BIBLIOGRAPHY BENITO, JENNY M....

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BENITO, JENNY M. APRIL 2010. Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush
Bean Entries in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan. Benguet State University, La Trinidad,
Benguet.
Adviser: Janet P. Pablo, MSc
ABSTRACT
The study was conducted to determine the growth and yield of seven bush bean
entries in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan; determine the best entries adapted in
Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan based on growth, yield and insect pest and disease
resistance; and to determine the profitability of growing bush bean in Camangaan, Sison,
Pangasinan.
In terms of plant vigor, all the seven entries evaluated were highly vigorous at 30
DAP. Majority of the seven entries of bush bean emerged seven days after sowing. Hab
63, Hab 323, Green crop, Contender and Hab 19 were the earliest to flower at 28 DAS
and earliest to set pods. All the seven entries were harvested at 43 DAS.
Most of the bush bean entries produced three to four flowers per cluster and three
pods per cluster. Contender had the highest number of flowers per plant and flower per
cluster. BBL 274, Landmark, Green crop and Contender produced the highest number of
pods per cluster while Green crop had the highest percentage of pod setting. Contender
had the longest pod and BBL 274 had the narrowest pod.

BBL 274, Landmark and Green Crop produced the highest yield per 5m2 and
recorded the highest ROCE. The seven entries exhibited resistance to bean rust and they
were not infested by pod borer under natural field condition.
ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
Bibliography………………………………………………………………....... i
Abstract…………………………………………………………….................
i

Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………..
ii
INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………
1
REVIEW OF LITERATURE ………………………………………………...
3
MATERIALS AND METHODS……………………………………………...
6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION…………………………………………........
12
Temperature, Relative Humidity and Rainfall……………………………..
12
Percent Survival……………………………………………………………
12
Plant Vigor………………………………………………………………....
13
Days from Sowing to Emergence…………………………………….........
15
Days from Emergence to Flowering………………………………….........
15
Days from Flowering to Pod Setting……………………………….............
15
Days from Emergence to First and Last
Harvesting of Fresh Pods..............................................................................
15
Initial and Final Plant Height ………………………………………..........
16
Number of Flowers per Cluster………………………………………........
17
Number of Flowers per Plant and
Flower Cluster per Plant ………….............................................................
17
Number of Pod per Cluster and
Pod Cluster per Plant ………………………………..................................
18
Percent Pod Set per Cluster…………………………………………..........
19

Length and Width of Marketable Pods …………………………...............
19
Reaction to Bean Rust..................................................................................
20
Reaction to Pod Borer..................................................................................
20
Weight of Marketable Fresh Pods ………………………………...............
20
Weight of Non-Marketable Fresh Pods …………………………..............
21
Total Yield per 5m2……………………………………………….............. 21
Computed Fresh Pod Yield per Hectare ………………………….............
22
ROCE of Fresh Pods………………………………………………...........
24
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION………….........
25
Summary ……………………………………………………………........
25
Conclusion ………………………………………………………….........
26
Recommendation……………………………………………………........
26
LITERATURE CITED………………………………………………….........
27
APPENDICES………………………………………………………….......... 29

INTRODUCTION

Bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) belongs to the Leguminosae family locally known
as “lubias”. It is one of the vegetable legumes grown in many parts of the Cordillera
region. They are excellent sources of proteins, vitamins and other functional nutrients that
are important for human health.

Cultivation of leguminous crops like bush bean helps to maintain and improve the
soil fertility because of its ability to fix nitrogen from the atmosphere through the action
of nitrogen fixing bacteria present in the roots (Agayao, 2002).

Nowadays, because of nutritional importance, increasing population, economic
crisis and to prevent malnutrition in the country, production must be increased through
the use of early maturing, high yielding varieties that are resistant to pest and diseases.
Using good and new varieties for local farmers may be the solution of the low –
yielding problem that had been observed and reported. Thus, evaluating different bean
varieties is essential in convincing the farmers to plant the crop.
Several studies conducted on varietal evaluation, with regards to the growth and
yield performance of crops, show that different crop varieties have varying performance
in different places. Therefore, continuous evaluation of varieties is needed in order to
determine the best variety that is adapted in a certain locality (Pastor, 2005).

Moreover, with the effect of climate change in agriculture particularly on crop
evaluation, adaptation and proper management are required for successful production.
The selection and suitability of varieties that could perform well and accepted by farmers
should be considered in introducing a crop in the locality. The growth and yield of a new
crop with economic potential is also essential in attaining sustainability, stability and for
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

2
increasing food sufficiency. Thus, evaluation of potential crops as an alternative crop is
essential.
The study aimed to:
1. determine the growth and yield of seven bush bean entries in Camangaan,
Sison, Pangasinan;
2. determine the best entries adapted in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan based on
growth, yield and insect pest and diseases; and
3. determine the profitability of growing bush bean in Camangaan, Sison,
Pangasinan.
The study was conducted at Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan from December 2009
to February 2010.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

3
REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Adaptation of Bush bean

The climatic requirements for bush bean are about the same as garden pea. It
grow best in areas with temperatures between 15 to 20 oC. However, it can tolerate warm
temperature up to 25oC. The planting season is usually during dry season to avoid adverse
weather conditions brought by typhoons. Yield performance varies widely with variety,
soil condition, climate, incidence of pests and diseases. In general, higher yield is
obtained during dry season particularly in irrigated field (HARRDEC, 1989).

Bean performs best in soil that are well structured and heavy rich loam with an
optimum pH range of 5.6-6.8. It is a short day crop, sensitive to photoperiod. Its growth
and development are favored mildly by cool environments, while high temperatures delay
flowering (Bawang, 2006).

Varietal Adaptation

Bantog (1993) reported that growth and yield of bush snap beans are best in high
elevation, however, yield are significantly reduced in low elevation and maturity of snap
bean is longer in high elevation than in lower elevation .
The adaptability and introduction of new varieties in particular location is
important for a successful production. It serves two purposes wherein, if it is proven that
it is suitable under local conditions it can be propagated and released for commercial
production, also important sources of variability and sources of desirable genes which
can be used in hybridization work (Bao-an, 2002 ).
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

4
Variety must be adapted to the area in which it is grown. When grown under the
same method of culture there is a great variation in the yielding ability of the different
varieties. It is not a guarantee that a variety that yields best in one region will perform
well in another region (Reily and Shry, 1991). Good performance and high yield of a
crop in an area could convince and encouraged farmers to grow legumes.

Varietal Evaluation
Improving crop performance, productivity, plant breeding and using new
developments in agricultural biotechnology will allow increase in crop yields and
maintenance of yield stability without increasing land usage (Reddy and Hodges, 2000).
Characteristics of a good variety should be high yielding, pest and diseases
resistant, good post harvest characteristic, eating quality and must be early maturing so
that production would entail less expense and ensure more profit. Selecting the right
variety will minimize problems associated with water and fertilizer management
(Bautista and Mabesa, 1986).
Six varieties studied by Dagson (2000) showed that HAB 63, Stringless, Torrent
and BBL 274 is recommended in La Trinidad condition due to better growth and yield
performance.
The result of the study of Pog-ok (2001) revealed that the Pencil variety
performance is significantly better than the other varieties with regards to the number of
days to flowering and first harvesting, pod length, pod diameter and resistance. Varieties
B - 21 and Hav 16 gave the highest pod yield of about 12 tons per hectare.
Paredes (2003) evaluated six varieties of bush snap beans namely Kentucky
wonder, Bush blue lake, Green crop, Blue lake, Landmark and Contender had the highest
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

5
number of flower per cluster. In addition Green crop variety was the highest yielding
varieties in terms of marketable and computed yield per hectare.
Lumicquio (2007) evaluated ten varieties of bush snap bean to determine the
economic benefits of fresh pods and dry seed production. Based on the results, BBL 274
and Contender showed the higher ROCE for dry seed yield.
Among the five varieties of bush snap bean evaluated by Orlang (2008), HAB 323
was the best performing bush bean variety evaluated because it is early maturing, earliest
to produce dry pod and to mature, registered the tallest plant, numerically produced the
heaviest marketable and computed seed yield and highly resistant to bean rust and pod
borers.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

6
MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total land area of 105m2 was properly cleaned and prepared. The area was
divided into three blocks, consisting of seven plots each with a dimension of 1m x 5m.
The experimental area was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with
three replications. Seven entries of bush beans were used in the study. Two seeds were
sown per hill at a distance of 20 cm between rows and 20 cm between hills. The cultural
management practices such as weeding, irrigation, hilling –up were done three weeks
after planting and spraying of insecticide with an interval of seven days were uniformly
employed in all treatments.
The seeds of the following entries, which served as treatments, were obtained
from BSU-IPB Highland Crops Research Station at BSU:
CODE ENTRY

V1 Hab 63
V2 BBL 274
V3 Landmark
V4 Hab 323
V5 Green crop
V6 Contender
V7 Hab 19

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

7
Farm Location

Barangay Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan is geographically located at the northern
portion of Pangasinan lying within the provincial boundaries of La Union and Benguet. It
is 43 km away from Baguio City.
The average monthly temperature is 27.91 degrees centigrade. Dry season arises
from November to April and during the rest of the year. It lies within the latitude of 16o
11o and longitude of 12o and 39o east. The soil is classified as clay loam and the terrain is
largely flat with a slope ranging from 0-15 %, moderately undulated and rolling in many
directions.

Data gathered

1. Meteorological data. Temperature, relative humidity and rainfall were taken
during the conduct of experiment at Dagupan PAGASA Station.
2. Percent survival. The data was computed using the formula:
Total number of plants per plot at 30 days
Percent survival=

X 100
Total number of sown seeds per plot

3. Plant vigor. The plants were rated at 30 DAP using the following scale:
Scale Description Remarks
1 Plants are weak with few stems Poor vigor
and leaves; very pale

2 Plants are weak with few thin Less vigorous
stems and leaves; pale

3 Better than vigorous Vigorous

4 Plants are moderately strong with Moderately vigorous
robust stems and leaves; leaves
light green in color

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

8
5 Plants are strong with robust stems Highly vigorous
and leaves; leaves are light to
dark green color

4. Maturity

a. Days from sowing to emergence. This was recorded by counting the
number of days from planting to the time when at least 50% of plants have fully emerged.
b. Days from emergence to flowering. This was recorded by counting the
days from emergence to the day when at least 50% of the plants have fully opened
flowers.
c. Days from flowering to pod setting. This was recorded by counting the
number of days starting from flowering to the day when pod sets formed.
d. Days from emergence to first harvest of fresh pods. This was recorded
by counting the number of days from emergence to first harvest.
e. Days from emergence to last harvest of fresh pods. This was recorded by
counting the number of days from emergence to the last harvest.
5. Plant height
a. Initial plant height (cm). This was measured one week after emergence
from the base of the plant at the ground level to the tip of the youngest shoots using meter
stick from ten sample plants.
b. Final plant height (cm). This was measured from the base of the plant at
the ground level to the youngest shoots before the first harvest, using a meter stick from
ten sample plants.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

9

6. Reproductive characters
a. Number of flower per cluster. The number of flower per cluster was
counted from ten random sample plants per plot.
b. Number of flowers per plant. The number of flower per plant was
counted from ten sample plants per plot.
c. Number of flower cluster per plant. This was obtained by counting the
number of flower cluster per plant from ten random sample plants per plot.
d. Number of pod per cluster. This was obtained by counting the number of
pod per cluster from ten random sample plants per plot.
e. Number of pod cluster per plant. This was obtained by counting the
number of pod cluster per plant from ten random sample plants per plot.
f. Percent pod set per cluster. This was computed using the formula:
Total no. of pods per cluster
% Pod set =

X 100
Total no. of flower per cluster
7. Pod data
a. Length of marketable pods (cm). Ten samples of pods were picked at
random from each plot and their length was measured from the pedicel to the blossom
end using veirner caliper.
b. Width of marketable pods (cm). This was measured by selecting ten
random sample plants and measured by using veirner caliper.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

10
8. Yield and yield components
a. Weight of marketable fresh pods (kg). The marketable fresh pods were
harvested and weighed upon maturity. Marketable fresh pods were free from insect pest,
diseases and not deformed.
b. Weight of non-marketable fresh pods (kg). The marketable pods were
those that are affected by insect pest, diseases and deformed pods. It was weighed and
discarded.
c. Total yield per plot. This was the total weight of harvested fresh pods
per plot.
d. Computed fresh pod yield per hectare. This was computed using the
formula:

Yield (t/ha) = Yield/plot (kg) 5m2 x 2
Where 2 is a factor to be used to convert yield in kg/5m2 to ton/ha
assuming one hectare effective areas.
9. Insect pest and diseases occurrence. This was determined by assessing the
degree of damage caused by specific insect pest and diseases to the crop using the
following scale used at BSU-IPBHCRS (Tandang et.al. 2008):
a. Pod borer, Bean rust
Scale
Description Remark
1 No infestation per plot Highly resistant
2 1-25% of infestation per plot Mildly resistant
3 26-50% of infestation per plot Moderately resistant
4 51-75% of infestation per plot Susceptible
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

11
5 76-100% of infestation per plot Very susceptible
10. Return on Cash Expenses. This was analyzed using the formula:
Gross sales-Total expenses
ROCE =

X 100

Total expenses

Data Analysis
All quantitative data were analyzed using the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for
Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The significance of
differences among treatments means was tested using the Duncans Multiple Range Test
(DMRT).

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

12
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Temperature, Relative Humidity and Rainfall

Table 1 shows the monthly temperature, relative humidity and amount of rainfall
during the conduct of the study from December 2009 to February 2010. Minimum
temperature ranged from 20.1 to 20.8OC while the maximum temperature ranged from
30.5 to 32.1OC. The relative humidity ranged from 79.6% to 81.6% or an average of
80.5% while no amount of rainfall was recorded. The temperature ranges are appropriate
since legume crops like bush bean performs well at 15OC to 31OC. However, Ferrer
(1981) reported that bean plants grown in higher elevation with a temperature of 17.2 OC
and relative humidity of 79.2% produced more and better yield than those planted in
lower elevations with temperature of 26-30 OC and relative humidity of 71.4%.

Plant Survival

Among the seven entries evaluated, Hab 323 had the highest percent survival
(92%), followed by Landmark (91%) while Hab 19 had the lowest percent survival of 82
% (Table 2). However, based on statistical analysis there were no significant differences

Table 1. Temperature and relative humidity taken during the conduct of the study

MONTH TEMPERATURE
(OC) RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
(%)
MIN. MAX.

DECEMBER 20.1 30.5
80.4

JANUARY 20.5
31.4 81.6

FEBRUARY 20.8 32.1
79.6

MEAN 20.5
31.3
80.5
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

13
Table 2. Percent survival of the seven bush bean entries at 30 DAP

ENTRY
SURVIVAL

(%)

Hab 63
86

BBL 274
86

Landmark 91

Hab 323
92

Green crop
85

Contender 83

Hab 19
82

CV (%)
4.41

on plant survival. Percent rate of survival could be due to the quality of the seeds.

Plant Vigor

All the entries evaluated were rated highly vigorous at 30 DAP. All the plants have
strong and robust stems and leaves (Figure 1). Statistical analysis showed that there were
no significant differences among the entries in terms of plant vigor. The results could be
due to the varietal characteristics coupled with the favorable environmental condition of
the area.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

14

Fig. 1. The bush bean entries at 30 days after planting.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

15
Days from Sowing to Emergence

All of the bush bean entries took seven days to emerge and the result showed no
significant differences. The results could be attributed to the adaptation of the entries to
the locality.

Days from Emergence to Flowering
In terms of days from emergence to flowering, there were no significant
differences among all the entries evaluated. Hab 63, Hab 323, Green crop, Contender and
Hab 19 flowered earlier at 28 days from emergence (Table 3). On the other hand, the
latest to flower were BBL 274 and Landmark at 30 days from emergence. Early
flowering could be due to its adaptation to the locality aside from its varietal
characteristics.

Days from Flowering to Pod Setting

Among the seven entries of bush bean evaluated in the study, Hab 63, Hab 323,
Green crop, Contender and Hab 19 set pods earlier than BBL 274 and Landmark as
shown in Table 3. This confirms the findings of Bantog (1993) that the duration for pod
setting at lower elevation was earlier than the pod setting of bush bean under high
elevation.

Days from Emergence to First and Last Harves-
ting of Fresh Pods

Based on statistical analysis, no significant differences were noted from
emergence to first and last harvest. All of the bush bean entries were first harvested at 43
days from emergence. Entries Hab 323 and Landmark had the longest duration of harves-
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

16
Table 3. Number of days from emergence to flowering, pod setting and harvesting of the
seven bush bean entries evaluated

NUMBER OF DAYS FROM EMERGENCE TO
ENTRY
FLOWERING
POD SETTING
FIRST
LAST
HARVEST
HARVEST

Hab 63
28
9
43
56

BBL 274
30
11
43
57

Landmark 30
11
43
58

Hab 323
28
9
43
58

Green crop
28
9
43
56

Contender 28
9
43
56

Hab 19
28
9
43
54

ting at 58 days and Hab 19 had the shortest duration of harvesting fresh pods at 54 days.
Findings could be due to its adaptation to the locality aside from its varietal
nature and this could be one way to determine its profitability in the area.

Initial and Final Plant Height

Table 4 shows significant differences on the initial and final height of the seven
bush bean entries. Contender and Hab 19 were the tallest at 9.85 cm and 9.83 cm,
respectively. However, initial plant height of Hab 323 and Hab 63 was statistically
comparable. The shortest plants were observed in BBL 274 (8.03cm). On the other hand,
it was noted that the shortest entries became the tallest at 43 DAP. It was recorded that
BBL 274 was one of the tallest (30.84cm) among all entries but comparable with
Landmark, Green crop, Contender and Hab 323 while Hab 19 was the shortest (25.46
cm). The significant differences could be attributed to the inherent characteristics of the
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

17
Table 4. Plant height of the seven bush bean entries evaluated

PLANT
HEIGHT
(cm)
ENTRY
7 DAP
43 DAP

Hab 63
9.17abc 27.42bc

BBL 274
8. 03d
30.84ab

Landmark 8.56bcd
33.63a

Hab 323
9.36ab
28.72abc

Green crop
8.32cd
32.22ab

Contender 9.85a
31.55ab

Hab 19
9.83a
25.46c

CV% 5.46
9.11
* Means followed by a common letter are significantly different at 5% level by DMRT

entries and wide adaptability to climatic condition. Findings showed that the taller the
plants, the higher the number of pods per plant that could be expected due to possible
higher photosynthetic rate brought about by longer sunshine duration (Borricano, 2008).

Number of Flowers per Cluster

Table 5 showed no significant differences on the number of flowers per cluster
among the seven entries evaluated. The entries produced three to four flowers per cluster.

Number of Flowers per Plant and
Flower Cluster per Plant

Significant differences were observed in the number of flowers per plant and the
number of flower cluster per plant. Contender had the highest number of flowers and
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

18
flower cluster with means of 28 flowers and 8 flower clusters per plant. Entry Hab 19
produced the lowest number of 17 flowers and five flower clusters per plant but compara-
Table 5. Flowering and pod setting of the seven bush bean entries evaluated

NUMBER

% POD SET
FLOWER PER FLOWER PER FLOWER
POD PER
POD
PER CLUSTER
ENTRY
CLUSTER
PLANT
CLUSTER PER CLUSTER
CLUSTER PER
PLANT
PLANT

Hab 63
4
19bc
6b 3 4ab 83

BBL 274
4
20bc
6b
4
5a
100

Landmark 4
20bc
6b
3
5a
75

Hab 323
4
22b
6b
3
4ab
75
Green
crop 4
20bc
6b
3
5a
92

Contender 4
28a
8a
3
5a
78

Hab 19
3
17c
5b
3
3b
83

CV% 13.64 9.86 14.89 11.34 14.35 16.16
* Means followed by a common letter are significantly different at 5% level by DMRT

ble with most of the entries except for Contender (Table 5). The significant differences
could be due to the varietal characteristic inherent in each variety.

Number of Pod per Cluster and Pod Cluster per Plant

Significant differences were noted among the bush bean entries evaluated,
majority of the entries produced three pods (Table 5).
On the number of pod cluster per plant, significant statistical differences were
obtained as shown in Table 5. BBL 274, Landmark, Green crop and Contender
significantly gave the highest number of pod cluster per plant which is comparable with
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

19
Hab 63 and Hab 323 with a pod cluster of 4 to 5. Hab 19 produced the least number of
three pod clusters. Significant differences could be due to their genetic characteristic.

Percent Pod Set per Cluster

Based on statistical analysis, the differences among entries were not significant.
Although, numerically, BBL 274 displayed the highest pod set per cluster of 100% while
Landmark and Hab 323 gave the lowest of 75% pod set.
Kudan (1999) reported that higher percentage of pod set at 62.5% is obtained
during October to November of planting while March to May produced 30 to 40% pod
set.

Length and Width of Marketable Pods

To determine the marketability of legume pod, pod length is one of the criteria to
be used. Longer pods are usually preferred by consumers and buyers than the shorter
ones (Viernes, 2000).
Significant differences on the length and width of marketable pods were recorded
as shown in Table 6. Green crop produced the longest pods at 16.14 cm and widest pods
at 1.2 cm while Contender produced the shortest pods at 12.49 cm. Most of the bush bean
entries had a comparable pod width with means ranging from 0.77 to 0.85cm. On the
contrary, the snap bean with narrow pods are considered to be desirable in the market and
generally preferred by consumers (Calya-en, 2009).

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

20
Table 6. Pod length and width of the seven bush bean entries evaluated
POD
(cm)
ENTRY
LENGTH
WIDTH

Hab 63
13.91b 0.85b

BBL 274
12.98cd
0.77b

Landmark 12.84cd
0.85b

Hab 323
12.49d
0.80b

Green crop
16.14a
1.20a

Contender 13.65bc
0.84b

Hab 19
14.01b
0.80b

CV% 3.37
5.14
* Means followed by a common letter are significantly different at 5% level by DMRT

Reaction to Bean Rust

The reaction of bush bean entries to insect pest and diseases in natural field
environment were rated during the vegetative stage at 30 days. Hab 63, BBL 274,
Landmark, Hab 323, Green crop and Contender showed high resistance to bean rust and
Hab 19 showed mild resistance to bean rust.

Reaction to Pod Borer

There were no pod borer observed during the conduct of the study.

Weight of Marketable Fresh Pods
The pods are considered marketable when free from insect pest and not deformed.
Table 7 shows significant differences on the weight of marketable fresh pods among
entries. BBL 274 produced the highest marketable pod yield of 1.73 kg.
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

21
Landmark produced comparable weight of marketable fresh pods (1.21 kg). The
lowest yield was obtained from Hab 19 and Hab 63 at 0.49 and 0.58 kg, respectively.
Significant differences in marketable fresh pods could be attributed to the number of
flowers per plant, number of pod cluster per plant and percent pod set produced.

Weight of Non-marketable Fresh Pods

Non-marketable pods are those that are affected by insect pest, diseases and
deformed pods. The bush bean entries significantly differed in the weights of non-
marketable pods. The lowest weight of non- marketable fresh pods were observed in Hab
63 (0.49 kg), Landmark (0.53 kg), Hab 323 (0.39kg) and Ha19 (0.49 kg). Green crop
produced the highest weight of non- marketable fresh pods at 0.74 kg as shown in Table
7.

Total Yield

Total yield per plot of the seven bush bean entries evaluated ranged from 0.98 to
2.27 kg (Table 7 and Figure 2). BBL 274 significantly registered the highest total yield
(2.27 kg) which is comparable to Landmark and Green crop (1.74 and 1.7 kg per 5m2,
respectively). Hab 19 produced the lowest total yield of 0.98 kg per 5 m2 and computed
yield of 1.97 tons per hectare. High total yield of some entries could be attributed to the
high marketable and non-marketable yield. It may be also be due to temperature and
maturity that may significantly be reduced at lower elevation and higher temperature and
the maturity of snap beans is shorter in lower elevation (Bantog, 1993 and Ferrer, 1981).

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

22
Computed Fresh Pod Yield per Hectare

Table 7 shows the computed fresh pod yield on a per hectare basis of the seven
bush bean entries evaluated with a yield ranging from 1.97 to 4.53 tons per hectare. BBL
274 obtained the highest computed fresh pod yield while Hab 19 produced the lowest
fresh pod yield per hectare (Fig.2).

Table 7. Weight of marketable, non-marketable, total yield and computed yield of fresh
pods of the seven bush bean entries

FRESH POD YIELD
ENTRY

MARKETABLE
NON-MARKETABLE
TOTAL
COMPUTED
(kg/5m2)
(kg/5m2)
(kg/5m2)
(t/ha)

Hab 63
0.58
0.46a 1.04bc 2.07

BBL 274
1.73a
0.55ab
2.27a
4.53

Landmark 1.21ab
0.53a
1.74ab
3.48

Hab 323
0.64bc
0.39a
1.03bc
2.07

Green crop
0.96bc
0.74b
1.70abc
3.40

Contender 0.62bc
0.59ab
1.21bc
2.43

Hab 19
0.49c
0.49a
0.98c
1.97

CV% 10.76
20.31
27.71

* Means followed by a common letter are significantly different at 5% level by DMRT

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

23

Fig. 2. Fresh pod yield of the seven bush bean entries.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

24
ROCE of Fresh Pods

The return on cash expense of bush bean entries is shown in Table 8. BBL 274
had the highest ROCE of 212.09% followed by Landmark, Green crop, Contender, Hab
63, Hab 323 and Hab 19. The results indicate that the entries with the highest yield also
gained the highest profit. It shows that the entries are best adapted to the area and have
high yield potential performance.

Table 8. Return on Cash Expenses (ROCE) of growing the seven bush bean entries

ENTRY
YIELD PER
GROSS
TOTAL
NET
ROCE%
PLOT (5m2)
SALES
EXPENSES
INCOME

Hab
63 1.04 15.53 10.91 4.62 42.30

BBL
274 2.27 34.05 10.91 23.14 212.09

Landmark 1.74 26.10 10.91 15.19 139.23

Hab
323 1.03 15.45 10.91 4.54 41.61

Green
crop 1.70 25.50 10.91 14.59 133.73

Contender 1.21 18.15 10.91 7.24 66.36

Hab
19 0.98 14.70 10.91 3.79 34.74
Fresh pods were sold at PHP 15.00 per kilogram.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

25
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Summary

The study was conducted at Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan to determine the
growth and yield of seven bush bean entries in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan; determine
the bean entries adapted in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan based on growth, yield and
resistance to insect pest and diseases and to determine the profitability of growing bush
bean in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan.
Among the entries evaluated, Hab 323 had the highest percent survival. Majority
of the seven bush bean entries were highly vigorous at 30 DAP, emerged at 7 DAS,
flowered at 28 days and set pods at 9 days after flowering. BBL 274 and Landmark were
the latest to mature and had the longest harvesting duration. Hab 19 had the shortest
duration of harvesting.
In terms of the reproductive characters, Contender had the highest number of
flowers per plant, flower cluster per plant and number of pod cluster per plant but
comparable with BBL 274, Landmark and Green crop.
High resistance to bean rust were observed from Hab 63, BBL 274, Landmark,
Hab 323, Green crop and Contender. No pod borer occurrence was observed.
Based on yield performance, BBL 274 had the highest weight of marketable fresh
pods, total yield, computed yield per hectare and gained the highest return on cash
expenses but comparable with Landmark and Green crop.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

26
Conclusion
Based on growth, resistance and yield, BBL 274, Landmark and Green crop were
highly resistant to bean rust and high yielding.
BBL 274 had the highest return on cash expenses.

Recommendation

Based on the results of the study, BBL 274, Landmark and Green crop are
recommended for planting in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

27
LITERATURE CITED

AGAYAO, M. C. 2002. Seed Production of Bush Bean in a Farmers Field as Affected by
Different Organic Fertilizer. BS Thesis. Benguet State University, La Trinidad,
Benguet. P. 1.

BANTOG, N. A. 1993. Farm elevation of promising varieties on a farmers production
practices of pole snap beans in different elevations. MS Thesis. Benguet State
University, La Trinidad, Benguet. Pp. 37-39.

BAO-AN, B. M. 2002. Seed Production of Promising Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris
Linn) Genotypes. BS Thesis. Benguet State University, La Trinidad, Benguet.
Pp. 1-2.

BORRICANO, D. F. 2008. Growth and Seed Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean
Varieties Planted at Different Months Under La Trinidad, Benguet Condition. BS
Thesis. Benguet State University, La Trinidad, Benguet. Pp. 12-13.

BAUTISTA, O. K. and R.G. MABESA.1986. Vegetable Production. 3rd Edition. UPLB,
College of Agriculture. Pp. 28, 33.

BAWANG, F. T. 2006. Production and Post harvest Technologies of Vegetables in Mid
Elevation and High Altitude Tropics.Baguio Allied Printers, Benguet State Univ-
ersity, La Trinidad Benguet. Pp. 146-147.

CALYA-EN, S. M. 2009. On-Farm Trial of Promising Varieties of Pole Snap Bean at
Balili, Mankayan, Benguet. BS Thesis. Benguet State University, La Trinidad,
Benguet. P. 17.

DAGSON, M. B. 2000. Performance and Acceptability of Six Varieties of Bush Snap
beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) Under La Trinidad Condition. BS Thesis. Benguet
State University, La Trinidad, Benguet. Pp. 18-19.

FERRER, T. E. 1981. Performance of three varieties of snap beans grown under two
locations. B.S Thesis, MSAC, La Trinidad, Benguet. P. 32.

HARRDEC. 1989. Snap Bean Technoguide for the Highlands. BSU, La Trinidad
Benguet. Pp. 2-5.

KUDAN, S.L. 1999. Snap bean and garden pea production. Published by the Office of
the Director of Extension, Benguet State University, La Trinidad, Benguet. P. 7.

LUMICQUIO, R.R. 2007. Evaluation of Bush Bean Varieties for Fresh Pod and Seed
Yield under Kayapa Proper, Nueva Viscaya Condition. BS Thesis. Benguet State
Universi, La Trinidad, Benguet. P. 26.
Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

28
ORLANG, J. 2008. Seed Yield Performance of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Under Cabitin,
Mankayan. BS Thesis. Benguet State University, La Trinidad, Benguet. Pp. 11-
21.
PAREDES, O. 2003. Evaluation of Bush Snap Beans in Longlong, La Trinidad, Benguet.
BS Thesis. Benguet State University, La Trinidad, Benguet. Pp. 12-13, 17.

PASTOR, C. P. 2005. Growth and Seed yield Performance of bush bean varieties under
Upper Tadiangan, Tuba, Benguet. BS Thesis. Benguet State University, La
Trinidad, Benguet. Pp. 14-15.

POG-OK, J. F. 2001. On-Farm Evaluation of Potential Varieties of Pole Snap Beans at
Pico, La Trinidad, Benguet BS Thesis. Benguet State University, La Trinidad,
Benguet. Pp. 22-23.

REDDY, K. R. and H. F. Hodges. 2000. Climate Change and Global Crop
Productivity.CABI Publishing, Newyork. Pp 472.

REILY, H. E. and C. L. SHRY. 1991. Introductory Horticulture. 4th Ed. New York.
Delmar Publisher, Inc. P. 562.

TANDANG, L. L, KIMUE, A. M, AMLOS, B. A, BAGTILA, J. G, KEBASEN, B. A
and MAGHIRANG, G. R. 2008. Development and Evaluation of Snap Bean
(Phaseolus vulgaris) Cultivars for the Philippine Highlands. A paper presented
during the 2009 Agency In House Review at Benguet State University, La
Trinidad Benguet. P. 17.

VIERNES, E. E. 2000. Increasing Productivity of Pole Snap Beans Through the use of
Effective Micro Organism (FM). BS Thesis. Benguet State University La
Trinidad, Benguet. P. 18.

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

29
APPENDICES

Appendixs Table 1. Percent survival

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 89 78 90 257 86

BBL
274
82 78 97 257 86

Landmark
86 90 97 273 91

Hab
323 90 90 96 276 92

Green
crop
84 83 87 254 85

Contender
87 75 88 250 83

Hab
19
81 77 88 246 82

TOTAL 599 571 643 1813 86

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
376.381
188.190

Treatment 6
256.000
42.667
2.94ns 3.00
4.82

Error 12
174.286
14.525

Total 20
806.667

ns= Not significant
CV% = 4.41

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

30
Appendix Table 2. Plant vigor

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 5 5 5 15 5

BBL
274
5 4 5 14 5

Landmark
5 5 5 15 5

Hab
323 5 5 5 15 5

Green
crop
5 5 5 15 5

Contender
5 5 5 15 5

Hab
19
5 4 5 14 5

TOTAL 35 33 25 103 5

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
0.381
0.190

Treatment 6
0.476
0.079
1.0ns 3.00
4.82

Error 12
0.952
0.079

Total 20
1.810

ns= Not significant CV%= 5.74

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

31
Appendix Table 3. Days from sowing to emergence

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 7 7 7 21 7

BBL
274
7 7 7 21 7

Landmark
7 7 7 21 7

Hab
323 7 7 7 21 7

Green
crop
7 7 7 21 7

Contender
7 7 7 21 7

Hab
19
7 7 7 21 7

TOTAL 49 49 49 147 7

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

32
Appendix Table 4. Days from emergence to flowering

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 28 28 28 84 28

BBL
274
30 30 30 90 30

Landmark
30 30 30 90 30

Hab
323 28 28 28 84 28

Green
crop
28 28 28 84 28

Contender
28 28 28 84 28

Hab
19
28 28 28 84 28

TOTAL 200 200 200 600 29

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

33
Appendix Table 5. Days from flowering to pod setting

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 9 9 9 27 9

BBL
274
11 11 11 33 11

Landmark
11 11 11 33 11

Hab
323 9 9 9 27 9

Green
crop
9 9 9 27 9

Contender
9 9 9 27 9

Hab
19
9 9 9 27 9

TOTAL 67 67 67 201 10

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

34
Appendix Table 6. Days from emergence to first harvest of fresh pods

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 43 43 43 129 43

BBL
274
43 43 43 129 43

Landmark
43 43 43 129 43

Hab
323 43 43 43 129 43

Green
crop
43 43 43 129 43

Contender
43 43 43 129 43

Hab
19
43 43 43 129 43

TOTAL 301 301 301 903 43

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

35

Appendix Table 7. Days from emergence to last harvest of fresh pods

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 58 55 55 168 56

BBL
274
58 55 58 171 57

Landmark
58 58 58 174 58

Hab
323 58 58 58 174 58

Green
crop
55 55 58 168 56

Contender
55 58 55 168 56

Hab
19
55 51 55 161 54

TOTAL 397 390 397 1184 56

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

36
Appendix Table 8. Initial plant height (cm)

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 8.95 10.2 8.37 27.52
9.17abc

BBL
274 8.45 8.08 7.55 24.08 8.
03d

Landmark
8.95 8.75 7.99 25.69
8.56bcd

Hab 323
10
9.32
8.75
28.07
9.36ab

Green crop
8.7
8.2
8.07
24.97
8.32cd

Contender
10.82 9.05 9.68 29.55 9.85a

Hab
19
10.55 9.86 9.08 29.49 9.83a

TOTAL 66.42 63.46 59.49 189.37 9

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
3.455
1.727

Treatment 6
9.487
1.581
6.51** 3.00
4.82

Error 12
2.913
0.243

Total 20
15.855

** = Highly significant

CV% = 5.46

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

37
Appendix Table 9. Final plant height

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 29.34 25.65 27.28 82.27 27.42bc

BBL
274 33 27.53 31.98 92.51 30.84ab

Landmark
36.14 30.26 34.5 100.9 33.63a

Hab
323 30.2 26.37 29.58 86.15 28.72abc

Green
crop
38.56 30.58 27.32 96.67 32.22ab

Contender
28.95 31.91 33.8 94.66
31.55ab

Hab
19 25.02 24.87 26.49 76.38 25.46c

TOTAL 221.21 197.17 210.95 629.54 30

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
41.575
20.788

4.82
Treatment 6
149.524
24.921
3.34* 3.00

Error 12
89.488
7.457

Total 20
280.587

* = significant

CV% = 9.11

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

38
Appendix Table 10. Number of flower per cluster

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 3 4 4 11 4

BBL
274
4 3 4 11 4

Landmark
4 4 4 12 4

Hab
323 4 4 4 12 4

Green
crop
4 4 3 11 4

Contender
4 4 5 13 4

Hab
19
3 4 3 10 3

TOTAL 26 27 27 80 4

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
0.095
0.048

Treatment 6
1.905
0.317
1.18ns 3.00
4.82

Error 12
3.238
0.270

Total 20
5.238

ns=Not significant

CV% =13.64

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

39
Appendix Table 11. Number of flower per plant

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 18 18 20 56 19bc

BBL
274
22 18 20 60 20bc

Landmark
19 18 22 59 20bc

Hab
323 26 20 21 67 22b

Green
crop
23 18 18 59 20bc

Contender
29 24 31 84 28a

Hab
19
16 16 19 51 17c

TOTAL 153 132 151 436 21

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
38.381
19.190

Treatment 6
229.143
38.190
9.11** 3.00
4.82

Error 12
50.286
4.190

Total 20
317.810

**= Highly significant

CV% = 9.86

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

40
Appendix Table 12. Number of flower cluster per plant

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 6 5 7 18 6b

BBL
274
8 4 6 18 6b

Landmark
6 4 7 17 6b

Hab
323 9 5 6 20 6b

Green
crop
9 5 6 19 6b

Contender
11 6 8 25 8a

Hab
19
7 4 5 16 5b

TOTAL 56 33 45 133 6

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
34.667
17.333

Treatment 6
17.333
2.889
3.25* 3.00
4.82

Error 12
10.667
0.889

Total 20
62.667

*= significant

CV% = 14.89

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

41
Appendix Table 13. Number of pod per cluster

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 3 3 3 9 3

BBL
274
4 3 4 11 4

Landmark
3 3 3 9 3

Hab
323 3 3 3 9 3

Green
crop
4 3 3 10 3

Contender
4 3 3 10 3

Hab
19
3 2 3 8 3

TOTAL 23 20 23 66 3

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
1.143
0.571

Treatment 6
1.905
0.317
2.50ns 3.00
4.82

Error 12
1.524
0.127

Total 20
4.571

ns= Not significant

CV% = 11.34

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

42
Appendix Table 14. Number of pod cluster per plant

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 4 3 4 11
4ab

BBL
274
5 4 5 14 5a

Landmark
5 4 6 15 5a

Hab
323 5 4 4 13
4ab

Green
crop
6 5 4 15 5a

Contender
5 5 6 16 5a

Hab
19
3 3 4 10 3b

TOTAL 33 23 33 94 4

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
2.381
1.190

Treatment 6
9.905
1.651
4.0* 3.00
4.82

Error 12
4.952
0.413

Total 20
17.238

*= significant

CV% = 14.35

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

43
Appendix Table 15. Percent pod set per cluster

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 100 75 75 250 83

BBL
274 100 100 100 300 100

Landmark
75 75 75 225 75

Hab
323 75 75 75 225 75

Green
crop
100 75 100 275 92

Contender
100 75 60 235 78

Hab
19
100 50 100 250 83

TOTAL 650 525 585 1760 84

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
1116.667
558.333

Treatment 6
1528.571
254.762
1.39 ns 3.00
4.82

Error 12
2200.000
183.333

Total 20
4845.238

ns= Not significant

CV% = 16.16

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

44
Appendix Table 16. Length of marketable pods (cm)

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 14.14
13.59 14 41.73
13.91b

BBL
274 12.39 13.61 12.94 38.94 12.98cd

Landmark 13.63 12.37 12.51 38.51 12.84cd

Hab
323 12.3 13.02 12.15 37.47 12.49d

Green
crop
16.06 16.28 16.08 48.42 16.14a

Contender 13.35 13.98 13.63 40.96 13.65bc

Hab
19
13.59 14.2 14.25 42.04 14.01b

TOTAL 95.46 97.05 95.56 288.07 13.72

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
0.227
0.113

Treatment 6
26.471
4.412
20.61** 3.00
4.82

Error 12
2.569
0.214

Total 20
29.267

**= Highly significant

CV% = 3.37

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

45
Appendix Table 17. Width of marketable pods (cm)

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 0.85 0.82 0.89 2.56 0.85b

BBL
274 0.84 0.73 0.75 2.32 0.77b

Landmark
0.94 0.8 0.8 2.54 0.85b

Hab 323
0.8
0.8
0.81
2.41
0.80b

Green crop
1.19
1.21
1.2
3.6
1.2a

Contender 0.8 0.89 0.83 2.52 0.84b

Hab
19
0.81 0.8 0.8 2.41 0.80b

TOTAL 6.23 6.05 6.08 18.09 0.86

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
0.003
0.001

Treatment 6
0.386
0.064
31.82** 3.00
4.82

Error 12
0.024
0.002

Total 20
0.413

**= Highly significant

CV% =5.14

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

46
Appendix Table 18. Weight of marketable fresh pods (kg)

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 0.55 0.625 0.55 1.725 0.575c

BBL
274 2 0.9 2.3 5.2 1.73a

Landmark 0.9 1.325 1.4 3.625
1.21ab

Hab 323
0.575
0.55
0.8
1.925
0.64bc

Green crop
1.35
0.6
0.925
2.875
0.96bc

Contender
0.725 0.55 0.58 1.855 0.62bc

Hab
19 0.45 0.475 0.55 1.475 0.49c

TOTAL 6.55 5.23 7.0 18.68 0.89

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
0.331
0.166

Treatment 6
3.632
0.605
5.82** 3.00
4.82

Error 12
1.248
0.104

Total 20
5.211

**= Highly significant

CV% =10.76

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

47
Appendix Table 19. Weight of non-marketable fresh pods (kg)

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 0.455 0.55 0.375 1.38 0.46b

BBL
274 0.55 0.5 0.6 1.65
0.55ab

Landmark
0.4 0.65 0.55 1.6 0.53b

Hab
323 0.425 0.475 0.275 1.175 0.39b

Green
crop
0.925 0.725 0.575 2.225 0.74a

Contender 0.575 0.625 0.58 1.78 0.59ab

Hab
19 0.4 0.475 0.6 1.475 0.49b

TOTAL 3.73 4 3.56
11.29
0.54

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
0.014
0.007

Treatment 6
0.223
0.037
3.12* 3.00
4.82

Error 12
0.143
0.012

Total 20
0.380

*= Significant

CV%= 20.31

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

48
Appendix Table 20. Total yield per plot

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 1.005 1.175 0.925 3.105 1.035bc

BBL
274 2.55 1.4 2.85 6.8 2.27a

Landmark 1.3 1.975 1.95 5.225 1.74ab

Hab 323
1
1.025
1.075
3.1
1.03bc

Green crop
2.275
1.325
1.5
5.1
1.7abc

Contender 1.3 1.175 1.16 3.635 1.21bc

Hab
19
0.85 0.95 1.15 2.95 0.98c

TOTAL 10.28 9.03 10.61 29.92 1.42

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

SOURCE OF
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN
COMPUTED TABULAR F
VARIATION
OF
SQUARE
SQUARE
F

FREEDOM
.05
.01

Replication 2
0.200
0.100

Treatment 6
4.291
0.715
4.59* 3.00
4.82

Error 12
1.870
0.156

Total 20
6.361

*= Significant

CV% =27.71

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

49
SAppendix Table 21. Computed fresh pod yield per hectare

REPLICATION

VARIETIES
I II
TOTAL
III
MEAN

Hab
63 2.01 2.35 1.85 6.21 2.07

BBL
274 5.1 2.8 5.7 13.6 4.53

Landmark
2.6 3.95 3.9 10.45 3.48

Hab
323 2 2.05 2.15 6.2 2.07

Green
crop
4.55
2.65 3 10.2 3.4

Contender 2.6 2.35 2.32 7.27 2.43

Hab
19
1.7 1.9 2.3 5.9 1.97

TOTAL 20.56 18.05 21.22 59.83 2.85

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries
in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan / Jenny M. Benito. 2010

Document Outline

Growth and Yield Evaluation of Seven Bush Bean Entries in Camangaan, Sison, Pangasinan
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- ABSTRACT
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- INTRODUCTION
- REVIEW OF LITERATURE
- MATERIALS AND METHODS
- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
- SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
- LITERATURE CITED
- APPENDICES