Fresh Pod Yield and Stability of NSIC-Approved Varieties of Pole Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris (L.)) in Benguet

Main Article Content

Margie E. Bad-ey Leoncia L. Tandang Hector C. Gayomba Johnson G. Bagtila

Abstract

Snap bean production is one of the main sources of livelihood of farmers in Benguet. It is mainly grown for fresh pods which can produce 17 to 28 t/ha depending on the cultivars. Snap bean farmers largely depend on the use of traditional variety which is low yielding with inferior pod quality. The BSU-IPB HCRS at BSU has developed and registered new improved varieties for production in the Northern Philippine Highland and officially approved by the DA-BPI NSIC for commercialization. On-farm trials involving eight varieties of pole snap beans were set up in four municipalities of Benguet following RCBD with three replications. The study aimed to evaluate the fresh pod yield, stability of NSIC-approved pole snap bean varieties, determine the most suitable location, identify the most stable and adapted variety for production in Benguet. The fresh pod yield of the eight pole snap bean varieties evaluated differed significantly among each other in four municipalities. Across locations, varieties ‘Itogon’ and ‘Kapangan’ produced the highest marketable fresh pod yield while variety ‘Itogon’ recorded the heaviest total fresh pod yield. Pole snap beans grown in Kapangan produced the highest marketable and total fresh pod yield. Significant interaction effect of genotype and environment was observed in the fresh pod yield. ‘Tublay’ was the most stable variety based on total fresh pod yield. Variety ‘Kibungan’ had specific adaptability in Kapangan and La Trinidad. Varieties ‘Mabunga’ and ‘Itogon’ had specific adaptability in Sablan and Varieties ‘Wangal,’ ‘Tuba,’ ‘Alno,’ ‘Tublay,’ and ‘Kapangan’ are best grown in Kibungan.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Akter, A., Hassen, J.M., Kulsum, U.M., Islam, M.R., Hossain, K., & Rahman, M.M. (2014). AMMI biplot analysis for stability of grain yield in hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Rice Res., 2:1–4. 10.4172/jrr.1000126

Barbeito, M.P., González, A.M., Rodiño, A.P., De Ron, A.M., & Santalla, M. (2008). Effects of planting season and plant cultivar on growth, development, and pod production in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 59, 1121–1129.

Benguet Province-Local Government Unit (LGU).(2009). 2004-2009 Commodity production profile. Benguet Province.

Ebdon, J.S., & Gauch Jr., H.G. (2002) Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction Analysis of National Turfgrass Performance Trials: I. Interpretation of Genotype 3 Environment Interaction. Crop Science, 42, 489-496.

Funga, A., Tadesse, M., Eshete, M., Fikre, A., Korbu, L., Girma, N., Bekele, D., Mohamed, R., Bishaw, Z., Rao, G., Siambi, M., Monyo, E., Gaur, P., & Ojiewo, C. (2017). Genotype by environment interaction on yield stability of desi type chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) at major chickpea producing areas of Ethiopia. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 11(2): 212-219.

Gauch, H.G.J. (2006). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science, 46(4): 1488-1500.

Gauch, H.G. J., & Zobel, R.W. (1997). Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science, 37:311-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020002x.

Meng, M., Fallavollita, P., Seelbach, I., Von Der Heide, A.M., Euler, E., Waschke, J., & Navab, N. (2016). Genetic variability, heritability, correlation coefficient and path analysis. Journal of Plant Sciences, 29: 446-453.

Mohammadi, R., Armion, M., Zadhasan, E., Ahmadi, M.M., & Amri, A. (2017). The use of AMMI model for interpreting Genotype × Environment interaction in durum wheat. Expl Agric.: Cambridge University Press.

Office of the Provincial Agriculturist. (2017). 20022015 Commodity Profile.

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2023). PSA Statistical Databases. https://openstat.psa.gov. ph/.

Rao, A.R., & Prabhakaran, V.T. (2003). Use of AMMI in Simultaneous Selection of Genotypes for Yield and Stability. Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, 59(1): 76-77.

Tandang, L.L., Kebasen, B.A., Kimeu, A.M., Amlos, B.B., & Maghirang, R.G. (2010). New NSICapproved varieties of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Benguet, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 35(3): 57-63.

Yan, W., & Hunt, L.A. (2001). Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science, 41: 19-25.

Zobel, R.W., Wright, M.J., & Gauch, H.G. (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal, 80: 388-393.