BIBLIOGRAPHY

MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011. Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties
Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La Trinidad, Benguet. Benguet State University, La
Trinidad Benguet.

Adviser: Janet P. Pablo, M.Sc.


ABSTRACT

The study was conducted to determine the growth and yield of the different bush snap
bean varieties applied with the different volumes of water; determine the best water requirements
for bush snap bean production; and to determine the interaction effect of the bush snap bean
varieties and the volumes of water on the growth and yield of bush snap beans.

Sablan and Bokod have the tallest plant height at 30 and 60 DAP, produced more flower
clusters, more pods per clusters while Contender had the widest leaf area, highest percentage pod
set per cluster, widest pod, longest pod, and more crown roots. On the other hand Sablan has the
longest roots and Bokod had the highest total yield per plant.

The different volumes of water significantly affected the number of crown roots and
length of the roots of the different bush bean varieties.

No significant differences were noted in all the parameters gathered as affected by the
bush snap bean varieties and the application of different volumes of water.

---

TABLE OF CONTENTS






Page


Bibliography…………………………………………………………………

i
Abstract ………………………………………………………………….
i
Table of Contents …………………………………………………………
ii


INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………
1


REVIEW OF LITERATURE ……………………………………………
3

Effect of Water stress on Plant ……………………………………
3

Effects of Water Stress on


Growth Stages of the Plant ………………………………………
3


Effects of Water Stress on


the Flower, Pod set and Pod


Formation of the Plant ……………………………………………
4


Effect of Water Stress on Root ……………………………………
4


Water Stress Resistance in Legumes ………………………………
5
MATERIALS AND METHODS …………………………………………
7
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ……………………………………...….
13

Agro Climatic Data


During the Study Period …………………………………………
13

Days from Sowing to Emergence and


Flowering …………………………………………………………
13


Initial Plant Height at 30 and 60 DAP ……………………………
14

Plant Vigor at 30 and 60 DAP ……………………………………
15

Days from Emergence to Pod Setting,


First, and Last Harvest ……………………………………….……
16

---

Number of Flower Cluster …………………………………………
16

Number of Flower per Cluster ……………………………………
17

Number of Pod per Cluster ………………………………………
18

Percentage Pod Set per Cluster ……...…………………………….
19

Pod Length and Width ………………………………………..……
20

Leaf Length and Width ……………………………………………
21

Number of Crown Roots ………………………………………….
22

Root Length ………………………………………………………
24

Reaction to Bean Rust and Pod Borer ……………………………
24

Weight of Marketable Pods (g) ……………………………………
26

Non- Marketable Weight of Pods (g) ……………………………...
26

Total Yield per Plant (g) ………………………………………...…
27
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECCOMENDATION …………….
30

Summary …………………………………………………………..
30

Conclusions ………………………………..………………………
30

Recommendations ………………………………………………..
31
LITERATURE CITED …………………………………………………..
32
APPENDICES …………………………………………………………...
34

---

1

INTRODUCTION


Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a common source of protein for human diet
and as well as feed supplement for animals. Snap bean thrives well in cool medium to
high altitude just like Benguet (Mariano, 2007). Further, it is one of the main sources of
income of the farmers in the highlands, like Benguet. They plant this crop mostly for it is
easily grown and does not require intensive management, but, for how many decades,
climate change became one of the major constraints to the bean production.

Pendleton and Lawson (1987) quoted that weather and climate changes strongly
affect the fluctuation of food supplies. Also, climate is a foremost factor in determining
the adaptability of crops. High rainfall and humidity which adversely affect reproduction,
ripening, drying, storage, increase pest and disease problems of cereals and grain
legumes. Fluctuating rainfall patterns combined with soils of low moisture-holding
capacity often lead to periodic drought.

One farmer mentioned that farming is a game of chance (“Sugal id niman nan
men garden”) (BSU-ISRD and FAO, Undated). This proves that farmers in Benguet are
already experiencing the effects of climate change as evident in the observed occurrence
of new pests and diseases, also crop destruction due to El Niño, La Niña, hail stone and
frost, and disruption of agricultural calendar.

At present, water stress is also one of the factors which limit the production of
snap bean. Water stress reduced the expression of most traits with the exception of days
to flower and leaf retention capacity. In addition, legume species often result in a loss of
seed yield (Singh and Saxena, 1990). Plants react to stress where there is abnormal
growth, and it could be either a decline in quality or yield reduction, where both are
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

2

important. Water stress can cause direct and indirect damages to the crops. Deficiency in
water can cause poor stand when water stress occurs during germination, and yield
reduction or decline in quality, such as deformity in the fruits of beans. Indirect damage
may consists of calcium deficiency , while water excess can also cause direct damage,
such as leaching of fertilizers, reduced root development, and development of
adventitious roots. Indirect effect can favor the occurrences of root rot and other diseases.

In this case, there is a need to evaluate potential varieties of beans which are able
to withstand different volume of water condition.

Thus, this study was conducted to:
1. evaluate the growth and yield of the different bush snap bean varieties applied
with different volumes of water;
2. determine the best water requirements for bush snap bean production; and
3. determine the interaction effect of the bush snap bean varieties and the different
volumes of water on the growth and yield of bush snap bean.
In addition, the choice of appropriate variety that can cope up with different
volumes of water is an important factor in the successful production of beans because
planting of variety that does not tolerate different volumes of water will lead to losses.

The study was conducted at Balili, La Trinidad, Benguet in a greenhouse from
November 2010 to March 2011.





Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

3

REVIEW OF LITERATURE


Effect of Water Stress on the Plant


Water stress affects practically every aspects of plant growth, modifying the
anatomy, morphology, physiology and biochemistry (Kramer, 1993).

In 1975, Tisdale and Nelson stated that plants require water for the manufacture
of carbohydrates, to maintain hydration of protoplasm, and as a vehicle of the
translocation of foods and other mineral elements. It also said that moisture stress causes
reduction in the cell elongation, hence retarding the growth of the plant. Recently,
Chapman and Carter (1976) postulated that all plants are harmed to some degree by
inadequate moisture and added that under condition of drought where total plant growths
or dry matter is reduced consequently reducing yield.

However, excessive water also affects crop growth where it causes direct damage
to shoots, high incidence of pests and diseases, physical destruction of flowers, and less
activity of pollinators (AVRDC, 1990).


Effects of Water Stress on Growth Stages of the Plant


Maiti (1997) stated that the normal process of seedling development is largely
controlled by environmental factors and influences the development of the adult plant.
Kramer (1976) as cited by Bawang (1990) stated that the vegetative growth is particularly
sensitive to water deficit because growth is closely related to turgor and loss of turgidity
stops cell division.

In addition, AVRDC (1990) stated that under this condition, guard cells lose their
turgidity and stomatal opening decreases. Eventually, the rate of photosynthesis and
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

4

consequently growth and yield also decrease where in extreme condition the plant may
either wilt or die.

However, under excess water conditions plant growth are being toxified, and
finally retards growth of the plant. It also said that crops in the early vegetative stage may
be unable to develop a deep root system if light watering is made regularly.


Effects of Water Stress on the Flower,
Pod set and Pod Formation of the Plant


Salehi et al., (2006) reported that seedling and flowering stages were the most
sensitive to water availability and water stress. However, occurrence of water stress
during any growth stages in legume species often results in a loss of yield especially seed
yield. Catipon et al. (1988) reported that intensive water stress in dry season and strong
wind in humid season reduced mungbean seed yield.

For all crops grown for fruits and seed, Chapman and Carter (1976) stated that
moisture stress before, during and immediately after flowering seems to have the greatest
effect on reducing yield.

Excessive abortion of flowers, young pods and seeds occurs in dry bean because
of water stress during pre- flowering (10 to 12 days before anthesis) and reproductive
periods. Moderate to severe water stress reduced biomass and seed yield from 20 percent
to 90 percent, harvest index, number of pods and seeds, seed weight, and days to maturity
(Salehi et al., 2008).

Effect of Water Stress on Root


Drought stress increase root shrinkage that consequently affects nutrient transport
to the root surface due to reduced contact between root and soil (North and Nobel, 1997).
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

5

Passioura (2002) stated that dry soil particles hold water and nutrient more
strongly on the surface, and dry soil is more compact for root penetration. Root rots
caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Groid; Fusarium solani f.sp.phaseoli
(Burk), and other fungi may aggravate drought stress. Similarly, drought stress cultivars
are prone to damage by leafhoppers in the tropics and subtropics. While excess water can
also reduced root development and development of adventitious roots. Indirect damage
due to excess water consists of root rot and other diseases, which are favored by high soil
moisture (AVRDC, 1990). As a result, plant roots cannot obtain oxygen for respiration to
maintain their activities for nutrient and water uptake.

Water Stress Resistance in Legumes


Some bean cultivars reportedly have a certain degree of resistance to water stress.
Resistant varieties are capable of growing and yielding satisfactorily under unfavorable
growing conditions. Plants which can survive drought either avoid or tolerate drought are
called to be drought avoiders where they avoid drying of their tissues by maintaining
their water uptake and/or reducing water loss. The plant should be able to produce more
roots than shoots. In addition, it has the ability to move its leaves so that only a very
small leaf area is exposed to incoming radiation. It also develops hairs to insulate the leaf
surface and it becomes waxier. According to AVRDC (1990) all these characteristics
reduce light absorption, hence, reduce water loss. In most of these drought avoiders are,
legumes.

On the other hand, tolerators survive drought by functioning normally even with a
low amount of water in their tissues (AVRDC, 1990).
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

6


Kramer (1969) pointed out that very young seedlings are more resistant to water
stress than older plants.

Excessive water also affects crop growth but however, the extent of flooding
damages depends upon the susceptibility of species or variety (AVRDC, 1990).



















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

7

MATERIALS AND METHODS



The experiment was done at BSU- Experimental Station in Balili, La Trinidad,
Benguet in a greenhouse. The area was properly cleaned. Plastic pots with a measurement
of 15.24cm x 27.94cm were used and filled with soil and bio-fertilizer with a 3:1 ratio.
Three bean seeds were planted per pot at a depth not exceeding 2.5 centimeters. After one
week germination it was thinned to only one plant per pot. The study was laid out using
3x5 factor factorial in Completely Randomize Design (CRD) with three replications.
Weeding was done to avoid water and nutrient competition on the crop. A rate of 120
grams compost fertilizer was applied to every pot at 20 days after planting. Irrigation
management as treatment was strictly applied to the plant when the true leaves fully
appeared. The different volumes of water served as Factor A and the three bush snap
bean varieties served as Factor B.
Factor A: Volume of water (T)

Code
Treatment
T0
200 ml. of water will be applied to all control plants every other
day (Farmers Practice)

T1
800 ml. of water will be applied every morning of the day to all
plants when the true leaf has fully appeared

T2
500 of water will be applied every morning of the day to all plants
when the true leaf has fully appeared

T3
100 ml. of water will be applied every other day to all plants when
the true leaf has fully appeared


T4
45 ml. of water will be applied every other day to all plants when
the true leaf has fully appeared


Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

8

Factor B: Varieties (V)
Code
Variety
Source
V1
Contender
BSU- NPRCRTC
V 2
Bokod
BSU- NPRCRTC
V 3
Sablan
BSU- NPRCRTC


The data gathered were the following:


1. Number of days from sowing to emergence. This was recorded by counting the
number of days from sowing to emergence and when at least 60% of the seed sown has
emerged.

2. Initial plant height (cm). This was measured from the base of the plant at the
ground level to the youngest shoots, using a meter stick or a foot rule from five plant
samples in different treatment at 30 days after planting.

3. Final height (cm). This was measured from the base of the plant at the ground
level to the youngest shoots, using a meter stick or a foot rule from five plant samples
in different treatment at 60 DAP.

4. Plant vigor. This was taken using these scales at 30 DAP and 60 DAP.

(NPRCRTC, 1997).

Scale
Description
Remarks
1
Plants are weak with few Poor vigor
stems and leaves; very
pale.


2
Plants are weak with few Less vigor

thin stems and leaves; pale









Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

9

Scale
Description
Remarks

3
Better than less vigorous
Vigorous
4
Plants are moderately Moderately vigorous
strong with robust stem
and leaves; leaves are
light green in color.
5
Plants are strong with Highly vigorous
robust stems and leaves;
leaves are light to dark
green color.


5. Days from emergence to flowering. This was recorded starting from emergence
to the day when 60% of plants have flowered.

6. Days from emergence to pod setting. This was taken by counting the number of
days starting from flowering to the days when pods are formed at the same time
recording the date of pod setting.

7. Days from emergence to first harvest. This was recorded by counting the
number of days from emergence to first harvest at the same time recording the date of
first harvest.

8. Days from emergence to last harvest. This was taken by counting the number of
days from emergence to last harvest at the same time recording the date of last harvest.

9. Number of flower cluster per plant. This was taken by counting the flower
cluster from the five sample plants.

10. Number of flower per cluster. This was taken by counting the flowers per
cluster from the five sample plants.

11. Number of pods per cluster. This was recorded by counting the number of
pods per cluster from five sample plants.

Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

10


12. Percentage pod set per cluster. This was taken by using this formula:
% Pod Setting = Total number of pods per cluster x 100



Total number of flower per cluster


13. Length of pod (cm). This was recorded by measuring the five randomly
selected pods at harvest maturity.

14. Width of pod (cm). This was recorded by measuring the five randomly
selected pods at harvest maturity.

15. Leaf length (cm). This was recorded by measuring the first trifoliate leaves of
five sample plants from petiole to leaf tip at 30 days after planting.

16. Leaf width (cm). This was recorded by measuring the first trifoliate leaves of
five sample plants from tip to tip sides at 30 days after planting.

17. Root length. This was recorded by measuring the tap or primary roots of five
sample plants using a meter stick or a foot rule after the last harvest.

18. Number of crown roots. This was recorded by counting the crown roots of
five sample plants.

19. Weight of marketable fresh pod per plant (kg). This was the pods that are
smooth, well- formed and free from damages. The fresh pod of variety in different
treatment was weighed after harvest.

20. Weight of non- marketable fresh pods per plant (kg). This was the pods that
are over matured, malformed, and damage by pest and diseases. This was obtained by
weighing the non- marketable fresh pods of variety in different treatment.

21. Total yield per plant (kg). This was recorded by getting the total weight of
marketable and non- marketable fresh pods per plant in the different treatment throughout
the harvest period.
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

11


22. Disease and Pest Incidence. This was noted by visual observation and was
assessed by rating the degree of disease and insect damage on the crop at 30 DAP and 60
DAP.

a. Bean rust. ( as cited by Jose, 2004).

Scale Description
Remark
1 No infection
High resistant
2
1-25% of the total plants are infected.
Mild resistant
3
25-50% of the total plants are infected.
Moderate resistant
4
50-75% of the total plants are infected.
Susceptible
5
75-100% of the total plants are infected.
Very susceptible


b. Pod borer.
Scale
Description
Remark

1
No infection
High resistant
2
1-25% of the total plants are infected.
Mild resistant
3
25-50% of the total plants are infected.
Moderate resistant
4
50-75% of the total plants are infected.
Susceptible
5
75-100% of the total plants are infected.
Very susceptible


23. Agro- climatic data. The average monthly temperature, relative humidity, sun
intensity was taken using the appropriate measuring devices like light meter
and
hygrometer every Mondays during the entire growing
seasons of the crop from
December 2010 to March 2011.

Data Analysis


All quantitative data was analyzed using analysis of variances (ANOVA) for
Completely Randomize Design (CRD) with three replications. The significance of
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

12

difference among treatment means was tested using Duncan’s Multiple range test
(DMRT) at 5% level of significance.










































Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

13

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS


Agro- Climatic Data during the Study Period

Table 1 shows the temperature, relative humidity and sunlight intensity.
Temperature ranged from 20.17 to 22.17 0C, relative humidity is 78.03 %, and light
intensity in lux ranged from 535.67 to 705 with a mean of 641.


According to BNCRDC Technoguide, snap bean is best grown under cool climate
condition. However, it can tolerate warm temperatures up to 25oC.

Days from Sowing to Emergence and Flowering


Effect of water volume. No significant differences were observed on the number
of days to emergence until flowering of the three bush snap bean varieties as affected by
the different volumes of water application. Different volume of water was applied after
the appearances of true leaves at 13 DAP as shown in Figure 1.

Effect of varieties. Result showed that the three bush snap bean varieties
uniformly emerged 8 days after sowing and flowered at 32 days from emergence.

Table 1. Agro climatic data during the study period (December, 2010 – February, 2011)


TEMPERATURE
RELATIVE
SUNLIGHT
MONTH
(OC)
HUMIDITY
INTENSITY

MEAN

(% )
(Lux)
December

22.17

77.30
705
January

20.20

79.80
682.6
February

20.17

77.00
535.67
MEAN

20.84

78.03
641.09

Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

14



Figure 1. Bush snap bean at 13 DAP (formation of true leaf has fully appeared in the start

of applying the different volumes of water)



Interaction effect. There was no significant difference observed in the days from

emergence to flowering as affected by three varieties and the different volume of water.


Initial Plant Height at 30 and 60 DAP

Effect of water volume. No significant differences were noted on the plant height
of the three bush snap beans at 30 and 60 DAP. However, taller plants were noted in the
bush snap beans varieties applied with 200 ml of water (farmer’s practice) with a height
of 25.170 cm. This could be attributed to enough moisture applied to the plant for growth
(Table 2).

Tisdale and Nelson (1975) stated that moisture stress causes reduction in the cell
elongation, hence retarding the growth of the plant. In addition, Chapman and Carter
(1976) postulated that all plants are harmed to some degree by inadequate moisture and
added that under condition of drought where total plant growths or dry matter is reduced
consequently reducing yield.
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

15

Table 2. Plant height at 30 DAP and 60 DAP of the three bush snap bean varieties as

affected by the volume of water application

PLANT HEIGHT PLANT
TREATMENTS
(cm)
VIGOR
30 DAP 60 DAP 30
60 DAP
DAP
VOLUME OF WATER (A)





200 ml. of water (Farmer’s 25.17
41.21
5.00 4.98
practice)

800 ml. of water
24.54
37.53
5.00 4.82

500 ml. of water
24.67
37.65
5.00 4.98

100 ml. of water
23.75
38.24
4.96 4.91

45 ml. of water
22.38
37.03
5.00 4.89
VARIETY (B)





Contender
20.87b
34.12b
4.97 4.87

Bokod
26.95a
41.19a
5.00 4.93

Sablan
24.94a
39.68a
5.00 4.93
AxB
ns
ns
ns
ns
CV%
8.54
8.00
1.19 2.78
Means of the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level of significance


Effect of variety. Statistically, the plant height of the three bush snap bean
varieties was significantly different. Bokod and Sablan were taller than Contender at 30
and 60 DAP. The differences noted could be genetic in nature.

Interaction effect. Statistically, there was no significant interaction effect between
the different volumes of water application on the plant height of the three bush snap bean
varieties.

Plant Vigor at 30 and 60 DAP

Effect of water volume. Results showed that there were no significant differences
on the plant vigor applied with the different volumes of waters at 30 and 60 DAP as
shown in Table 2.
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

16


Effect of variety. Results showed that there were no significant differences among
varieties. All of the varieties were observed to be highly vigorous with robust stem and
the leaves are light to dark green in color.

Interaction effect. The interaction between the different volumes of water and
bush snap bean varieties was observed to be not significant at 30 and 60 DAP.

Days from Emergence to Pod Setting,
First, and Last Harvest


Effect of water volume. No significant differences on the volume of water
application on the number of days from emergence to pod setting, days from emergence
to first harvest, and days from emergence to last harvest were observed.

Effect of variety. Results showed that there were no varietal significant
differences between the three bush snap bean varieties in the days from emergence to pod
setting, days from emergence to first harvest, and days from emergence to last harvest.

Interaction effect. There was no significant interaction effect among the three
varieties of bush snap beans and the volumes of water applications on the number of days
from emergence to pod setting, and emergence to first and last harvest.

Number of Flower Cluster

Effect of water volume. As shown in Table 3, there were no significant
differences on the number of flower cluster as affected by the application of different
volumes of water. All of the bush snap beans produced five flower clusters except the
plants applied with 200 ml water with six.

Effect of variety. Results showed that there was a significant difference between
the varieties on the number of flower cluster produced. Although, Bokod and Sablan have
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

17

Table 3. Number of flower cluster and number of flower per cluster of bush snap bean as

affected by different volumes of water applied

NUMBER
TREATMENTS
FLOWER
FLOWER PER
CLUSTER
CLUSTER
VOLUME OF WATER (A)



200 ml. of water (Farmer’s practice)
6
6

800 ml. of water
5
5

500 ml. of water
5
5

100 ml. of water
5
5

45 ml. of water
5
5
VARIETY (B)



Contender
4b
5b

Bokod
6a
6a

Sablan
6a
6a
AxB
ns
ns
CV%
9.31
12.18

Means of the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level of significance

six flower clusters while Contender has four flower clusters. These differences noted
among the three bush snap bean varieties can be associated with their different genetic
potentials. The number of flower cluster is an important factor contributing to yield of the
plants. Theoretically, the more the flower cluster, the greater the yield (Singha, 1973).

Interaction effect. There was no significant interaction effect between the
different volumes of water application on the three bush snap bean varieties on the
number of flower cluster.

Number of Flower per Cluster


Effect of water volume. No significant differences were observed on the three
varieties of bush snap beans on the number of flower per cluster even applied with
different volumes of water. The application of 200 ml of water though produced six
flowers per cluster while the rest of the plant produced five.
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

18


Salehi et al.,( 2008) stated that excessive abortion of flowers, young pods and
seeds occurs in dry bean because of water stress during pre- flowering (10 to 12 days
before anthesis) and reproductive periods.

Effect of variety. The number of flower produced per cluster is presented in Table
3. Statistically, results showed no significant varietal differences on the number of
flowers produced. Means ranged from five to six flowers per cluster.

Interaction effect. There were no significant interactions between the different
volumes of water application on the three varieties of bush snap beans evaluated in the
production of flowers per cluster.

Number of Pod per Cluster

Effect of water volume. Statistically, there was no significant effect of the
different volumes of water application on the production of pod per cluster of the

Table 4. Number of pod per cluster and percentage pod set per cluster as affected diffe-

rent volumes of water applied

NUMBER OF
PERCENTAGE
TREATMENTS
POD PER
POD SET PER
CLUSTER
CLUSTER
VOLUME OF WATER (A)



200 ml. of water (farmer’s practice)
4
66.9

800 ml. of water
3
66.3

500 ml. of water
4
67.4

100 ml. of water
3
65.6

45 ml. of water
3
62.6
VARIETY (B)



Contender
3
67.0

Bokod
4
63.6

Sablan
4
66.7
AxB
ns
ns
CV%
20
18.41

Means of the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level of significance
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

19

different varieties of bush snap beans. The number of pod per cluster produced has a
mean of three to four pods (Table 4).

For all crops grown for fruits and seed, Chapman and Carter (1976) stated that
moisture stress before, during and immediately after flowering seems to have the greatest
effect on reducing yield. In addition, high soil moisture levels during seed formation, pod
striping and seed coloring will result in white- mold damage, delayed maturity and
quality problems.

Effect of varieties. The different varieties used did not significantly affect the
number of pods per cluster produced by the bush snap beans (Table 4). Number of pods
ranged from three to four.

Interaction effect. No significant interactions were noted in terms of pod per
cluster on the three varieties of bush snap bean as affected by different volumes of water
applied.

Percentage Pod Set per Cluster


Effect of water volume. The different volumes of water applied did not
significantly influence the percent pod setting of the different varieties. Percentage pod
setting ranges from 62.6 to 67.4.

Effect of varieties. The different bush snap bean varieties used did not
significantly influence the percent pod setting. Numerically, highest pod setting was
recorded in Contender (67 %), followed by Sablan (66.7 %) while 63 % pod setting was
observed in Bokod.
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

20

Interaction effect. No significant interactions were noted in terms of percentage
per cluster on the three varieties of bush snap bean as affected by different volumes of
water applied.

Pod Length and Width

Effect of water volume. No significant differences on the effect of the different
volume of water application on the pod length and width on the different varieties of bush
snap beans were observed as shown in Table 5. Pod length ranges from 14.56 to15.38 cm
while pod width ranges from 0.94 to 0.97 cm.

Effect of varieties. No significant differences were also noted on the different
varieties of bush snap beans in terms of length. However, in terms of pod width
Contender significantly produced the widest pod of 1.12 cm, and the narrowest pod was
observed in Bokod and Sablan with 0.80 and 0.85 cm, respectively.

Table 5. Pod length and width of bush snap bean as affected by volumes of water applied

POD
TREATMENTS
(cm)
LENGTH
WIDTH
VOLUME OF WATER (A)



200 ml. of water (farmer’s practice)
15.38
0.94

800 ml. of water
15.01
0.97

500 ml. of water
15.19
0.94

100 ml. of water
14.79
0.94

45 ml. of water
14.56
0.94
VARIETY (B)



Contender
15.49
1.12

Bokod
14.80
0.87

Sablan
14.66
0.85
AxB
ns
ns
CV%
6.59
5.67

Means of the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level of significance
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

21


Interaction effect. No significant interaction was recorded in terms of pod length
and width as affected by the bush snap bean varieties and by the different volumes of
water applied.

Leaf Length and Width

Effect of water volume. No significant differences were observed on the leaf
length and width of the three bush snap bean varieties as affected by different volumes of
water application.

Effect of varieties. The different bush bean varieties had significantly affected the
leaf length and width measured at 30 DAP (Table 6). Contender produced the widest and
longest leaf of 21.63 and 14.15 cm, respectively. Comparable leaf width was observed in
Bokod (19.23) while Sablan produced the narrowest leaf.

Table 6. Leaf length and width of bush snap bean as applied with different volumes of

water


LEAF
TREATMENTS
(cm)
LENGTH
WIDTH
VOLUME OF WATER (A)



200 ml. of water (farmer’s practice)
13.24
19.72

800 ml. of water
12.62
19.56

500 ml. of water
13.12
20.22

100 ml. of water
12.91
20.11

45 ml. of water
13.54
19.23
VARIETY (B)



Contender
14.15a
21.63a

Bokod
12.63b
19.23ab

Sablan
12.45b
18.44b
AxB
ns
Ns
CV%
9.98
9.67

Means of the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level of significance

Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

22


Figure 2. Leaves of the bush snap beans starting to fold as affected with little volume of

water



Crops that have wider leaf area have higher transpiration rate than of leaf that has
less area. Since legumes have less leaf area with hairy leaves and have the ability to move
their leaves so that only a very small leaf area is exposed to incoming radiation which
reduce transpiration (AVRDC, 1990) as shown in Figure 2.

Interaction effect. No significant interaction was noted in terms of leaf length and
width on the three bush snap bean varieties as affected by the different volumes of water
application.

Number of Crown Roots


Effect of water volume. Statistically, result showed that there was a high
significant effect of the different volumes of water applied on the number of crown roots
(Table 7). The application of 800 ml of water gave the highest number of crown roots
with 12, comparable with the application of 500 and 200 ml of water with 11 and 10
number of crown roots, respectively. The least number of crown roots was observed on
plants applied with 45 ml of water. With a high moisture soil plant should produce more
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

23

roots for survival and well developed aerenchyma (Buchanan, Gruissem and Jones,
2000).

Effect of variety. As shown in Table 7, Contender significantly displayed the
highest number of crown roots, while Bokod and Sablan produced ten crown roots. The
differences noted could be genetic in nature. Crops that have more roots are more
resistant to drought and can tolerate moist soils (AVRDC, 1990).

Interaction effect. No significant interaction was noted in terms of number of
crown roots on the three varieties of bush snap bean as affected by the different volume
of water application.


Table 7. Number of crown roots and root length of bush snap bean as applied with differ-

rent volume of water


NUMBER OF
ROOT LENGTH
TREATMENTS
CROWN ROOTS
(cm)
VOLUME OF WATER (A)



200 ml. of water (farmer’s practice)
10.30ab
42.20ab

800 ml. of water
11.80a
26.92c

500 ml. of water
11.33a
31.00bc

100 ml. of water
9.49bc
41.95ab

45 ml. of water
9.33c
48.78a
VARIETY (B)



Contender
11.04a
30.40c

Bokod
10.05b
40.89b

Sablan
10.25b
43.21a
AxB
ns
ns
CV%
10.95
21.83

Means of the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level of plants




Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

24

Root Length


Effect of water volume. Result showed that there was a significant effect of the
different volumes of water applied on the root length as shown in Table 7. The
application of 45ml water produced the longest root of 48.78 cm followed by the
significanceapplication of 200 ml and 100 ml of water. The shortest root was recorded on
applied with 800 ml of water. Observation showed that high volumes of water produce
shorter roots while low volumes of water has longer root. In area where there is a deficit
of water the root of the plant should grow longer to absorb water from the lower depths
while, excess water can also reduced root development and development of adventitious
roots (AVRDC, 1990)

Effect of variety. Significant differences were obtained on the root length as
shown in Table 7 and Figure 3. Sablan was noted to produce the longest roots of 43.21
cm while Contender produced the shortest root length of 30.40 cm. Plant that has longer
rooting system can absorb water from the lower depths (AVRDC, 1990).

Interaction effect. No significant interaction effect was noted in terms of root
length on the three varieties of bush snap bean as affected by the different volumes of
water applied.

Reaction to Bean Rust and Pod Borer

The three varieties applied with different volumes of water showed mild
resistance to bean rust which means 1 to 25 % of the total plants are infected. Resistance
to bean rust plays an important role in bush snap bean production because infection could
affect the photosynthetic activity of the plant. While the reaction of bush snap beans to

Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

25

CONTENDER
To- 200 ml of water
T1- 800 ml of water
T2- 500 ml of water
T3- 100 ml of water T4- 45 ml of water





BOKOD




To- 200 ml of water
T1- 800 ml of water
T2- 500 ml of water
T3- 100 ml of water
T4- 45 ml of water



SABLAN



To- 200 ml of water
T1- 800 ml of water
T2- 500 ml of water
T3- 100 ml of water
T4- 45 ml of water

Figure 3. Roots of different bush snap bean varieties as affected with the different



volumes of water






Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

26

pod borer as monitored at 60 DAP showed that the three varieties of bush snap bean were
highly resistant to pod borer regardless of the different volumes of water applied.

Weight of Marketable Fresh Pods


Effect of water volume. No significant differences were observed on the weight of
marketable fresh pods as affected by the different volume of water applied on the three
varieties. Numerically, application of 200 ml of water or the farmers practice yield higher
pods (104 gram) per plant while the lowest marketable pods were recorded in plants
applied with 45 ml of water. Lack and excess soil moisture content can affect the biomass
yield of the crops (Buchanan et al., 2000).

Effect of variety. There were also no significant differences among the three
varieties as observed in terms of marketable weight of fresh pods. Bokod and Sablan
produced more marketable pods in terms of weight while Contender produced the least.

Interaction effect. No significant interaction was noted in terms of marketable
weight of fresh pods on the three varieties as affected by different volumes of water
applied.

Non- Marketable Weight of Fresh Pods


Effect of water volume. There were no significant differences in the different
volumes of water applied in terms of non- marketable weight of fresh pods.

Effect of variety. The production of non-marketable fresh pods was not significant
among the varieties of bush snap beans as shown in Table 8.Non- marketable pod weight
ranges from 1.67 to 2.67 g. This is due to protected environment where there is least pest
infestation.
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

27


Interaction effect. No significant interaction was noted in terms of the production
of non- marketable weight of fresh pods on the three varieties of bush snap bean as
affected by the different volumes of water applied.

Total Yield Per Plant


Effect of water volume. Table 8 showed that numerically the application of 100
ml of water produce the highest total yield per plant of 110.44 g, followed by the
application of 200 ml of water (166.67 g). The lowest total yield per plant was noted on
plants applied with 45 ml of water with 83.56 of fresh pods produced. As mentioned
earlier, the differences could be attributed to their flower cluster as detected by their
genetic make up.

Table 8. Weight of marketable pods, non- marketable and total yield per plant of three

bush snap bean as applied with different volumes of water.


WEIGHT OF PODS (g)
TOTAL

MARKET-
NON-
YIELD PER
TREATMENTS
ABLE
MARKE
PLANT

TABLE
(g)

VOLUME OF WATER (A)




200 ml. of water (farmer’s
104
2.67
106.67

practice)

800 ml. of water
96
0.78
97.22

500 ml. of water
94
1.78
91.00

100 ml. of water
108
1.67
110.44

45 ml. of water
79
4.11
83.56
VARIETY (B)




Contender
94
3.0
97.13

Bokod
97
1.47
98.87

Sablan
98
2.13
97.33
AxB
ns
ns
ns
CV%
7.56
172.35
56.87

Means of the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level of significance

Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

28

CONTENDER

TO- 200 ml of water
T1- 800 ml of water
T2- 500 ml of water
T3- 100 ml of water
T4- 45 ml of water

BOKOD
TO- 200 ml of water
T1- 800 ml of water
T2- 500 ml of water
T3- 100 ml of water
T4- 45 ml of water


SABLAN
TO- 200 ml of water
T1- 800 ml of water
T2- 500 ml of water
T3- 100 ml of water
T4- 45 ml of water

Figure 4. Pods of the three bush snap bean as affected by different volumes of water

applied





Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

29


Effect of variety. The production of total yield per plant was not significant
among the varieties of bush snap beans as shown in Table 8. Total yield ranges from
97.13g to 97.87 g. This is due to protected environment where there is least pest
infestation as shown in Figure 4.

Interaction effect. No significant interaction was noted in terms of total yield per
plant on the three varieties of bush snap bean as affected by the different volumes of
water.
































Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

30

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


Summary


Evaluation of bush snap bean varieties applied with different volumes of water
was conducted at La Trinidad, Benguet in a greenhouse condition from December 2010
to February 2011. The objectives of the study were to determine the growth and yield of
the different bush snap bean variety\\ies applied with different volumes of water;
determine the best water requirements for bush snap bean production; and determine the
interaction effect of variety and the volumes of water on the growth and yield of bush
snap bean.

Among the three varieties of bush snap bean, Sablan and Bokod have the tallest
plant height at 30 and 60 DAP, produced more flower clusters, more pods per cluster
while Contender had the widest leaf area, highest percentage pod set per cluster, widest
pod, longest pod, and more crown roots. On the other hand, Sablan had the longest roots
and Bokod had the highest total yield per plant.

The different volumes of water significantly affected the number of crown roots
and length of the roots of the different bush snap bean varieties.

No significant differences were noted in all the parameters gathered as affected by
the bush snap bean varieties and the application of different volume of water.

Conclusions

Sablan variety was the best performing as it produced the tallest plants, longest
roots and highest yield. Contender produced the longest and widest leaf but the shortest
root.
Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

31


The application of different volumes of water does not significantly affect the
growth and yield of all the bush bean varieties. The volume of water applied by farmers
though produced the highest yield. Lowest yield was obtained from bush beans applied
with the least amount of water.

The application of different volumes of water did not affect the growth and yield
of the different varieties of bush beans

Recommendations



Sablan variety is recommended for production even under different levels of
water in a green house. Likewise, application of 200 ml or the farmer’s practice of water
is still recommended to irrigate the bush snap bean varieties under protected
environment.

Further evaluation is recommended to verify the results of the study under open
field.










Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

32

LITERATURE CITED


ASIAN VEGETABLE RESEARCH DEVELOMPMENT CENTER (AVRDC). 1990.

Vegetable Production Training Manual. Taiwan: AVRDC. Pp.128-130.

BAWANG, F.T. 1990. The Effect of Moisture Stress on the Growth and Yield of White

Potato. La Trinidad: Depth News Phillipines. P. 259.

BSU-ISRD (BENGUET STATE UNIVERSITY- INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL RESEARCH

and DEVELOPMENT) and FAO.Undated. Climate Change: Vulnerability and

Adaptation Capacity Assessment in Benguet (Socio-economic Component). La

Trinidad: BSU-ISRD,
FAO, SPICACC, MDGF. 2 pages.

BUCHANAN, B. B., GRUISSEM, W. and R. L. JONES. 2000. Biochemistry and

Molecular
Biology of Plants. American Society of Plant Physiologist. Pp.

301-308.


CATIPON, E.M., B.M. LEGASPI and F.A. JARILL. 1988. Development of Mung Bean

Varieties from Avrdc Line for the Phillipines. In: Mung Bean, Shan Magasundara,

S. and B.T. MCLEAN (Eds.). Proceeding of the 2nd Int. Symp. Taiwan: AVRDC.

Pp. 88-97.

CHAPMAN, S.R. and L.P. CARTER. 1976. Crop Production: Principles and Practices.

San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company. Pp. 128-130.

JOSE, M. C. 2004.Notes in Legume Production. La Trinidad, Benguet. 2 pages.

KRAMER, D. J. 1969. Plant and Soil Water Relationship. A Modern Synthesis. USA:

Tata MC Graw Hill Publishing., Ltd. Pp. 347-390.

KRAMER, D. J. 1993. Water Stress Physiology and Plant Growth in: Agronomy

Journal. Pp. 31-35.

MAITI, R.1997. Phaseoulos spp. Bean Science. USA: Science Publisher. P. 15.

MARIANO, P.M. 2007. Bureau of Plant Industry, Baguio National Crop Research and
Development Center (BNCRDC) Technoguide, Series no. 03-07, Snap Bean.
Baguio City: BNCRDC. P. 1.

NELSON, W.L. and NIELSEN. 1998. Physiological Performance, Yield, and, Quality of

Dry Bean Seeds Under Drougth Stress. Retrieved on December 12, 2010 from

http://www.Uaemix.mx/pdf/339/33913147012.pdf Ma.Vandia.

Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

33

PASSIOURA, J.B., 2002. Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. Retrieved on November 06,
2010
from
http://www.Online
library.wiley.com./doio/10.1046/j.0016-
8025.2001.x/full.

PENDLETON, J. W. and T. L. LAWSON. 1987. Climate and Food Security: Papers

Presented at the International Symposium on Climate Variability and Food

Security in Developing Countries 5- 9. Retrieved on November 06, 2010 from

http://www.books .O2bPK22GYC&pg=PA68&lpg=PA68&dq=pendleton,+j
.+w.+ lawson&source=bl&ots=zgMljuPVCr&sig=i7Cz3N8pVA2V5MRJ -ljrq H
Q&hl=en&ei=94VTTbWjGcmPcYax5aQG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&r
esnum=4&ved=0CDcQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=pendleton%2C%20j. %20
w.
%20and%20t.l.%20la wson&f=false

SALEHI, M., A. HAGHNAZARI and F. SHEKARI, 2006. The Study of Morpho-

physiological Traits of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) Relation with Grain Yield

Under Normal and Drought Stress Conditions. Retrieved on December 04,

2010 from 2010 at http://www.google.com.ph/#hl=en&biw= 1366&bih=

543&q=salehi
%2C+m.+a.+haghnazari+and+f+shekari+
2006&aq

=f&aqi =&aql=&oq=&fp= ba94db5dd3c30688.

SINGHA, S. K. 1973. Yield of Grain Legumes; Problems and Prospects. India: Indian

Journal of Genetics. P. 5.

SIGHN, K.B., and M.C. SAXENA, 1990. Studies on Drought Tolerance. Syria:

ICARDA. Pp. 15-17.

TISDALE, S.C. and W.L. NELSON. 1975. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. New York: Mac

Millan Publishing Company Inc. Pp. 29-30.









Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

34

APPENDICES


Appendix Table 1. Number of days from sowing to emergence








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
8
8
8
24
8
V2
8
8
8
24
8
V3
8
8
8
24
8
Sub- total
24
24
24
72
8
T1V1
8
8
8
24
8
V2
8
8
8
24
8
V3
8
8
8
24
8
Sub- total
24
24
24
72
8
T2V1
8
8
8
24
8
V2
8
8
8
24
8
V3
8
8
8
24
8
Sub-total
24
24
24
72
8
T3V1
8
8
8
24
8
V2
8
8
8
24
8
V3
8
8
8
24
8
Sub- total
24
24
24
72
8
T4V1
8
8
8
24
8
V2
8
8
8
24
8
V3
8
8
8
24
8
Sub- total
24
24
24
72
8










Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

35

Appendix Table 2. Initial plant height of bush snap beans at 30 DAP








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
20.96
24.68
22.92
68.56
22.85
V2
27.87
27.32
28.86
84.05
28.02
V3
24.56
25.24
24.52
74.32
24.77
Sub- total
73.39
77.24
76.3
226.93 24.21
T1V1
21.82
21.42
20.04
63.28
21.09
V2
30.74
27.26
26.44
84.44
28.15
V3
24.78
23.62
24.74
73.14
24.38
Sub- total
77.34
72.3
71.22
220.86 24.54
T2V1
23.56
20.36
23.62
67.54
22.51
V2
26.00
27.36
27.56
80.92
26.97
V3
25.8
23.6
24.12
73.52
24.51
Sub- total
73.63
71.32
75.3
220.25 24.47
T3V1
22.61
19.66
19.38
61.65
20.55
V2
26.5
25.95
27.1
79.55
26.52
V3
24.84
23.42
24.26
72.52
24.17
Sub- total
73.95
69.03
70.74
213.72 23.75
T4V1
21.78
19.34
20.26
61.38
20.26
V2
27.2
23
25.06
75.26
25.09
V3
25.32
23.5
25
73.82
24.61
Sub- total
74.3
65.84
70.32
210.46 23.38













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

36

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
68.56
84.05
74.32
226.93
75.64
800 ml
63.28
84.44
73.14
220.86
73.62
500 ml
67.54
80.92
73.52
220.25
73.42
100ml
61.65
79.55
72.52
213.72
71.24
45 ml
61.38
75.26
73.82
210.46
70.15
TOTAL
322.41
404.22
367.32
1093.95 364.07
MEAN
64.84
80.84
73.46
219.14
72.81


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
26.589
13.295
7.04**
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
42.594
10.648
2.51ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
280.723
140.362
33.13**
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
30.430
3.804
0.90ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
127.080
4.236



TOTAL
44
480.827




**- Highly significant



Coefficient of variation=8.54%
ns- not significant





















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

37

Appendix Table 3. Final plant height of bush snap beans at 60 DAP








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
35.38
36.76
35.2
107.34 35.78
V2
41.68
42.04
50.42
134.14 44.71
V3
40.88
46.32
42.26
129.46 43.15
Sub- total
117.94
125.12
127.88
370.94 41.22
T1V1
36.3
35.16
34.6
106.06 35.35
V2
44.3
43.32
33.2
120.82 40.27
V3
36.88
34.6
39.44
110.95 36.97
Sub- total
117.48
113.08
107.24
337.8
37.53
T2V1
36.9
32.08
32.66
101.64 33.88
V2
37.82
40.84
40.2
118.86 39.62
V3
42.9
37.82
37.6
118.32 39.44
Sub- total
117.62
110.74
110.46
338.82 37.65
T3V1
32.34
36.58
32.5
101.42 33.81
V2
41.5
44
42.76
128.26 42.75
V3
38.56
35.44
40.46
114.46 38.15
Sub- total
112.4
116.02
115.72
344.14 38.24
T4V1
30.1
32.54
32.74
95.38
31.79
V2
38.34
37.72
39.74
115.8
38.6
V3
46.3
35.8
40
122.1
40.7
Sub- total
114.74
106.06
112.48
333.28 37.03













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

38

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
107.34
134.14
129.46
370.94
123.65
800 ml
106.06
120.82
110.95
337.8
112.6
500 ml
101.64
118.86
118.32
338.82
112.94
100ml
101.42
128.26
114.46
344.14
114.71
45 ml
95.38
115.8
122.1
333.28
111.09
TOTAL
511.84
617.88
595.29
1724.98 574.99
MEAN
102.37
123.58
118.01
343.96
114.10


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
588.497
42.035
5.0**
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
100.113
25.028
2.66ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
415.890
207.945
2.13**
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
72.494
9.062
0.96ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
281.861
9.395



TOTAL
44
870.358




**- Highly significant



Coefficient of variation=8.00%
ns- not significant





















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

39

Appendix Table 4. Plant vigor of bush snap beans at 30 DAP








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
5
5
5
15
5
V2
5
5
5
15
5
V3
5
5
5
15
5
Sub- total
15
15
15
45
5
T1V1
5
5
5
15
5
V2
5
5
5
15
5
V3
5
5
5
15
5
Sub- total
5
5
5
45
5
T2V1
5
5
5
15
5
V2
5
5
5
15
5
V3
5
5
5
15
5
Sub- total
15
15
15
45
5
T3V1
5
5
5
15
5
V2
5
5
5
15
5
V3
5
5
5
15
5
Sub- total
15
15
15
45
5
T4V1
5
5
5
15
5
V2
5
5
5
15
5
V3
5
5
5
15
5
Sub- total
15
15
15
45
5













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

40

Appendix Table 5. Plant vigor of bush snap beans at 60 DAP








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
5
5
5
15
5
V2
4.8
5
5
14.8
4.93
V3
5
5
5
15
5
Sub- total
14.8
15
15
44.8
4.98
T1V1
4.8
5
4.6
14.4
4.8
V2
5
4.6
5
14.6
4.86
V3
4.8
4.6
5
14.4
4.8
Sub- total
14.6
14.2
14.6
43.4
4.82
T2V1
5
5
4.8
14.8
4.93
V2
5
5
5
15
5
V3
5
5
5
15
5
Sub- total
15
15
14.8
44.8
4.98
T3V1
4.8
4.6
5
14.4
4.8
V2
4.8
5
5
14.8
4.93
V3
5
5
5
5
5
Sub- total
14.6
14.6
15
44.2
4.91
T4V1
5
4.6
4.8
14.4
4.8
V2
4.8
5
5
14.8
4.93
V3
5
5
4.8
14.8
4.93
Sub- total
14.8
14.6
14.6
44
4.89













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

41

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
15
14.8
15
44.8
14.93
800 ml
14.4
14.6
14.4
43.4
14.47
500 ml
14.8
15
15
44.8
14.93
100ml
14.4
14.8
15
44.2
14.73
45 ml
14.4
14.8
14.8
44
14.67
TOTAL
73
74
74.2
221.2
73.73
MEAN
24.33
24.67
24.73
73.73
14.75


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
0.50
0.004
1.0ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
0.014
0.004
1.0ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
0.007
0.004
1.0ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
0.028
0.004
1.0ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
0.107
0.004



TOTAL
44
0.156




ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=8.00%

















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

42

Appendix Table 6. Days from emergence to flowering








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
32
32
32
96
32
V2
32
32
32
96
32
V3
32
32
32
96
32
Sub- total
96
96
96
288
32
T1V1
32
32
32
96
32
V2
32
32
32
96
32
V3
32
32
32
96
32
Sub- total
96
96
96
288
32
T2V1
32
32
32
96
32
V2
32
32
32
96
32
V3
32
32
32
96
32
Sub- total
96
96
96
288
32
T3V1
32
32
32
96
32
V2
32
32
32
96
32
V3
32
32
32
96
32
Sub- total
96
96
96
288
32
T4V1
32
32
32
96
32
V2
32
32
32
96
32
V3
32
32
32
96
32
Sub- total
96
96
96
288
32













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

43

Appendix Table 7. Days from flowering to pod setting








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
7
7
7
21
7
V2
7
7
7
21
7
V3
7
7
7
21
7
Sub- total
21
21
21
63
7
T1V1
7
7
7
21
7
V2
7
7
7
21
7
V3
7
7
7
21
7
Sub- total
21
21
21
63
7
T2V1
7
7
7
21
7
V2
7
7
7
21
7
V3
7
7
7
21
7
Sub- total
21
21
21
63
7
T3V1
7
7
7
21
7
V2
7
7
7
21
7
V3
7
7
7
21
7
Sub- total
21
21
21
63
7
T4V1
7
7
7
21
7
V2
7
7
7
21
7
V3
7
7
7
21
7
Sub- total
21
21
21
63
7













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

44

Appendix Table 8. Days from emergence to first harvest








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
56
56
56
168
56
V2
56
56
56
168
56
V3
56
56
56
168
56
Sub- total
168
168
168
504
56
T1V1
56
56
56
168
56
V2
56
56
56
168
56
V3
56
56
56
168
56
Sub- total
168
168
168
504
56
T2V1
56
56
56
168
56
V2
56
56
56
168
56
V3
56
56
56
168
56
Sub- total
168
168
168
504
56
T3V1
56
56
56
168
56
V2
56
56
56
168
56
V3
56
56
56
168
56
Sub- total
168
168
168
504
56
T4V1
56
56
56
168
56
V2
56
56
56
168
56
V3
56
56
56
168
56
Sub- total
168
168
168
504
56













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

45

Appendix Table 9. Days from emergence to last harvest








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
66
66
66
198
66
V2
66
66
66
198
66
V3
66
66
66
198
66
Sub- total
198
198
198
594
66
T1V1
66
66
66
198
66
V2
66
66
66
198
66
V3
66
66
66
198
66
Sub- total
198
198
198
594
66
T2V1
66
66
66
198
66
V2
66
66
66
198
66
V3
66
66
66
198
66
Sub- total
198
198
198
594
66
T3V1
66
66
66
198
66
V2
66
66
66
198
66
V3
66
66
66
198
66
Sub- total
198
198
198
594
66
T4V1
66
66
66
198
66
V2
66
66
66
198
66
V3
66
66
66
198
66
Sub- total
198
198
198
594
66













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

46

Appendix Table 10. Number of flower cluster per plant








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
5
4
5
14
4.67
V2
6
6
6
18
6.00
V3
6
6
6
18
6.00
Sub- total
17
16
17
50
5.56
T1V1
4
5
5
14
4.67
V2
5
6
5
16
5.33
V3
5
5
6
16
5.33
Sub- total
14
16
16
46
5.11
T2V1
5
5
5
15
5.00
V2
6
5
6
17
5.67
V3
5
6
5
16
5.33
Sub- total
16
16
16
48
5.33
T3V1
5
4
5
14
4.67
V2
6
5
6
17
5.67
V3
5
6
5
16
5.33
Sub- total
16
15
16
47
5.22
T4V1
5
5
5
15
5.00
V2
6
6
5
17
5.67
V3
5
5
6
16
5.33
Sub- total
16
16
16
48
5.33













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

47

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
14
18
18
50
16.67
800 ml
14
16
16
46
15.33
500 ml
15
17
16
48
16.00
100ml
14
17
16
47
15.67
45 ml
15
17
16
48
16.00
TOTAL
72
85
82
239
79.67
MEAN
24
28.33
27.33
79.66
15.93


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
8.311
0.594
2.32*
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
0.978
0.244
1.0ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
6.178
3.089
12.64**
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
1.156
0.144
0.59ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
7.333
0.244



TOTAL
44
15.644




*- significant




Coefficient of variation=9.31%
ns- not significant





**-Highly significant















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

48

Appendix Table 11. Number of flower per clusters








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
5
5
5
15
5
V2
5
7
6
18
6
V3
5
6
7
18
6
Sub- total
15
18
18
51
5.67
T1V1
6
5
4
15
3
V2
5
6
5
16
5.33
V3
5
5
6
16
5.33
Sub- total
16
16
15
47
5.22
T2V1
5
5
5
15
5
V2
6
5
6
17
5.67
V3
5
6
5
16
5.33
Sub- total
16
16
16
48
5.33
T3V1
4
5
5
14
4.67
V2
6
5
6
17
5.67
V3
5
6
5
16
5.33
Sub- total
15
16
16
47
5.22
T4V1
5
5
4
14
4.67
V2
5
6
5
16
5.33
V3
6
5
6
17
5.67
Sub- total
16
16
15
47
5.22













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

49

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
15
18
18
51
17.00
800 ml
15
16
16
47
15.67
500 ml
15
17
16
48
16.00
100ml
14
17
16
47
15.67
45 ml
14
16
17
47
15.67
TOTAL
73
84
83
240
80.01
MEAN
24.33
28
26.67
79
16.12


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
7.333
0.540
1.21ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
1.333
0.333
0.79ns
2.04 2.74
Factor B
2
4.933
2.467
5.84**
2.69 4.02
A x B
8
1.067
0.133
0.32ns
3.32 3.17
Error
30
12.667
0.422



TOTAL
44
20.000




** Highly significant



Coefficient of variation=12.18%
ns- not significant






















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

50

Appendix Table 12. Number of pod per cluster








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
4
3
4
11
3.67
V2
4
4
3
11
3.67
V3
4
3
4
11
3.67
Sub- total
12
10
11
33
3.67
T1V1
4
4
2
10
3.33
V2
3
4
4
11
3.67
V3
3
4
3
10
3.33
Sub- total
10
12
10
32
3.56
T2V1
3
4
3
10
3.33
V2
4
3
4
11
3.67
V3
3
4
4
11
3.67
Sub- total
10
11
11
32
3.56
T3V1
3
2
4
9
3.00
V2
4
3
4
11
3.67
V3
4
4
3
11
3.67
Sub- total
11
9
11
31
3.44
T4V1
4
3
2
9
3.00
V2
4
3
3
10
3.33
V3
4
3
4
11
3.67
Sub- total
12
9
9
30
3.33













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

51

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
11
11
11
33
11.00
800 ml
10
11
10
32
10.67
500 ml
10
11
11
32
10.67
100ml
9
11
11
31
10.33
45 ml
9
10
11
30
10.00
TOTAL
49
54
54
158
52.67
MEAN
16.33
18
18
52.33
10.53


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
2.578
0.184
0.37ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
0.578
0.144
0.30ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
1.111
0.556
1.13ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
0.889
0.111
0.22ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
14.667
0.489



TOTAL
44
17.244




ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=9.31%

















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

52

Appendix Table 13. Percentage pod set per clusters








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
80
75
80
235
78.33
V2
66.67
66.67
50
183.34
61.11
V3
66.67
50
66.67
183.34
61.11
Sub- total
213.34
191.67
196.67
601.68
66.85
T1V1
80
80
40
200
66.67
V2
60
66.67
80
206.67
68.89
V3
60
80
50
190
63.33
Sub- total
200
226.67
170
596.67
66.30
T2V1
60
80
60
200
66.67
V2
66.67
60
66067
193.34
64.45
V3
66.67
66.67
80
213.34
71.11
Sub- total
193.34
206.67
206.67
606.68
67.41
T3V1
60
50
80
190
63.33
V2
66.67
60
66.67
193.34
64.45
V3
80
66.67
60
206.67
68.89
Sub- total
206.67
176.67
206.67
590.01
65.56
T4V1
80
60
40
180
60
V2
66.67
50
60
176.67
58.89
V3
80
60
66.67
206.67
68.89
Sub- total
226.67
170
166.67
563.34
62.59













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

53

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
235
183.34
183.34
601.68
200.56
800 ml
200
206.67
190
596.67
198.89
500 ml
200
193.34
213.34
606.68
202.23
100ml
190
193.34
206.67
590.01
196.67
45 ml
180
176.67
206.67
563.34
187.78
TOTAL
1005
953.36
1000.02
2958.38 986.13
MEAN
201
190.6
200
590.6
197.226


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
1069.684
76.406
0.52ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
128.427
32.107
0.22ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
108.192
54.096
0.37ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
833.065
104.133
0.71ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
4394.600
146.487



TOTAL
44
5464.284




ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=18.41%

















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

54

Appendix Table 14. Pod length








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
16.8
15.42
15.56
47.78
15.93
V2
16.36
14.1
15.4
45.86
15.23
V3
14.88
14.58
15.34
44.8
14.93
Sub- total
48.04
44.1
46.3
138.44 15.38
T1V1
15.72
14.7
16.18
46.6
15.53
V2
14.02
16.98
13.82
44.82
14.94
V3
15.82
13.7
14.14
43.66
14.55
Sub- total
45.56
45.38
44.14
135.08 15.01
T2V1
16.42
15.68
15.04
47.14
15.71
V2
14.82
14.08
15.82
44.72
14.91
V3
14.98
15.96
13.94
44.88
14.96
Sub- total
46.22
45.72
44.6
136.54 15.17
T3V1
15.06
15.12
15.7
45.88
15.29
V2
15.64
13.72
14.02
43.38
14.46
V3
16.34
13.28
14.22
43.84
14.61
Sub- total
47.04
42.12
43.94
133.1
14.79
T4V1
14.96
14.76
15.3
45.02
15.01
V2
14.96
13.4
14.86
43.22
14.41
V3
13.98
15.32
13.46
42.76
14.25
Sub- total
43.9
43.48
43.62
131
14.56













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

55

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
47.78
45.86
44.8
138.44
46.15
800 ml
46.6
44.82
43.66
135.08
45.03
500 ml
47.14
44.72
44.88
136.54
45.51
100ml
45.88
43.38
43.84
133.1
44.37
45 ml
45.02
43.22
42.76
131
43.67
TOTAL
232.42
222
219.94
674.36
224.73
MEAN
46.484
44.4
43.99
134.87
44.95


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
10.157
0.726
0.79ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
3.822
0.955
0.98ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
5.968
2.984
3.06ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
0.367
0.046
0.05ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
29.266
0.976



TOTAL
44
39.424




ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=6.59%

















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

56

Appendix Table 15. Pods width








REPLICATION



TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
1.12
1.09
1.12
3.33
1.11
V2
0.9
0.82
0.85
2.57
0.86
V3
0.82
0.84
0.91
2.57
0.86
Sub- total
2.84
2.75
2.88
8.47
0.94
T1V1
1.34
1.10
1.06
3.5
1.17
V2
0.85
0.93
0.91
2.69
0.89
V3
0.84
0.83
0.88
2.55
0.85
Sub- total
3.03
2.86
2.85
8.74
0.97
T2V1
1.09
1.06
1.11
3.26
1.09
V2
0.84
0.84
0.94
2.62
0.87
V3
0.85
0.85
0.84
2.54
0.85
Sub- total
2.78
2.75
2.89
8.42
0.94
T3V1
1.09
1.12
1.17
3.38
1.13
V2
0.86
0.86
0.85
2.57
0.86
V3
0.85
0.86
0.84
2.55
0.85
Sub- total
2.8
2.84
2.86
8.5
0.94
T4V1
1.04
1.18
1.05
3.27
1.09
V2
0.86
0.85
0.88
2.59
0.86
V3
0.84
0.85
0.87
2.56
0.85
Sub- total
2.74
2.88
2.8
8.42
0.94













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

57

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
3.33
2.57
2.57
8.47
2.82
800 ml
3.5
2.69
2.55
8.74
2.91
500 ml
3.26
2.62
2.54
8.42
2.81
100ml
3.38
2.57
2.55
8.50
2.83
45 ml
3.27
2.59
2.56
8.42
2.81
TOTAL
16.74
13.04
12.77
42.55
14.18
MEAN







ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
0.676
0.048
15.97**
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
0.008
0.002
0.68ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
0.660
0.330
115.23**
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
0.008
0.001
0.34ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
0.086
0.003



TOTAL
44
0.762




**- highly significant Coefficient of variation=5.67%
ns- not significant






















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

58

Appendix Table 16. Leaf length (cm)








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
20.14
21.6
20.84
62.58
20.86
V2
18.94
21.3
19.8
60.04
20.01
V3
19.38
17.54
17.92
54.84
18.28
Sub- total
58.46
60.44
58.56
177.46 19.72
T1V1
21.4
22.24
20.14
63.78
21.26
V2
21.52
20.52
15.88
57.92
19.31
V3
17.36
17.6
19.4
54.36
18.12
Sub- total
60.28
60.36
55.42
176.06 19.56
T2V1
24.56
21.5
21.16
67.22
22.41
V2
18.34
21.56
19.06
58.96
19.65
V3
20.38
16.38
19.06
55.82
18.61
Sub- total
63.28
59.44
59.28
182
20.22
T3V1
23.1
25.74
20.96
69.8
23.27
V2
19.78
16.9
19.4
56.08
18.69
V3
17.56
18.04
19.52
55.12
18.37
Sub- total
60.44
60.68
59.88
181
20.11
T4V1
21.04
21.4
18.68
61.12
20.37
V2
18.58
18.16
18.72
55.46
18.49
V3
23.6
15.26
17.66
56.52
18.84
Sub- total
63.22
54.82
55.06
173.1
19.23













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

59

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
62.58
60.04
54.84
177.46
59.15
800 ml
63.78
57.92
54.36
176.06
58.69
500 ml
67.22
58.96
55.82
182
60.67
100ml
69.8
56.08
55.12
181
60.33
45 ml
61.12
55.46
56.52
173.1
57.70
TOTAL
324.5
288.46
276.66
889.62
296.54
MEAN
64.9
57.69
55.33
177.92
59.31


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
38.002
2.710
1.64ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
4.323
1.081
0.63ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
27.373
13.686
8.02**
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
6.306
0.788
0.46ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
51.196
1.707



TOTAL
44
89.197




**-Highly significant



Coefficient of variation=9.98%
ns- not significant






















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

60

Appendix Table 17. Leaf width (cm)








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
15.42
14.92
13.5
43.84
14.61
V2
13.12
13.5
12.52
39.14
13.05
V3
12.9
11.68
11.56
36.14
12.05
Sub- total
41.44
40.1
37.58
119.12 13.24
T1V1
13.5
13.84
12.94
40.28
13.43
V2
13.82
12.52
10.18
36.52
12.17
V3
11.56
12.24
12.98
36.78
12.26
Sub- total
38.88
38.6
36.1
113.58 12.62
T2V1
15.6
12.46
16.44
44.5
14.83
V2
12.08
13.26
12.38
37.72
12.57
V3
12.84
10.8
12.24
35.88
11.96
Sub- total
40.52
36.52
41.06
118.1
13.12
T3V1
13.98
15.3
13.56
42.84
14.28
V2
12.6
10.78
12.76
36.14
12.05
V3
13.58
11.88
12.74
38.2
12.73
Sub- total
40.16
37.96
39.06
117.18 13.02
T4V1
15.38
15.48
11.44
42.3
14.1
V2
12.18
12.48
15.2
39.86
13.29
V3
14.6
11.82
13.3
39.72
13.24
Sub- total
42.16
39.78
39.94
121.88 13.54













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

61

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
43.84
39.14
36.14
119.12
39.71
800 ml
40.28
36.52
36.78
113.58
37.86
500 ml
44.5
37.72
35.88
118.1
39.37
100ml
42.84
36.14
38.2
117.18
39.06
45 ml
42.3
39.86
39.72
121.88
40.62
TOTAL
213.68
189.38
186.72
589.86
196.62
MEAN
42.74
37.88
37.34
117.96
39.32


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
105.468
7.533
2.12*
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
5.893
1.473
0.40ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
82.817
41.409
11.34**
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
16.758
2.095
0.57ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
109.526
3.651



TOTAL
44
214.994




**-Highly significant



Coefficient of variation=9.67%
ns- not significant






*- significant















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

62

Appendix Table 18. Weight of marketable pods (gram)








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
158
135
31
324
108.00
V2
64
145
93
302
100.67
V3
42
157
111
310
103.33
Sub- total
264
437
235
936
62.4
T1V1
134
137
28
299
99.67
V2
55
161
89
305
101.67
V3
33
130
101
264
88.00
Sub- total
222
428
218
868
57.87
T2V1
83
103
101
287
95.67
V2
47
180
30
257
85.67
V3
69
187
53
309
103.00
Sub- total
199
470
184
853
56.87
T3V1
122
80
63
265
88.33
V2
52
151
161
364
121.33
V3
54
198
98
350
116.67
Sub- total
228
429
322
979
65.27
T4V1
119
78
42
239
79.67
V2
50
152
31
233
77.67
V3
52
125
68
245
81.67
Sub- total
221
355
141
717
47.8













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

63

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
324
302
310
936
312.00
800 ml
299
305
264
868
289.33
500 ml
287
257
309
853
284.33
100ml
265
364
350
979
326.33
45 ml
239
233
245
717
239.00
TOTAL
1414
1461
1478
4353
1450.99
MEAN
282.8
292.2
295.6
870.6
290.20


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
7238
517
0.16ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
4437.47
1109.37
0.35ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
146.53
73.27
0.02ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
2654.80
331.85
0.10ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
96578
3219.27



TOTAL
44
555.20




ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=7.56%

















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

64

Appendix Table 19. Weight of non- marketable pods (gram)








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
0
5
4
9
3
V2
0
0
0
0
0
V3
0
15
0
15
5
Sub- total
0
20
4
24
2.67
T1V1
0
4
1
5
1.67
V2
0
0
0
0
0
V3
0
2
0
2
0.67
Sub- total
0
6
1
7
0.78
T2V1
0
2
9
11
3.67
V2
0
5
0
5
1.67
V3
0
0
0
0
0
Sub- total
0
7
9
16
1.78
T3V1
0
2
3
5
1.67
V2
0
0
6
6
2
V3
0
4
0
4
1.33
Sub- total
0
6
9
15
5
T4V1
0
10
5
15
5
V2
0
0
11
11
3.67
V3
0
4
7
11
3.67
Sub- total
0
14
23
37
4.11













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

65

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
9
0
15
24
8.00
800 ml
5
0
2
7
2.33
500 ml
11
5
0
16
5.33
100ml
5
6
4
15
5.00
45 ml
15
11
11
37
12.33
TOTAL
45
22
32
99
32.99
MEAN
9
4.4
6.4
19.8
6.60


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
123.87
8.85
0.62ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
57.20
14.300
0.99ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
17.73
8.867
0.62ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
48.93
6.117
0.43ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
431.33
14.378



TOTAL
44
555.20




ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=172.35%

















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

66

Appendix Table 20. Total yield per plant (g)








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
158
140
35
333
111
V2
64
145
93
302
100.67
V3
42
172
111
325
108.33
Sub- total
264
457
239
960
64
T1V1
134
141
29
304
101.33
V2
55
161
89
305
101.67
V3
33
132
101
266
88.67
Sub- total
222
434
219
875
58.33
T2V1
83
105
110
298
99.33
V2
47
185
30
262
87.33
V3
69
137
53
259
86.33
Sub- total
199
427
193
819
56.4
T3V1
122
82
66
270
90
V2
52
151
167
370
123.33
V3
54
202
98
354
118
Sub- total
228
435
331
994
66.27
T4V1
119
88
45
252
84
V2
50
152
42
244
81.33
V3
52
129
75
256
85.33
Sub- total
221
369
162
752
50.13













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

67

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
333
302
325
960
320.00
800 ml
304
305
266
875
291.67
500 ml
298
262
259
819
273.00
100ml
270
370
354
994
331.33
45 ml
252
244
256
752
250.67
TOTAL
291.4
296.6
292
880
293.34
MEAN
58.28
59.32
58.4

58.68


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
7156.45
511.18
0.61ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
4391.78
1097.94
0.35ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
26.98
13.49
0.00ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
2737.69
342.211
0.11ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
92745.33
3091.51



TOTAL
44
99901.78




ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=56.87%



















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

68

Appendix Table 21. Pest incidence (60 DAP)








REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
2
3
2
7
2.3
V2
2
2
2
6
2
V3
2
2
2
6
2
Sub- total
6
7
6
19
2.1
T1V1
2
2
2
6
2
V2
2
2
2
6
2
V3
2
3
2
7
2.3
Sub- total
6
7
6
19
2.1
T2V1
2
2
2
6
2
V2
3
2
2
6
2.3
V3
2
2
2
7
2
Sub- total
7
6
6
19
2.1
T3V1
2
2
2
6
2
V2
2
2
2
6
2
V3
2
2
2
6
2
Sub- total
6
6
6
18
2
T4V1
2
2
2
6
2
V2
2
2
2
6
2
V3
2
2
2
6
2
Sub- total
6
6
6
18
2













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

69

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
7
6
6
19
6.33
800 ml
6
6
7
19
6.33
500 ml
6
6
7
19
6.33
100ml
6
6
6
18
6.00
45 ml
6
6
6
18
6.00
TOTAL
31
30
32
93
30.99
MEAN
6.2
6
6.4
18.6
6.20


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
0.800
0.057
0.86ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
0.133
0.033
0.50ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
0.000
0.000
0.00ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
0.667
0.667
1.25ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
2.000
2.000



TOTAL
44
2.800
2.800



ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=12.49%



















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

70

Appendix Table 22. Diseases incidence (60 DAP)









REPLICATION


TREATMENT
I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
3
2
2
7
2.3
V2
2
2
3
7
2.3
V3
2
2
2
6
2
Sub- total
7
6
7
20
2.22
T1V1
2
2
2
6
2
V2
3
2
2
6
2
V3
2
3
2
7
2
Sub- total
7
7
6
20
2.3
T2V1
2
2
2
6
2.22
V2
2
2
2
6
2
V3
2
2
2
6
2
Sub- total
6
6
6
18
2
T3V1
2
2
2
6
2
V2
2
2
2
6
2
V3
2
2
2
6
2
Sub- total
6
6
6
18
2
T4V1
3
2
2
7
2.3
V2
2
2
3
7
2.3
V3
2
3
2
7
2.3
Sub- total
7
7
7
21
2.3













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

71

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
7
7
6
20
4.00
800 ml
6
6
7
19
3.80
500 ml
6
6
6
18
3.60
100ml
6
6
6
18
3.60
45 ml
7
7
7
21
4.20
TOTAL
32
32
32
96
19.2
MEAN
6.4
6.4
6.4
19.2
3.84


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
1.244
0.089
0.82ns
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
0.800
0.200
1.29ns
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
0.044
0.022
0.14ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
0.400
0.050
0.32ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
4.667
0.156



TOTAL
44
5.911




ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=11.95%

















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

72

Appendix Table 23. Number of crown roots








REPLICATION


TREATMENT I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
11.2
11.6
11.2
34

V2
8.4
9.4
10.6
28.4

V3
11
9.8
9.4
30.2

Sub- total
30.6
30.8
31.2
92.6

T1V1
12.2
12.6
12.2
37

V2
12.8
9.8
12
34.6

V3
11.2
10
13.4
34.6

Sub- total
36.2
32.4
37.6
106.2

T2V1
10.2
11.8
12.4
34.4

V2
10
10.4
11.2
31.6

V3
11
11
14
36

Sub- total
31.2
33.2
37.6
102

T3V1
9.8
12.8
9
31.6

V2
10
10
8.8
28.8

V3
8.6
8
8.4
25

Sub- total
28.4
30.8
26.2
85.4

T4V1
8.8
10
9.8
28.6

V2
7.4
9.6
10.4
27.4

V3
9
9.2
9.8
28

Sub- total
25.2
28.8
30
84














Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

73

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
34
28.4
30.2
92.6
30.87
800 ml
37
34.6
34.6
106.2
35.40
500 ml
34.4
31.6
36
102
34.00
100ml
31.6
28.8
25
85.4
28.47
45 ml
9
9.2
9.8
28
9.33
TOTAL
146
132.6
135.6
414.2
138.07
MEAN
29.2
26.52
27.12
82.84
27.61


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
60.786
4.342
3.31**
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
43.195
10.799
8.24**
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
8.162
4.081
3.11ns
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
9.429
1.179
0.90ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
39.307
1.310



TOTAL
44
100.092




ns- not significant




Coefficient of variation=10.95%
**-Highly significant
















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

74

Appendix Table 24. Root length (cm)








REPLICATION


TREATMENT I
II
III
TOTAL MEAN
TOV1
32.3
36.76
41.4
110.46 36.82
V2
45.2
41.1
52.6
138.9
46.3
V3
43.06
52.2
54.22
149.48 49.83
Sub- total
120.56
130.06
148.22
398.84 44.32
T1V1
22.6
22.2
19.26
64.06
21.35
V2
49.62
16.28
23.06
88.96
29.65
V3
41.44
18.38
29.4
89.22
29.74
Sub- total
113.66
56.86
71.72
242.24 26.92
T2V1
24.72
24.54
18.92
68.18
7.58
V2
31.24
25.48
42.9
99.62
33.21
V3
42.2
32.9
36.1
111.2
37.07
Sub- total
98.16
82.92
97.92
279
31
T3V1
37.4
32.4
38.4
108.2
36.07
V2
47.6
48
38.42
134.02 44.67
V3
41.2
41
53.1
135.3
45.1
Sub- total
126.2
121.4
129.92
377.52 41.94
T4V1
45.14
36.5
42.52
124.16 42.39
V2
51.4
41.8
58.6
151.8
50.6
V3
57
54.56
51.38
162.94 54.31
Sub- total
153.54
132.86
152.5
438.9
48.77













Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

75

TWO WAY TABLE





DIFFERENT
VARIETY


VOLUMES
CONTENDER
BOKOD
SABLAN
TOTAL MEAN
OF WATER
200 ml
110.46
138.9
149.48
398.84
132.95
800 ml
64.06
88.96
89.22
242.24
80.75
500 ml
68.18
99.62
111.2
279
93.00
100ml
108.2
134.02
135.3
377.52
125.84
45 ml
124.16
151.8
162.94
438.9
146.30
TOTAL
475.06
613.3
648.14
1736.5
578.84
MEAN
95.01
122.66
129.63
347.3
115.77


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE







SOURCE
DEGREE
SUM OF
MEAN COMPUTED TABULAR
VARIANCE
OF
SQUARES
OF
F
F
FREEDOM
SQUARES


0.05 0.01
Treatment
14
4415.871
315.459
4.78**
2.04 2.74
Factor A
4
2888.106
722.027
10.40**
2.69 4.02
Factor B
2
1396.288
698.144
10.05**
3.32 5.39
A x B
8
131.477
16.435
0.24ns
2.27 3.17
Error
30
2082.760
69.425



TOTAL
44
6498.630




**-Highly significant



Coefficient of variation=21.83%
ns- not significant





















Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

76

Appendix Table 25. Agro climatic data during the study (December 2010 to February


2011)





MONTH
TEMPERATURE
RELATIVE
LIGHT
HUMIDTY
INTENSITY
MIN
MAX
(%)
LUX
December




1st week
15
28
80
715
2nd week
16
29
77
650
3rd week
16
29
75
750
MEAN
15.67
28.67
77.33
705
January




1stweek
15
28
80
827
2nd week
14
24
79
347
3rdweek
13
25
79
672
4thweek
14
26
82
712
5thweek
14
29
79
855
MEAN
14
26.4
79.8
682.6
February




1stweek
13
26
75
662
2nd week
14
27
77
122
3rdweek
14
27
79
820
MEAN
13.67
26.67
77
535.67

Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean Varieties Applied with Different Volumes of Water in La
Trinidad, Benguet. MENDOZA, MARVIN T. APRIL 2011

---

Document Outline

• Evaluation of Bush Snap Bean VarietiesApplied with Different Volumes of Water in La Trinidad, Benguet
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • INTRODUCTION
  • REVIEW OF LITERATURE
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
  • SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • LITERATURE CITED

---