.67
AGS 433
39
39
39
117
39.00
AGS 434
39
39
39
117
39.00
AGS 435
40
39
41
120
40.00
AGS 436
38
38
39
115
38.33
AGS 437
37
35
38
110
36.67
AGS 438
34
36
37
107
35.67
AGS 439
36
39
38
113
37.67
AGS 440
37
38
39
114
38.00
AGS 292
38
38
38
114
38.00
Ifugao 47 48 46 141 47.00

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
4.55
2.27
Treatment 10 257.39
30.66**
25.74
2.35
3.37
Error
20
16.79
0.84
TOTAL 32
278.73

**-Highly Significant

CV% = 2.35%

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

30

Appendix Table 3. Days from flowering to pod setting of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION
BLOCK
TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS 432
38
39
39
116
38.67
AGS 433
39
39
39
117
39.00.
AGS 434
39
39
39
117
39.00
AGS 435
40
39
41
120
40.00
AGS 436
38
38
39
115
38.33
AGS 437
37
35
38
110
36.67
AGS 438
34
36
37
107
35.67
AGS 439
36
39
38
113
37.67
AGS 440
37
38
39
114
38.00
AGS 292
38
38
38
114
38.00
Ifugao 47 48 46 141 47.00

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.73
0.36
Treatment 10 9.58
4.16**
0.96
2.35
3.37
Error
20
4.61
0.23
TOTAL 32 14.91

**-Highly Significant

CV% = 5.44%

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

31

Appendix Table 4. Days from emergence to first harvest of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS 432
71
72
71
214
71.33
AGS 433
73
72
72
217
72.33
AGS 434
71
71
72
214
71.33
AGS 435
72
72
72
216
72.00
AGS 436
73
71
71
215
71.67
AGS 437
72
72
71
215
71.67
AGS 438
73
72
71
216
72.00
AGS 439
71
71
71
213
71.00
AGS 440
70
72
72
214
71.33
AGS 292
72
73
72
217
72.33
‘Ifugao’ 78 80 80 238 79.33

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
8.91
4.46
Treatment 10 56.06
1.94ns
5.61
2.35 3.37
Error
20
57.76
2.89
TOTAL 32
122.73

ns- Not Significant

CV% = 2.36%

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

32

Appendix Table 5. Days from emergence to last harvest of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION REPLICATION TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
90 90 91 271
90.33
AGS
433
91 91 91 273
91.00
AGS
434
90 91 90 271
90.33
AGS
435
90 92 92 274
91.33
AGS
436
91 91 91 273
91.00
AGS
437
92 92 93 277
92.33
AGS
438
93 93 93 279
93.00
AGS
439
92 90 93 275
91.67
AGS
440
91 90 92 273
91.00
AGS
292
90 90 90 270
90.00
Ifugao 102 103 101 306
102.00

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
1.27
0.64

Treatment 10 341.58
56.6**
34.16
2.35 3.37
Error
20
12.06
0.60
TOTAL 32
354.91

**- Highly Significant

CV = 0.84%

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

33

Appendix Table 6. Plant height 30 DAP of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS 432
12.2
13.44
11.64
37.28
12.43
AGS 433
13.1
14.26
14.50
41.86
13.95
AGS
434
12.56 13.50 12.28 38.34 12.78
AGS
435
13.36 14.90 15.58 43.84 14.61
AGS
436
13.00 13.68 12.44 39.12 13.04
AGS
437
10.72 13.06 12.22 36.00 12.00
AGS
438
13.70 12.76 14.16 40.62 13.54
AGS
439
11.12 11.56 11.96 34.64 11.55
AGS
440
11.50 13.06 14.08 38.64 12.88
AGS
292
11.34 12.98 11.34 35.66 11.89
Ifugao 10.78 14.26 12.96 38.00 12.67

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
9.47
4.73
Treatment 10 25.22
3.86 **
2.52
2.35 3.37
Error
20
13.06
0.65
TOTAL 32 47.75

**- Highly Significant

CV = 6.29%

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

34

Appendix Table 7. Plant height at 60 DAP of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
16.10 15.70 15.25 47.04 15.65
AGS
433
20.67 22.10 20.04 62.81 20.94
AGS
434
19.20 17.63 16.25 53.08 17.69
AGS
435
21.50 20.03 22.64 64.17 21.39
AGS
436
20.36 20.16 21.00 61.52 20.51
AGS
437
17.19 18.39 19.40 54.98 18.33
AGS
438
18.75 19.47 20.19 58.41 19.47
AGS
439
14.65 15.92 15.33 45.90 15.30
AGS
440
16.78 17.49 17.20 51.47 17.16
AGS
292
17.64 18.54 19.31 55.49 18.50
Ifugao 23.71 21.41 22.67 67.79 23.00

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.41
0.21
Treatment 10 165.67
17.51 **
16.57
2.35 3.37
Error
20
18.92
0.95
TOTAL 32
185.00

**- Highly Significant

CV = 5.15%

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

35

Appendix Table 9. Number of one-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
18 27 12 57
19.00
AGS
433
28 24 32 84
28.00
AGS
434
18 19 13 50
16.67
AGS
435
19 28 41 88
29.33
AGS
436
17 33 11 61
20.33
AGS
437
40 24 29 93
31.00
AGS
438
20 23 14 57
19.00
AGS
439
28 21 24 73
24.33
AGS
440
26 25 22 73
24.33
AGS
292
29 25 21 75
25.00
Ifugao 500 816 342 1658
552.67

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
11843.15
5921.58
Treatment 10
763739.52
14.47 **
76373.96
2.35 3.37
Error
20
105566.85
5278.34
TOTAL 32
881149.52

**- Highly Significant

CV = 8.54%

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

36

Appendix Table 10. Number of two-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS 432
8
14
13
35
11.67
AGS
433
17 19 13 49
16.33
AGS 434
18
24
7
49
16.33
AGS
435
24 16 18 58
19.33
AGS
436
42 43 29 114
38.00
AGS 437
14
18
6
38
12.67
AGS
438
18 21 21 60
20.00
AGS
439
39 26 38 103
34.33
AGS
440
30 21 30 81
27.00
AGS
292
24 13 12 49
16.33
Ifugao 537 921 868 2326
775.33

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
6680.06
3340.03

Treatment 10
1553230.73
38.54**
155323.07
2.35 3.37
Error
20
80601.27
4030.06
TOTAL 32
1640512.06

**- Highly Significant

CV = 10.29 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

37

Appendix Table 11. Number of three-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
4 5 2 11
3.67
AGS
433
4 7 1 12
4.00
AGS
434
5 3 6 14
4.67
AGS
435
7 5 2 14
4.67
AGS
436
8 3 4 15
5.00
AGS
437
3 2 1 6
2.00
AGS
438
4 4 2 10
3.33
AGS
439
6 4 9 19
6.33
AGS 440
4
1
12
17
5.67
AGS
292
2 3 2 7
2.33
Ifugao 88 168 94 350
116.67

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
296.97
148.49
Treatment 10 34568.55
18.14**
3456.86
2.35 3.37
Error
20
3810.36
190.52
TOTAL 32
38675.88

**- Highly Significant

CV = 35.26 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

38

Appendix Table 12. Weight of one-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
0.025 0.032 0.014 0.071 0.024
AGS
433
0.033 0.028 0.037 0.098 0.033
AGS
434
0.020 0.020 0.014 0.054 0.018
AGS
435
0.020 0.032 0.046 0.098 0.033
AGS
436
0.018 0.036 0.013 0.067 0.022
AGS
437
0.045 0.027 0.032 0.104 0.035
AGS
438
0.022 0.025 0.015 0.062 0.021
AGS
439
0.031 0.023 0.023 0.077 0.026
AGS
440
0.028 0.027 0.023 0.078 0.026
AGS
292
0.033 0.026 0.024 0.083 0.028
‘Ifugao’ 0.603 0.980 0.410 1.993 0.664

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.02
0.01
Treatment 10 1.11
14.58**
0.11
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.15
0.01
TOTAL 32 1.28

**- Highly Significant

CV = 13.99 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

39

Appendix Table 13. Weight of two-seeded pods of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
0.016 0.027 0.030 0.073 0.024
AGS
433
0.036 0.042 0.029 0.107 0.036
AGS
434
0.041 0.053 0.019 0.113 0.038
AGS
435
0.045 0.030 0.033 0.108 0.036
AGS
436
0.080 0.083 0.056 0.219 0.073
AGS
437
0.027 0.035 0.010 0.072 0.024
AGS
438
0.035 0.039 0.040 0.114 0.038
AGS
439
0.075 0.049 0.072 0.196 0.065
AGS
440
0.058 0.039 0.055 0.152 0.057
AGS
292
0.046 0.025 0.022 0.093 0.031
Ifugao 1.02 1.75 1.65 4.42 1.470

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.02
0.01
Treatment 10 5.60
38.36**
0.56
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.29
0.02
TOTAL 32 5.91

**- Highly Significant

CV = 6.34 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

40

Appendix Table 14. Weight of three-seeded pods of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
0.010 0.013 0.004 0.027 0.009
AGS
433
0.009 0.016 0.002 0.027 0.009
AGS
434
0.012 0.005 0.016 0.033 0.011
AGS
435
0.017 0.012 0.003 0.032 0.011
AGS
436
0.019 0.007 0.010 0.036 0.012
AGS
437
0.008 0.003 0.002 0.013 0.004
AGS
438
0.011 0.009 0.006 0.026 0.009
AGS
439
0.015 0.010 0.021 0.046 0.015
AGS
440
0.010 0.002 0.031 0.043 0.014
AGS
292
0.004 0.007 0.004 0.015 0.005
Ifugao 0.210 0.370 0.206 0.786 0.262

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.001
0.001
Treatment 10 0.174
20.13**
0.017
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.017
0.001
TOTAL 32 0.192

**- Highly Significant

CV = 2.29 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

41

Appendix Table 15. Length of one-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
3.98 3.67 3.35 11.00 3.67
AGS
433
4.20 4.40 4.12 12.72 4.24
AGS
434
3.56 3.45 3.78 10.79 3.60
AGS
435
4.37 3.98 4.02 12.37 4.12
AGS
436
3.78 3.89 4.11 11.78 3.93
AGS
437
3.86 3.62 3.70 11.18 3.73
AGS
438
3.64 3.68 3.92 11.24 3.75
AGS
439
4.30 4.17 3.89 12.36 4.12
AGS
440
3.95 4.10 4.23 12.28 4.09
AGS
292
3.65 3.82 4.40 11.87 3.96
Ifugao 3.11 3.20 3.19 9.50 3.17

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.02
0.01
Treatment 10 2.90
6.19**
0.29
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.92
0.05
TOTAL 32 3.86

**- Highly Significant

CV = 5.62 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

42

Appendix Table 16. Length of two-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
4.75 5.20 5.00 14.95 4.98
AGS
433
5.20 5.00 5.50 15.70 5.23
AGS
434
5.65 5.43 5.22 16.30 5.43
AGS
435
4.80 4.62 4.91 14.33 4.78
AGS
436
5.46 5.01 5.22 15.69 5.23
AGS
437
4.75 4.82 4.90 14.47 4.82
AGS
438
5.60 5.44 5.65 16.69 5.56
AGS
439
5.70 5.30 5.50 16.50 5.50
AGS
440
5.49 5.46 5.10 16.05 5.35
AGS
292
4.55 4.90 4.85 14.30 4.77
Ifugao 4.20 4.13 4.08 12.41 4.14

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.03
0.02
Treatment 10 5.43
15.09**
0.54
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.72
0.04
TOTAL 32 6.18

**- Highly Significant

CV = 3.74 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

43

Appendix Table 17. Length of three-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS 432
5.7
5.9
5.7
17.30
5.77
AGS 433
6.2
6.0
6.5
18.70
6.23
AGS 434
6.7
6.3
6.4
19.40
6.47
AGS 435
5.9
5.2
5.8
16.90
5.63
AGS 436
6.3
6.4
6.4
19.10
6.37
AGS 437
5.8
6.0
5.6
17.40
5.80
AGS 438
6.6
6.2
6.3
19.10
6.37
AGS 439
6.5
6.6
6.4
19.50
6.50
AGS 440
6.2
6.0
6.3
18.50
6.17
AGS 292
5.8
5.4
5.9
17.10
5.70
Ifugao 4.9 4.8 4.8 14.50 4.83

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.16
0.08
Treatment 10 7.49
19.80**
0.75
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.76
0.04
TOTAL 32 8.40

**- Highly Significant

CV = 3.25 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

44

Appendix Table 18. Width of one-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
1.62 1.52 1.55 4.69 1.56
AGS
433
1.60 1.63 1.60 4.83 1.61
AGS
434
1.58 1.53 1.52 4.63 1.54
AGS
435
1.68 1.61 1.72 5.01 1.67
AGS
436
1.68 1.57 1.46 4.71 1.57
AGS
437
1.65 1.64 1.59 4.88 1.63
AGS
438
1.68 1.69 1.65 5.02 1.67
AGS
439
1.62 1.60 1.64 4.86 1.62
AGS
440
1.60 1.68 1.65 4.93 1.64
AGS
292
1.51 1.68 1.66 4.85 1.62
Ifugao 1.32 1.40 1.42 4.14 1.38

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.00
0.00
Treatment 10 0.20
5.92**
0.02
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.07
0.00
TOTAL 32 0.27

**- Highly Significant

CV = 3.66 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

45

Appendix Table 19. Width of two-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
1.64 1.60 1.58 4.82 1.61
AGS
433
1.62 1.65 1.65 4.92 1.64
AGS
434
1.62 1.58 1.55 4.75 1.58
AGS
435
1.65 1.68 1.70 5.03 1.68
AGS
436
1.65 1.60 1.55 4.80 1.60
AGS
437
1.63 1.65 1.60 4.88 1.63
AGS
438
1.64 1.69 1.65 4.98 1.66
AGS
439
1.65 1.62 1.64 4.91 1.64
AGS
440
1.67 1.62 1.66 4.95 1.65
AGS
292
1.60 1.67 1.65 4.92 1.64
Ifugao 1.40 1.40 1.36 4.16 1.39

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.00
0.00
Treatment 10 0.19
21.22**
0.02
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.02
0.00
TOTAL 32 0.21

**- Highly Significant

CV = 1.84 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

46

Appendix Table 20. Width of three-seeded pod of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
1.56 1.60 1.59 4.75 1.58
AGS
433
1.65 1.62 1.62 4.89 1.63
AGS
434
1.63 1.61 1.64 4.88 1.63
AGS
435
1.64 1.65 1.63 4.92 1.64
AGS
436
1.60 1.66 1.64 4.90 1.63
AGS
437
1.61 1.61 1.62 4.84 1.61
AGS
438
1.65 1.60 1.66 4.91 1.64
AGS
439
1.60 1.67 1.62 4.89 1.63
AGS
440
1.63 1.66 1.68 4.97 1.66
AGS
292
1.64 1.67 1.60 4.91 1.64
Ifugao 1.35 1.40 1.38 4.13 1.38

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.00
0.00
Treatment 10 0.18
30.41**
0.02
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.01
0.00
TOTAL 32 0.19

**- Highly Significant

CV = 1.53 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

47

Appendix Table 21. Weight of marketable pods per plot of AVRDC soybean accessions

Accession BLOCK Total
Mean
I II III
AGS
432
0.24 0.26 0.18 0.68 0.23
AGS
433
0.31 0.36 0.29 0.96 0.32
AGS
434
0.29 0.33 0.22 0.84 0.28
AGS
435
0.38 0.34 0.36 1.08 0.36
AGS
436
0.53 0.80 0.50 1.83 0.61
AGS
437
0.36 0.28 0.19 0.83 0.28
AGS
438
0.45 0.53 0.44 1.42 0.47
AGS
439
0.53 0.36 0.52 1.41 0.47
AGS
440
0.43 0.44 0.50 1.37 0.46
AGS
292
0.36 0.42 0.22 1.00 0.33
Ifugao 2.56 3.58 3.31 9.45 3.15

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.08
0.04
Treatment 10 21.29
69.98**
2.13
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.61
0.03
TOTAL 32 21.98

**- Highly Significant

CV = 27.58 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

48

Appendix Table 22. Weight of non-marketable pods per plot of AVRDC soybean
accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS 432
0
.09
.05
0.14
0.05
AGS
433
0.06 0.05 0.03 0.14 0.05
AGS
434
0.06 0.04 0.01 0.11 0.04
AGS
435
0.01 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.02
AGS
436
0.07 0.04 0.02 0.13 0.04
AGS
437
0.02 0.03 0.01 0.06 0.02
AGS
438
0.07 0.11 0.04 0.22 0.07
AGS
439
0.05 0.03 0.04 0.12 0.04
AGS
440
0.03 0.08 0.13 0.24 0.08
AGS
292
0.03 0.05 0.02 0.10 0.03
Ifugao 0.09 0.12 0.06 0.27 0.09

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.00
0.00
Treatment 10 0.02
2.21ns
0.00
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.02
0.00
TOTAL 32 0.04

ns- Not Significant

CV = 2.50 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

49

Appendix Table 23. Total pod yield per plot of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
0.24 0.35 0.23 0.82 0.27
AGS
433
0.37 0.41 0.32 1.10 0.37
AGS
434
0.35 0.37 0.23 0.95 0.32
AGS
435
0.39 0.35 0.39 1.13 0.38
AGS
436
0.60 0.62 0.52 1.74 0.58
AGS
437
0.38 0.31 0.20 0.89 0.30
AGS
438
0.52 0.63 0.48 1.63 0.54
AGS
439
0.58 0.39 0.56 1.53 0.51
AGS
440
0.46 0.52 0.63 1.61 0.54
AGS
292
0.39 0.47 0.24 1.10 0.37
Ifugao 2.89 3.70 3.97 10.56 3.52

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.04
0.02
Treatment 10 26.62
74.63**
2.66
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.71
0.04
TOTAL 32 27.37

**- Highly Significant

CV = 27.03 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

50

Appendix Table 24. Computed pod yield per plot of AVRDC soybean accessions

ACCESSION BLOCK TOTAL
MEAN
I II III
AGS
432
0.48 0.70 0.46 1.64 0.55
AGS
433
0.74 0.82 0.64 2.20 0.73
AGS
434
0.70 0.74 0.46 1.90 0.63
AGS
435
0.78 0.70 0.78 2.26 0.75
AGS
436
1.20 1.24 1.04 3.48 1.16
AGS
437
0.76 0.62 0.40 1.78 0.59
AGS
438
1.04 1.26 0.96 3.26 1.09
AGS
439
1.16 0.78 1.12 3.06 1.02
AGS
440
0.92 1.04 1.26 3.22 1.07
AGS
292
0.78 0.94 0.48 2.20 0.73
Ifugao 7.30 6.36 6.74 20.40 6.80

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF
DEGREES
SUM OF
MEAN
F
Tabular F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARES
SQUARE
VALUE
0.05 0.01
FREEDOM
Replication
2
0.02
0.05
Treatment 10 98.50
235.73**
9.85
2.35 3.37
Error
20
0.84
0.04
TOTAL 32 99.36

**- Highly Significant

CV = 14.86 %

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions
Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet / Glorry Ann A. Bolon. 2010

Document Outline

Adaptability of AVRDC Soybean Accessions Under Guinaoang, Mankayan, Benguet
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- ABSTRACT
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- INTRODUCTION
- REVIEW OF LITERATURE
- MATERIALS AND METHODS
- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
- SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- LITERATURE CITED
- APPENDICES